SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 62nd percentile overall, indicating a balanced mid-to-upper tier configuration for professional workloads. The CPU’s benchmark average of 6638 places it within 0.5% of several disparate rivals, while the GPU’s average of 17789 is similarly clustered, suggesting that neither component dramatically outclasses the other in raw compute. However, the specific workload distribution reveals a system where the GPU, despite its professional pedigree, may present a more significant constraint in certain modern applications than the ten-core processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13400E and Quadro RTX 4000 is characterized by a CPU that offers substantial multi-threaded headroom and a GPU that, while capable, is anchored to an older architecture. The CPU’s 62nd percentile versus all CPUs, combined with its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950, indicates strong sustained throughput for processor-bound tasks. In contrast, the GPU’s 61st percentile versus all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 15117, shows it is a capable but not class-leading performer. The data suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in tasks that scale with graphics memory bandwidth or shader throughput, particularly at higher resolutions or with real-time ray tracing enabled.

Evidence for this bottleneck dynamic comes from the GPU’s architectural age relative to the CPU’s generation. The Quadro RTX 4000, built on the 12 nm Turing process, delivers 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. While these figures are respectable, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is modest. The CPU, however, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, can feed frames at a rate that may exceed the GPU’s rendering capacity in lighter scenes. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or AI inference using the CPU, the i5-13400E will dominate, while in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K texture rendering, the Quadro RTX 4000 will set the pace.

The performance delta between the CPU and its nearest rivals reinforces this balance. The i5-13400E is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (deltaPct -0.1) and Intel Core i9-9940X (deltaPct -0.3), meaning its multi-core output is comparable to those high-end parts from previous generations. Meanwhile, the GPU’s closest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (deltaPct 0.7), is a much older, lower-tier card, showing that the Quadro RTX 4000’s performance profile is closer to mainstream gaming hardware than to contemporary workstation flagships. This creates a system where the CPU is likely underutilized in GPU-heavy workloads, but the GPU is the clear bottleneck for anything involving modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features or high-fill-rate requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13400E demonstrates a strong multi-core showing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 and a single-core score of 3240. In Cinebench R20, the CPU scores 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core, while in the older R15 test, it achieves 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. The average benchmark score of 6638 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, scoring 6647 (deltaPct -0.1). This indicates that the i5-13400E performs nearly identically to a 16-core HEDT processor from an earlier era, evidence of the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture. The single-core scores, particularly the R23 result of 3240, are critical for lightly-threaded tasks like legacy software or certain game engines, where the 4.60 GHz boost clock provides a decisive advantage.

For the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, the benchmark suite reveals a mixed profile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate solid compute throughput for professional applications. However, the Passmark scores are more telling: DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, DirectX 12 at 52, and DirectX 9 at 205. These low DirectX scores, particularly the DirectX 12 result of 52, suggest that the GPU’s driver optimization for consumer gaming APIs is poor or that the architecture is not well-suited to modern graphics workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 15117 and G2D score of 846 are more representative of general 3D rendering capability, but the GPU compute score of 6176 shows that raw compute is not its primary strength. The average benchmark score of 17789 places the GPU at the 61st percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 as a near rival at 17639 (deltaPct 0.9).

The combined picture is that of a CPU that far exceeds the GPU in relative performance potential. While the CPU is at the 62nd percentile, its rival list includes high-core-count processors, whereas the GPU’s rival list includes the integrated AMD Radeon 780M (deltaPct 1.1), a mobile iGPU. This disparity means that in a balanced system, the Quadro RTX 4000 will consistently be the component that limits frame rates or render times, unless the workload is purely CPU-bound. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 confirms that the GPU is capable of modern rendering, but its performance is not in the same league as the CPU’s multi-threaded output.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is 62, indicating a mid-to-upper tier desktop configuration relative to all tested hardware.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The Core i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.1% lower than the Threadripper 2950X’s score of 6647, making them effectively equal in multi-threaded performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is sufficient for professional workloads but may be a limiting factor for high-resolution texture streaming.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation stability and data integrity in compute-heavy environments.

Q: What is the GPU’s DirectX 12 performance score?

A: The Passmark DirectX 12 score for the Quadro RTX 4000 is 52, which is notably low and suggests weak driver optimization for modern gaming APIs, although the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average score of 17789, which is 0.9% higher than the RTX 4060’s 17639, indicating nearly identical raw benchmark performance despite the architectural generation gap.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The Core i5-13400E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads like video editing and certain game engines.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 and low DirectX 11 score of 128 indicate poor frame generation in modern titles, and the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3240 cannot compensate for the GPU’s rendering bottleneck. Gamers seeking 144 Hz performance would find the Quadro RTX 4000 insufficient, as its 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 output is modest for current titles.

Streaming and content creation see a better fit. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s 288 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based encoding features. However, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous rendering and streaming tasks in complex scenes.

Video editing is a strong workload for this system. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, handle timeline scrubbing and export efficiently, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9639. The GPU’s 416.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects rendering, though its older Turing architecture lacks the latest decode engines.

3D rendering is where the GPU’s professional pedigree matters. The Quadro RTX 4000’s 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores support ray-traced workflows, and its 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 output is adequate for DCC applications. The CPU’s 22950 Cinebench R23 score ensures that viewport interactions remain fluid, but final frame renders will be GPU-bound.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compile times. The multi-core score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 suggests rapid code compilation, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 78844 supports GPU-accelerated compute for testing. The 65 W TDP of the CPU keeps power draw manageable, but the GPU’s 160 W TDP requires a 450 W PSU.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware. The CPU’s single-core performance is more than sufficient for productivity suites, and the GPU’s 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds stability for long-running data analysis tasks, though the GPU’s capabilities are largely unnecessary for spreadsheets or document editing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with 10 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm², it features a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. This configuration delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950, placing it at the 62nd percentile versus all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 6638 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (deltaPct -0.1), a striking result given the Threadripper’s higher core count.

The architecture’s efficiency is evident in the single-core scores, with a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3240. This high single-threaded performance, driven by the 4.60 GHz boost clock, is essential for applications that rely on a few fast cores, such as legacy CAD tools or certain game engines. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation stability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion, though the integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present for basic display output only.

The 65 W TDP is modest for the performance on offer, making the i5-13400E an energy-efficient choice. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900E, scores 6611 (deltaPct 0.4), demonstrating that the 13400E offers comparable multi-threaded performance to a higher-tier part from the same generation. This CPU is the clear strength of the pairing, providing headroom for demanding professional workloads without the power draw of higher-core-count HEDT processors.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU built on the 12 nm Turing architecture, with a die size of 545 mm² containing 13,600 million transistors. It features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 13 Gbps effective across a 256-bit bus, yielding 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The benchmark data reveals a GPU that is competent but not exceptional. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 indicate solid compute capabilities for professional APIs. However, the Passmark DirectX scores are concerning: DirectX 9 at 205, DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, and DirectX 12 at 52. These low scores suggest that the driver stack is optimized for workstation applications rather than consumer gaming, which aligns with its Quadro branding. The Passmark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute score of 6176 provide a more balanced view, showing that general 3D rendering and compute tasks are within its wheelhouse.

The GPU’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 98.88 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for professional visualization, but its 61st percentile ranking places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (deltaPct 0.9), a consumer card. The 160 W TDP and single 8-pin power connector are manageable, and the suggested PSU of 450 W is reasonable for a desktop build. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support professional display configurations, and the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is a limitation for data transfer but does not bottleneck the GPU’s rendering output.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for professionals who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU rendering speed. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the i5-13400E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950, while the Quadro RTX 4000’s 288 tensor cores can accelerate machine learning inference. The ECC memory support makes it viable for data analysis where memory corruption is unacceptable.

Content creators working in video editing will find the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads sufficient for 4K timeline editing, and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for effects in Adobe After Effects. However, 3D artists using ray-traced renderers will find the GPU’s 36 RT cores helpful but not fast, with the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 output limiting final frame render times.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with high refresh rates should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates poor performance in modern titles. However, gamers at 1440p with less demanding esports titles may find the system acceptable, given the CPU’s strong single-core score of 3240. Small business workstations for CAD or financial modeling will appreciate the stability of ECC memory and the multi-display support via 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Students and office users will be over-served by this hardware, as the CPU’s single-core performance is excessive for document processing, and the GPU’s capabilities are wasted on spreadsheets. The 65 W CPU TDP and 160 W GPU TDP mean the system runs relatively cool, making it suitable for a quiet office environment, but the cost of the GPU is not justified for basic productivity.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 form a desktop-class build that targets professional workloads with a strong emphasis on CPU performance. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking create a combined percentile of 62, indicating a system that is balanced in overall capability but skewed toward processor-bound tasks. This is a mid-tier workstation configuration, not a high-end render farm or a gaming rig.

The pairing leverages the i5-13400E’s Raptor Lake architecture with 10 cores and 16 threads, which outperforms its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900E, by 0.4%. The Quadro RTX 4000, despite being end-of-life, offers professional features like 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, making it suitable for AI-accelerated workflows. However, its DirectX 12 performance is poor, and its overall score is only 0.9% higher than the consumer RTX 4060.

The build class is desktop, confirming that this is a stationary workstation rather than a mobile solution. The combined percentile of 62 places it in the upper-middle range of all systems, meaning it will handle most professional tasks with ease but will not excel in state-of-the-art gaming or extreme rendering. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 160 W TDP suggest a system that is power-efficient for its performance class, with a suggested PSU of 450 W providing sufficient headroom.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides a modern foundation for high-speed storage and expansion cards. The memory support for ECC is a key feature, though this requires a compatible motherboard chipset.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a limitation for data transfer but does not significantly impact rendering performance. The motherboard must provide an 8-pin power connector for the GPU, and the suggested PSU of 450 W is the minimum recommended for this configuration. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means a modest air cooler is sufficient, though the GPU’s single-slot design requires adequate case airflow.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Quadro RTX 4000 with a newer GPU that offers better DirectX 12 performance, given that the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638 is only 0.1% lower than the Threadripper 2950X, suggesting it can support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The platform’s support for DDR5 memory allows for a future memory upgrade, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure compatibility with next-generation storage.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3240, indicates it can handle game logic and physics without issue. However, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 is a significant red flag for modern gaming performance.

Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 and its 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 output, frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in modern titles would likely be in the low-to-mid range, possibly struggling to maintain 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU’s 416.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM would become limiting factors, with estimated frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in demanding games. The DirectX 11 score of 128 suggests that older titles may run at playable frame rates, but the DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates that newer games using this API will be severely performance-limited.

The GPU’s 36 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low DirectX 12 score suggests that enabling this feature would result in single-digit frame rates. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and use older APIs, the system might achieve high frame rates, but the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 205 is not indicative of strong performance in these games. Overall, this is not a gaming system, and any FPS estimates should be viewed with caution given the GPU’s poor API performance scores.