SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is a high-performance desktop combination that sits at the 82nd percentile overall. This pairing leverages a strong 10-core Raptor Lake CPU with a flagship RDNA 2 GPU, creating a system geared toward high-resolution gaming and demanding productivity tasks. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact configuration, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this CPU+GPU combination, the following analysis is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 and a Passmark G3D score of 26732, positions itself in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This level of graphics performance indicates a card capable of driving modern titles at high detail settings, particularly at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for large textures and high-resolution assets.

The CPU side of the gaming equation is handled by the Intel Core i5-13400F, whose single-threaded performance is represented by a 3DMark single-thread score of 960 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191. These scores suggest the processor can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios without becoming a major bottleneck, especially in titles that are not heavily reliant on multi-core scaling. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provides solid responsiveness for game logic and physics calculations.

At 1080p resolution, the RX 6900 XT is likely to be the primary driver of frame rates, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensuring that minimum frame rates remain stable. The Passmark single-thread score of 3634 reinforces the CPU's capability in this regard. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the system should deliver very high frame rates in most esports and competitive titles, though the exact figures depend on the specific game and its optimization.

At 1440p, this pairing is estimated to be particularly well-balanced. The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 720.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle the increased resolution load, while the CPU continues to provide sufficient data to the graphics card. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5591 indicates that the processor's multi-threaded capabilities are sufficient for modern game engines that utilize multiple cores for streaming and background tasks.

For 4K gaming, the RX 6900 XT is expected to be the limiting factor, as is typical for most systems at this resolution. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a positive indicator for 4K textures, and the 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests strong fill-rate performance. However, achieving high refresh rates at 4K in demanding titles will likely require settings adjustments. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores indicate a system well-suited for high-fidelity gaming at 1440p and competent 4K performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13400F achieves an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, scores 25284, showing a delta of 0%. This indicates the i5-13400F performs nearly identically to a high-end mobile Ryzen 9 processor in aggregate benchmarks. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362, a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365, also a -0.3% delta, meaning the i5-13400F trails these two desktop chips by a razor-thin margin. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a 0.4% delta in favor of the Intel part.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i5-13400F demonstrates strong performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11068. The Passmark multithread score of 25032 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 7307 further corroborate its multi-threading prowess. The Passmark integer math score of 79942 and floating-point math score of 60539 show a balanced execution unit design, while the data compression score of 311364 and encryption score of 16608 highlight specific workload strengths.

Single-threaded performance is equally respectable, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1996 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3634. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1880 indicate strong per-core efficiency, which is crucial for legacy applications and lightly-threaded games. The 3DMark 4-thread score of 3459 and 8-thread score of 5591 show a steady scaling curve as thread counts increase, culminating in the near-linear jump to 7314 at max threads.

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 50951, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, scores 51790, a -1.6% delta in favor of the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, a 1.9% delta, meaning the RX 6900 XT beats it by that margin. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, a 2% delta, and the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, a 2.4% delta, both trailing the RX 6900 XT.

In compute benchmarks, the RX 6900 XT shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673 and a Vulkan score of 148525, with a Metal score of 177021. The Passmark G3D score of 26732 is notably strong, while the GPU compute score of 14547 indicates solid non-graphics compute capabilities. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 113 and DirectX 11 score of 279 are relatively lower compared to the G3D score, suggesting the card's performance is more consistent in raw graphics throughput than in specific API-bound tests.

The combined picture from these scores is a system where the CPU and GPU are both above-average performers relative to their respective markets. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 82. This suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the CPU is not a weak link.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the i5-13400F's single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 and 960 in 3DMark single-thread should provide sufficient frame pacing for high-refresh monitors. The GPU's 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance are strong indicators for pushing very high frame rates in less demanding titles, though exact numbers are estimates.

Streaming: The 10 cores and 16 threads of the i5-13400F, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604, provide enough parallel processing headroom to encode video while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 16608 and data compression score of 311364 suggest the CPU can handle the encoding overhead without significantly impacting game performance, though a dedicated encoder would offload this entirely.

Video Editing: Multi-threaded performance is critical for video editing, and the i5-13400F delivers with a Geekbench multi-core score of 11068 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 7307. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth can accelerate effects rendering and timeline scrubbing. The Passmark floating-point math score of 60539 indicates strong number-crunching ability for video processing tasks.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8892 and R15 multi-core score of 2278 demonstrate the CPU's capability in CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU's 5120 shading units and 80 ray-tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers, with the 46.08 TFLOPS FP16 performance being particularly relevant for certain rendering algorithms.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from multi-threading, and the Passmark integer math score of 79942 and multithread score of 25032 suggest strong performance in code compilation. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, and the DDR4/DDR5 memory support allows for flexible system configuration.

Student and Office Work: The i5-13400F's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1880 and Passmark single-thread score of 3634 are more than adequate for typical productivity applications. The GPU's capabilities are excessive for basic office work, but the system would handle any document processing, spreadsheet calculations, or presentation creation with ease. The 65W CPU TDP suggests efficient operation during light loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility in system building, allowing users to choose between established DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation use cases that require error correction.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This is a significant feature for future expansion, as it allows for the installation of PCIe Gen 5 SSDs or other high-bandwidth devices. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slot and does not bottleneck the RX 6900 XT's bandwidth requirements.

The suggested PSU for this system is 700 W, which accounts for the GPU's 300 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, with dimensions of 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. These physical constraints are important for case compatibility and cable management planning.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count CPU within the Socket 1700 family, as the i5-13400F's 10-core configuration can be surpassed by processors with more cores for heavily parallel workloads. The motherboard's memory support determines whether DDR4 or DDR5 upgrades are possible, and the PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that next-generation storage devices can be added without hardware changes. The GPU can also be upgraded to a newer model when available, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is forward-compatible.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-13400F and the RX 6900 XT is characterized by the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 77th percentile indicates that the graphics card has more headroom above its competition. In gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the increased pixel count places more demand on the graphics card than the CPU.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU becomes more relevant to frame rates. The i5-13400F's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191, is sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks in most titles. However, in highly CPU-intensive games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the CPU could limit maximum frame rates. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 83 is a low score, which might indicate weaker integer-heavy single-thread operations, but this specific test is less representative of gaming workloads.

For productivity tasks, the balance shifts depending on the application. Multi-threaded workloads like video editing and 3D rendering will utilize both components, with the CPU's 16 threads handling task scheduling and physics while the GPU accelerates rendering. The CPU's Passmark physics score of 1437 suggests it can handle physics simulations that are common in games and some professional applications. The GPU's compute score of 14547 in Passmark indicates it can offload significant parallel processing from the CPU.

The memory subsystem plays a role in bottleneck dynamics. The CPU's 20 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support help maintain data flow to the cores. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM at 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture and geometry data is readily available for rendering, reducing the likelihood of GPU-side stutters in memory-intensive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 82, placing it above the vast majority of systems in the database.

Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS in average benchmark scores?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS has a score of 25284, resulting in a 0% delta and essentially identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RX 6900 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the i5-13400F support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through its dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6900 XT is 700 W, which accounts for the GPU's 300 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz.

Q: How does the RX 6900 XT compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark scores?

A: The RX 6900 XT has an average score of 50951, while the RTX 5070 Ti has a score of 49957, showing a 2% delta in favor of the AMD card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The processor has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported through traditional means.

The CPU's single-threaded performance is represented by a 3DMark single-thread score of 960 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191. These numbers indicate that the Raptor Lake cores are efficient at executing lightly-threaded tasks, which is important for legacy software and many game engines. The Geekbench single-core score of 1996 and Passmark single-thread score of 3634 reinforce this assessment. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1880 shows that dual-thread performance scales well from the single-thread baseline.

Multi-threaded performance is where the 10-core configuration shines. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 is nearly identical to the max-threads score of 7307, indicating that the processor reaches its full multi-threading potential with 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 is particularly strong for a 65 W processor, suggesting efficient power delivery to all cores. The Passmark multithread score of 25032 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11068 provide additional confirmation of its parallel processing capabilities.

The Passmark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 79942 and floating-point math score of 60539 show a balanced ALU and FPU design. The data compression score of 311364 and encryption score of 16608 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 19847 and random string sorting score of 32076 further demonstrate the CPU's versatility. The physics score of 1437 and find prime numbers score of 83 are lower, but these are niche workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. The CPU is from the Core 13th Gen series, released in January 2023, and remains in active production. The GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on the Navi 21 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, and is marked as end-of-life with a release date in October 2020. The system's overall tier is established by the 82nd combined percentile, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

The build represents a pairing of a mid-range, high-efficiency processor with a former flagship graphics card. The i5-13400F's 65 W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice, while the RX 6900 XT's 300 W TDP is characteristic of a high-performance GPU. The GPU's triple-slot design and 267 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance and airflow. The 2x 8-pin power connectors and 700 W suggested PSU indicate a system that needs a quality power supply.

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform with broad motherboard availability. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives builders flexibility in component selection. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking, even though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring that future high-bandwidth peripherals can be accommodated. The CPU's lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides.

Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for gamers targeting 1440p resolution as their primary gaming platform. The RX 6900 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the i5-13400F's strong single-thread performance, make it capable of delivering high frame rates at this resolution in most titles. Gamers at 4K will also find this system competent, though the GPU will be the limiting factor for achieving very high refresh rates. For 1080p competitive gaming, this build provides more than enough performance, potentially exceeding the refresh rate capabilities of many monitors.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering applications will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide a solid foundation for rendering tasks. The 16 GB of VRAM is particularly useful for working with large textures or high-resolution video timelines. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded performance, with the Passmark integer math score of 79942 indicating strong compilation throughput.

Students and professionals engaged in general office work will find this system overqualified for their needs, but it offers headroom for any future workloads. The CPU's efficiency at 65 W TDP makes it suitable for builds where power consumption is a consideration. Small business workstations that occasionally need to handle more demanding tasks, such as light video editing or CAD work, would benefit from this combination. The system's performance is not limited to gaming, making it a versatile choice for mixed-use scenarios where both productivity and entertainment are priorities.