SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop configuration that mixes a mid-range, power-efficient 13th Gen processor with a flagship-class GPU. Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not direct measurements. The CPU’s 62nd percentile standing and the GPU’s 86th percentile standing indicate a system skewed heavily toward graphics performance, where the RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant component in most workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows for this CPU-GPU pairing, so any frame rate expectations are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests it is capable of driving very high frame rates at demanding settings. With a boost clock of 2550 MHz, 10240 shading units, and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 736.3 GB/s, the GPU has the raw throughput for 1440p and 4K gaming. However, the CPU’s performance ceiling will determine how consistently those frame rates hold.

The Core i5-13400E, with 10 cores and 16 threads boosting to 4.60 GHz, produces a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240. This single-threaded strength is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, but the CPU’s 62nd percentile overall score suggests it may bottleneck the RTX 4080 SUPER in CPU-intensive scenes or at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 4K resolution, the GPU’s workload becomes heavier, and the i5-13400E is more likely to keep pace, whereas at 1080p, the CPU could hold back the GPU’s potential. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 is roughly 1.5 times the CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638, reinforcing that the graphics card is the performance leader here.

For esports titles or older games, the CPU’s single-core score of 326 in Cinebench R15 and 1360 in Cinebench R20 indicates strong per-core performance that should handle high-refresh-rate scenarios, but the lack of measured FPS means these are estimates. For AAA games at ultra settings, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 80 RT cores provide ample horsepower for ray-traced workloads, but the exact frame rates depend on the game’s CPU utilization. The overall picture is a system that will excel at high-resolution gaming, but the CPU’s mid-range positioning means it is not an ideal match for extreme low-latency, high-FPS competitive play.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and preference. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop chips and can appeal to users running workstation-style tasks. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing a modern interface for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards, though the RTX 4080 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 320 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This means a standard mid-range power supply with adequate headroom is sufficient, and the system does not require an oversized PSU. The GPU is triple-slot and 310 mm long, requiring a spacious case with good airflow; the 1x 16-pin power connector means an adapter or a native 16-pin PSU cable is necessary. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the 65 W TDP keeps thermals manageable with a capable air cooler.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be moving to a higher-core-count 13th Gen CPU, such as an i7 or i9 variant on the same Socket 1700, to better match the GPU’s performance in multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, adding more DDR4 or DDR5 memory would benefit memory-hungry applications, but the CPU’s dual-channel bus limits the benefit of adding more than two sticks. The PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage upgrades, but the platform is at the end of its generation, so the next major upgrade would require a new motherboard and CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU performance. The RTX 4080 SUPER sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the Core i5-13400E sits in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. This 24-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in most workloads, and the CPU is the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 54209 is over eight times the CPU’s average score of 6638, which is expected given the different benchmark types, but the percentile difference is the key metric.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At 1080p or 1440p with high frame rates, the CPU’s single-core performance becomes more critical, and the i5-13400E’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240 may not be sufficient to fully saturate the RTX 4080 SUPER in every title. At 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU is less likely to be the bottleneck, allowing the GPU to operate closer to its full potential. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 reflects its strong DX12 performance, but that score is achieved in isolation, not with the CPU feeding it.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads with a 20 MB L3 cache provide solid multi-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950. However, the GPU’s compute capabilities, such as the 19822 PassMark GPU Compute score, far exceed the CPU for parallel tasks like rendering or AI inference. The system is balanced for GPU-heavy tasks but unbalanced for CPU-heavy tasks, where the i5-13400E will be the ceiling. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this mixed picture, with the GPU pulling the system upward.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads over CPU-intensive tasks. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K resolution with ultra settings will benefit most from the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 86th percentile performance, as the GPU can handle high-resolution textures and ray tracing without issue. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering, such as video editors leveraging CUDA cores or 3D artists using ray tracing, will find the 16 GB VRAM and 320 tensor cores valuable for their workflows. The CPU’s support for ECC memory also makes it suitable for small business workstations where data integrity is important, though the GPU is overkill for typical office tasks.

Developers working on graphics-heavy applications or machine learning models can use the GPU’s 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 80 RT cores for training and inference, but they may find the CPU’s 10 cores limiting for compilation or simulation tasks. Students building a high-end gaming rig for school and play will get excellent gaming performance, but they should be aware that the CPU is not top-tier for productivity benchmarks. Small business users with workstation needs, such as CAD or video editing, will benefit from the GPU’s rendering power, but the CPU’s 62nd percentile means it is not the best choice for heavy multi-threaded CPU workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high frame rates, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 10240 shading units and 2550 MHz boost clock can push high FPS in most titles, but the Core i5-13400E’s single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games. The 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth supports texture streaming, but the exact FPS is an estimate.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC hardware (implied by the 320 tensor cores) can handle video encoding without taxing the CPU, allowing the i5-13400E’s 16 threads to manage game logic and streaming software. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 shows it can handle concurrent tasks, but the lack of measured data means streaming performance is speculative.

