SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 pairing sits at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a well-matched system that avoids severe component starvation. The data shows a balanced partnership: the CPU ranks at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards. This near-identical percentile positioning — a two-point gap — suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which is the hallmark of a bottleneck-free configuration for most workloads.

Benchmark results reveal the CPU's scaling characteristics across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 960 in single-thread, to 1,880 in 2-thread, 3,459 in 4-thread, 5,591 in 8-thread, and 7,307 at max threads. This scaling pattern demonstrates strong multi-threaded headroom — the 8-thread score is 5.8 times the single-thread score, indicating the 10-core/16-thread configuration effectively utilizes additional cores. The 16-thread score of 7,314 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7,307, confirming that all 16 threads are fully engaged without significant contention.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 versus a single-core score of 3,191 produces a 7.1x scaling ratio. For gaming workloads, this means the CPU can deliver high single-thread performance for game logic while still possessing massive multi-thread reserves for background tasks, streaming, and content creation. The GPU, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides 202.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate, ensuring that at standard gaming resolutions the graphics pipeline rarely stalls waiting on the CPU.

The Passmark multithread score of 25,032 versus single-thread score of 3,634 shows an 6.9x scaling ratio, consistent with the Cinebench results. The data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU in GPU-bound scenarios — the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,067 and the CPU's Passmark physics score of 1,437 indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming situations. However, in highly CPU-intensive titles at lower resolutions, the i5-13400F's single-thread performance — ranked against rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with a 0% delta — could become the limiting factor before the RX 6800 reaches its ceiling.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25,292, which is essentially identical to the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 25,284 — a 0% delta. This means the two processors deliver statistically equivalent overall performance despite coming from different architectures and market segments.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 has an average benchmark score of 30,095, placing it 0.5% ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti's 29,945. This indicates the RX 6800 slightly edges out the RTX 3070 Ti in overall GPU benchmarks, making them direct competitors in the same performance tier.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this pairing?

A: The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, suggesting the CPU is marginally stronger relative to its own market, but the two-point gap is small enough that neither component consistently dominates the other in real-world workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The i5-13400F runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 4.60 GHz, but users cannot manually increase the multiplier beyond factory settings. Performance tuning is therefore limited to memory and power adjustments rather than core clock overclocking.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i5-13400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more established DDR4 platforms or newer DDR5 for potentially higher bandwidth, depending on motherboard selection.

Q: What is the suggested power supply requirement for the GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 6800 has a TDP of 250 W and the manufacturer suggests a 600 W power supply. This headroom accommodates the GPU's peak power draw along with the rest of the system components without requiring an oversized PSU.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D?

A: The i5-13400F scores 25,292 on average, while the Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25,365 — a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Ryzen 5 5600X3D is marginally faster by about 0.3%. The two CPUs are effectively performance peers, with differences well within run-to-run variance.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 configuration places it at the 76th percentile overall among all desktop and laptop pairings. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,292, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 30,095. These scores position the system firmly in the upper-midrange tier of computing hardware.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 is its strongest rendering result, while the single-core score of 3,191 demonstrates competent per-thread performance. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 11,068 and a single-core score of 1,996. In Passmark tests, the CPU achieves 25,032 in multithread, 3,634 in single-thread, 79,942 in integer math, 60,539 in floating-point math, and 311,364 in data compression. The data compression score is particularly notable — it is nearly 12 times higher than the multithread score, indicating the CPU's architecture is exceptionally efficient at compression workloads.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,188 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming metric, while Geekbench scores of 153,635 in Metal, 115,107 in Vulkan, and 24,508 in OpenCL show strong cross-API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 22,067 is the GPU's primary gaming benchmark, with a GPU compute score of 10,864 for non-graphics compute tasks. The RX 6800's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, scores 29,945 — the RX 6800 leads by 0.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30,433, placing it 1.1% ahead of the RX 6800, which shows the RX 6800 sits at the higher end of the RX 6000 series desktop lineup.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25,284, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (25,362, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201, 0.4% delta). This cluster of scores within a 0.7% range underscores that the i5-13400F delivers performance indistinguishable from several competing high-end processors, making the CPU selection less critical than GPU choice for overall system performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This dual-memory compatibility provides flexibility for builders: existing DDR4 owners can reuse memory modules, while new builds can opt for DDR5. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes (CPU only) ensures the system is ready for the latest PCIe 5.0 storage devices, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully backward compatible.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, a modest power envelope for a 10-core processor. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This means a 600 W power supply provides adequate headroom for the entire system, with the CPU's low TDP leaving substantial power budget for the GPU during gaming loads. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, so the power supply must include at least those connectors.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Intel 13th Gen processor, as the Socket 1700 platform supports the full Core 13th Gen lineup. The existing 10-core/16-thread configuration already handles multi-threaded workloads well, but users seeking more rendering performance could step up within the same socket. For the GPU, the RX 6800's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial headroom for future titles, and the card's End-of-life production status suggests buyers should consider whether they need more performance now or can wait for the next generation.

The CPU's locked multiplier means overclocking is not an upgrade path; instead, users can tune DDR4 or DDR5 memory settings or adjust power limits on compatible motherboards. The platform's dual-slot GPU design (267 mm length, 120 mm height, 40 mm width) fits most mid-tower cases, though compact builds should verify clearance. With a 600 W suggested PSU, the system leaves approximately 285 W for other components (CPU, motherboard, storage, fans) after accounting for the GPU's 250 W TDP and reasonable overhead.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The die size is 215 mm². This is a 13th Gen Core i5 processor released in early 2023 with a launch MSRP of $196.

The benchmark scores reveal a CPU that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,314 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7,307, indicating that all 16 threads are fully utilized without hyperthreading penalties. The single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark and 3,191 in Cinebench R23 show that the boost clock of 4.60 GHz delivers competitive per-thread performance. The Passmark data compression score of 311,364 is remarkably high, suggesting the hybrid architecture (performance and efficiency cores) is particularly adept at data-intensive tasks.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 places this CPU in the range of many workstation-class processors from previous generations. The Geekbench multicore score of 11,068 and single-core score of 1,996 provide cross-platform comparisons. The Passmark multithread score of 25,032 confirms the CPU's ability to handle heavily threaded applications, while the single-thread score of 3,634 ensures responsive day-to-day use. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs means it outperforms 77% of all processors in the database, placing it in the upper fourth of the market.

The nearest rival comparison shows the i5-13400F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4% delta), while being marginally behind the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (both -0.3% delta). This clustering indicates that the i5-13400F delivers performance that is indistinguishable from several competing high-end mobile and desktop processors, making it a versatile choice for builders who prioritize price-to-performance — though the lowest-cost option in this cluster would depend on platform pricing, not raw performance.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,067, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,188, and percentile rank of 75 among all GPUs indicate strong 1440p and capable 4K gaming performance. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory at 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample storage for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,191 Cinebench R23 single-core, 3,634 Passmark single-thread) should be sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles, though the GPU may not be fully utilized in CPU-bound scenarios. The 8-thread 3DMark score of 5,591 suggests the CPU can handle modern game engines that use 6-8 threads effectively. Estimated 1080p performance would likely exceed 100 FPS in most esports and competitive titles, with AAA games typically running between 80-120 FPS at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the RX 6800's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate become more relevant, and the GPU is likely the primary performance driver. The GPU's 0.5% advantage over the RTX 3070 Ti in average benchmark score translates to near-identical frame rates between these two cards. Estimated 1440p ultra performance would typically range from 70-100 FPS in demanding AAA titles, with lighter games exceeding 120 FPS.

At 4K resolution, the 16 GB memory capacity is a significant advantage, preventing VRAM-related stuttering in texture-heavy titles. The GPU's 202.1 GPixel/s pixel rate supports 4K rendering, though frame rates would be lower — estimated 40-60 FPS in the most demanding games at ultra settings. The CPU's 16 threads provide sufficient headroom for background tasks during gaming, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking-based performance gains. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming, with 4K being playable but not at maximum refresh rates.

# Who Should Build It

This Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 system is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile ranking ensure that neither component becomes a consistent bottleneck at this resolution, delivering smooth frame rates in most titles. Gamers who play demanding AAA releases at 1440p ultra settings will find the 16 GB VRAM sufficient for current and near-future titles, while esports players can achieve very high frame rates at 1080p.

Content creators who edit video or work with 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 and the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 10,864). The 10-core/16-thread CPU handles multi-stream video encoding and rendering tasks efficiently, while the GPU accelerates effects and preview rendering. The data compression score of 311,364 on the CPU benefits file archiving and backup workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and the Passmark integer math score of 79,942. The memory flexibility (DDR4 or DDR5) allows developers to choose memory based on budget and performance needs. Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs will find the system capable of running development environments, simulations, and creative software simultaneously without performance degradation.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for office productivity, database management, and data analysis will be well-served. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, while the system's overall 76th percentile ranking ensures it handles demanding business applications with ease. The GPU's End-of-life status is less relevant for office workloads, where the 16 GB memory provides headroom for large spreadsheets and data visualization tools.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6800. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0 architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile rank of 76 places this system in the upper quarter of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a harmonious pairing where neither component consistently limits the other. The average benchmark scores — 25,292 for the CPU and 30,095 for the GPU — both fall in the upper-midrange of their respective categories. The system's overall tier is firmly upper-midrange to high-end, suitable for demanding gaming and productivity tasks without reaching the extreme performance (and cost) of flagship components.

The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, with the RX 6800 leading by 0.5% in average benchmark score. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, with a 0% delta. This means the build competes directly with systems using those components, offering comparable performance at potentially different platform costs. The RX 6800's End-of-life production status means it may become harder to find new, but its 16 GB memory capacity remains competitive against newer cards with 8-12 GB.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, while the CPU's 16 threads prevent background processes from causing stutter. The 8-thread 3DMark score of 5,591 indicates the CPU can handle modern game engines, and the GPU's 0.5% advantage over the RTX 3070 Ti positions this system for 100+ FPS in competitive titles at 1080p and 60-90 FPS in demanding AAA games at 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 65 W TDP provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the Passmark multithread score of 25,032 ensuring smooth stream output. The GPU's 60 ray accelerators (RT cores) and FP32 performance of 16.17 TFLOPS can also handle hardware encoding offload, freeing the CPU for game logic.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,604 accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing, while the GPU's 16 GB memory handles 4K video previews without swapping. The data compression score of 311,364 on the CPU benefits file management and project archiving.

3D rendering: The GPU's 505.2 GTexel/s texture rate and 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate viewport rendering, while the CPU's 16 threads handle final frame rendering in CPU-based engines. The Geekbench multicore score of 11,068 confirms strong multi-threaded rendering capability.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 79,942 and random string sorting score of 32,076 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The 10 cores/16 threads allow multiple build processes to run in parallel, and the memory flexibility (DDR4 or DDR5) lets developers optimize for their specific workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,634 in Passmark ensures responsive application performance, while the 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and power-efficient for shared workspaces. The GPU's 16 GB memory provides headroom for large documents, presentations, and data analysis tools, though the discrete GPU is overkill for basic office tasks — the system excels when students also engage in creative or technical projects.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400F

AMD Radeon RX 6800

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds