SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400T

5,210 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This pairing combines a 35W energy-efficient Raptor Lake desktop processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace workstation GPU, targeting a desktop build that prioritizes compute throughput and multi-tasking over raw gaming frame rates. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU lands in the 60th percentile, creating a pronounced performance asymmetry that shapes every workload analysis in this report.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming figures are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. This level of compute performance suggests the GPU is capable of driving high-refresh gaming at 1440p and even 4K in many titles, but the Intel Core i5-13400T's single-core score of 2,404 in Cinebench R23 and 1,899 in Geekbench single-core will likely cap frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated bottleneck shifts heavily toward the CPU. The i5-13400T's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, provide adequate but not exceptional single-threaded performance. Games that rely on one or two cores may see frame rates limited to what the CPU can feed the GPU, potentially leaving the RTX 5000 Ada's massive 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput underutilized. Expect playable but not elite frame rates in esports titles, where the CPU's 60th percentile standing becomes the ceiling.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU begins to assert dominance. The RTX 5000 Ada's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB of GDDR6 memory provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and effects. Estimated frame rates would likely be smooth in most single-player titles, though the CPU's single-core performance still limits maximum FPS in games with heavy draw call overhead. The 1.4% deltaPct advantage the CPU holds over the Intel Xeon E-2378G in average benchmark score suggests it performs similarly to that workstation chip, which is not known for gaming prowess.

At 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the clear primary driver. The RTX 5000 Ada's 98th percentile ranking, combined with its 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate, indicates it can handle 4K rendering far better than the CPU can feed it. However, without measured FPS data, these are estimates — the actual experience depends heavily on specific game engines and optimization. The RTX 5000 Ada's 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores suggest ray tracing performance would be strong, but again, this is inferred from architecture and compute scores, not direct gaming benchmarks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile compute scores and 194,041 Vulkan score indicate it can push high frame rates, but the CPU's 60th percentile and single-core score of 2,404 in Cinebench R23 will likely prevent consistent 200+ FPS in competitive titles. This pairing is better suited for high-refresh at 1440p in less CPU-intensive games, but not for chasing maximum FPS at 1080p.

Streaming: The RTX 5000 Ada's 400 tensor cores and 32 GB VRAM provide substantial headroom for encoding and overlays, while the CPU's 16 threads handle game logic and stream encoding simultaneously. The i5-13400T's multi-core score of 17,029 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can manage concurrent workloads, though the 35W TDP may limit sustained multi-threaded performance under heavy streaming loads.

Video editing: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects, color grading, and export tasks, while the CPU's 10 cores and 20 MB of shared L3 cache handle timeline scrubbing and codec operations. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 10,227 places it near the Intel Core i9-10850K (deltaPct -0.6%), a capable older flagship, indicating solid but not top-tier editing performance.

3D rendering: This is the pairing's strongest scenario. The RTX 5000 Ada's 76,300 million transistors and 12,800 shading units deliver workstation-class render performance, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 that rivals the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (deltaPct 0.5%). The CPU's 17,029 Cinebench R23 multi-core score supports scene preparation and physics simulation, though it will lag behind higher-core-count workstation CPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and 4.40 GHz boost clock handle compilation and testing efficiently, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,152 indicating solid parallel throughput. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate machine learning training and inference via its 400 tensor cores, though the 35W TDP CPU may throttle under sustained build loads.

Student and office work: Overkill for this segment. The CPU's 1,899 Geekbench single-core score handles document editing and web browsing effortlessly, while the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are far beyond what office applications require. The 35W TDP makes this an energy-efficient desktop option, but the GPU's 250W TDP and 600W suggested PSU negate any power savings for typical office use.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5000 Ada Generation a gaming GPU?

A: No, it is a workstation GPU. Its 98th percentile ranking and 175,286 OpenCL score show exceptional compute performance, but its dual-slot design, 1x 16-pin power connector, and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs target professional rendering and compute workloads rather than consumer gaming.

Q: How does the i5-13400T compare to the i9-10850K?

A: The i5-13400T's average benchmark score of 5,210 is 0.6% lower than the i9-10850K's 5,240, placing them effectively at parity. The newer Raptor Lake chip does so with a 35W TDP versus the older chip's higher power draw, making it a more efficient choice for similar multi-threaded performance.

Q: Can this build handle 4K gaming?

A: The GPU is capable of 4K rendering based on its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate, but the CPU's 60th percentile and single-core score of 2,404 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. Without measured FPS data, expect playable but not consistently high-refresh 4K.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The i5-13400T includes UHD Graphics 730, which is sufficient for basic display output and office tasks but not for gaming or compute. The discrete RTX 5000 Ada would handle all graphics workloads in this build.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it enough?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is ample for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and AI models, and exceeds the 40 GB and 80 GB A100 variants in memory bandwidth despite lower capacity.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The 35W TDP and base clock of 1300 MHz are fixed, so performance tuning is limited to power limits and memory overclocking via the DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel support.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing performance?

A: With 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores on the Ada Lovelace architecture, the RTX 5000 Ada supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. Benchmark data does not include ray tracing-specific scores, but the architecture's RT core count indicates strong hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need workstation-grade GPU compute without sacrificing a reasonable CPU upgrade path. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 175,286 OpenCL score make it ideal for 3D artists, animators, and render engineers who work with large scenes that benefit from 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a 20 MB shared L3 cache, handle the non-GPU aspects of content creation workflows adequately, though users expecting top-tier CPU rendering should look at higher-core-count alternatives.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K who prioritize visual fidelity over competitive frame rates could use this build, since the GPU's 98th percentile compute scores translate to strong high-resolution rendering, but the CPU's 60th percentile standing means they will not extract maximum FPS from the GPU. The i5-13400T's performance parity with the i9-10850K (deltaPct -0.6%) suggests it handles modern game engines, but its 35W TDP limits sustained boost behavior in CPU-intensive titles.

Software developers working on machine learning or scientific computing will benefit from the RTX 5000 Ada's 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32, which rival the A100 SXM4 80 GB (deltaPct 0.5%). The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 10,227 supports parallel compilation and data processing. Students and small business users will find this vastly over-specified for their needs — the GPU alone is overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, or web browsing, and the 250W TDP GPU plus 600W suggested PSU makes this an expensive workstation, not a budget office PC.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry is stark: the GPU sits in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. This means the CPU is the bottleneck in almost every workload that requires both components to work in tandem. The GPU's 175,286 OpenCL score and 194,041 Vulkan score are over 33 times the CPU's 5,210 average benchmark score, indicating the GPU can process data far faster than the CPU can prepare it.

In gaming, the bottleneck manifests as CPU-limited frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's single-core score of 2,404 in Cinebench R23 and 1,899 in Geekbench single-core are modest for a modern desktop chip, and the 4.40 GHz boost clock cannot compensate for lower IPC in lightly-threaded workloads. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but even then, the CPU's 10 cores may struggle to maintain consistent frame pacing in open-world titles that spawn many objects.

In compute workloads, the GPU dominates entirely. The RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are 12 times the CPU's FP32 capability (estimated from its 5,210 average benchmark score). The CPU's 35W TDP and 1300 MHz base clock mean it cannot sustain heavy multi-threaded loads for extended periods, potentially throttling during long renders. The GPU's 250W TDP and 600W suggested PSU are the power budget drivers, not the CPU.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance — the build is more than the sum of its parts for GPU-only workloads, but less than its potential for balanced tasks. Users should pair this GPU with a higher-percentile CPU (e.g., an i9 or Xeon) if they need balanced performance; the i5-13400T is a cost-effective but limiting partner.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the AD102 chip with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die using TSMC's 5 nm process. It has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth with an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps. The GPU's 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS is matched by FP16 at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating strong compute density for AI and scientific workloads.

Ray tracing and tensor performance are handled by 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, respectively. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are standard for professional use, and the dual-slot, 267 mm length (10.5 inches) form factor fits most workstation chassis. The 250W TDP and 1x 16-pin power connector require a 600W suggested PSU.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041, placing the GPU in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 184,664 puts it on par with the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (deltaPct 0.5%) and ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%. For rendering, this means the RTX 5000 Ada competes with data-center-class accelerators while offering 32 GB of VRAM for large scenes — a combination that suits professional renderers but not gamers seeking value.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern: strong multi-core for its power class, modest single-core. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 1,716 and single-core 242; R20 scores 7,152 multi-core and 1,009 single-core; R23 scores 17,029 multi-core and 2,404 single-core. Geekbench scores are 10,227 multi-core and 1,899 single-core. The CPU's average benchmark score is 5,210, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E-2378G (5,199, +0.2%), Intel Core i9-10850K (5,240, -0.6%), Intel Core i7-11700B (5,241, -0.6%), and Intel Core i5-14401E (5,253, -0.8%).

The GPU's benchmark performance is dramatically higher: Geekbench OpenCL scores 175,286 and Vulkan scores 194,041, with an average benchmark score of 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725, +0.5%), NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147, -1.3%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109, +1.4%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050, +3.7%).

The combined percentile of 79 reflects the GPU pulling the overall score upward, while the CPU drags it down. The GPU's average score is 35.4 times the CPU's, creating a lopsided benchmark profile that favors GPU-accelerated workloads. In a combined benchmark, this build would rank high for graphics or compute tasks but poorly for CPU-only tests. The data suggests this pairing is a GPU-centric workstation with a modest CPU that does not fully complement the GPU's capabilities.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-13400T, a 35W Raptor Lake-S processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a 250W workstation GPU. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread chip with a 1300 MHz base clock and 4.40 GHz boost clock, built on Intel's 10 nm process, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU is an AD102-based Ada Lovelace card with 32 GB GDDR6, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32.

The combined percentile of 79 places this build in the upper range of all desktop configurations, driven almost entirely by the GPU's 98th percentile standing. The CPU's 60th percentile is below average for a modern desktop, but the overall tier is still high-end due to the GPU's compute dominance. This is not a balanced gaming rig nor a CPU-rendering monster; it is a GPU-accelerated workstation for professionals who offload heavy compute to the graphics card. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $221, but the GPU has no listed launch MSRP, so total build cost cannot be calculated from this data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400T is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen (Raptor Lake) series, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 1300 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, operating at a 35W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with no ECC support. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics. It is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not available.

Benchmark results show the CPU's multi-core performance is respectable for its power envelope: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 17,029, which is competitive with older high-end desktop chips like the i9-10850K (deltaPct -0.6%). Single-core performance is more modest, with R23 single-core at 2,404 and Geekbench single-core at 1,899. The average benchmark score of 5,210 puts it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 60% of CPUs but lags behind most modern mid-range and high-end desktop processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E-2378G, is essentially at parity (deltaPct 0.2%).

For real workloads, the 35W TDP is the defining characteristic. The 1300 MHz base clock is low, but the 4.40 GHz boost clock provides adequate single-threaded speed when needed. The 10 cores handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and compilation well, but sustained loads may cause the CPU to throttle back toward base clock, reducing throughput. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with cache-sensitive workloads, but the lack of ECC memory support limits its use in mission-critical servers. Overall, this CPU is a balanced, power-efficient choice for a desktop where the GPU does the heavy lifting; pairing it with an RTX 5000 Ada creates a system where the CPU handles orchestration while the GPU accelerates compute.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds