SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13420H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13420H

18,511 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13420H + AMD Radeon 8050S: A Mobile Powerhouse Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake-H mobile processor with AMD's high-end RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics, creating a laptop platform that sits in the 81st percentile overall among all system configurations. The CPU and GPU each bring substantial compute resources, but the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component, not direct measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13420H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform with no upgrade path for the processor itself. This is a fixed BGA design typical of thin-and-light laptops, meaning the CPU cannot be swapped or replaced after purchase. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the specific memory type depends on the laptop manufacturer's design choices. The memory bandwidth is listed as system-dependent, which ties directly to the GPU's shared memory architecture — faster system memory will benefit both CPU and GPU performance simultaneously.

For PCIe expansion, the CPU provides Gen 5 connectivity with 8 lanes allocated to the CPU itself, while the GPU connects via a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This is a notably high-bandwidth connection for an integrated GPU, allowing the Radeon 8050S to access system memory with minimal latency overhead. The platform's power envelope is modest, with the CPU rated at 45W TDP and the GPU at 55W TDP, suggesting a total system power draw that remains manageable for laptop cooling solutions. No suggested PSU is listed, which is expected for a mobile platform where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power brick and battery system.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform is limited to memory and storage. Upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 is not possible if the motherboard supports only one type, but increasing memory capacity and speed can meaningfully improve the shared GPU performance. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would also yield tangible benefits for load times and data-intensive workloads. The 10nm Intel process node and 4nm TSMC process for the GPU represent mature manufacturing technologies, and the platform's production status is active, meaning laptops with this configuration remain current in the market.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an interesting balance between the CPU and GPU, with the processor sitting at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs and the graphics solution at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This 17-percentage-point gap suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, making it the potential bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's multi-threaded benchmark results show strong scaling from 2 threads to max threads — the 3dmark score rises from 1871 at 2 threads to 5587 at max threads, indicating good parallel efficiency. However, the single-thread score of 948 is comparatively modest, which could limit performance in lightly threaded applications.

For gaming workloads, the GPU's 89th percentile ranking means it can drive high frame rates at demanding settings, but the CPU's 72nd percentile position may cap performance in CPU-limited titles, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The CPU's passmark single-thread score of 3396 and 3dmark single-thread score of 948 suggest adequate but not exceptional per-core performance, which is typical for a mobile processor with a 45W TDP. In productivity applications that scale across cores, the CPU's 12 threads provide solid throughput, but the GPU's FP32 performance of 11.47 TFLOPS will dominate compute-heavy tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

The shared memory architecture of the Radeon 8050S introduces a potential bottleneck, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth. The system-dependent bandwidth figure means that laptops with slower memory will see reduced GPU performance, potentially widening the gap between the GPU's theoretical and actual capabilities. This makes the memory configuration a critical factor in overall system balance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 18511, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all processors. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 11084 points in multi-core and 1689 points in single-core, demonstrating strong multi-threaded capability and moderate single-thread performance. The 3dmark tests show a clear scaling pattern: 1871 at 2 threads, 3357 at 4 threads, 4614 at 8 threads, 5518 at 16 threads, and 5587 at max threads, indicating diminishing returns beyond 16 threads — which aligns with the 8-core, 12-thread configuration. Passmark results show particularly strong integer math at 58156 and floating-point math at 42806, with data compression reaching 209450, making this CPU well-suited for file compression and data processing tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench results show 65818 in OpenCL and 58398 in Vulkan, with the OpenCL score notably higher. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (2.5% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63775 (2.6% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 (2.7% faster). This places the Radeon 8050S in competitive territory with dedicated mobile GPUs, despite being an integrated solution.

The combined system percentile of 81 indicates that this pairing outperforms the vast majority of laptop configurations, with the CPU and GPU both contributing above-average performance. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE at 18505 (0% delta), the Intel Core i3-14100F at 18519 (0% delta), the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0.7% faster), and the Intel Core 7 360 at 18374 (0.7% faster), showing that the i5-13420H performs nearly identically to these desktop-oriented chips in aggregate benchmarks.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets laptop buyers who need strong all-around performance without a dedicated GPU. Gamers playing at 1080p with high settings will find the GPU's 89th percentile ranking sufficient for smooth gameplay in most titles, while content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded Cinebench score of 11084 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 12 threads and the strong integer math score of 58156, which indicates solid compilation throughput.

Students and office workers will find the platform more than adequate for everyday tasks, with the CPU's passmark single-thread score of 3396 ensuring responsive application performance. Small business workstations requiring moderate compute capability, such as data analysis or financial modeling, will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 209450 and encryption score of 11559. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking also makes this suitable for light machine learning experimentation, with the 32 ray tracing cores providing hardware acceleration for RT workloads.

However, users requiring maximum CPU performance in single-threaded applications may find the 72nd percentile ranking limiting, and those needing high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K with maximum settings would likely require a dedicated GPU. The platform is best suited for users who want a single device capable of handling both productivity and gaming without the bulk and power draw of a discrete graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13420H features 8 cores and 12 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10nm process node. The base clock of 2.10 GHz boosts up to 4.60 GHz, providing a wide dynamic range for varying workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the multi-threaded performance seen in benchmarks. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported.

The 3dmark results reveal the core scaling behavior: the 8-thread score of 4614 represents 82.6% of the max-thread score of 5587, while the 16-thread score of 5518 is 98.8% of max. This indicates that the processor's performance gains plateau quickly beyond 8 threads, which is consistent with the 8-core, 12-thread design where hyper-threading provides limited additional throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11084 translates to roughly 13.8x the single-core score of 1689, showing good but not perfect scaling across cores.

The Passmark results provide insight into real-world workload performance. The data encryption score of 11559 suggests adequate AES-NI acceleration, while the extended instructions score of 12897 indicates solid SIMD performance. The physics score of 1012 is relatively modest, which could impact gaming physics calculations. The find prime numbers score of 52 is low, indicating that the processor is not optimized for this type of integer-heavy, single-threaded workload. The multi-thread score of 17475 combined with a single-thread score of 3396 confirms that this processor excels in parallel workloads but is less impressive in sequential tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the Strix Halo chip, utilizing the RDNA 3.5 architecture on TSMC's 4nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The die size of 308 mm² is substantial for an integrated solution, reflecting the high transistor count dedicated to graphics compute. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz, achieving a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s.

The FP32 performance of 11.47 TFLOPS is competitive with many dedicated mobile GPUs, and the FP16 performance matches at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable for AI and compute workloads. The memory configuration is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the same memory pool as the CPU, with bandwidth dependent on the system's memory configuration. This shared architecture is both a strength and weakness: it allows the GPU to access large memory pools but introduces latency and bandwidth contention with the CPU.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398 indicate strong compute performance across different APIs. The Vulkan score being lower than OpenCL suggests that the driver optimization for Vulkan may be less mature, or the workload characteristics differ. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking places it above many dedicated mobile GPUs, as evidenced by its nearest rivals — the Radeon Pro W6600M and RX 7600M are both dedicated solutions, yet the 8050S performs within 2.7% of them. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT acceleration, making this GPU capable of handling modern RT workloads, though the shared memory bandwidth may limit RT performance in memory-intensive scenes.

Gaming Performance

Important note: There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the CPU's 72nd percentile, this system is estimated to deliver smooth gaming performance at 1080p with high settings in most titles. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s suggest it can handle modern game rendering demands, while the 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though at a performance cost. The shared memory architecture means the effective bandwidth will vary with system memory speed, potentially causing frame rate fluctuations in memory-intensive scenes.

The CPU's gaming-relevant performance is moderate: the 3dmark single-thread score of 948 and 2-thread score of 1871 indicate adequate but not exceptional per-core performance, which may bottleneck the GPU in CPU-bound titles or at lower resolutions. The physics score of 1012 in Passmark suggests that physics-heavy games may see reduced performance. For esports titles with low CPU requirements, the system is estimated to achieve high frame rates, while AAA single-player games at 1080p high settings are expected to run at playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for most titles, though this is an estimate.

At higher resolutions like 1440p, the GPU's performance will scale down, but the 89th percentile ranking suggests it can still deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles. For 4K gaming, the system would likely struggle with modern AAA titles, as the shared memory bandwidth and integrated GPU design limit high-resolution performance. Ray tracing workloads will see significant frame rate reductions, with the 32 RT cores providing functional but not high-performance RT capabilities. The GPU's nearest rivals — the RX 7600M and RX 9060 XT LP — are both dedicated GPUs with their own memory, meaning the 8050S's shared memory architecture may cause it to perform differently in real gaming scenarios than raw benchmark scores suggest.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13420H processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The system achieves an 81st combined percentile, placing it in the upper tier of laptop configurations. The CPU, at the 72nd percentile, provides solid multi-threaded performance for productivity tasks, while the GPU, at the 89th percentile, delivers near-dedicated-GPU graphics performance in an integrated form factor. This pairing is notable for the GPU's high relative performance, which exceeds what is typical for integrated graphics solutions.

The system's overall tier is high-midrange to upper-midrange for laptops, capable of handling both demanding productivity workloads and modern gaming at reasonable settings. The CPU's 8 cores and 12 threads, combined with the GPU's 2048 shading units, create a balanced platform for most applications. The absence of a dedicated GPU keeps the system compact and power-efficient, with the CPU at 45W and GPU at 55W TDP, making this suitable for thin-and-light laptop designs. The platform's production status is active, with the CPU released in early 2023 and the GPU in early 2025, representing a current-generation configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system achieves an 81st combined percentile, placing it above 81% of all benchmarked system configurations.

Q: How does the Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU scores 62108 on average, which is 0.3% faster than the Radeon Pro W6600M (61896), 2.5% slower than the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693), 2.6% slower than the RX 7600M (63775), and 2.7% slower than the RX 9060 XT LP (63830).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 8050S uses system shared memory, with the memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 11084 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1689 in single-core, with a multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 6.6x.

Q: Is ray tracing supported on this GPU?

A: Yes, the Radeon 8050S features 32 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The GPU achieves 11.47 TFLOPS in FP32, with matching 11.47 TFLOPS in FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest smooth frame rates at 1080p in competitive titles, though the CPU's 72nd percentile and single-thread score of 948 may cap performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and strong multi-threaded scores (18511 average, 17475 Passmark multi-thread) provide adequate encoding headroom, while the GPU's 2048 shading units handle rendering concurrently, though the shared memory architecture may introduce bandwidth contention.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11084 and the GPU's 65818 OpenCL score indicate strong performance for timeline editing and effects rendering, with the 32 RT cores accelerating previews of RT effects.

3D Rendering: The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS and the CPU's 6013 Cinebench R20 multi-core score provide a balanced rendering platform, with the Pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s supporting high-resolution viewport work.

Software Development: The CPU's integer math score of 58156 and data compression score of 209450 indicate fast compilation and build times, while the 12 threads handle parallel build processes effectively.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3396 in Passmark ensures responsive everyday applications, while the GPU's integrated design keeps power consumption low (55W TDP), extending battery life for mobile use.