SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing represents a distinctly balanced desktop configuration, landing at the 68th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU itself sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 59th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where the processor holds a clear theoretical advantage over the graphics subsystem. This gap in percentile positioning suggests that for pure computational tasks, the platform has more headroom than for graphics-bound workloads, yet the measured frame rates across a broad game library indicate the GPU is not a severe bottleneck at common resolutions. The data reveals a pairing that favors high-refresh 1080p gaming and responsive multi-threaded productivity over extreme 4K rendering demands.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core i5-13400F and Radeon RX 9060 is best understood through the lens of their respective percentile ranks. The CPU’s 77th percentile standing against all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 59th percentile, implying the processor is the more capable component in this pairing. In practical terms, this means the RX 9060 will typically be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios, while the 13400F can comfortably feed the GPU at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: at 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 110.7 FPS across 50 games, but this average masks a wide variance from 25 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended to 391 FPS in Valorant.

The scaling pattern across resolutions reveals where the bottleneck shifts. In Counter-Strike 2, performance drops from 171 FPS at 1080p to 113 FPS at 1440p and 63 FPS at 4K, a classic GPU-bound scaling curve where the CPU’s single-thread strength (a 3dmark single-thread score of 960) maintains high frame rates until the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the constraint. Conversely, in Microsoft Flight Simulator, the drop from 62 FPS at 1080p to 50 FPS at 1440p and 37 FPS at 4K is far more gradual, suggesting a workload that stresses both components more evenly. The 16-thread 3dmark score of 7314 and max-thread score of 7307 indicate the CPU has substantial parallel headroom, yet the 2-thread score of 1880 shows the importance of single-thread performance for lighter tasks.

The pair rank of 2226 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 110.7, places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all tested combinations. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (77 vs 59) is significant enough to conclude that users seeking higher frame rates in GPU-heavy titles would benefit more from a GPU upgrade than a CPU swap. However, for users playing esports titles or CPU-intensive simulations, the 13400F’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample processing power. The data suggests the bottleneck is situational: GPU-bound in most AAA titles at 1440p and above, but CPU-bound in specific high-FPS competitive scenarios where the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking is less relevant.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13400F delivers a robust multi-threaded showing with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 and a Geekbench multicore score of 11068, while its single-thread capabilities are evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1996. The Passmark suite further reinforces this profile with a multithread score of 25032 and a single-thread score of 3634. These results place the CPU at the 77th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 25292. The nearest rival comparisons show the 13400F essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (deltaPct 0), slightly behind the Intel Core 5 120 (deltaPct -0.3) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (deltaPct -0.3), and marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (deltaPct 0.4). This is a tightly contested performance band where the 13400F neither dominates nor falls behind its closest competitors.

For the Radeon RX 9060, the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 place it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. The Passmark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 provide additional context for its rendering and compute capabilities. The nearest rivals show a similar level of competition: the RX 9060 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by a negligible 0.7 percent, leads the AMD Radeon R9 370X by 1 percent, leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700 by 1 percent, and leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 2.1 percent. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative standing, yet the pairing still achieves a respectable 68th combined percentile, indicating that the system as a whole is better than roughly two-thirds of all tested configurations.

The benchmark data reveals a CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8892 nearly quadrupling its single-core result of 1255. The Passmark data compression score of 311364 and integer math score of 79942 further highlight the processor’s strength in parallel workloads. Meanwhile, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s suggest a capable 1080p performer that can handle moderate 1440p gaming but will struggle at 4K in demanding titles. The measured FPS data confirms this, with many games failing to reach 60 FPS at 3840x2160, including Cyberpunk 2077 at 25 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23 FPS.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel, featuring 10 cores and 16 threads. The core configuration includes a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it a power-efficient choice for desktop builds. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This combination of core count, clock speeds, and cache size explains the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the 3dmark 16-thread score of 7314 and the max-thread score of 7307, which are nearly identical and indicate full utilization of all 16 threads.

