SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-13400F's socket and what memory does it support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU does not support ECC memory.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i5-13400F have?

A: The Core i5-13400F has 10 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 2.50 GHz, and it boosts up to 4.60 GHz. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 83. The CPU alone sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the RX 6950 XT's power requirement and physical size?

A: The RX 6950 XT has a TDP of 335 W and requires a suggested 700 W power supply. It is a triple-slot card, measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, and requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the i5-13400F in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with a score of 25284, a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 120 (25362) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365) are both 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201) is 0.4% ahead.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the dominant performance component. The RX 6950 XT sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, which is 11 points higher than the i5-13400F's 77th percentile among CPUs. This gap suggests that in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the graphics card will be the primary performance driver, with the CPU potentially being the limiting factor in certain scenarios.

Looking at the CPU's threading scaling, the 3DMark scores show a clear progression: 1880 at 2 threads, 3459 at 4 threads, 5591 at 8 threads, and 7307 at max threads. The jump from 8 threads to max threads (7314 at 16 threads) is only a 30.7% improvement, indicating that the CPU's scaling efficiency diminishes beyond 8 threads. This means that in lightly-threaded workloads, the single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark becomes more relevant, and the CPU's boost clock of 4.60 GHz will matter more.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 throughput of 23.65 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s further emphasizes that the RX 6950 XT is built for heavy rasterization and compute loads. In gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck, as the CPU's multi-threaded scores are strong enough to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios — such as high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p or physics-heavy simulation games — the i5-13400F's 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache will be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 1437 and the find prime numbers score of 83 indicate that the CPU's integer and physics performance is respectable but not class-leading. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5591 versus the max-thread score of 7307 suggests that games using more than 8 threads will see some benefit, but the gains taper off.

For productive workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 shows strong parallel performance, while the single-core score of 3191 is competitive. In these scenarios, the CPU and GPU can work in parallel, with the GPU handling rendering and the CPU managing encoding and scene logic. The bottleneck will depend on the specific software's optimization for multi-threading versus GPU acceleration.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 14199, compared to the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25032, provides a quantitative basis for understanding workload distribution. For tasks that are purely GPU-compute heavy, the RX 6950 XT will dominate. For tasks that rely on CPU integer math (PassMark integer score of 79942) or floating-point operations (60539), the i5-13400F will be the more active component.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the i5-13400F's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191) and the RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile GPU ranking makes this system well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM provide ample headroom for modern titles, though the CPU's 16 threads will be the ceiling in esports titles that favor single-thread performance.

Streaming: For streaming, the CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache provide sufficient headroom for x264 encoding at moderate presets. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8892 and PassMark multithread score of 25032 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding, though dedicated GPU encoding via the RX 6950 XT's hardware is also an option given its DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Video Editing: The i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with the RX 6950 XT's compute capabilities (23.65 TFLOPS FP32), make this a capable editing workstation. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11068 suggests good responsiveness in timeline scrubbing and effect previews, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM accommodates large projects and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the i5-13400F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 places it in a strong position for moderate render workloads. For GPU-based renderers, the RX 6950 XT's 5120 shading units and 80 ray accelerators provide substantial compute power, as reflected in its Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 311364 and random string sorting score of 32076 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable during long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: For everyday productivity, the i5-13400F's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3634) ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking. The GPU is massively overkill for this scenario, but the system's overall 83rd combined percentile means it will handle any office workload with ease, from spreadsheet calculations to video conferencing.

Who Should Build It

This build targets enthusiasts and professionals who require high GPU performance without compromising on CPU capabilities. The RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth shine. The i5-13400F's 77th percentile CPU performance ensures that the system won't be CPU-limited in most gaming scenarios.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU's compute power. The Geekbench Metal score of 222653 and Vulkan score of 165212 indicate strong cross-platform compute performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and the PassMark data encryption score of 16608, which suggests good security and compression workloads.

Small business workstations that need to handle both productivity and occasional rendering or CAD work would find this pairing suitable. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, while the GPU's triple-slot design and 700 W PSU suggestion indicate the need for a robust power delivery system. The system's 83rd combined percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations across a broad range of tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13400F achieves an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (+0.4%). This indicates that the i5-13400F sits in a highly competitive performance tier where differences of less than 1% separate it from its peers.

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 58392, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, -0.2%), Intel Arc A570M (58239, +0.3%), AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, -0.5%), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, +0.5%). The GPU's average score is more than double the CPU's, reflecting the graphics card's dominant role in this pairing.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the i5-13400F shows consistent scaling across tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 versus the single-core score of 3191 yields a multi-to-single ratio of 7.08, indicating strong parallel efficiency. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11068 against a single-core score of 1996 yields a ratio of 5.55, which is lower but still respectable. The 3DMark scores show a similar pattern: single-thread score of 960 scales to 7314 at max threads, a 7.62x improvement.

For the GPU, the PassMark G3D score of 28070 is the headline figure, complemented by a PassMark G2D score of 1063. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming metric. The Geekbench compute scores — Metal at 222653, OpenCL at 205998, and Vulkan at 165212 — show that the GPU is particularly strong in Metal and OpenCL environments, which is relevant for macOS and general compute workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU's 88th percentile performance provides the headline capability, while the CPU's 77th percentile ensures no significant bottleneck in most applications. The combined percentile of 83 reflects this balanced-but-GPU-forward configuration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates at 1440p in most modern titles. The RX 6950 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory bandwidth for high-resolution textures, while its 5120 shading units handle pixel processing efficiently.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes the critical metric. This suggests that the RX 6950 XT can sustain high pixel throughput at 4K, though frame rates will naturally be lower than at 1440p. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking at 4K, where GPU load dominates.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3634 in PassMark and the 3DMark 4-thread score of 3459 indicate that the i5-13400F can push high frame rates, but the GPU's performance will be the limiting factor in less-demanding titles. The RX 6950 XT's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 300 and DirectX 12 score of 114 suggest that the GPU is optimized for modern APIs and may show relative weakness in older DirectX 9/10 titles.

Given the GPU's 88th percentile standing, the estimated gaming performance is expected to be in the top 15% of all desktop systems for gaming workloads. The 16 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for upcoming titles that may require more than 12 GB of memory at high settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This L3 cache size is significant for gaming and productivity workloads, as it reduces the need to access system memory. The CPU does not have an integrated GPU, requiring a discrete graphics card for display output.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 is particularly strong for a 65 W part, indicating that the 10 cores and 16 threads are well-utilized. The PassMark multithread score of 25032 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 7307 corroborate this strength.

Single-thread performance is also competitive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3634 show that the boost clock of 4.60 GHz is effective. The 3DMark single-thread score of 960 is lower than some rivals but still respectable.

The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, matches its average score almost exactly (25284 vs. 25292, a 0% delta). This is notable because the Ryzen 9 6900HS is a mobile processor, while the i5-13400F is a desktop part, suggesting that the Intel chip's desktop platform advantages are offset by the AMD chip's higher core count (8 cores vs. 10 cores but different architecture efficiency).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the dual-channel configuration means that two DIMMs are recommended for optimal bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the latest graphics cards and NVMe SSDs.

The RX 6950 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's 335 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU indicate that a robust power supply is necessary. The triple-slot design and 267 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance.

The upgrade path on the Socket 1700 platform is limited, as this socket is associated with the 13th generation Core series. However, the CPU's 65 W TDP means that users can potentially upgrade to higher-TDP processors within the same socket family without changing the motherboard, provided the VRM and cooling support it.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the RX 6950 XT is at the 88th percentile and the CPU has headroom to support faster graphics cards. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that future GPUs will not be bandwidth-limited. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could benefit memory-sensitive workloads.

The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU's memory controller is dual-channel, so the memory bandwidth is determined by the RAM modules' speed and the number of channels used.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, creating a system that sits at the 83rd combined percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU, at the 77th percentile, and the GPU, at the 88th percentile, form a pairing where the graphics card is clearly the dominant component.

The build class is desktop, indicating a full-size tower or similar form factor. The GPU's triple-slot design and 335 W TDP necessitate a case with good airflow and a power supply rated at least 700 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP allows for a moderate air cooler, though the system's overall power draw will be significant due to the GPU.

This is a high-performance pairing that targets gamers and content creators who prioritize GPU-intensive workloads. The 10-core CPU provides enough processing power for modern games and productivity applications, while the 16 GB VRAM GPU handles high-resolution textures and complex compute tasks.

The overall tier is upper-midrange to high-end, given the GPU's 88th percentile ranking. The CPU, while not top-tier, is more than adequate for the GPU's performance level, ensuring that the system operates without significant bottlenecks in most scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The chip contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². This is an end-of-life product, with its predecessor being Navi and its successor being Navi III.

The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations pipelines. It features 80 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The base clock is 1860 MHz, with a game clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, delivering 18 Gbps effective throughput across a 256-bit bus for a total bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is substantial, providing ample capacity for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s indicate strong rasterization throughput. The FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) make this a capable compute card.

In benchmark tests, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 28070 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 14199. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 provides a modern gaming metric. The Geekbench scores — Metal at 222653, OpenCL at 205998, and Vulkan at 165212 — show strong cross-platform compute performance, with Metal and OpenCL being particularly strong.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores slightly higher at 58528 (a -0.2% delta), indicating that the RX 6950 XT is competitive with enterprise-grade NVIDIA parts. The Intel Arc A570M is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 0.5% ahead, showing that the RX 6950 XT sits in a tightly contested performance bracket.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 80 ray accelerators provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphical features. The Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support make it versatile across different rendering APIs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors.