SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. It operates with a 2.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited by design, but the boost clock already provides substantial single-thread performance for everyday responsiveness.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This arrangement favors workloads that benefit from fast access to frequently used data, such as gaming and office productivity. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and memory speed. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes enables high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 77th percentile among all processors, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the market. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 22,604, while the single-core score is 3,191. These numbers reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks — rendering, compiling, and batch processing — while maintaining competitive single-thread speed for gaming and legacy applications.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear pattern: 2-thread score is 1,880, 4-thread is 3,459, 8-thread is 5,591, and 16-thread is 7,314, with max-threads at 7,307. The near-flat performance from 16 threads to max threads suggests the processor's 16 logical threads are fully utilized by modern multi-core workloads, and adding more threads yields negligible gains because the hardware is saturated. This means the 13400F is well-suited for software that scales to 16 threads, but it will not benefit from 32-thread workloads the way higher-end chips might.

Geekbench scores of 11,068 multi-core and 1,996 single-core reinforce the balanced nature of the chip. PassMark tests provide additional context: integer math at 79,942 and floating-point math at 60,539 show strong arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 311,364 and encryption at 16,608 highlight productivity strengths. The extended instructions score of 19,847 indicates solid SIMD performance for AVX-heavy workloads, and the find-prime-numbers score of 83 is modest, reflecting the chip's focus on general-purpose computing rather than specialized integer crunching.

Compared to nearest rivals, the 13400F's average benchmark score of 25,292 is statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25,284, 0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 (25,362, -0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365, -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201, 0.4% delta). This positions the 13400F as a mid-pack performer among similarly priced CPUs, neither dominating nor lagging its direct competition. The practical takeaway is that the 13400F delivers consistent, predictable performance across a wide range of workloads, making it a reliable choice for balanced desktop builds.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The GPU features 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, providing a substantial foundation for modern rendering tasks. Clock speeds are 1,330 MHz base, 2,070 MHz game, and 2,520 MHz boost, which translate to impressive fill rates: 322.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 564.5 GTexel/s texture rate.

Memory configuration is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a generous memory pool for 1440p and 4K gaming, as well as for creative applications that require large frame buffers. The 56 ray-tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 36.13 TFLOPS 1:1) indicates robust compute capability for both gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, which is respectable but not top-tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 shows strong DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 and Vulkan score of 58,705 demonstrate good cross-API compatibility. PassMark G3D score of 25,381 and G2D score of 1,280 reflect solid overall graphics performance, with the GPU compute score of 14,737 indicating capable compute offload for tasks like video encoding or physics simulation.

The nearest rivals paint a nuanced picture: the RX 9070's average benchmark score of 23,877 sits between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23,736, 0.6% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24,063, -0.8% delta), with the RTX 3080 Mobile (23,628, 1.1% delta) and RTX 2080 SUPER (24,170, -1.2% delta) rounding out the comparison. This suggests the RX 9070 performs at a level comparable to last-generation high-end mobile GPUs and older desktop flagship cards, though it lacks the sheer compute density of more recent high-end desktop offerings.

The 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU indicates this is a power-hungry component, requiring adequate cooling and a quality power supply. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures full bandwidth compatibility with modern motherboards, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a) support high refresh rate and high resolution monitors. The dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors is standard for this performance class.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a CPU in the 77th percentile and a GPU in the 69th percentile, with the overall pairing achieving a 73rd percentile combined score. This indicates a well-matched system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though the CPU does hold a slight edge in relative standing.

In 3DMark thread tests, the CPU scores 7,314 at 16 threads and 7,307 at max threads, showing that the 16-thread configuration is the sweet spot for this chip. The single-thread score of 960 and 2-thread score of 1,880 demonstrate that light-threaded applications such as older games or office software will run smoothly, but the real strength emerges in multi-threaded scenarios where the 10-core, 16-thread configuration can flex its muscles.

Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22,604 and single-core at 3,191 place this CPU comfortably in the upper mid-range for content creation. The gap between multi-core and single-core scores — a ratio of roughly 7:1 — highlights that the chip scales well with thread count, making it suitable for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where all cores are engaged.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 is a modern DX12 benchmark that stresses ray tracing and mesh shaders. The PassMark DirectX scores are more variable: DirectX 9 at 343, DirectX 10 at 141, DirectX 11 at 281, and DirectX 12 at 74. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the RX 9070's architecture may be optimized differently across API versions, though the 3DMark score provides a more reliable indicator of modern gaming performance.

The average FPS across all measured games is 153.1 at ultra settings, placing this pair at rank 1,113 out of 3,732 pairs (approximately the 70th percentile of all CPU-GPU combinations). This is a strong showing that confirms the system can handle most games at high settings, though it is not at the absolute top end of performance.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are reasonably balanced, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and workload. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,634) becomes the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles like esports games, while the GPU has headroom. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's raw throughput (36.13 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the primary constraint, as evidenced by frame rate drops across most games.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows this pattern clearly. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, frames drop from 236.8 at 1080p to 157.2 at 1440p to 88.6 at 4K — a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K that is typical of GPU-bound scaling. In contrast, a CPU-bound title like Valorant shows only a 18% drop from 1080p (456 FPS) to 4K (374 FPS), indicating the CPU is the limiting factor even at high resolutions.

The CPU's 77th percentile versus the GPU's 69th percentile suggests the CPU is slightly stronger relative to the market, meaning in most gaming scenarios the GPU will be the bottleneck at high resolutions, while the CPU may limit frame rates in very light workloads at 1080p. The 65 W TDP CPU is also far less power-hungry than the 220 W GPU, creating a thermal balance where the GPU requires more substantial cooling.

For productivity workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,604) and PassMark multithread (25,032), the CPU is the clear driver, and the GPU's compute capabilities (14,737 GPU compute score) can assist but will not be the primary bottleneck. In gaming, the pair's average FPS of 153.1 across all titles indicates that most games will run smoothly, but demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (32.7 FPS at 1080p) will struggle regardless of resolution.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's strongest benchmark area?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F excels in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,604 and a PassMark multithread score of 25,032, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 4K gaming at moderate settings, though the measured FPS at 4K drops significantly in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (35 FPS).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The system achieves a 73rd percentile combined score, with the CPU at 77th percentile and GPU at 69th percentile, indicating a well-balanced mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop build.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 1440p and 4K resolutions, as shown by significant FPS drops in GPU-intensive titles, while the CPU can limit frame rates in lightweight esports games at 1080p.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the 4.60 GHz boost clock is the maximum achievable without external clock generator modifications, which are not supported on this chip.

Q: What memory types are compatible?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, allowing builders to choose based on motherboard and budget constraints.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9070's average benchmark score of 23,877 is within 1.2% of the GTX TITAN Z, RX 6800S, RTX 3080 Mobile, and RTX 2080 SUPER, making it statistically comparable to these older high-end cards.

# Who Should Build It

This Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 pairing targets desktop users who need a balanced system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and general productivity. The CPU's 77th percentile performance and the GPU's 69th percentile performance make this a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range build for gamers who play at 1440p with high settings, as demonstrated by titles like Call of Duty: Warzone (86 FPS at 1440p) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (49.5 FPS at 1440p).

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22,604 and Geekbench multi-core at 11,068 — for video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance support GPU-accelerated rendering and machine learning inference tasks, though the compute score of 14,737 is not class-leading.

Students and small business users who run office applications, web development tools, or virtual machines will find the 10-core, 16-thread CPU more than adequate, with PassMark integer math at 79,942 and data compression at 311,364 indicating strong throughput for typical productivity workloads. The 65 W TDP CPU also keeps power consumption reasonable for all-day operation.

For gamers targeting 4K, this system is usable but not ideal — many titles drop below 60 FPS at 3840x2160 (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 35 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 15.2 FPS). However, for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the pair delivers excellent frame rates in most titles, with esports games like Valorant (456 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (531.7 FPS at 1080p) easily exceeding high refresh rate monitor capabilities.

# Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data across 53 games at ultra settings provides a comprehensive picture of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 153.1 FPS across all titles, with a wide range from Ark: Survival Ascended at 32.7 FPS (a notoriously demanding game) to CS:GO at 531.7 FPS. The median 1080p experience is around 115 FPS, which is excellent for smooth gameplay on most monitors.

At 2560x1440, the average drops to approximately 95 FPS, with titles like Fortnite at 73 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 86 FPS, and Control at 75 FPS providing strong 1440p experiences. The most demanding 1440p titles include Ark: Survival Ascended (22.2 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (49.5 FPS), which may require settings adjustments for playable frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with the most demanding titles: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 35 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 30.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 15.2 FPS. However, lighter titles remain playable: Valorant at 374 FPS, CS:GO at 215.8 FPS, and Minecraft at 78 FPS. The data clearly shows this is a 1080p and 1440p gaming system, with 4K reserved for less demanding games or reduced quality settings.

Esports performance is exceptional across the board. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 236.8 FPS at 1080p and 88.6 FPS at 4K, while Valorant achieves 456 FPS at 1080p and 374 FPS at 4K. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 285 FPS at 1080p and 103 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate the system will fully utilize 240Hz or 360Hz monitors at 1080p in competitive titles.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400F (Raptor Lake, 10 cores, 16 threads) with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 (RDNA 4.0, Navi 48). The CPU sits in the 77th percentile among all processors, and the GPU in the 69th percentile, with a combined percentile of 73. This positions the system as a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop configuration, suitable for mainstream gaming and productivity.

The CPU's release date of January 2023 and the GPU's March 2025 release date mean this pairing combines a slightly older but proven processor with a state-of-the-art graphics card. The 65 W TDP CPU is energy-efficient, while the 220 W TDP GPU requires substantial power delivery. The pair's average FPS across all measured games is 153.1, ranking 1,113th out of 3,732 CPU-GPU pairs, placing it in the top 30% of all tested combinations.

The system is designed for users who want strong 1080p and 1440p performance without the cost of top-tier components. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities and the GPU's generous 16 GB VRAM make it a versatile choice for both gaming and creative work, though it is not optimized for 4K gaming or extreme compute workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This socket is compatible with a range of 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Intel processors, offering a clear upgrade path to higher-core-count CPUs within the same platform. The chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, ensuring compatibility with next-generation GPUs and storage devices.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, leaving significant thermal and power headroom in most motherboards. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and with the CPU's low power draw, a 550 W to 650 W power supply would provide adequate headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, which is standard for modern power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider moving to a higher-core-count Intel 13th or 14th generation CPU on the same socket, which would improve multi-threaded performance for productivity workloads. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a more powerful RDNA 4 or competing architecture would enhance 4K gaming performance, though the current GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for most games. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can upgrade memory speed without changing the motherboard, though DDR5 will require a compatible motherboard.

The platform's long-term viability is supported by the active production status of both the CPU and GPU, and the PCIe 5.0 interface ensures that storage and GPU bandwidth will not be a bottleneck for several years. The main limitation is the locked multiplier, which prevents CPU overclocking, but the 4.60 GHz boost clock is already competitive for most workloads.