The single-thread performance, while lower in absolute terms, remains competitive with a 3dmark single-thread score of 960 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3634. The 2-thread score of 1880 and 4-thread score of 3459 show a linear scaling pattern that suggests the CPU handles lightly-threaded workloads efficiently. The Cinebench R15 results of 2278 (multicore) and 321 (singlecore) further demonstrate this balance, with the multicore score being roughly seven times the single-core score, which is typical for a 10-core processor. The Geekbench scores of 11068 (multicore) and 1996 (singlecore) provide a cross-platform comparison point, showing the CPU performs well in both productivity and everyday tasks.

The 13400F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support for 16 CPU lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe drives. The CPU lacks integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already accounted for in this pairing. The 65 W TDP and active production status suggest this is a mainstream component with broad compatibility. The Passmark extended instructions score of 19847 and floating point math score of 60539 indicate strong SIMD performance, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideally suited for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or solid 1440p performance, as the measured FPS data shows an average of 110.7 FPS across games at 1080p. Esports titles like Valorant (391 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (377 FPS at 1080p) will run exceptionally well, making this a strong choice for competitive players. The CPU’s 16 threads and high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 22604) make it equally capable for content creators who edit video or work with large datasets. The Passmark data compression score of 311364 suggests fast file archiving and compression tasks, while the integer math score of 79942 benefits software developers compiling code.

For students and small business workstations, the 65 W TDP and 10-core configuration offer a balance of performance and efficiency that handles office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and light programming without excessive power draw. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors on the market, making it a future-proof choice for general-purpose use. However, the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking means users who prioritize 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering should consider this pairing only if they accept the limitations, as the RX 9060 achieves sub-30 FPS in several demanding titles at 3840x2160.

The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives builders flexibility in choosing a motherboard and RAM configuration based on their budget and performance needs. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures compatibility with the latest storage devices, while the 16 CPU lanes provide sufficient bandwidth for a single high-end GPU. This pairing is not intended for extreme overclocking, as the multiplier is locked, but the boost clock of 4.60 GHz already provides strong out-of-the-box performance. Overall, this build targets the sweet spot of mainstream gaming and productivity, where the CPU’s strength compensates for the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using a 4 nm process from TSMC, featuring the Navi 44 chip with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The GPU comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the core clocks range from a 1700 MHz base to a 2400 MHz game clock and a 2990 MHz boost clock. This configuration delivers an FP32 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS and an FP16 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1), which positions the GPU as a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p performer.

The shader configuration includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 28 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can handle high-resolution textures and effects reasonably well for its class. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure modern game APIs are fully supported, while the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 12 score of 44 show varying performance across API generations. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 39476 provides additional evidence of the GPU’s compute capabilities.

The 59th percentile ranking places the RX 9060 in the mid-range segment, with benchmark scores that nearly match the RTX 3060 Ti (deltaPct -0.7) and slightly exceed the RX 7700 (deltaPct 1). This suggests the GPU competes with previous-generation mid-range cards rather than current high-end offerings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures but may become a limitation at higher resolutions in VRAM-hungry titles. The 132 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU make this a power-efficient choice that can be paired with modest power supplies, while the dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector simplify installation.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance across 50 titles at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most games, with an average of 110.7 FPS. Esports titles excel: Valorant hits 391 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 171 FPS. Competitive shooters like Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (203 FPS) and Call of Duty: Warzone (141 FPS) also perform strongly. However, demanding AAA titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 50 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 25 FPS at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops to roughly 60-70 FPS across the library, with Valorant still producing 334 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 260 FPS. More demanding games struggle to maintain 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 38 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16 FPS. The 1440p resolution is playable for most titles, but users should expect to lower settings in the most graphically intensive games. At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become pronounced, with an average of roughly 40 FPS across titles, and many games falling below 30 FPS, including Cyberpunk 2077 (25 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (23 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (8 FPS).

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent pattern of roughly halving at each resolution step for most games, indicating a GPU-bound scenario. However, some titles like Call of Duty: Warzone (141 to 107 FPS) and Overpower (69 to 52 FPS) show less dramatic drops, suggesting CPU involvement in frame generation. For users with high-refresh 1080p monitors, this pairing delivers an excellent experience in competitive and less demanding titles. For 1440p, the system is best suited for medium to high settings in most games, while 4K gaming should be reserved for older or less demanding titles or with significant graphical compromises.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the choice of using existing DDR4 modules or investing in newer DDR5 for potential bandwidth advantages. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the latest GPUs and storage solutions. The platform’s memory support is dual-channel, and while the specific bandwidth is not listed, the architecture supports high-speed memory kits that can improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 132 W TDP of the GPU combine for a total system power draw that is manageable with the 300 W suggested PSU, though users with additional drives or peripherals may prefer a slightly larger power supply.

