SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a 1080p and 1440p gaming desktop pairing with strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity. The processor is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0 architecture chip (Navi 22) with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The combined benchmark percentile for this pair is 76, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested desktop combinations. This build is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, entry-level 1440p gaming, and productivity workloads that leverage the CPU's thread count.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the P-core/E-core split; the thread count of 16 from 10 cores implies the presence of efficient cores.

Benchmark data shows strong scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3dMark single-thread score is 1002, while the 2-thread score is 1959, the 4-thread score is 3552, the 8-thread score is 5731, and the 16-thread score is 7556. The max-thread score is 7550, nearly identical to the 16-thread result, indicating that the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads and adding more schedulable threads does not improve throughput. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is a 31.8% increase in score, demonstrating good multi-threading efficiency for applications that can use more than eight threads.

In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score is 22747, while the R23 single-core score is 3211. The ratio between these scores (roughly 7.1x) shows that multi-threaded workloads benefit significantly from the core count. The R20 multicore score is 9553, and the R15 multicore score is 2292. Single-core scores in R20 and R15 are 1348 and 323, respectively. PassMark results reinforce this picture: the multithread score is 26569, single-thread is 3828, integer math is 83723, floating-point math is 60273, and data compression is 328397. The encryption score is 17902, and extended instructions score is 20837.

The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 80, meaning it is in the top 20 percent of all processors tested. Its average benchmark score is 28185. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 with an average score of 28128 (0.2% slower), the Intel Core i5-14500T with 28065 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE with 28054 (0.5% slower). The only rival it trails is the Intel Core i9-11950H with 28332 (-0.5% faster). These deltas are within a fraction of a percent, meaning performance is effectively identical to these four chips in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, this CPU provides robust performance for compiling code, video encoding, and 3D rendering tasks that scale with threads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing.

The CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 1002, Cinebench R23 single-core of 3211) is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking most GPUs in gaming scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 20700, and its 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2548. These numbers suggest the RX 6750 XT is capable of high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in most titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS in esports and competitive shooters. For demanding AAA titles at 1080p ultra, estimated frame rates would typically fall in the 70-100 FPS range, depending on the title's optimization.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-texture settings at this resolution, but the raw compute throughput (13.31 TFLOPS FP32) will likely produce average frame rates in the 50-75 FPS range for triple-A games on ultra settings. Lowering settings to high or medium would push frames higher, but the estimates remain qualitative due to the lack of measured data. The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 71, indicating it performs better than 71 percent of tested GPUs, but it is not a top-tier 4K card. For 4K gaming, this combination would likely require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 22 chip manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The die contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² area. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It includes 40 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the fact pack does not list tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated features like DLSS are not available; the card relies on AMD's FSR for upscaling.

Memory configuration is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2150 MHz, the game clock is 2495 MHz, and the boost clock is 2600 MHz. Pixel fill rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 2548 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 137249 in Geekbench Metal, 16360 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 98089 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark scores include 20700 for G3D, 9550 for GPU compute, and 972 for G2D. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 125, 180, and 80, respectively, while DirectX 9 is 263. These scores place the GPU at the 71st percentile vs all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, 0.5% slower), AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, 0.6% slower), AMD FirePro D700 (25842, 0.7% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, 1.1% slower). The RX 6750 XT leads these rivals by a small margin, confirming its position as a solid mid-range performer.

For rendering workloads, the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide capable performance for 3D modeling and video effects. The 12 GB VRAM is beneficial for large textures and complex scenes, but the 192-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory cards. Ray tracing performance is present but not class-leading; the 40 RT cores can handle moderate ray-traced effects, but users may prefer to disable RT in demanding titles to maintain frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU and GPU are well-matched for 1080p gaming, with the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 1002 (3dmark) and multi-thread score of 7556 (16 threads) suggest it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20700 and percentile of 71 indicate it is the weaker component relative to its own peer group, while the CPU sits at the 80th percentile.

In gaming workloads, the balance shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3211) is likely sufficient to drive the GPU to near-maximum utilization, meaning the GPU will be the bottleneck in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU's compute throughput (13.31 TFLOPS) becomes the limiting factor, as the resolution increases the pixel fill rate demand (166.4 GPixel/s) and texture rate (416.0 GTexel/s) are taxed more heavily. The CPU's headroom is evident in its multi-thread scaling: the 8-thread score (5731) is 76% of the 16-thread score (7556), suggesting that games using 8 threads or fewer will not fully utilize the CPU, leaving overhead for background tasks.

For productivity, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and PassMark multithread score of 26569 are substantially higher than the GPU's compute score (9550 in PassMark GPU compute). This means CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, spreadsheet processing, and database operations will be limited by the processor, not the graphics card. Conversely, GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering in Blender or video encoding with hardware acceleration will be limited by the RX 6750 XT's 13.31 TFLOPS.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming (1080p): This pairing is well-suited for 144Hz or 165Hz monitors. The CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread 1002, R23 single-core 3211) ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU's 20700 G3D score and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth can push frame rates above 100 FPS in most esports titles at ultra settings. The combination's combined percentile of 76 supports this assessment.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads (10 cores) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 26569 indicates strong x264 encoding capability. The GPU's 40 RT cores and 2560 shading units can handle the rendering load simultaneously. However, the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI upscaling for streaming; users will rely on CPU-based encoding or AMD's software solutions.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore 22747) excels in timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 13.31 TFLOPS accelerate effects and color grading. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K video editing, though 8K workflows may strain the memory bus.

3D rendering: The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate handle real-time viewport rendering, while the CPU's 16 threads (R23 multicore 22747) accelerate final frame rendering in CPU-based engines. The 12 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes with high-resolution textures, but the 192-bit bus may slow down large data transfers.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83723 and data compression score of 328397 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The 24 MB L3 cache and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide responsive single-threaded performance for IDE operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, making this a CPU-centric workload.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3828 (PassMark) and 1002 (3dmark) ensure snappy application responsiveness. The GPU is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the 12 GB VRAM can accelerate spreadsheet rendering and data visualization. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP create a system that is efficient for long study sessions.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings at 1440p. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and GPU's 71st percentile ranking mean this system outperforms most pre-built desktops in its class. Specifically, it suits:

Gamers at 1080p: The combination of the CPU's single-thread strength (3dmark single-thread 1002) and the GPU's 20700 G3D score delivers high frame rates in competitive titles. Users with 144Hz monitors will see the benefits in fast-paced shooters and MOBAs.
Gamers at 1440p: Those targeting 60 FPS in AAA titles will find this adequate, with the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS providing enough compute for medium-high settings. The 12 GB VRAM is future-proof for upcoming titles at this resolution.
Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists who need a balance between CPU rendering (Cinebench R23 multicore 22747) and GPU acceleration (PassMark GPU compute 9550) will find this system capable for entry-level professional work.
Software developers: The CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score (83723) make it suitable for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and handling data processing tasks.
Students and small business workstations: The 65 W CPU TDP allows for quiet operation, and the system's overall performance handles office suites, spreadsheets, and light CAD work without issue. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM can accelerate certain scientific visualization tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus. The fact pack does not specify which memory type is optimal, but the presence of both indicates flexibility. The PCIe interface for the CPU is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for future expansion, such as high-speed NVMe SSDs, while the GPU operates at Gen 4 speeds.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that is comfortably handled by a 600 W PSU, as indicated by the `suggestedPsu` field for the GPU. This leaves headroom for additional drives and peripherals, but not for a significant GPU upgrade without a PSU bump. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, which is standard for mid-range cards.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier card when the RX 6750 XT becomes insufficient for new game releases. The CPU's 16 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock should remain relevant for several years, and the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes ensure that a future GPU (even one using Gen 5) will not be bottlenecked by the motherboard interface. The socket 1700 platform is at the end of its lifecycle for new CPU releases, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change, but the current CPU's 80th percentile ranking means it is not an urgent upgrade. For memory, adding more capacity (if using DDR4) or upgrading to DDR5 (if using DDR4 currently) would be a low-cost performance boost for memory-intensive applications.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i5-13490F support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support field lists both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6750 XT have?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning it outperforms 76 percent of tested desktop combinations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck in 4K gaming?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, as its 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 64 ROPs are insufficient for high-resolution ultra settings; the CPU's single-thread score of 1002 is not the limiting factor.

Q: Does this GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 40 RT cores, but the fact pack does not specify ray tracing performance levels; it is present but not class-leading.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The CPU's launch MSRP is $235.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the `multiplierUnlocked` field is false, meaning the CPU is locked and does not support multiplier overclocking.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13490F achieves a 3dmark 16-thread score of 7556 and a single-thread score of 1002. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22747 multicore and 3211 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 26569, with a single-thread score of 3828. Its average benchmark score is 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile vs all CPUs. The nearest rivals are within 0.5% performance: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28128, 0.2% slower), Intel Core i5-14500T (28065, 0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054, 0.5% slower). The Intel Core i9-11950H is 0.5% faster with a score of 28332.

The RX 6750 XT scores 2548 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 20700 in PassMark G3D, and 9550 in PassMark GPU compute. Its average benchmark score is 26011, placing it at the 71st percentile vs all GPUs. The nearest rivals are all within 1.1%: the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, 0.5% slower), AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, 0.6% slower), AMD FirePro D700 (25842, 0.7% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, 1.1% slower).

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and 28185 average score indicate a high-end mid-range processor, while the GPU's 71st percentile and 26011 average score represent a solid mid-range graphics card. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this balance, with the CPU providing more headroom for future GPU upgrades. In aggregate, this system excels in CPU-bound productivity tasks and is capable but not exceptional in GPU-bound gaming and rendering workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are based on synthetic benchmarks, but the scores align to suggest a well-rounded 1080p gaming and productivity machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds