SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13420H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13420H

18,511 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13420H and AMD Radeon RX 7600M pairing represents a mobile platform built for balanced 1080p gaming and productivity work. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-H part with 8 cores and 12 threads, delivers a 3dmark_max_threads score of 5587, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.0 with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775. Together, they land at the 81st combined percentile among all laptop configurations in the database, indicating a system that handles modern workloads with competence but stops short of enthusiast-tier performance. The data shows a machine that prioritizes versatility over raw extremes, with the CPU’s 72nd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking creating a slight asymmetry that favors graphics performance in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming — The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking, backed by a 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, suggests this laptop can push frame rates well past the 60 FPS threshold in most modern titles at 1080p with high settings. The CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 948 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 1871 provide sufficient per-core performance to avoid stalling the graphics pipeline in most games, though the 8-core/12-thread configuration may show limits in the most CPU-intensive e-sports titles at extremely high refresh rates.

Streaming — The combination of 12 threads and the GPU’s dedicated video encoding hardware (part of the RDNA 3.0 architecture) creates a viable streaming setup. The CPU’s passmark_multithread score of 17475 indicates enough headroom to handle game capture and encoding overhead simultaneously, while the GPU’s 28 RT cores and 1792 shading units can offload encoding tasks without significantly impacting frame rates in the primary game session.

Video Editing — The CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 11084 and passmark_data_encryption score of 11559 suggest solid performance for timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks in consumer video editors. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking means hardware-accelerated effects, color grading, and preview rendering will be noticeably smoother than on systems with lower-tier graphics, especially in 1080p and 1440p timelines.

3D Rendering — The GPU’s FP32 compute of 17.27 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) make this laptop a reasonable choice for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender’s Cycles or Redshift. The CPU’s cinebench_r20_multicore score of 6013 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 5587 provide respectable CPU-based rendering fallback, though the 45 W TDP limits sustained multi-hour render jobs compared to desktop-class parts.

Software Development — The CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 58156 and passmark_random_string_sorting score of 22045 indicate strong performance for code compilation, unit test execution, and data processing tasks. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel memory support help reduce compile times for larger codebases, while the GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate parallel workloads like data analysis or machine learning inference.

Student and Office Work — The CPU’s passmark_single_thread score of 3396 and 3dmark_single_thread score of 948 ensure snappy response in document editing, spreadsheet manipulation, and web browsing. The 8-core/12-thread arrangement handles multitasking well — dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication apps run concurrently without measurable slowdown, and the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU provides a fallback display output that preserves battery life when the discrete GPU is idle.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 18511 places it at the 72nd percentile among all processors in the database, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE (avg score 18505, deltaPct 0) and Intel Core i3-14100F (avg score 18519, deltaPct 0). This near-identical performance to those desktop-class parts indicates the i5-13420H punches above its mobile positioning in multi-threaded workloads. The 3dmark suite shows progressive scaling: 1871 in 2 threads, 3357 in 4 threads, 4614 in 8 threads, and 5587 in max threads, suggesting the 12-thread configuration adds meaningful headroom beyond the physical 8 cores.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 puts it at the 89th percentile, just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (score 63830) and 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (score 63842). This places the RX 7600M firmly in upper-midrange mobile graphics territory, outperforming the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (score 63693, deltaPct 0.1) and coming within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (score 64212). The combined 81st percentile for the whole system reflects a GPU that outpaces the CPU in relative performance, a common trait in gaming-focused laptops where graphics demand exceeds compute demand.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13420H is a Raptor Lake-H part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 8 physical cores and 12 threads via a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores. The base clock of 2.10 GHz boosts to 4.60 GHz, enabling bursty single-thread workloads to hit high frequencies while maintaining a 45 W TDP for sustained multi-core loads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides adequate data locality for most applications without the larger pools found in higher-tier desktop parts.

Benchmark results reveal a CPU that excels in mixed workloads. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 11084 and passmark_multithread score of 17475 indicate strong performance for video encoding, 3D scene assembly, and parallel compile jobs. The passmark_find_prime_numbers score of 52 is notably low, reflecting the architecture’s weaker performance in specific integer-heavy single-thread loops, but this is an outlier — the passmark_integer_math score of 58156 and floating_point_math score of 42806 show robust arithmetic throughput. Data compression (209450) and random string sorting (22045) scores demonstrate the cache and memory subsystem handles typical productivity workloads efficiently.

The single-thread performance is respectable but not class-leading. A 3dmark_single_thread score of 948 and passmark_single_thread score of 3396 put it near desktop i3 parts, with the cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1689 confirming that most games and lightly-threaded applications will run smoothly. The 12-thread count, while modest by modern standards, provides enough parallelism for streaming, background tasks, and multi-tasking without the thermal overhead of higher-core-count parts. The lack of ECC memory support and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 controller limit the CPU in certain workstation scenarios, but for its intended mobile market, the performance profile is well-balanced.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the dominant component, holding an 89th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 72nd percentile. This asymmetry means that in GPU-bound workloads — most modern games at 1080p or higher, GPU rendering, and compute tasks — the RX 7600M will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. The 3dmark_16_threads CPU score of 5518, combined with the GPU’s 63775 OpenCL score, suggests that in gaming scenarios, the frame rate will typically be constrained by the GPU’s rasterization throughput rather than the CPU’s ability to feed it draw calls.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (passmark score 209450), or single-threaded office tasks, the CPU becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s high relative performance does not accelerate these tasks, and the CPU’s 45 W TDP limits sustained multi-threaded throughput compared to higher-power mobile parts or desktop chips. The 3dmark single-thread score of 948 indicates that some older or poorly-threaded applications will see frame rates capped by the CPU, particularly at lower resolutions where GPU load is reduced.