The upgrade path from this configuration is straightforward but limited by the LGA 1700 socket’s lifecycle. Users can upgrade the CPU to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor without changing the motherboard, which would improve multi-threaded performance further. The GPU can be upgraded to a higher-tier Radeon RX 9000 series card or a competing NVIDIA offering, with the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. The 8 GB VRAM on the RX 9060 may become a limiting factor in future games, so users planning for high-resolution or VRAM-heavy workloads should consider a GPU with more memory as a future upgrade.

The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can upgrade memory without replacing the motherboard, though moving to DDR5 would require new modules. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future storage devices that can take advantage of higher bandwidth. The 65 W CPU TDP means cooling requirements are modest, allowing for smaller air coolers, while the GPU’s 132 W TDP and single 8-pin connector make it compatible with a wide range of power supplies. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute throughput, as the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking suggests it can support a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing achieves the 68th combined percentile across all tested CPU-GPU combinations, indicating it performs better than roughly two-thirds of all configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The 13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (deltaPct 0), slightly behind the Intel Core 5 120 (deltaPct -0.3) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (deltaPct -0.3), and marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (deltaPct 0.4).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What frame rate can I expect in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 50 FPS. At 2560x1440 it drops to 38 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 25 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13400F has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), meaning it cannot be overclocked beyond its factory boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Radeon RX 9060 is 300 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 132 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP in this pairing.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 trails the RTX 3060 Ti by a negligible 0.7 percent in average benchmark score, placing them in the same performance tier.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing excels at 1080p with esports titles like Valorant (391 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (171 FPS) easily exceeding 144 Hz. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 960 and the GPU’s balanced compute ensure competitive frame rates, though demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (50 FPS at 1080p) require settings adjustments for 144 Hz displays. Streaming gameplay benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads, which handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604.

Video editing workflows see strong performance from the CPU’s multi-core capabilities, with the Passmark integer math score of 79942 and floating point score of 60539 accelerating encoding and effects processing. The GPU’s 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance aids in GPU-accelerated rendering and AI effects. 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya would rely more on the CPU’s 10 cores, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8892 indicating solid render times, while the GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores provide assistance for viewport and final frame ray tracing.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads for compilation and the Passmark data compression score of 311364 for large codebase management. The platform’s DDR4 and DDR5 support allows developers to choose memory capacity and speed based on project needs. Student and office workloads are well-served by the CPU’s single-thread score of 3634 for everyday tasks and the GPU’s 1002 Passmark G2D score for 2D acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP makes this a quiet and cool-running system suitable for shared spaces, while the GPU’s 132 W TDP keeps energy costs reasonable for daily use.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 constitute a desktop-class build (buildClass is desktop) that targets the mainstream performance segment. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, provides strong multi-threaded performance at the 77th percentile, while the GPU, with 8 GB VRAM and RDNA 4.0 architecture, offers mid-range graphics capability at the 59th percentile. Together, they achieve the 68th combined percentile, making this a well-rounded system for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks. The pair rank of 2226 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 110.7 across 50 games, confirms its position as a capable but not top-tier configuration.

The CPU’s leadership in this pairing means the system excels in CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, compilation, and data processing, while the GPU’s performance is adequate for most gaming at 1080p and moderate 1440p. The balanced nature of this build is reflected in its power requirements: the CPU’s 65 W TDP and GPU’s 132 W TDP can be handled by a 300 W PSU, making it an efficient choice for a wide range of users. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 storage provides flexibility for future upgrades, though the LGA 1700 socket limits CPU upgrade options to the 13th generation family. Overall, this pairing represents a sensible mid-range desktop configuration that prioritizes multi-threaded processing power while delivering competent gaming performance.