SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400T

5,210 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines a 10-core Raptor Lake processor with a workstation-grade Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 78th percentile overall. The CPU sits at the 60th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 95th percentile, creating a lopsided configuration where graphics capability far outstrips compute throughput. The data shows a system designed for GPU-accelerated professional workloads rather than balanced general-purpose computing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile position and Vulkan score of 123842 suggest strong 1440p and 4K potential, but the CPU's 60th percentile ranking may cap frame rates in esports titles. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1899 and Cinebench R23 single-core result of 2404 are adequate for modern game logic, though not exceptional. Expect the GPU to be the primary driver at higher resolutions, with CPU limitations emerging at 1080p ultra settings.

Streaming: The RTX 4000 Ada's tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide dedicated encoding hardware, though the FACT PACK does not list specific NVENC capabilities. The CPU's 16 threads handle encoding overhead, and its 17029 Cinebench R23 multicore score suggests sufficient headroom for simultaneous game and encode workloads. The 20 GB VRAM offers ample buffer for stream compositing and overlays.

Video editing: The 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is the standout feature here, allowing large timelines and 4K/8K previews without spilling to system RAM. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146593 indicates strong compute throughput for effects and color grading. CPU-side, the multicore score of 10227 in Geekbench supports smooth timeline scrubbing and export parallelization, though the 35W TDP limits sustained all-core boosts.

3D rendering: This is the pairing's strongest scenario. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS and 48 RT cores position it well for both rasterization and ray-traced rendering. The CUDA-accelerated render engines would leverage the 6144 shading units effectively. The CPU's 17029 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles scene preprocessing and physics simulation, but GPU rendering will dominate workflow speed.

Software development: The 10 cores and 16 threads handle parallel compilation reasonably well, with the 20 MB shared L3 cache reducing memory latency. The 60th CPU percentile places it above entry-level workstation chips but below high-core-count alternatives. The 35W TDP means sustained all-core workloads may throttle, making this better suited for incremental builds than massive full-project rebuilds.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 730 covers basic display output, and the CPU's 1899 Geekbench single-core score handles productivity suites smoothly. The GPU is overkill for this segment, but the system's overall 78th percentile ensures responsiveness across multitasking. The 35W TDP keeps power draw low for dorm rooms or small offices.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 5210 places it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E-2378G with an average score of 5199, a delta of 0.2%, making the two effectively identical in aggregate performance. The Core i9-10850K scores 5240, just 0.6% higher, while the Core i7-11700B also posts 5241, again 0.6% ahead. The Core i5-14401E leads this group at 5253, 0.8% higher. These margins are negligible in real-world use, meaning the 13400T trades blows with several older high-end chips.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 135218 puts it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA A10M at 135230, a 0% delta, followed by the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (0.1% behind), the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 (0.4% behind), and the Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 (0.9% behind). The RTX 4000 Ada Generation effectively matches these professional workstation cards, all clustered within a 1% performance band.

The combined picture shows a GPU that outperforms its CPU counterpart by a wide margin. The GPU's 95th percentile versus the CPU's 60th percentile creates a 35-point spread, indicating that the graphics card is the dominant component. This asymmetry suggests that for GPU-bound tasks, the system punches well above its CPU weight class, but for CPU-bound workloads, performance is merely average among desktop processors.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The boost clock reaches 2175 MHz from a 1500 MHz base, enabling an FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS. For graphics, this translates to a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s.

Memory configuration includes 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. This yields 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a workstation card but not exceptional given the wide bus of competing products. The 20 GB capacity is the key differentiator, enabling large datasets and high-resolution textures in professional applications.

The Ada Lovelace architecture contributes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based workloads. The RT cores handle path tracing and denoising, while the tensor cores accelerate DLSS and similar neural network operations. OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 146593 and 123842 respectively confirm strong compute performance, though the Vulkan lead over OpenCL suggests the architecture favors modern graphics APIs.

For rendering workflows, the combination of 26.73 TFLOPS FP32, 48 RT cores, and 20 GB VRAM makes this GPU suitable for production rendering in Blender, Maya, or Unreal Engine. The single-slot design and 130W TDP allow deployment in dense workstation configurations, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 35-point percentile gap between GPU (95th) and CPU (60th) clearly identifies the processor as the limiting factor in most workloads. In GPU-bound scenarios like rendering or machine learning inference, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation will operate near its full potential, with the CPU providing necessary scene data and command processing. However, in CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulation, compilation, or single-threaded productivity, the 13400T's 60th percentile position means the GPU will idle while the processor works through instructions.

The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads with a 35W TDP indicate a power-efficient design that trades sustained performance for low energy draw. Its boost clock of 4.40 GHz and base of 1300 MHz show a wide frequency range, but the low TDP likely triggers throttle under extended all-core loads. This affects scenarios like video encoding or batch rendering, where the CPU must maintain high throughput for minutes or hours.

The GPU's 130W TDP and the CPU's 35W TDP create a system with modest total power requirements, but the performance asymmetry means users should match workloads to the component best suited for them. For gaming, the GPU will dominate at 1440p and 4K, but at 1080p with lower graphics settings, the CPU may become the bottleneck. The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so these are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 78th combined percentile, reflecting the GPU's 95th percentile position and the CPU's 60th percentile position.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-13400T scores 5210 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Xeon E-2378G, 0.6% lower than the Core i9-10850K and Core i7-11700B, and 0.8% lower than the Core i5-14401E.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation offers 360.0 GB/s bandwidth from 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus running at 2250 MHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13400T does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for certain professional workstation uses.

Q: What is the GPU's transistor count and die size?

A: The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon PRO W6800?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada scores 135218 on average, which is 0.1% lower than the Radeon PRO W6800's 135396, making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The Core i5-13400T has a TDP of 35W, which is notably low for a 10-core desktop processor and contributes to its efficiency profile.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p and 4K: The GPU's 95th percentile and 20 GB VRAM support high-resolution textures and ray tracing, making this build suitable for immersive gaming at high settings. The CPU's 60th percentile is sufficient for most titles at these resolutions, where the GPU is the primary driver.

Content creators working with video: The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth enable large video timelines and high-bitrate codecs. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146593 supports effects processing, while the CPU's 16 threads handle timeline preview and export tasks.

3D artists and architectural visualizers: The 48 RT cores and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate ray-traced rendering, and the 20 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes. The CPU's multicore score of 17029 in Cinebench R23 handles scene assembly and physics.

Software developers in game or graphics fields: The 10 cores and 16 threads compile code efficiently, and the GPU's Vulkan score of 123842 indicates strong API performance for testing graphics applications.

Students in engineering or design programs: The low 35W CPU TDP keeps system power draw manageable, while the GPU handles CAD, simulation, and rendering assignments. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output.

Small business workstations: The single-slot GPU and 130W TDP allow compact system builds, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups. The system's 78th percentile overall ensures smooth operation across office and professional applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides headroom for future high-bandwidth devices, though the GPU currently runs on PCIe 4.0 x16. The 35W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that a 300W PSU can handle, as indicated by the suggested PSU rating.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor on the same socket, which would better balance the GPU's capabilities. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration at 60th percentile leaves room for improvement that would narrow the gap to the GPU's 95th percentile. Alternatively, adding more system memory or faster DDR5 would reduce potential bottlenecks in memory-intensive workloads.

The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs for next-generation storage and accelerator cards. The GPU's single-slot design and 300W suggested PSU mean there is no immediate need for a power supply upgrade, but a higher-TDP CPU would require reassessment of thermal and power delivery. The 215 mm² CPU die size and 10 nm process node indicate headroom for future process improvements within the same platform generation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13400T with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system sits at the 78th combined percentile, driven largely by the GPU's 95th percentile performance against the CPU's 60th percentile.

The pairing is characterized by significant performance asymmetry. The GPU is a top-tier professional component, rivaling the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 and NVIDIA A10M within 0.1% in average benchmark scores. The CPU, meanwhile, performs comparably to several older high-end desktop chips like the Core i9-10850K and Core i7-11700B, all within 0.8% of each other. This makes the build GPU-centric, best suited for workloads that leverage the graphics card's substantial compute and memory resources.

The system's overall tier is upper-midrange, with the 78th percentile indicating it outperforms the majority of desktop configurations. The 35W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP make it power-efficient for its performance class, and the single-slot GPU design allows flexible system integration. For professional users prioritizing GPU acceleration, this build offers workstation-grade graphics capability in a desktop form factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400T features 10 cores and 16 threads on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock runs at 1300 MHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and it operates within a 35W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a multicore score of 17029 in Cinebench R23 and 7152 in Cinebench R20, with single-core scores of 2404 and 1009 respectively. Geekbench results show 10227 multicore and 1899 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 60th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 5210. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.8% performance, indicating this processor sits in a crowded mid-range segment.

The Raptor Lake architecture provides a hybrid core design, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The 10 cores and 16 threads suggest a 6+4 configuration typical of this generation, with performance and efficiency cores. The 20 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, and the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in system building.

The 35W TDP is notably low for a desktop processor with this core count, indicating a power-optimized bin. This limits sustained all-core performance but benefits thermals and energy consumption. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output without requiring a discrete GPU, useful for troubleshooting or office workloads. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking, which may partially offset the low TDP if the cooling solution allows.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 95th percentile rank and Vulkan score of 123842, this build should deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most modern titles when graphics settings are set to ultra. The 20 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures. The 48 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though enabling them will reduce overall frame rates.

The CPU's 60th percentile and single-core score of 1899 in Geekbench suggest it can keep up with the GPU at higher resolutions but may bottleneck at 1080p, particularly in CPU-intensive titles with high object counts or physics simulation. The 4.40 GHz boost clock helps in lightly threaded games, but the 35W TDP may cause frequency drops during prolonged gaming sessions.

For esports titles at 1080p with lower settings, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU could deliver. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the build should provide a smooth experience in most games. G-sync or FreeSync displays would help mitigate any frame pacing issues from the CPU's variable performance under load.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds