SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 74th combined percentile, a figure that places it comfortably above the median of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The data shows a system built around Intel Socket 1700 and the Raptor Lake architecture, paired with a RDNA 2.0 graphics card that retains active production status for the processor while the GPU has reached end-of-life. This combination delivers an average of 127.1 FPS across the measured game library at ultra settings, with the CPU ranking in the 77th percentile against all processors and the GPU in the 71st percentile against all graphics cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the motherboard choice determines memory type, and the system can be built with either older DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits without changing the processor. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with the suggested power supply rated at 600 W. This PSU headroom indicates that the system draws well within the capacity of a mid-range power supply, leaving room for additional drives or peripherals without requiring an immediate upgrade.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited to what the motherboard and memory allow rather than core clock adjustments. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, meaning replacement availability may decline over time, but the CPU remains active. A sensible next upgrade path would involve moving to a higher-tier processor on the same socket, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it, or upgrading the GPU to a newer generation when the end-of-life RDNA 2 card becomes insufficient. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a platform upgrade to a newer socket would also require new memory, making this pairing a complete platform commitment.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper quartile of all tested pairs. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25,292, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS at 25,284, showing a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 120 scores 25,362, putting the i5-13400F 0.3% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25,365, also 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25,201, which the i5-13400F beats by 0.4%. These rival comparisons show that the CPU sits in a tight cluster of mid-range processors where performance differences are within a single percentage point, meaning real-world application choice matters more than raw score differences.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,011, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25,891, a 0.5% lead. The AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25,856, putting the RX 6750 XT 0.6% ahead, and the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25,842, a 0.7% lead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25,740, which the RX 6750 XT beats by 1.1%. These deltas are small, but the GPU’s percentile of 71 against all GPUs indicates it outperforms most discrete and integrated graphics solutions, even if it does not reach the top tier. The combined picture is a system where both components perform above average, with the CPU slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, creating a balanced but CPU-leaning configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The architecture is Raptor Lake, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but ECC memory is not supported. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and was released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $196.

Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern from single-thread to multi-thread workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score is 960, while the 2-thread score is 1,880, the 4-thread score is 3,459, the 8-thread score is 5,591, and the 16-thread score is 7,314. The max-thread score is 7,307, nearly identical to the 16-thread result, indicating that the processor reaches its full throughput at 16 threads without additional gains beyond that point. Cinebench R23 scores are 3,191 for single-core and 22,604 for multi-core, showing a 7x scaling factor from single to multi-core. Geekbench scores are 1,996 for single-core and 11,068 for multi-core, a 5.5x scaling factor.

PassMark results provide workload-specific insights. The multi-thread score is 25,032, with integer math at 79,942 and floating-point math at 60,539. Data compression scores 311,364, while data encryption scores 16,608. Extended instructions score 19,847, and random string sorting scores 32,076. The single-thread score is 3,634, and the physics score is 1,437. The find prime numbers score is 83, which is a relatively low number compared to other tests, indicating this workload is not a strength. In real workloads, the data suggests the CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, where the 16 threads are fully utilized, while single-thread performance remains competitive but not class-leading, as shown by the 77th percentile standing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s percentile of 77 against all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s percentile of 71 against all GPUs, indicating the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-frame-rate esports titles at lower resolutions, the GPU may become the limiting factor. The measured FPS data supports this: in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p, the system hits 198.1 FPS, but at 1440p it drops to 129 FPS, and at 2160p it drops to 72.3 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 2160p is a 63% reduction, which is steeper than what a purely GPU-bound workload would show, but the absolute FPS numbers remain high.

In contrast, GPU-bound titles show different scaling. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58.7 FPS at 1080p, 45.3 FPS at 1440p, and 28.3 FPS at 2160p. The drop from 1080p to 2160p is 52%, which indicates the GPU is the primary constraint, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions. The pair rank by FPS is 1,712 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the 54th percentile of pairs, which is below both the CPU and GPU individual percentiles. This discrepancy suggests that the combination does not fully maximize the potential of either component, with the GPU bottlenecking the CPU in many scenarios. The average FPS across games is 127.1, but the distribution is wide, ranging from 445.1 FPS in Valorant at 1080p to 9 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended at 2160p.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2150 MHz, the boost clock is 2600 MHz, and the game clock is 2495 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The shader configuration includes 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

DirectX 12 Ultimate support is present with the 12_2 feature level, along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W power supply. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections. Benchmark scores show a strong compute performance: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2,548, Geekbench OpenCL scores 16,360, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 98,089. PassMark G3D scores 20,700, with G2D at 972, and GPU compute at 9,550. The DirectX 10 score is 125, DirectX 11 is 180, DirectX 12 is 80, and DirectX 9 is 263.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 performance indicates the GPU can handle compute-heavy tasks, but the 40 ray tracing cores are modest by current standards, meaning ray-traced effects will require significant compromises. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes more critical. The 71st percentile standing means the GPU outperforms most cards, but it does not reach the top tier where ray tracing performance would be stronger.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p, most titles exceed 60 FPS, with esports titles like Valorant reaching 445.1 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 429.9 FPS. At 1440p, many games still maintain high frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 129 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 125.7 FPS, but more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 45.3 FPS. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads, as Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,604 indicates strong multi-threaded performance. Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines will find the 10 cores and 16 threads useful, with PassMark multi-thread score of 25,032.

Students and small business users building a workstation will find the system capable for office tasks, where the single-thread score of 3,634 in PassMark ensures responsive application performance. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the GPU is mandatory for display output, which is fine for gaming but should be noted for office builds. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 71st percentile indicate that this is a mid-to-upper-tier system, suitable for users who want high performance without reaching the top-end enthusiast tier. The measured FPS data confirms that 4K gaming is possible but often at lower frame rates, with titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 28.3 FPS, making 1440p the practical ceiling for demanding games.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 74, placing it in the upper quartile of all tested pairs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25,292, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25,284, showing a 0% delta.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth over a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the maximum FPS measured in esports titles at 1080p?

A: The highest measured FPS is 445.1 in Valorant at 1080p, followed by 429.9 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, it has 40 ray tracing cores, but the modest count means ray-traced performance is limited compared to higher-tier cards.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this system?

A: The suggested power supply is 600 W, based on the GPU’s 250 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22,604, with a single-core score of 3,191.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The CPU is from the Core 13th Gen series with Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series with RDNA 2.0 architecture. The combined percentile of 74 places this system above the majority of tested builds, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 71st percentile. The pair rank by FPS is 1,712 out of 3,732, indicating that while the individual components are strong, the combination does not achieve the top-tier performance of the best pairs. The average FPS across all measured games is 127.1, which demonstrates solid overall gaming capability. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures. The system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K possible but requiring reduced settings in demanding titles.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is based on actual testing, and the results show a wide range of performance across different games and resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles: Valorant hits 445.1 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 429.9 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X hits 235.5 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 58.7 FPS, while Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 29 FPS. At 1440p, performance scales down but remains playable in many titles: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 129 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 125.7 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS. At 2160p, only lighter titles maintain high frame rates, with Valorant at 303.1 FPS and Roblox at 95 FPS, while demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended fall to 9 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 to 28.3 FPS.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 2160p shows a consistent pattern of frame rate reduction, with the steepest drops in GPU-heavy titles. For example, Control drops from 83.8 FPS at 1080p to 40.4 FPS at 2160p, a 52% reduction, while Fortnite drops from 92.4 FPS to 30.2 FPS, a 67% reduction. This indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly the bottleneck as resolution increases, which is expected given the 71st percentile GPU standing. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance supports high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU limits performance in graphically intensive games at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system excels, with measured frame rates exceeding 144 FPS in Valorant, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,634 in PassMark supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU provides sufficient rendering power for most games at this resolution. Streaming while gaming is feasible, as the CPU’s 16 threads can handle encoding overhead, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,604 indicating strong multi-tasking capability.

Video editing benefits from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with PassMark multi-thread score of 25,032 and data compression score of 311,364, which are relevant for codec processing and file handling. 3D rendering workloads will see strong CPU performance in Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,604, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS aids in GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 40 ray tracing cores limit ray-traced workloads. Software development benefits from the 10 cores and 16 threads for compilation, with integer math score of 79,942 indicating solid computational throughput. Student and office work is well-served by the single-thread performance of 3,634 in PassMark, ensuring responsive applications, though the lack of integrated graphics requires the GPU for any display output, which is always present in this pairing.