SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F represents a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. Its hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, with a 2.50 GHz base clock that boosts up to 4.60 GHz. The chip carries 20 MB of shared L3 cache alongside per-core L1 and L2 allocations of 80 KB and 1.25 MB respectively, producing a die size of 215 mm². This processor operates within a 65 W TDP envelope, making it a mainstream desktop part that does not demand exotic cooling solutions.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the upper-midrange tier. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 demonstrates strong parallel throughput, while the single-core score of 3191 indicates healthy per-thread performance. In Geekbench, the processor achieves 11068 multicore and 1996 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling is particularly revealing: scores climb from 960 single-thread to 3459 at 4 threads, 5591 at 8 threads, and 7314 at 16 threads, with max-thread performance at 7307 nearly matching the 16-thread result. This plateau suggests the processor is fully utilized by 16 threads and additional workload parallelism yields minimal gains.

The PassMark suite adds practical context. Integer math scores of 79942 and floating-point math of 60539 show strong arithmetic capability, while data compression at 311364 and encryption at 16608 indicate solid throughput for these specific workloads. The multithread score of 25032 combined with a single-thread score of 3634 puts this chip in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 25292 places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (25362, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201, 0.4% delta). These near-identical averages suggest the i5-13400F trades blows with those rivals within a fraction of a percent.

For real workloads, the data suggests a processor that excels in multithreaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multicore figure of 22604 indicates strong rendering performance for its class, while the single-core score of 3191 supports snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The 16-thread scaling pattern points toward efficient utilization in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks that can leverage all threads. The 65 W TDP keeps thermal management straightforward, but the performance ceiling is clearly below enthusiast-class chips given the 77th percentile standing.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13400F compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the Intel chip scores 25292 while the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, a 0% difference. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the i5-13400F achieves 22604, indicating comparable multithreaded performance despite the rival being a mobile-oriented processor.

Q: What does the 77th percentile ranking mean for this CPU?

A: The 77th percentile indicates the i5-13400F outperforms approximately 77% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. This places it in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for demanding productivity tasks but not at the absolute top of performance charts.

Q: Is the 10-core, 16-thread configuration effective for multithreaded workloads?

A: Yes. The 3DMark scores scale from 1880 at 2 threads to 7314 at 16 threads, showing strong scaling. The max-thread score of 7307 nearly matches the 16-thread score of 7314, indicating the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads with negligible additional gains beyond that point.

Q: What memory types does this processor support?

A: The i5-13400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the "F" suffix affect integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the "F" designation means this processor has no integrated graphics. The FACT PACK lists integratedGraphics as null, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: How does single-thread performance compare to multicore performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3191 versus 22604 multicore, a ratio of roughly 7:1 favoring multithreaded performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3634 against a multithread score of 25032 reinforces this pattern, showing this is a processor optimized for parallel workloads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of this CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $196, which positions it as a mainstream desktop processor at introduction.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Intel Core i5-13400F combined with the AMD Radeon RX 6700. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact pairing, so all frame rate discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 18931 places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting strong rasterization performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 77th percentile standing and strong single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 indicate it can feed a midrange GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 represents modern API performance, while DirectX 12 PassMark of 71 and DirectX 11 of 166 offer additional context for legacy titles. DirectX 9 scores of 250 suggest compatibility with older games, though absolute performance there is less relevant for modern gaming.

Given the CPU's 16-thread capability and the GPU's 10 GB VRAM, estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely be smooth in most titles, with 1440p remaining playable. The lack of measured data means these figures cannot be stated precisely; the combination of a 77th percentile CPU and 75th percentile GPU suggests a balanced pairing for high-refresh 1080p or standard 1440p displays. Esports titles and older games would likely run at very high frame rates, while the most demanding AAA releases at ultra settings might require adjustments to maintain high refresh rates.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13400F and Radeon RX 6700 can be assessed through their respective percentile standings. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile among all GPUs — a nearly identical positioning that suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The combined percentile of 76 for the pairing reinforces this equilibrium.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor's 16-thread scaling from 1880 at 2 threads to 7314 at 16 threads demonstrates that multithreaded applications will utilize the chip effectively. The max-thread score of 7307 being nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 7314 indicates the CPU reaches its throughput ceiling at 16 threads, meaning games or applications that use fewer threads will leave some headroom. For gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance of 960 in 3DMark single-thread and 3191 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest it can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

GPU-bound workloads show a different picture. The Radeon RX 6700's PassMark G3D score of 18931 and 75th percentile placement indicate solid rasterization throughput. The GPU's pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s suggest it can push high resolutions, but the 160-bit memory bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth might constrain performance at very high resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads. In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU would likely idle with spare capacity, as the 3DMark thread scores show the processor can feed data quickly.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the percentile alignment suggests that in most games, the bottleneck would shift between CPU and GPU depending on the title's optimization. CPU-heavy games like simulators or strategy titles would lean on the i5-13400F's single-thread strength, while visually demanding AAA games would likely stress the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 1.1% delta between the RX 6700 and RX 6800 in average score indicates the RX 6700 sits close to a higher-tier card, meaning the CPU might become the limiting factor in some scenarios.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25292 places it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.4% delta: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS at 25284 (0%), Intel Core 5 120 at 25362 (-0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D at 25365 (-0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 25201 (0.4%). The clustering of these scores within a 0.7% range indicates that the i5-13400F is part of a tightly competitive performance tier where architectural differences produce negligible benchmark gaps.

Specific CPU scores highlight strengths: Cinebench R23 multicore of 22604 and single-core of 3191, Geekbench multicore of 11068 and single-core of 1996, and PassMark multithread of 25032. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 960 single-thread to 7314 at 16 threads, with the max-thread score of 7307 confirming saturation. PassMark integer math of 79942 and floating-point math of 60539 demonstrate strong arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 311364 and encryption at 16608 show practical workload performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 30433 places it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 70HX at 30476 (-0.1%), NVIDIA Tesla M60 at 30490 (-0.2%), AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095 (1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29945 (1.6%). The GPU is slightly ahead of the RX 6800 and RTX 3070 Ti by 1.1% and 1.6% respectively, while trailing the CMP 70HX and Tesla M60 by fractions of a percent.

GPU benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014, Geekbench Metal of 122223, OpenCL of 97841, and Vulkan of 83974. PassMark results show G3D of 18931 and GPU compute of 8240. The combined picture for this pairing shows a CPU and GPU that are nearly aligned in percentile terms (77 vs 75), with a combined percentile of 76, indicating a well-matched system where neither component dramatically limits the other across diverse workloads.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p standard refresh displays are the primary audience. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile alignment supports smooth frame delivery in most titles, with the 10 GB VRAM providing ample capacity for modern game assets at these resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 ensures game logic and physics processing keep pace with the GPU's rasterization throughput.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 16-thread CPU beneficial. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 and Geekbench multicore of 11068 indicate strong parallel processing for rendering tasks, while the GPU's 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports compute acceleration in supported applications. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8240 adds further evidence of compute capability.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's multithreaded throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 79942 and multithread score of 25032 suggest efficient handling of compilation workloads, while the 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. Students and small business users building general-purpose workstations will find the 65 W TDP easy to cool and the DDR4/DDR5 memory flexibility accommodating for various platform budgets.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. The GPU contains 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² die. Its 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units are complemented by 36 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz.

Memory configuration consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth figure is modest by modern standards, suggesting that texture-heavy workloads at high resolutions could see performance limitations, though the 10 GB capacity provides headroom for large assets. The FP32 throughput of 11.29 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.58 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate solid compute performance for its class.

The GPU's 75th percentile standing and average benchmark score of 30433 place it alongside the NVIDIA CMP 70HX (30476, -0.1%) and Tesla M60 (30490, -0.2%), while slightly ahead of the RX 6800 (30095, 1.1%) and RTX 3070 Ti (29945, 1.6%). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 reflects modern API performance, while Geekbench Vulkan of 83974 and OpenCL of 97841 show cross-platform compute capability. The 36 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the modest RT core count suggests performance here will be adequate rather than exceptional.

The 175 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU and single 8-pin power connector makes this GPU straightforward to integrate into mainstream builds. The dual-slot design with 267 mm length fits most mid-tower cases. Display connectivity includes one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting multi-monitor setups. The production status is end-of-life, so availability may be limited to existing stock or used markets.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal and power headroom within most motherboard designs, allowing for potential future upgrades to higher-TDP processors on the same socket.

Memory flexibility is a key advantage: builders can choose DDR4 for lower platform costs or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, depending on motherboard selection. The dual-channel memory bus ensures adequate bandwidth for the CPU's 10 cores, though the lack of ECC support may be a consideration for users requiring error-correcting memory. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking, though current GPUs typically utilize PCIe 4.0.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 450 W indicates the entire system can operate within a modest power supply budget, given the CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 175 W TDP combine to roughly 240 W of component power draw before other system components. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. The GPU's 1x 8-pin power connector is standard and compatible with most power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform supports higher-end Raptor Lake processors on Socket 1700, which would leverage the existing motherboard and memory. The GPU, being end-of-life, could be upgraded to a newer generation when available, though the current pairing's percentile alignment (77 CPU vs 75 GPU) suggests neither component is drastically limiting the other. A future upgrade would likely target the GPU first if gaming performance becomes insufficient, or the CPU for heavily multithreaded workloads that exceed 16 threads.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 as a desktop-class system. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 25292, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 30433. The combined percentile of 76 places this pairing in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for mainstream gaming and productivity workloads.

The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provide strong single and multithreaded performance, as evidenced by Cinebench R23 scores of 3191 single-core and 22604 multicore. The GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture with 2304 shading units and 10 GB GDDR6 memory delivers solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, with a PassMark G3D score of 18931. The 65 W CPU TDP and 175 W GPU TDP combine for efficient power consumption, requiring only a 450 W suggested PSU.

This pairing represents a balanced mainstream desktop configuration. The near-identical percentile rankings ensure neither component consistently bottlenecks the other, making it a versatile system for users who game, create content, or run productivity applications. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 readiness provide some future-proofing, though the GPU's end-of-life status means the graphics card may be the first component to warrant replacement in a future upgrade cycle.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 77th percentile and single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 ensure game logic keeps up with the GPU. The GPU's 75th percentile and 18931 PassMark G3D score support high frame rates at 1080p, with the 10 GB VRAM handling modern game assets. The 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at higher resolutions, but 1080p high-refresh is well within reach.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game and stream encoding workloads, though dedicated encoding hardware on a newer GPU might be preferable for maximum quality.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 and Geekbench multicore of 11068 demonstrate strong timeline rendering and export performance. The GPU's 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 compute accelerates effects and color grading in supported applications, while the 10 GB VRAM accommodates large preview buffers.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16-thread throughput with a max-thread score of 7307 in 3DMark supports CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 8240 and OpenCL score of 97841 enable GPU-accelerated rendering. The 36 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support for compatible renderers.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 79942 and multithread score of 25032 indicate fast compilation times. The 20 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code and data, while the DDR4/DDR5 memory flexibility allows builders to optimize for cost or bandwidth.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark and 3634 in PassMark single-thread ensure responsive everyday computing. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low, and the GPU's 3D acceleration handles productivity applications with ease, though the discrete GPU is more power than typical office workloads require — its presence suggests some gaming or creative use as well.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400F

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds