SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a desktop configuration that combines a modern 13th-generation CPU with a workstation-class Turing GPU. The combined benchmark percentile for this pairing is 65, placing it above the majority of all possible system configurations. It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all performance discussions regarding gaming frame rates are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-13400E?

A: The CPU features 10 physical cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much video memory does the Quadro RTX 5000 have, and what is its type?

A: The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile compared to all other processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E sits in the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 62% of the processors in the database.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile compared to all other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 ranks in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, showing it surpasses two-thirds of all graphics cards in the database.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, while the GPU itself has a TDP of 230 W.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting code memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation stability and data integrity.

Q: Which PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU itself uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this build is defined by a strong, balanced duo. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6638, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. This performance is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which scores 6647, and the Intel Core i9-9940X, which scores 6657, with the i5-13400E trailing those rivals by only 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively. In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 22950 indicates substantial parallel processing power, while the single-core score of 3240 shows strong per-thread performance.

On the graphics side, the Quadro RTX 5000 achieves an average benchmark score of 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it on par with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, with the Quadro trailing by just 1%. In contrast, it leads the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by 1.2%, which scores 21379. The GPU's Geekbench scores are robust, with an OpenCL result of 78999 and a Vulkan result of 92309. The combined percentile for the system is 65, indicating that this pairing outperforms 65% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

The data suggests that while neither component is a top-tier leader, the combination avoids major weaknesses. The CPU’s multi-core might is complemented by a GPU that offers competitive compute performance. For tasks that rely on both CPU and GPU, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, this pairing should deliver predictable and reliable throughput, though it will not set records against the highest-end components in the database.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation card built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, featuring 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1620 MHz, with a boost clock of 1815 MHz.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven tasks. The FP32 performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 22.30 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 348.5 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 15616 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6525. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 suggest strong compute capabilities for OpenCL-based rendering and Vulkan workloads. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are variable, with DirectX 11 scoring 140 and DirectX 12 scoring only 59, indicating that the card's DirectX performance is not its primary strength.

For rendering tasks, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, allowing large scenes and textures to be loaded without spilling into system memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that memory-intensive operations, such as high-resolution texture streaming, run smoothly. The presence of tensor cores makes the card suitable for AI-accelerated denoising and other neural network tasks, which are common in modern rendering pipelines. The RT cores provide hardware support for ray tracing, a feature that is becoming increasingly standard in professional visualization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is characterized by a slight GPU bias in terms of percentile ranking, but the CPU is not far behind. The GPU sits at the 67th percentile, while the CPU is at the 62nd percentile, a difference of 5 points. This suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the CPU is capable of feeding it without becoming a major bottleneck in compute-heavy tasks.

In gaming scenarios, where no measured FPS data exists, estimates can be drawn from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3240 is strong and should handle game logic and physics well. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 11 score of 140 is decent, but its DirectX 12 score of 59 is low, suggesting that in modern DirectX 12 titles, the GPU may struggle to maintain high frame rates. This implies that the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck in gaming, especially at higher resolutions where the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may be taxed.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22950 is excellent, allowing it to handle heavy compilation, encoding, and simulation tasks without issue. The GPU’s compute scores are also strong, but in tasks that are purely CPU-bound, the CPU will lead. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like rendering with OptiX or CUDA, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The data indicates a well-matched pairing for general workstation use, where neither component will consistently hold the other back to a significant degree.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The TDP is 65 W, making it a power-efficient choice for a desktop CPU. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22950, which is a strong result for a 65 W part. The R20 multi-core score is 9639, and the R15 multi-core score is 2313. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 3240, R20 single-core scoring 1360, and R15 single-core scoring 326.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638 places it in the 62nd percentile. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which scores 6647, and the Intel Core i9-9940X, which scores 6657. This is notable because those are high-end HEDT processors from previous generations, indicating that the i5-13400E provides comparable multi-threaded performance to much more expensive parts. It also edges out the Intel Core i9-12900E, which scores 6611, by 0.4%.

For real workloads, the 10 cores and 16 threads are well-suited for software development, where compilation can utilize multiple threads. The high single-core boost of 4.60 GHz ensures that lightly-threaded tasks like code editing or scripting remain responsive. The support for ECC memory is a critical feature for workstations that require data integrity, such as financial modeling or scientific computing. The 20 MB of L3 cache is adequate for most applications, providing low-latency access to frequently used data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and budget. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is forward-looking for next-generation storage and GPUs, although the current GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a basic display output for troubleshooting or non-GPU tasks.

The GPU requires a 550 W suggested PSU, which is a moderate requirement for a high-end workstation card. The card itself has a TDP of 230 W and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. It measures 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, fitting a standard dual-slot layout. The display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase memory capacity, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but the specific memory bandwidth is not listed in the data. If the user is on DDR4, migrating to DDR5 could improve memory-bound workloads, though the performance impact is not quantified in the benchmark data. For the GPU, an upgrade to a newer architecture with higher DirectX 12 scores would improve gaming performance, as the current GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 59 is a weak point. However, the 16 GB VRAM and compute capabilities of the Quadro RTX 5000 remain adequate for many professional tasks. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive high frame rates in esports titles. However, the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that modern AAA games at 1440p or 4K will likely struggle to maintain high refresh rates, making this a 1080p gaming system with medium-to-high settings at best, based on the benchmark estimates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding without dropping frames. The GPU’s 384 tensor cores could also be used for NVENC-based encoding, though the specific encoding performance is not measured in the data.

Video editing: The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is excellent for handling large 4K timelines and effects. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 78999 suggests strong acceleration in OpenCL-based editors. The CPU’s multi-core performance will speed up export and rendering tasks, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 providing a solid foundation.

3D rendering: The Quadro RTX 5000 is designed for this task. The 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the 384 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising. The FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle complex scenes. The CPU’s multi-core score will also contribute to CPU-based rendering, making this a balanced system for both GPU and CPU render engines.

Software development: The 10 cores and 16 threads are ideal for compiling large codebases. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates that compilation times will be short. The support for ECC memory is a major advantage for long-running build servers or critical development work where memory errors cannot be tolerated.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU’s single-core performance is more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The GPU’s compute capabilities are unused in these scenarios, but the system will be extremely responsive. The 16 GB of VRAM is unnecessary for office work, but it does not hinder performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400E with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 16 GB Turing workstation card with a 230 W TDP. The combined percentile of 65 indicates that this system outperforms 65% of all configurations in the database. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile show a balanced pairing, with the GPU having a slight edge in relative performance.

The build is best described as a mid-to-high-end workstation. It is not a top-tier enthusiast gaming rig, given the GPU’s lower DirectX 12 scores, but it is a highly capable machine for professional workloads. The CPU offers performance comparable to older HEDT chips like the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, while the GPU offers compute power comparable to a mainstream GTX 1060 6 GB, though with far more VRAM and professional features. The data suggests this is a system built for productivity, not just gaming, with a strong emphasis on multi-threaded CPU tasks and GPU compute.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at professionals and power users who need a balanced CPU-GPU pairing for compute-heavy workloads. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the 16 GB of VRAM and the 48 RT cores for ray tracing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 will speed up rendering and export times, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 78999 ensures smooth viewport performance.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads for compilation and simulation. The ECC memory support is a critical feature for ensuring data integrity in long-running computations. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking shows it can handle demanding workloads, and the GPU’s compute scores make it suitable for machine learning inference tasks.

Gamers who prioritize single-core performance will find the CPU’s boost clock of 4.60 GHz adequate, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K is not this system’s primary strength. It is better suited for 1080p gaming or for users who game casually while using the system for professional work. Small business workstations that require reliability, ECC memory, and multi-display support will also find this build appropriate, given the Quadro’s 4x DisplayPort outputs and the CPU’s stable performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds