SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a coherent desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming, with enough multi-threaded headroom for productivity tasks. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S part on Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 192-bit memory bus. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmarks, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The combined percentile for this build is 74, placing it above the majority of all possible CPU and GPU pairings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The chip's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. With a TDP of 65 W, it is a relatively efficient part for its performance class, and it lacks an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1002 in single-thread, 1959 in 2-thread, 3552 in 4-thread, 5731 in 8-thread, and 7556 in 16-thread workloads, with a max-thread score of 7550. This scaling pattern indicates a robust core design where performance increases almost linearly up to 8 threads, then plateaus slightly as the 16 threads (10 cores with hyper-threading) are fully utilized. The Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 2292 versus 323 single-core, R20 multicore scores 9553 versus 1348 single-core, and R23 multicore scores 22747 versus 3211 single-core. These numbers suggest a processor that excels in multi-threaded rendering tasks, with a single-core performance that is strong but not class-leading.

PassMark results add another dimension. The CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 26569 and a single-thread score of 3828. In specific workloads, it shows high throughput in integer math (83723) and floating-point math (60273), but notably lower scores in data encryption (17902) and prime number finding (114). The data compression score is 328397, and extended instructions score 20837. These figures indicate a processor geared toward general productivity, content creation, and compilation tasks, rather than specialized cryptographic or highly parallel integer workloads.

The i5-13490F sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28185. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128 (0.2% slower), the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.5% slower). The only rival that beats it is the Intel Core i9-11950H, which scores 28332 (0.5% faster). This places the i5-13490F in a performance tier where it is effectively tied with several modern mid-range processors, making it a solid foundation for a balanced build rather than an outlier in either direction.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The GPU contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². It features 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The core clocks are a base of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

For ray tracing, the card includes 54 RT cores, and while tensor cores are not listed, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Compute performance is rated at 35.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s. The card is dual-slot, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and has a TDP of 245 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C.

Benchmark performance places this GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 22549. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3316. PassMark results show a G3D score of 22547, a G2D score of 1161, and a GPU compute score of 12912. Geekbench scores are 138383 in OpenCL and 46443 in Vulkan. The DirectX tests in PassMark show scores of 119 (DX10), 232 (DX11), 79 (DX12), and 294 (DX9). These numbers indicate a GPU that is strong in traditional rasterization and compute, but the relatively low DirectX 12 score compared to DirectX 11 suggests that the card's feature set may not be fully optimized for all DX12 titles, or that driver overhead varies by workload.

The nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435 (0.5% slower), the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729 (0.8% faster), the RTX 2080 scores 22895 (1.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170 (1.7% slower). This means the RX 7700 XT is effectively performance-equivalent to a desktop RTX 2080 and competitive with mobile versions of newer NVIDIA cards, which is notable given the RX 7700 XT's desktop form factor and higher power envelope.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores shows a build where the CPU and GPU are well-matched in terms of percentile ranking. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 74, which is a weighted average that reflects the CPU being stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform better than in GPU-bound scenarios, but neither component is drastically out of step with the other.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28185 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T, and 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, but 0.5% lower than the Intel Core i9-11950H. The GPU's average score of 22549 is 0.5% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile, 1.7% higher than the RX 5700, but 0.8% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile and 1.5% lower than the RTX 2080. The data indicates that the CPU is slightly above average for its tier, while the GPU is slightly below average for its tier, but the deltas are small enough that real-world differences will depend more on specific game engines and drivers than on raw aggregate scores.

In terms of real workloads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 suggests it can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3316 and PassMark G3D score of 22547 indicate it can drive modern games at high settings, though its 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor at 4K or in texture-heavy titles. The combination of a 80th percentile CPU with a 67th percentile GPU means that for most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates, but the CPU will not hold it back in CPU-bound titles.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so these expectations are based on the relative performance of the CPU and GPU against known rivals, not on direct frame captures.

Based on the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316, this system is expected to deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p Ultra settings in most titles, with frame rates typically exceeding 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth will allow high settings, but frame rates will drop depending on the game's optimization. For esports titles, the CPU's single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark suggests high frame rates are achievable, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22547 indicates that the GPU will cap performance before the CPU becomes a bottleneck. The RTX 2080 is a close rival (1.5% faster), and that card is known to handle 1440p well; the RX 7700 XT should behave similarly, with the caveat that RT performance via its 54 RT cores will vary by title.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which means the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface will run at full bandwidth without bottleneck. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, leaving ample headroom for the GPU's 245 W TDP, and the suggested PSU of 550 W is sufficient for this pairing.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but the specific choice depends on the motherboard. The GPU is the more likely upgrade target, as its 67th percentile ranking is lower than the CPU's 80th percentile. Replacing the RX 7700 XT with a higher-tier GPU would better balance the system in GPU-bound workloads, but the CPU's 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform mean that a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future GPUs using PCIe Gen 5 will not be limited by the platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and an effective speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is not supported on the Intel Core i5-13490F.

Q: What is the PSU requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which is based on the GPU's 245 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The i5-13490F has an average benchmark score of 28185, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen AI 5 435's score of 28128.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), as well as OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is the GPU's performance closer to a desktop or mobile NVIDIA card?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 22549 is 0.5% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile and 0.8% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile, making it competitive with both mobile parts, but it is also 1.5% lower than the desktop RTX 2080.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high settings, as the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for these resolutions. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 make it suitable for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile code, as those tasks benefit from the 16 threads. Students and small business workstations can also benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance in productivity applications, while the GPU provides acceleration for tasks like GPU compute, as evidenced by its PassMark GPU compute score of 12912. Developers using the system will find the CPU's integer math score of 83723 and floating-point math score of 60273 helpful for build times and simulations. However, the GPU's 67th percentile ranking means that users seeking 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing should look elsewhere, as the 54 RT cores and 12 GB VRAM may be insufficient for those workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 12 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 245 W TDP. The combined percentile is 74, which indicates that this system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all possible CPU and GPU pairings. The CPU's 80th percentile is notably higher than the GPU's 67th percentile, suggesting that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop configuration, suitable for high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable 1440p gaming, with enough CPU horsepower for productivity tasks. The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended for stationary use rather than mobile applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU is at the 80th percentile, while the GPU is at the 67th percentile, creating an imbalance where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as strategy games or physics simulations, the i5-13490F's 3DMark max-thread score of 7550 will allow it to maintain high frame rates without being the limiting factor. In GPU-bound workloads, such as modern AAA games at 1440p Ultra, the RX 7700 XT's PassMark G3D score of 22547 will likely cap performance before the CPU does.

The FPS scaling between the CPU and GPU is not directly measurable due to the lack of measured FPS data, but the percentile difference of 13 points (80 vs 67) suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, meaning it is not an outlier, but the GPU's rivals include the RTX 2080, which is 1.5% faster, and the RX 5700, which is 1.7% slower. This indicates that the GPU is in a competitive but slightly weaker position within its tier. For users who prioritize gaming, a GPU upgrade would yield more tangible FPS gains than a CPU upgrade, but the current pairing is balanced enough that neither component will dramatically hold back the other in typical use cases.