Memory bandwidth is a shared resource that can create secondary bottlenecks. The GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for its 8 GB VRAM pool, but the CPU’s dual-channel memory controller (shared with the GPU via the system’s unified memory architecture) means that heavy data transfers in one subsystem can starve the other. In practice, the data suggests that a gaming session with a streaming overlay will show more performance degradation in the stream encoding quality than in the game frame rate, as the CPU’s 12 threads juggle both workloads while the GPU focuses on rendering.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p — The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 72nd percentile position make this laptop a strong fit for 1080p gaming at high or ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game textures without excessive stuttering, and the CPU’s 12 threads ensure background apps don’t tank frame rates.

Content Creators — Video editors and 3D artists working at 1080p or moderate 1440p resolutions will benefit from the GPU’s FP32 compute of 17.27 TFLOPS for effects rendering and the CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 11084 for export tasks. The combination handles short-form content, YouTube videos, and lightweight 3D scenes without requiring a desktop workstation.

Software Developers — The CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 58156 and 12 MB of L3 cache make this a reliable machine for code compilation, running local development servers, and executing test suites. The GPU adds value for developers working on graphics, game engines, or machine learning inference.

Students — The balanced performance covers coursework across engineering, design, and computer science majors. The CPU’s passmark_single_thread score of 3396 handles office software and web apps, while the GPU accelerates any graphics, CAD, or video projects that arise.

Small Business Workstations — For offices running database operations, financial modeling, or data visualization, the CPU’s passmark_data_encryption score of 11559 and data compression score of 209450 provide adequate throughput. The GPU’s compute capabilities can be leveraged for occasional rendering or analysis tasks without dedicating a separate workstation.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU/GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking, combined with the CPU’s 72nd percentile, indicates a system that should achieve 60-100 FPS in most modern AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, dropping to 40-60 FPS in the most demanding games with ray tracing enabled. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but 1440p ultra settings may exceed the frame buffer in some titles.

At 1080p, the CPU’s 3dmark_single_thread score of 948 and the GPU’s compute capabilities suggest that frame rates will be GPU-limited in the majority of games. E-sports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should run well above 144 FPS at competitive settings, while visually intensive games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 will likely hover near 60 FPS with upscaling enabled. The 28 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput means that full ray tracing at high settings will require DLSS-style upscaling or reduced resolutions to maintain playable frame rates.

For older games or less demanding titles, the system has ample headroom. The CPU’s 4.60 GHz boost clock and the GPU’s 2410 MHz boost clock work together to deliver consistent frame pacing, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents texture streaming bottlenecks in open-world games. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are estimates, but the benchmark scores paint a picture of a laptop that comfortably handles 1080p gaming for the next 2-3 years.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using TSMC’s 6 nm process, with a die size of 204 mm² containing 13,300 million transistors. The chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, providing a pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places it at the 89th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (deltaPct -0.1) and NVIDIA CMP 30HX (deltaPct -0.1). This performance level suits 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings, with the 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 compute handling modern game engines’ shading requirements. The FP16 throughput of 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) provides accelerated performance for AI-based upscaling and some compute workloads.

The 28 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the implementation is first-generation RDNA 3.0, meaning performance in ray-traced scenes will be modest compared to dedicated RT hardware in competing NVIDIA parts. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs. The 90 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is a mobile-only part, with the display outputs being portable device dependent, meaning the implementation varies by laptop manufacturer. The 6 nm process keeps power efficiency reasonable, though sustained gaming will still generate significant heat that the laptop’s cooling solution must manage.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU/GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks at the 81st combined percentile among all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average benchmark score of 18511, matching the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE (18505, deltaPct 0) and Intel Core i3-14100F (18519, deltaPct 0), while sitting 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100 (18380) and Intel Core 7 360 (18374).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this laptop support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance in ray-traced scenes is modest given the 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56?

A: The RX 7600M’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 is 0.1% higher than the Radeon Pro Vega 56’s score of 63693.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13420H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard. The 45 W TDP is fixed by the laptop’s cooling solution, and the memory controller supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, so users can upgrade RAM capacity but not the memory type without a motherboard change. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), which offers ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is also soldered to the motherboard, with a 90 W TDP and no power connectors, making GPU upgrades impossible in the traditional sense. The 8 GB VRAM is the maximum configuration for this chip, so users cannot expand graphics memory. The system’s PSU requirements are modest given the combined 45 W CPU and 90 W GPU TDPs, so the laptop’s power adapter should have headroom for the entire platform, but the FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU rating.

For future upgrades, the most sensible path is to focus on storage and memory. The PCIe Gen 5 support (8 lanes CPU only) allows for high-bandwidth NVMe drives, and the dual-channel memory controller can accommodate up to the maximum DDR5 capacity supported by the platform. Users who need more graphics performance would need to purchase a new laptop, as this platform is not designed for component-level upgrades. The 2023 release date places this system in the current generation, so it remains relevant for 2-3 more years before GPU and CPU demands in games and applications outpace its capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13420H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13420H

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds