SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX pairing represents a striking asymmetry in the desktop hardware landscape. The CPU, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part, sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, a 24 GB RDNA 3 flagship, occupies the 64th percentile of all GPUs. This division of labor results in a combined percentile of 71, placing the system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The i5-13400F, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its class, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 and a single-core score of 3191. The GPU, with 6144 shading units and 96 ray accelerators, provides massive raw compute, yet its benchmark score positions it closer to mid-range rivals than its specifications suggest. This is a machine built around the graphics card, with the CPU serving as a capable but not excessive partner.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². Its configuration of 10 cores and 16 threads leverages a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the performance/efficiency core split. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering platform flexibility, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. With a 65 W TDP, it is a power-conscious choice for a desktop build, and its lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 960 in single-thread to 7314 in 16-thread tests, with a max-thread score of 7307, indicating that the 16-thread ceiling is reached efficiently. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 22604 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 3191, demonstrating strong parallel scaling for rendering workloads. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with a multicore score of 11068 versus a single-core score of 1996. The PassMark multithread score of 25032, combined with an integer math score of 79942 and floating-point math of 60539, suggests robust performance in compute-heavy tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, scores 25284, a negligible 0% delta, placing the i5-13400F in a competitive position against a mobile flagship part. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are also within 0.3% of its average score, indicating that this CPU is a solid mid-tier performer rather than a top-tier champion.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread strength (960 in 3DMark single-thread) supports high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, which hits 296.9 FPS, and Valorant at 140 FPS. The GPU is more than capable, but the CPU can keep up with the demand for high FPS in less demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604, provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. PassMark data compression (311364) and encryption (16608) scores indicate solid throughput for encoding streams, though a dedicated encoder on the GPU could offload this work.

Video editing: The multicore performance is adequate for 4K timeline editing, with Geekbench multicore at 11068 and PassMark multithread at 25032. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large file operations, and the dual-channel memory bus, while not the fastest available, supports DDR5 for higher bandwidth.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multicore at 8892 and R15 multicore at 2278 show that the CPU can handle moderate rendering tasks, but for final-frame renders, the GPU’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the primary accelerator. The CPU is not the bottleneck here, but it is not the main engine either.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 79942 and extended instructions score of 19847 indicate strong performance for code compilation and hash operations. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3634 in PassMark ensures responsive UI interactions.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for basic tasks, but its 65 W TDP and support for DDR4 memory make it a cost-effective choice for a workstation that occasionally needs to handle more intensive loads. The Geekbench single-core score of 1996 ensures snappy application launches and document editing.

FAQ

Q: Does the Core i5-13400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the fact pack lists `integratedGraphics` as null, meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7900 XTX?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, thanks to a 384-bit bus and 24 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 20 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The RX 7900 XTX has a TDP of 355 W and a suggested PSU of 750 W, requiring two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Can the CPU support PCIe Gen 5 devices?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the release date of the GPU?

A: The RX 7900 XTX was released on 2022-11-02, and its production status is now end-of-life.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which is 20 MB total, as the `totalL3` field is null.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-bound performance over CPU headroom. Gamers at 2560x1440 or 3840x2160 will see the RX 7900 XTX deliver playable frame rates in demanding titles, such as 67.9 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p and 41.6 FPS at 4K, where the CPU’s role diminishes. Content creators working with 4K video and GPU-accelerated renders will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM, which handles large textures and complex scenes without overflow. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and high integer math score, though they may not need the GPU’s full compute power. Students building a versatile desktop for coursework and casual gaming will find the 65 W CPU efficient, but the GPU’s 355 W TDP and dual-slot size require a spacious case. Small business workstations running CAD or data analysis software can leverage the GPU’s OpenCL score of 50465 for parallel workloads, while the CPU handles typical office tasks with ease. This is not a build for those seeking a balanced, entry-level system; it is a GPU-first configuration for users who know their workloads scale with graphics power.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, confirmed as `dataIsMeasured`, reveals a system that excels at high-refresh 1080p gaming but shows limitations at 4K in the most demanding titles. In esports and light titles, the pair dominates: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 649.5 FPS at 1080p, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 352 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 292 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in low-overhead scenarios. At 1440p, the system remains strong, with Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS and Fortnite at 87.1 FPS, making it a solid choice for high-refresh 1440p monitors. However, at 4K, the GPU’s raw power is tested: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 41.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a stutter-prone 14 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 178.9, and the pair ranks 593rd out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the 84th percentile of all tested configurations. For gamers, the sweet spot is 1440p ultra, where most titles exceed 60 FPS, while 4K is viable only for less demanding or older games like Assetto Corsa (72.8 FPS) and Roblox (144.3 FPS).

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a 5 nm part from TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is essential for high-resolution textures. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, along with 96 ray accelerators for hardware ray tracing. Its compute performance is substantial: FP32 at 61.39 TFLOPS and FP16 at 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1), making it a powerhouse for compute workloads. The pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s support high fill rates in 4K gaming. However, benchmark scores present a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6841, but PassMark G3D is 31238, and Geekbench OpenCL is 50465. The GPU’s percentile rank of 64 is surprisingly low for a flagship, and its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (avg score 19334, delta 0.4%) and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp (avg score 19177, delta 1.2%). This suggests that the RX 7900 XTX underperforms in certain synthetic benchmarks relative to its specifications, possibly due to driver maturity or test methodology. For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage over 8-12 GB competitors, allowing for massive scenes in 3D applications, while the 96 RT cores provide acceptable, though not class-leading, ray tracing performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most modern games, but the CPU can limit performance in specific scenarios. At 1080p, where CPU load is higher, the i5-13400F’s single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark supports high frame rates, but the gap between esports titles (649.5 FPS in CS:GO) and AAA titles (87.5 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077) shows that the GPU’s rendering load is the limiting factor. In 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, as seen in Ark: Survival Ascended (14 FPS) and The Medium (41 FPS), where the CPU’s 16 threads are underutilized. However, the CPU’s percentile rank of 77 versus the GPU’s 64 suggests that in lighter workloads, the CPU could hold back the GPU. For example, in a CPU-bound game like Valorant, the 1080p score of 140 FPS is lower than expected from the GPU, indicating that the CPU’s single-thread performance (3634 in PassMark single-thread) is the constraint. Conversely, in GPU-bound titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (76.9 FPS at 1080p), the CPU has ample headroom. The pair’s average FPS of 178.9 across games and its rank of 593 out of 3732 pairs show that this is a high-performing combination, but the balance is skewed: the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a competent supporting actor that occasionally limits peak performance in low-resolution, high-FPS scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a mid-range 13th Gen Intel Core i5 processor with a flagship Radeon RX 7000 series GPU. The CPU, with a 65 W TDP and 10 cores, is designed for mainstream performance, while the GPU, with a 355 W TDP and dual-slot cooler, is a power-hungry enthusiast component. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU’s 77th percentile rank indicates it is better than most CPUs, but not a top-tier part, while the GPU’s 64th percentile is below what its specifications would suggest, implying that the system’s overall tier is dragged down by the GPU’s benchmark performance. In practice, this is a high-end gaming machine that excels at 1440p, with the CPU providing a solid foundation without being the main attraction. The build is not balanced in the traditional sense—the GPU is overqualified for the CPU—but for users who prioritize graphics fidelity, this pairing delivers excellent results, as evidenced by the 178.9 average FPS across games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its score, including the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.3% delta), indicating that the i5-13400F is a well-rounded performer that trades blows with mobile and desktop parts. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19410, placing it in the 64th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (19334, 0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19602, -1% delta), which are significantly older and less powerful parts. This suggests that the RX 7900 XTX’s benchmark scores are anomalous for its class, possibly due to the specific tests used. In combined terms, the pair’s performance is strong: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 indicate a system capable of handling both productivity and gaming. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 25032 complements the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 31238, providing a balanced overall picture that exceeds the sum of its parts in real-world gaming, as shown by the 178.9 average FPS.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides an upgrade path for memory, though the fact pack does not specify maximum capacity. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, leaving the Gen 5 bandwidth available for future NVMe drives or other devices. The GPU has a TDP of 355 W and a suggested PSU of 750 W, meaning the system has headroom for a CPU upgrade to a higher-core part within the same socket, as long as power delivery is sufficient. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, so a more powerful CPU could be installed without exceeding the PSU’s capacity, though the 750 W recommendation is for the GPU alone. Memory support for DDR5 offers a clear upgrade path from DDR4, potentially improving bandwidth for both CPU and GPU workloads. The GPU’s end-of-life status means it is not a candidate for future upgrades, but its 24 GB VRAM ensures it will remain relevant for years. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i7 or i9 from the same generation, to better match the GPU’s raw power in CPU-bound scenarios. Alternatively, adding a second NVMe SSD with PCIe Gen 5 support would leverage the CPU’s unused lanes. The platform’s flexibility in memory and storage, combined with the GPU’s ample VRAM, makes this a solid foundation for a long-lived system, with the CPU being the primary upgrade target to unlock more performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400F

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Minecraft

Minecraft: Java Edition

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds