SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13450HX

34,333 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13450HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a laptop configuration where the CPU holds a clear advantage over the GPU in raw compute potential, but the practical bottleneck shifts depending on workload type. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 63rd percentile among all graphics cards. This 21-point gap indicates that in most CPU-bound tasks, the processor will be waiting on the graphics solution, but in GPU-accelerated workloads, the balance flips.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's multi-threaded strength is substantial. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-13450HX scores 16797, which places it in the upper tier of mobile processors. The single-core score of 1746 in the same test is comparatively modest, suggesting that while the processor can handle heavy parallel workloads, its per-thread performance is not the standout feature. The GPU, on the other hand, delivers a PassMark G3D score of 14423, which is competitive with desktop mid-range cards from previous generations.

For gaming, the bottleneck is almost certainly the GPU. The RTX 4050 Mobile's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level figures for modern titles, and the FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS indicates that 1080p high-refresh gaming will be limited by the graphics card rather than the processor. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3553 is sufficient to feed frames to the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means it will cap frame rates well before the CPU becomes a limiting factor.

In productivity workloads, the balance is more even. The CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB of shared L3 cache give it strong multi-core capability, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 25084. Meanwhile, the GPU's compute performance, measured at 5947 in PassMark GPU Compute, is adequate for acceleration in video encoding and some rendering tasks, but it will not be the primary driver of performance in CPU-intensive applications like software compilation or data processing.

The data also reveals a nuance in memory-bound scenarios. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s is low by modern standards, and this will constrain performance in texture-heavy games and GPU compute tasks that rely on bandwidth rather than raw compute. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which gives system memory bandwidth flexibility, but the GPU's narrow 96-bit bus is a fixed limitation.

Thermal and power constraints further shape the bottleneck picture. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU is rated at 50 W. In a laptop chassis, these components will compete for thermal headroom, and sustained loads are likely to see the GPU throttle before the CPU, given that the GPU's boost clock of 1755 MHz is relatively low and leaves little margin for thermal degradation. The CPU's boost clock of 4.60 GHz is more resilient under load, but the 10 nm process node means it generates more heat per watt than the GPU's 5 nm process.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high settings, this pairing will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM will limit performance in demanding AAA games. Esports titles and older games should run comfortably, but the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 indicates that modern API-heavy games will stress the graphics solution. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate, but the GPU will be the primary constraint on frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16797) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, can offload encoding tasks, but the GPU's modest compute resources mean that simultaneous gaming and encoding will strain the graphics card. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 5947 suggests that hardware encoding will work, but users should expect some frame rate impact in GPU-bound titles.

Video editing: Timeline performance in editors like Premiere Pro will benefit from the CPU's multi-core capability. The PassMark floating point math score of 61776 indicates strong number-crunching for effects and transitions. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing with moderate effects, but 4K timelines with heavy color grading will exceed the VRAM capacity. The CUDA acceleration from the RTX 4050 Mobile will help with rendering, but the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means it will not be a standout performer.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software will be excellent, with the i5-13450HX's 16 threads and 16797 Cinebench R23 multi-core score providing strong performance. GPU rendering will be limited by the RTX 4050 Mobile's 20 RT cores and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The GPU can handle modest scenes, but complex renders will be slow. The CPU is clearly the stronger rendering component.

Software development: Compilation times will benefit from the CPU's multi-core scores. The PassMark integer math score of 83209 and data compression score of 305990 indicate strong performance in code compilation and build automation. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures that builds will be fast relative to typical laptop processors.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread score of 3553 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the 16 threads provide headroom for multitasking with many browser tabs and office applications. The GPU's power draw is low at 50 W, which contributes to battery life, though the CPU's 55 W TDP is higher than typical office processors. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a mobile processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The core configuration mixes performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of the Raptor Lake design. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 20 MB shared across all cores.