Video editing: The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for 4K video timelines, and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 34245 indicates strong acceleration for effects and renders. The CPU’s 10 cores and 20 MB L3 cache provide adequate support for timeline scrubbing, but the GPU does the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: With 80 RT cores and 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, the GPU excels at ray-traced rendering, and the 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die suggest high throughput. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 is modest, so CPU-based rendering would be slower than GPU-based rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 threads and ECC memory support are useful for compilation and testing, but the GPU is overkill for most development tasks. The i5-13400E’s 62nd percentile score means it is a mid-range choice for code builds, while the GPU remains idle unless used for testing graphics code.

Student and office work: For typical productivity apps, the CPU’s single-core performance is more than adequate, and the GPU is entirely unnecessary. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw low for the CPU, but the 320 W GPU makes this system inefficient for basic tasks, so it is only sensible if the student also games or creates content.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and memory runs at 1438 MHz with 23 Gbps effective speed. The GPU packs 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 80 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores, delivering 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute. The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080, scores 54247 on average, just 0.1% higher, indicating the SUPER is essentially a refresh with similar performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 260075 and OpenCL score of 219065 show strong compute capabilities for both graphics and general-purpose workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 is high, but the DirectX 9 and 11 scores of 381 and 301 are lower, suggesting the GPU excels in modern APIs but may not optimize older titles.

For rendering, the 80 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing, and the 320 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated tasks. The 736.3 GB/s bandwidth is ample for high-resolution textures and 4K rendering, and the 16 GB VRAM prevents capacity issues in most scenarios. The GPU’s TDP is 320 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W, and it requires a triple-slot cooler, 310 mm length, and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The card is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but its benchmark scores remain competitive.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor on a 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and L3 is 20 MB shared. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, and offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output, but the discrete GPU makes it redundant.

In benchmarks, the CPU scores 22950 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3240 in single-core, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900E, scores 6611 on average, just 0.4% higher, meaning the i5-13400E is competitive with a previous-generation i9. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 6647, only 0.1% higher, showing the i5-13400E matches a high-end HEDT chip from older generations. The Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657, 0.3% higher, and the Pentium Gold G6405 scores 6605, 0.5% higher, which is an outlier but shows the i5’s average score of 6638 is well-positioned.

For real workloads, the 10 cores and 16 threads handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or compilation reasonably well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The single-core score of 3240 ensures responsive everyday use and good gaming performance in CPU-light titles. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the lack of an unlocked multiplier means no overclocking, but the boost clock of 4.60 GHz is sufficient for most applications. The CPU’s 62nd percentile is a solid mid-range showing, but it is not a top-tier performer.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 74, reflecting the GPU’s 86th percentile and the CPU’s 62nd percentile.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900E?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-12900E’s 6611.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4080 SUPER is 700 W, with the GPU’s TDP at 320 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 4080 SUPER is 999 USD.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU pairing, so all frame rates are estimates.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13400E achieves an average benchmark score of 6638, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench scores are 2313 in R15 multi-core, 326 in R15 single-core, 9639 in R20 multi-core, 1360 in R20 single-core, 22950 in R23 multi-core, and 3240 in R23 single-core. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, scores 6647, a delta of -0.1%, while the Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657, a delta of -0.3%. The Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611, a delta of 0.4%, and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 scores 6605, a delta of 0.5%. These small deltas indicate the i5-13400E is tightly clustered with these rivals, making it a competitive mid-range CPU.

The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6600, and its Geekbench scores are 219065 in OpenCL and 260075 in Vulkan. PassMark scores include 34245 in G3D, 19822 in GPU Compute, and lower scores in older DirectX versions: 193 in DX10, 301 in DX11, 134 in DX12, and 381 in DX9. The nearest rival, the RTX 4080, scores 54247, a delta of -0.1%, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a delta of -1.1%. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a delta of -2.7%, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a delta of -2.8%.

The combined picture shows a GPU that is near the top of its class, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 indicating strong DX12 performance, while the CPU is a solid but not exceptional performer. The GPU’s 86th percentile versus the CPU’s 62nd percentile creates a system where the GPU is the clear performance leader. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for a 65 W part, but the GPU’s compute capabilities dwarf it for parallel workloads. This pairing is best suited for GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or rendering, where the CPU’s limitations are less impactful.