SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell 2.0 graphics card, creating a desktop build that sits at the 77th percentile overall. The CPU, an Intel Core i5-13400E, is a 65-watt part with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the GPU is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, a 575-watt card with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The data shows a significant performance gap between the two components: the CPU ranks at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy sets the stage for a build where the graphics card dramatically outclasses the processor in raw capability, and the benchmark results confirm this imbalance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a cache hierarchy comprising 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation applications. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 730, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 22,950 and a single-core score of 3,240. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 9,639 and single-core is 1,360, while in the older Cinebench R15, multicore reaches 2,313 and single-core 326. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6,638, placing the i5-13400E at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows the processor is nearly identical in average score to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which scores 6,647 with a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-9940X, which scores 6,657 with a delta of -0.3%. It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900E, which scores 6,611 with a delta of 0.4%, and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405, which scores 6,605 with a delta of 0.5%.

For real workloads, these scores indicate a mid-range desktop processor that handles multi-threaded tasks competently but does not approach high-end workstation territory. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,950 suggests strong performance for content creation applications that utilize all cores, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, but the single-core score of 3,240 is more modest. The 65-watt TDP is a defining characteristic, allowing the CPU to run in systems with modest cooling and power delivery, which is a key consideration given the GPU's power demands. The presence of ECC memory support and DDR4/DDR5 compatibility makes this processor flexible for budget-conscious workstation builds, though the locked multiplier (not unlocked) limits overclocking potential.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a stark contrast between the two components. The CPU's average benchmark score is 6,638, ranking at the 62nd percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 77,712, ranking at the 92nd percentile. This places the overall build at the 77th combined percentile, reflecting the GPU's dominance in the pairing.

The GPU delivers extraordinary results in synthetic benchmarks. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 14,326. Geekbench OpenCL yields a score of 310,674, and Geekbench Vulkan reaches 376,915. Passmark tests show a G3D score of 44,065, a GPU compute score of 28,396, and DirectX-specific results of 434 for DX9, 371 for DX11, and 231 for DX10. The GPU's average benchmark score of 77,712 places it at the 92nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76,904 (delta of 1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (delta of -1.6%), and NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants at 79,396 and 79,605 (deltas of -2.1% and -2.4%, respectively).

The combined picture is one of a GPU that is roughly 11.7 times more powerful than the CPU in average benchmark score, which is an extreme ratio. For CPU-bound workloads, the i5-13400E will be the limiting factor, while for GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the RTX 5090 D will perform at its full potential. The percentile gap of 30 points (62 vs. 92) indicates that the CPU is a mid-pack performer while the GPU is near the top of the charts, and this imbalance shapes all subsequent analysis.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth compatibility. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a differentiator for users who require error-correcting memory in their workflows, though the locked multiplier means CPU overclocking is not an option.

The power requirements of this build are substantial. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 watts, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 950 watts. This means the system requires a high-capacity power supply, and the GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, so case compatibility with a large, high-wattage PSU and adequate clearance is essential.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the CPU, as it is the weaker component. A socket 1700 processor with a higher average benchmark score would better match the GPU's capability, though the specific choices are limited by the platform's generation. Alternatively, the memory subsystem could be upgraded to DDR5 if the system currently uses DDR4, which would improve memory bandwidth, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific memory bandwidth figures. The GPU is already at the 92nd percentile, so upgrading it further would yield diminishing returns. The ECC memory support and dual-channel memory bus provide a solid foundation for workstation tasks, but the CPU's 65-watt TDP suggests it is designed for efficiency rather than maximum performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090 D is capable of driving extremely high frame rates at any resolution, given its 92nd percentile ranking and massive 32 GB frame buffer. However, at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking and single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,240 may bottleneck frame rates in CPU-intensive titles, so the system is best suited for 1440p or 4K gaming where the GPU is the primary driver.

Streaming: The GPU's tensor cores and 32 GB of VRAM provide ample resources for encoding and streaming simultaneously, and the CPU's 16 threads can handle the overhead of streaming software. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration is sufficient for concurrent gaming and streaming, though the CPU's mid-range performance means heavy multitasking may show some strain.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,950 supports smooth timeline editing and export tasks, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 376,915 accelerates effects and rendering. The 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on the GPU is particularly beneficial for large projects and high-resolution footage, and the ECC memory support on the CPU platform adds reliability for long render sessions.

3D rendering: The GPU is the dominant force here, with a Passmark G3D score of 44,065 and FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS, making it exceptionally fast for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU's multicore score of 22,950 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU will complete most render tasks in a fraction of the time.

Software development: The 10 cores and 16 threads handle compilation and multi-threaded development tools well, and the CPU's single-core score of 3,240 is sufficient for everyday coding tasks. The 65-watt TDP keeps power consumption low during long development sessions, and the ECC memory support is valuable for critical workstations.

Student and office work: This build is massively over-provisioned for typical office tasks, but the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking means it handles productivity applications without issue. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU will be used for any graphics-intensive work, and the system's power draw of 640 watts combined (CPU plus GPU TDP) may be excessive for a typical office environment.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck scenario where the CPU limits the GPU in certain workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,638 is roughly 8.5% of the GPU's average score of 77,712, and the percentile gap of 30 points is substantial. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or 4K gaming, the RTX 5090 D will operate near its full potential, as the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking indicates it can handle virtually any graphics task. However, in CPU-bound scenarios such as 1080p gaming at high frame rates or physics simulations, the i5-13400E's 62nd percentile ranking and single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,240 will cap performance.

The FPS scaling evidence is limited because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, but the benchmark scores provide a clear picture. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 and Passmark G3D score of 44,065 indicate exceptional graphics throughput, while the CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 326 suggests modest per-thread performance. For gaming, the bottleneck will manifest primarily at lower resolutions; at 4K, the GPU's rendering capability will dominate, while at 1080p, the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU enough frames in CPU-intensive games. For productivity, the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 310,674 and Vulkan 376,915) will accelerate any GPU-accelerated workflow, but pure CPU tasks will be limited by the processor's mid-range performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 D have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the TDP of each component, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, the GPU has a TDP of 575 watts, and the suggested PSU is 950 watts.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The CPU scores 22,950 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3,240 in single-core.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this build?

A: The CPU is the bottleneck, as its 62nd percentile ranking is significantly lower than the GPU's 92nd percentile, particularly in CPU-bound workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is 2,299 USD.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU performance above all else. Gamers seeking maximum fidelity at 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 5090 D's 92nd percentile ranking and 32 GB of VRAM, which ensures headroom for the most demanding titles. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, or GPU-accelerated effects will find the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 310,674 and Vulkan 376,915) and FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS exceptionally powerful, though they should be aware of the CPU's limitations in CPU-bound rendering tasks.

Software developers who rely on GPU compute for machine learning or scientific simulations will appreciate the 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and the GPU's Passmark GPU compute score of 28,396, while the CPU's 16 threads and ECC memory support provide a stable platform for development work. Students and small business users are not ideal targets for this build, as the GPU's 575-watt TDP and the system's overall power requirements are excessive for typical productivity tasks, and the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking is more than sufficient for office applications without needing such a powerful GPU. The build is best suited for enthusiasts and professionals who demand top-tier graphics performance and are willing to accept the CPU bottleneck as a trade-off for the GPU's immense capability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65-watt TDP, while the GPU is NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell 2.0 card with a 575-watt TDP and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined percentile is 77, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile, making this a graphics-first system where the GPU is the clear centerpiece.

The build class is desktop, and the tier is defined by the GPU's near-top-tier ranking against the CPU's mid-range positioning. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,638 places it in the middle of the pack, while the GPU's average score of 77,712 places it at the 92nd percentile. This is not a balanced build; it is a GPU-centric configuration where the processor provides adequate support but does not match the graphics card's extraordinary performance level.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources are extensive, with 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. The GPU includes 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores, making it well-equipped for both real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance reaches 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's dominance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 indicates strong DX12 gaming performance, while Geekbench Vulkan at 376,915 and OpenCL at 310,674 show exceptional compute capability. Passmark G3D at 44,065 and GPU compute at 28,396 round out a comprehensive performance picture. The average benchmark score of 77,712 places the GPU at the 92nd percentile, with nearest rivals within a narrow band: the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76,904 (1.1% above), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (1.6% below), and NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants at 79,396 and 79,605 (2.1% and 2.4% below).

For rendering workloads, the GPU's combination of 32 GB VRAM, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance makes it exceptionally capable for large scenes, high-resolution textures, and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 680 tensor cores and 170 RT cores enable advanced features like DLSS and ray-traced effects, while the 512-bit memory bus eliminates bandwidth constraints in memory-intensive applications. The 575-watt TDP and suggested 950-watt PSU indicate this is a power-hungry card, but the performance it delivers justifies the power requirements for users who need maximum graphics throughput.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Passmark G3D score of 44,065 indicate that the RTX 5090 D is capable of extremely high frame rates at virtually any resolution, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,240 suggests it can feed frames adequately at higher resolutions but may limit performance at lower ones.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 92nd percentile ranking and 32 GB of VRAM mean it can handle ultra settings in the most demanding titles, with estimated frame rates well above 60 FPS in most games and potentially exceeding 100 FPS in less demanding ones. At 1440p, the system should deliver very high frame rates, again limited primarily by the CPU in CPU-intensive titles. At 1080p, the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking and single-core performance may become the bottleneck, potentially capping frame rates in esports or fast-paced shooters where high CPU throughput is required. These figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores, and actual performance will vary by game and specific workload, but the overall picture is one of a GPU that can handle any game at maximum settings, with the CPU as the only potential constraint at lower resolutions.