The processor's 55 W TDP is modest for a high-performance mobile chip, but the 4.60 GHz boost clock indicates that it can sustain high frequencies under load when thermal headroom is available. The socket is Intel BGA 1964, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving system builders flexibility in memory choice. ECC memory support is included, which is unusual for a consumer mobile processor and suggests potential workstation use cases.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 84th percentile of all processors, which is strong for a mobile part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 is particularly impressive, rivaling desktop processors from a few generations ago. The single-core score of 1746 is less remarkable but still respectable for a mobile chip. The PassMark multithread score of 25084 further confirms the processor's multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 3553 indicates balanced performance.

The processor's 20 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial for a mobile part and helps with cache-sensitive workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 16632 shows solid AES performance, which matters for VPNs and disk encryption. The extended instructions score of 19083 indicates good AVX-512 and other vector instruction performance, though availability depends on the specific instruction set support. The PassMark physics score of 1504 is modest, suggesting that physics simulations in games will not be a standout feature.

Real-world performance implications are clear: this CPU is built for multi-threaded workloads. Video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and data analysis will all benefit from the 16 threads. The relatively lower single-core performance means that lightly threaded tasks like web browsing or office work will not feel exceptionally fast, but they will not feel slow either. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.2% in average benchmark score, and it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD EPYC 4244P. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is 0.4% ahead, which shows these processors are closely matched.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong multi-core CPU performance in a laptop form factor without requiring top-tier graphics. The 84th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators, developers, and data analysts who run CPU-intensive workloads but play games only occasionally or at moderate settings.

Gamers at 1080p: Players who target 1080p with high but not ultra settings will find this pairing adequate. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means it can handle most titles at playable frame rates, and the CPU will not be a bottleneck. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for those resolutions in modern titles.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists who work primarily in CPU-based applications will benefit from the i5-13450HX's multi-core strength. The 16797 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures fast rendering in software like Blender's Cycles or Premiere Pro's software encoder. The GPU provides CUDA acceleration for effects and GPU-accelerated rendering, but it is not the primary strength of this build.

Software developers: The CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score (83209) make it excellent for code compilation. The ECC memory support is a bonus for developers who require data integrity in long build processes. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, but the overall performance ensures smooth multitasking with IDEs, containers, and virtual machines.

Students and office workers: This configuration is far more powerful than needed for typical student or office workloads, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years. The low GPU power draw of 50 W contributes to battery life, though the CPU's 55 W TDP is higher than ultra-portable processors. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 allows the discrete GPU to idle, saving power.

Small business workstations: The CPU's ECC memory support and 16 threads make it suitable for small business workstations that run databases, financial modeling, or engineering simulations. The GPU's compute capability (5947 PassMark GPU Compute) can accelerate some workloads, but the primary value is the CPU's multi-core performance.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333 in average benchmark score, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, 0.3% above the AMD EPYC 4244P, and 0.4% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it sufficient for modern games?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but modern AAA titles at high textures will exceed 6 GB.

Q: What is the GPU's DirectX 12 performance score?

A: The GPU scores 61 in PassMark DirectX 12, which is below its DirectX 11 score of 130. This suggests that the GPU is better optimized for older APIs and may struggle with modern DirectX 12 titles.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13450HX supports ECC memory. This is unusual for a mobile consumer processor and makes it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 20 RT cores based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, the modest compute resources mean ray tracing performance will be limited.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the GPU in terms of percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, indicating that the CPU is the stronger component.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration can sustain high frequencies under load when thermal headroom permits.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate.

The RTX 4050 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 14423 places it in the mid-range tier, comparable to a desktop AMD Radeon RX 6600, which scores 19036 with a delta of 0.1%. This suggests that at 1080p with high settings, the GPU can handle most games at 60-80 FPS, though demanding titles will drop below 60 FPS. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 61 is concerning, as modern games increasingly rely on DirectX 12 features. DirectX 11 performance is better at 130, so older titles will run more smoothly.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3553 in PassMark ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with game data streaming, and the 16 threads provide headroom for background tasks. However, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM will be the limiting factor in games with high-resolution textures. At 1080p, most titles fit within 6 GB, but texture quality may need to be reduced in newer releases.

Ray tracing performance will be poor. The 20 RT cores are present, but the GPU's overall compute throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS is low for ray-traced workloads. Users should expect to disable ray tracing in most games or accept significant frame rate drops. The GPU's pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s are modest, further limiting performance in graphically intensive scenes.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU will easily sustain high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 FPS. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, expect 40-60 FPS at medium settings, with drops below 40 FPS in dense scenes. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking means it is not designed for high-refresh gaming at maximum settings.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 34333, placing it at the 84th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, scores 34260, a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 (0.3% delta), the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 34485 (-0.4% delta). These results indicate that the i5-13450HX is competitive with desktop processors from previous generations.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 16797 multi-core and 1746 single-core. The multi-core score is 9.6 times the single-core score, which reflects the 16-thread configuration. The Cinebench R20 scores are 8728 multi-core and 1232 single-core, while Cinebench R15 scores are 2503 multi-core and 248 single-core. These scores show consistent scaling across benchmark versions.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight. The multithread score is 25084, and the single-thread score is 3553. Integer math scores 83209, floating point math scores 61776, and extended instructions score 19083. Data compression scores 305990, data encryption scores 16632, and random string sorting scores 31940. The physics score is 1504, and finding prime numbers scores 83. These numbers indicate a well-rounded CPU that excels in integer-heavy workloads and data processing.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, placing it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, scores 19036 with a 0.1% delta. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089 (-0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 (0.5% delta). The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 14423, with a GPU Compute score of 5947.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 74748 in OpenCL and 75235 in Vulkan. These scores are relatively close, indicating consistent performance across APIs. The PassMark DirectX scores show a clear hierarchy: DirectX 9 scores 184, DirectX 11 scores 130, DirectX 10 scores 79, and DirectX 12 scores 61. This suggests that the GPU is optimized for older DirectX versions, which is a limitation for modern games.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, which indicates that the configuration sits in the upper-middle tier of laptop builds. The CPU is the stronger component, and users who prioritize multi-threaded CPU performance will be satisfied, while those expecting high-end GPU performance will be disappointed.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13450HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based mobile graphics card with a 50 W TDP. The combination targets the mid-range laptop market, offering strong CPU performance with adequate GPU capability.

The CPU's 84th percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of mobile processors, while the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking places it in the mid-range. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU carrying most of the performance weight. This is a configuration for users who need CPU horsepower for productivity tasks and are willing to accept moderate gaming performance.

The build class is laptop, meaning the components are integrated into a portable chassis. The CPU's socket is Intel BGA 1964, which is soldered, and the GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, meaning it is also soldered. Neither component is upgradeable, so this is a fixed configuration.

The overall tier is upper-middle, based on the 74th combined percentile. This is not a high-end gaming laptop, nor is it a budget workstation. It sits in a middle ground where CPU-intensive workloads will perform well, but GPU-bound tasks will be limited. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $326, which provides a reference point for the processor's value within the build.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip, codenamed AD107, contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². This is a modern, efficient design that delivers solid performance at a low 50 W TDP.

The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 20 RT cores for ray tracing and 80 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The base clock is 1455 MHz, with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, with a 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective) and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The predecessor is the GeForce 30 Mobile series, and the successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile series.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's strengths and weaknesses. The PassMark G3D score of 14423 is the primary gaming indicator, and it is competitive with desktop cards in the same tier. The GPU Compute score of 5947 is modest, indicating that compute workloads are not this GPU's forte. The Geekbench scores of 74748 (OpenCL) and 75235 (Vulkan) are more favorable, suggesting better performance in those APIs.

For rendering, the GPU's 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the modest compute throughput means ray-traced scenes will be slow. The 80 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling. However, the 6 GB VRAM is a bottleneck for high-resolution textures and large scenes.

The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking places it below the median of all GPUs, but it is within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600, which is a solid desktop card. This indicates that the RTX 4050 Mobile is a capable 1080p gaming GPU, but it will struggle at higher resolutions or with demanding settings. The low memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s is a particular weakness for texture-heavy games and compute workloads that rely on memory throughput.