SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile among all builds, a position driven by a top-tier GPU and a strong mid-range CPU. The processor holds an 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the graphics card reaches the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This gap indicates a system where the GPU is the dominant component, a pattern visible across the benchmark data. The following analysis examines the CPU, GPU, platform, and performance expectations strictly from the provided fact pack.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 26,800 million transistors across a 520 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, producing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1825 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz.

The shader array is substantial: 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. The GPU also includes 80 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. Pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 720.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 23.04 TFLOPS for FP32 and 46.08 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These figures place the card firmly in the high-end segment of its generation.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture depending on the API. In PassMark, the GPU scores 26732 in G3D and 14547 in GPU compute. DirectX 11 yields a score of 279, while DirectX 12 drops to 113. DirectX 10 and DirectX 9 scores are 167 and 268, respectively. Geekbench results are higher: OpenCL scores 187673, Metal scores 177021, and Vulkan scores 148525. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test reports 4079. The average benchmark score for this GPU is 50951, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6900 XT is 1.6% behind the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, which scores 51790. It is 1.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), 2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957), and 2.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49737). These deltas are small, indicating the RX 6900 XT sits in a competitive performance cluster. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are the defining characteristics, allowing large textures and complex scenes to reside in memory without spilling to system RAM. The 80 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, the platform for Raptor Lake. The Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, running in dual-channel mode. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. The processor has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 10-core part. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 700 W. The power connectors are 2x 8-pin. The system draws a combined thermal load of roughly 365 W from these two components, leaving headroom for other peripherals within the 700 W suggested PSU specification.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though the link will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The card is triple-slot wide, measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. This physical footprint requires a case with adequate clearance. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve the CPU, since the GPU is already near the top of its class. The 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 compatibility allow for a drop-in replacement with a higher-core-count Raptor Lake part, provided the motherboard's VRM and power delivery can handle the increased load. Memory upgrades are also viable: the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means users can choose either platform depending on motherboard selection, though mixing is not possible. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck for several years, so the platform's longevity depends on the CPU and memory subsystem.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no entries for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 50951, at the 86th percentile, indicates strong raw performance. The CPU's 3DMark scores provide context for the pairing: 7556 in the 16-thread test, 5731 in the 8-thread test, and 1002 in the single-thread test. In gaming, the single-thread score is often more relevant for frame pacing. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26732 is high, suggesting that at 1080p and 1440p, this system should deliver high frame rates in most titles. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become more important, and the GPU's 86th percentile position suggests it can handle 4K with adjusted settings.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. For highly threaded titles that scale well beyond 8 threads, the 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides a solid base. However, the absence of measured data means these expectations are qualitative. Users should treat any specific FPS numbers from other sources as unverified for this exact pair. The benchmark scores indicate a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1440p, with 4K viable for less demanding titles or with reduced settings.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile and CPU's 80th percentile combine for a system that should sustain high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark and 3828 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports this assessment.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 65 W TDP allow for software encoding without excessive power draw. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 and max-thread score of 7550 show consistent multi-threaded performance. The GPU has no dedicated encoder listed, so streaming will rely on the CPU's 10 cores.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 indicates strong rendering capability for video exports. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and timeline scrubbing. The PassMark data compression score of 328397 suggests efficient handling of compressed video formats.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9553 and the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance are both relevant. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the RX 6900 XT's 5120 shading units provide ample compute. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache helps with scene graph traversal.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83723 and floating point math score of 60273 indicate strong compile times. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel builds well. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731 shows scaling from 4 to 8 threads.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for everyday tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3828 ensures responsive office applications. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but the system handles it without strain.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-S). The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 4.80 GHz. The process node is 10 nm from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with no ECC support. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The TDP is 65 W. The launch MSRP is $235.

Benchmark scores show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores are 1959 for 2 threads, 3552 for 4 threads, 5731 for 8 threads, and 7556 for 16 threads. The max-thread score is 7550, nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating that all 10 cores are fully utilized at that point. The single-thread score is 1002. Cinebench R23 scores are 3211 single-core and 22747 multi-core. PassMark scores include 3828 single-thread, 26569 multithread, 83723 integer math, and 60273 floating point math.

The average benchmark score is 28185, placing the CPU at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are close: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332 (0.5% behind). These deltas are within 0.5%, meaning the i5-13490F is effectively tied with these parts. For real workloads, the 24 MB L3 cache and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide strong single-thread responsiveness, while the 16 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like compilation and rendering.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize GPU performance without neglecting CPU throughput. Gamers at 1440p resolution will benefit from the GPU's 86th percentile ranking, which is 2% ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark score. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles. Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 sufficient for export tasks, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles large compositions.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83723, which correlates with compile times. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration allows for parallel builds. Students and office workers will find the system more than adequate, with the CPU's single-thread score of 3828 providing responsive daily use. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded workloads, such as data analysis, will rely on the CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731.

The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests this is a build for users who want a high-end card at a potentially reduced cost, though pricing is not discussed here. The CPU's active production status means it remains a viable current choice. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W GPU TDP together require a 700 W PSU, which is a standard specification for this performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 83 sits between the CPU's 80th and GPU's 86th percentiles, indicating a slight GPU bias. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark is modest compared to the GPU's 86th percentile, suggesting that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the CPU could hold back the GPU.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26732 is 86th percentile, while the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 26569 is 80th percentile. The gap is small, but the GPU has more headroom. In rendering workloads that use both components, such as 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance dominates. In CPU-only rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 determines throughput.

FPS scaling is not measured, but the benchmark scores imply that at 4K, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are the primary drivers. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance of 1002 in 3DMark becomes more relevant. The 0.5% delta between the CPU and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11950H, indicates that the i5-13490F is not an outlier in either direction. The system is balanced for high-resolution gaming, but lower-resolution high-refresh scenarios may expose CPU limits.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has an average benchmark score of 28185, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435's score of 28128.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU have tensor cores?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT has no tensor cores listed. It has 80 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 700 W, with a GPU TDP of 300 W.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 50951, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 83. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, with a score of 28128 (0.2% higher), while the GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, with a score of 51790 (1.6% higher).

Key CPU scores: Cinebench R23 multi-core is 22747, single-core is 3211. 3DMark 16-thread is 7556, single-thread is 1002. PassMark multithread is 26569, single-thread is 3828. Key GPU scores: PassMark G3D is 26732, GPU compute is 14547. Geekbench OpenCL is 187673, Vulkan is 148525. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is 4079.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU by 6 percentile points. This is a favorable imbalance for gaming, where the GPU does most of the work. For CPU-intensive tasks like software compilation, the 80th percentile ranking is still strong, but the gap means the GPU will finish its portion of a workload faster than the CPU in mixed scenarios.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i5-13490F, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, a 300 W RDNA 2.0 GPU with 16 GB VRAM. The combined percentile of 83 places this system in the upper tier of all builds, though not at the very top. The GPU's 86th percentile is the higher of the two components, making this a GPU-first design.

The CPU's 80th percentile is respectable, placing it above most processors. The 0.5% or less delta to its nearest rivals means the CPU is not a differentiator; it is a solid, mid-range part. The GPU's 86th percentile, however, is within 2% of the RTX 5070 Ti, indicating that this system competes with newer GPU configurations. The 16 GB VRAM is a key feature, as it exceeds the capacity of many current cards. The build is suited for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, with the CPU providing adequate support without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The end-of-life status of the GPU and active status of the CPU suggest a system built around a last-generation flagship card, paired with a current-generation mid-range processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds