SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation represents a desktop build that combines a mainstream 13th Gen Intel processor with a professional workstation GPU. The CPU, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and Intel's 10 nm process, offers 10 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration is designed for multi-threaded productivity, while the GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and TSMC's 5 nm process, focuses on professional rendering and compute tasks rather than consumer gaming. The data set contains no measured FPS information for this specific pairing, meaning all gaming performance figures presented are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, featuring a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores. It provides 10 cores and 16 threads, which is a substantial amount for a mid-range chip, allowing it to handle both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads effectively. The base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz indicate that the processor can scale from energy-efficient operation to high-performance bursts when demanded by applications.

Benchmark results reveal a strong multi-core performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 places it well above typical entry-level processors, while the single-core score of 3191 demonstrates solid per-thread performance for tasks like web browsing and office applications. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11068 and single-core score of 1996 reinforce this balanced profile. In the 3DMark tests, the processor scores 7314 in the 16-thread test and 7307 in the max-thread test, showing that scaling from 16 threads to the full thread count yields almost no additional performance, meaning the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads. The 8-thread score of 5591 and 4-thread score of 3459 indicate diminishing returns as thread count decreases, which is typical for a processor with 16 logical processors.

The CPU has a 20 MB shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB L2 cache per core and 80 KB L1 cache per core. This cache hierarchy is designed to reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel memory buses, allowing builders flexibility in platform costs. Its 65 W TDP suggests efficient power consumption, making it suitable for compact builds or systems where thermal management is a priority.

The PassMark tests provide additional insights. The integer math score of 79942 and floating point math score of 60539 indicate robust computational capacity for general and scientific workloads. The data compression score of 311364 and encryption score of 16608 show that the processor can handle data-intensive tasks, though encryption performance is moderate relative to other scores. The extended instructions score of 19847 suggests good support for modern instruction sets, which benefits applications like video encoding and cryptography.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13400F shows a nuanced picture. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, with a deltaPct of 0, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 0.4% ahead. It trails the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D by 0.3%. These results indicate that the i5-13400F sits in a competitive band where small differences in average benchmark scores translate to negligible real-world performance differences. The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 among all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors on the market, making it a capable choice for most productivity tasks.

Gaming Performance

It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this combination of CPU and GPU. The FACT PACK contains an empty object for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 suggest strong compute capabilities that translate well to gaming. For a title at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the combination of the i5-13400F's single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark and the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS fp32 performance would likely produce high frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in most modern games. However, without measured data, these figures remain speculative.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU's 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 GB of VRAM become more critical. The 20 GB frame buffer is generous for high-resolution textures, reducing the likelihood of VRAM bottlenecks in demanding titles. The estimated performance would still be strong, but the CPU's single-thread performance might start to become a limiting factor in games that rely heavily on CPU-bound physics or AI.

At 4K resolution, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck, but its 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a top-tier performer. The 64 ROPs and 192 TMUs provide adequate pixel and texture throughput for high resolutions. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra settings would be lower than at 1080p but should remain playable in most titles, possibly in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the game's optimization.

The absence of measured FPS data means that these estimates should be taken with caution. The benchmark scores indicate a system capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid performance at 1440p, but the exact figures cannot be verified. For competitive esports titles, the CPU's high single-thread score would support high frame rates, while the GPU's compute power would ensure visual fidelity is maintained.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong showing, indicating that the i5-13400F outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, has an almost identical average score of 25284, with a deltaPct of 0, showing that the two are statistically indistinguishable in performance. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is 0.4% ahead, all within a 0.7% range.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 117088, putting it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. This is an exceptional ranking, meaning the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms 95% of graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, is 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 1.6% ahead. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is 2.4% behind, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile is 2.8% behind. This places the GPU in a high-performance tier, suitable for demanding professional workloads.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 86, which reflects the strong performance of both components. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile combine to create a system that is well above average overall. The GPU is clearly the more dominant component in terms of percentile ranking, suggesting that it will carry the system in GPU-intensive tasks, while the CPU provides ample support for general processing.

The Cinebench R20 scores of 8892 multi-core and 1255 single-core reinforce the CPU's multi-threaded strengths. The PassMark multithread score of 25032 and single-thread score of 3634 provide additional confirmation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 for the GPU is particularly notable, as it indicates strong compute performance for tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need professional-grade GPU performance without sacrificing CPU capability. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing. The 20 GB of VRAM is particularly beneficial for large datasets and high-resolution textures, common in architectural visualization and film production.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions would benefit from the high GPU performance and solid CPU single-thread scores. The estimated frame rates, while not measured, suggest that this system can handle ultra settings in most games at these resolutions. The GPU's 64 ROPs ensure efficient pixel processing, while the 192 TMUs handle texture mapping effectively.

Content creators who work with video editing software like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve would find the combination of the CPU's multi-core performance and the GPU's compute power advantageous. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 indicates fast rendering times for CPU-based effects, while the GPU's fp32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and encoding.

Software developers working on large codebases would appreciate the CPU's 16 threads for parallel compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 79942 indicates strong performance in tasks that involve logical operations, which is relevant for code compilation and data processing.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the system's efficiency. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 70 W TDP mean the system consumes relatively little power, keeping operating costs low. The dual-slot GPU design and lack of power connectors simplify installation in standard desktop cases.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i5-13400F?

A: The processor has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation have?

A: The GPU features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit memory bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, indicating the system outperforms 86% of all builds in the database.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 70 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile, outperforming 95% of all graphics cards in the database.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, which combine to deliver a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 720 MHz and a boost clock of 1560 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, effective 14 Gbps. The 20 GB of GDDR6 memory is connected via a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is tailored for professional workloads that require large frame buffers, such as rendering high-resolution scenes or training machine learning models.

For ray tracing, the GPU has 48 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 192 tensor cores. These hardware units enable real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The fp32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS and fp16 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate that the GPU can handle both single-precision and half-precision compute tasks at the same rate, which is beneficial for certain scientific and AI workloads.

The GPU's benchmark scores are impressive. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 place it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. This means it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards, including many consumer gaming GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, is 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 is 1.6% ahead. The GPU is 2.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile.

The GPU's power consumption is remarkably low for its performance class, with a TDP of only 70 W. It requires no power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot, and is a dual-slot design measuring 168 mm in length and 69 mm in height. The suggested PSU is 250 W, making it suitable for compact systems. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support up to four displays, which is useful for multi-monitor professional setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this system is asymmetric, with the GPU being the more dominant component. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking is solid, but the GPU's 95th percentile ranking is significantly higher. This means that in GPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU will be the primary determinant of performance, and the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations or software compilation, the CPU's 16 threads and 22604 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will be the limiting factor. The GPU's massive compute power will remain underutilized in these tasks. However, the CPU's performance is still strong enough to avoid being a severe bottleneck in most scenarios.

The data shows that the CPU's multi-thread scaling from 16 threads to max threads is minimal, with scores of 7314 and 7307 respectively. This indicates that the processor is fully utilized at its thread count and adding more threads would not help. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark is adequate for most titles, but the GPU's estimated FPS at 1080p would likely exceed 100 FPS in many games, meaning the CPU could become a bottleneck in high-refresh-rate scenarios.

The GPU's 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest compared to its compute capabilities, which could be a limiting factor in memory-intensive workloads. However, the 20 GB VRAM size mitigates this by allowing large datasets to be stored locally, reducing the need for frequent data transfers. The CPU's support for DDR5 memory helps reduce memory latency, but the overall system memory bandwidth is not specified.

In summary, the GPU is the performance leader in this system, and users should prioritize GPU-bound tasks when evaluating performance. The CPU provides adequate support but will not push the GPU to its limits in most gaming scenarios. For professional workloads that use both CPU and GPU, such as video editing with GPU acceleration, the balance is more favorable, as both components contribute significantly.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation represents a pairing of a mainstream consumer CPU with a professional workstation GPU. The CPU is from the Core 13th Gen series, designed for desktop use, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, but with a workstation-specific "SFF Ada Generation" designation.

The overall tier of this build is high, with a combined percentile of 86. This means the system outperforms 86% of all builds in the database, placing it in the upper echelon of performance. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile contribute to this high ranking, with the GPU being the primary driver of the system's overall performance.

The GPU's "SFF" designation suggests it is designed for small form factor systems, but the build class is still desktop, meaning it can be installed in standard desktop cases. The GPU's dual-slot design and 168 mm length make it compatible with most cases, and the lack of power connectors simplifies installation. The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 70 W TDP mean the system has modest power requirements, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

This pairing is not typical for consumer gaming builds, as the GPU is more expensive and geared toward professional use. However, for users who need both gaming and professional compute capabilities, this system offers a compelling balance. The CPU provides solid gaming performance, while the GPU excels in rendering and AI tasks, making it a versatile workstation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile and CPU's 960 single-thread score in 3DMark suggest the system can achieve high frame rates at 1080p. Estimated performance would exceed 144 FPS in esports titles, though this is not measured data. At 1440p, frame rates would be lower but still likely above 60 FPS in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 311364 indicates fast encoding performance, while the GPU's tensor cores can offload encoding tasks via NVENC. This combination supports smooth streaming at 1080p60.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 accelerates rendering in software like Premiere Pro. The GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS fp32 performance and 20 GB VRAM handle GPU-accelerated effects and color grading efficiently. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 confirms strong compute performance for video processing.

3D rendering: The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 20 GB VRAM make it ideal for rendering high-resolution scenes in Blender or Maya. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, while the 192 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated denoising. The CPU's multi-core performance supports scene preparation and simulation.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and integer math score of 79942 enable fast code compilation. The large L3 cache of 20 MB reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The GPU's compute power can be used for parallel processing tasks like unit testing or data analysis.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy response in office applications. The GPU's low 70 W TDP and the system's overall efficiency keep electricity costs low, making it suitable for a shared workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 13th Gen Core processors. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for high-bandwidth GPUs or NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 70 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades, as most power supplies exceed this requirement. The GPU requires no power connectors, so upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would necessitate a new PSU and possibly new power cables.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to 32 GB or 64 GB, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5. This would improve performance in memory-intensive workloads like video editing or virtualization. The CPU's 16 threads are sufficient for most tasks, so a CPU upgrade would only be necessary for extreme multi-threaded workloads.

The GPU's 20 GB VRAM is generous, and an upgrade would only be needed for very large datasets or higher-resolution rendering. The system's overall balance is good, so any upgrade should target the component that is most limiting for the user's specific workload. For gaming, the CPU might be upgraded to a higher-core-count processor, while for professional work, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier workstation card. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 ensures future compatibility with next-generation components.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds