SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

31,087 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER form a desktop pairing that sits at the 69th combined percentile, indicating a system that is well above average for overall performance. The processor, built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, offers 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that balances multi-threaded capacity with single-core speed. Its base clock of 2.40 GHz can boost up to 4.60 GHz, and the 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps feed the cores efficiently. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6638, placing it in the 62nd percentile against all CPUs, which suggests it holds its own in a wide field of processors. The data shows a close grouping with rivals; the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 6647, only 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i9-9940X is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core i9-12900E is 0.4% behind. This tight clustering implies that the i5-13400E delivers performance nearly identical to those older high-end parts, making it a strong contender for its class.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13400E’s architecture is Raptor Lake-S, and it is a desktop-class part with a production status of Active. Its 10 cores and 16 threads are split into performance and efficiency groups, a design that allows the operating system to schedule tasks appropriately, pushing heavy loads to the high-performance cores and lighter background work to the efficient ones. The process node is 10 nm, with a die size of 215 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. This flexibility is significant for system builders, as it allows for either a more economical DDR4 build or a higher-bandwidth DDR5 setup, and the CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a basic display output, but the system is clearly intended to be paired with a discrete GPU, given the presence of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

Benchmark results from Cinebench paint a clear picture of the CPU’s capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 22950, while the single-core score is 3240. The single-core figure is particularly important for everyday responsiveness and gaming, where a high score indicates the CPU can handle the primary game thread without becoming a bottleneck. The multi-core score, meanwhile, is what drives productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, where all cores are utilized simultaneously. The Cinebench R20 scores follow a similar pattern, with 9639 for multi-core and 1360 for single-core, while the older R15 tests show 2313 for multi-core and 326 for single-core. The average benchmark score of 6638, which is an aggregate across multiple tests, places the i5-13400E in the 62nd percentile, meaning it outperforms the majority of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of this score, which indicates that the i5-13400E delivers performance on par with much more expensive HEDT (High-End Desktop) platforms like the Threadripper 2950X and the Core i9-9940X. This is an impressive result for a mainstream 10-core part, suggesting that architectural efficiency in Raptor Lake is able to overcome any deficit in raw core count or memory bandwidth compared to those older, larger chips.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is strong, with a combined percentile of 69, which reflects the system’s position relative to all other CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6638, and the GPU’s average benchmark score is 31087, placing it in the 76th percentile against all GPUs. The GPU’s scores are particularly telling. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 5569, which is a modern, demanding test that reflects heavy graphical loads. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 199267, which is a strong showing for compute workloads, while the Vulkan score of 53683 indicates solid performance in cross-platform graphics APIs. The Passmark suite provides more granular data: the G3D score is 31811, which is the primary gaming and 3D rendering metric, and the GPU compute score is 18372, indicating strong parallel processing capabilities. The older DirectX tests show scores of 360 for DX9, 278 for DX11, and 119 for DX12, but these are legacy tests and less relevant to modern performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 31087 places it in the 76th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 2% of its score. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 is 0.4% behind, the GRID M60-1Q is 0.4% behind, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 1.4% behind, and the TITAN RTX is 1.9% behind. This indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is positioned in a performance tier that is competitive with professional-grade workstation cards and the previous generation’s flagship consumer card, the TITAN RTX. The data suggests that the GPU is a very capable component that will not likely be the limiting factor for most workloads, and its 76th percentile score is higher than the CPU’s 62nd percentile, hinting that the CPU might be the more modest partner in this pairing. However, the CPU’s scores are still high enough to avoid significant bottlenecks in most scenarios, and the combined percentile of 69 reflects a system that is well-balanced overall.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s Passmark G3D score of 31811 is exceptionally high, indicating it can push very high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3240 is also strong, which is crucial for maintaining those high frame rates, as the CPU must process game logic and draw calls quickly. The data suggests this pairing is well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU is typically the bottleneck, but even at 1080p, the CPU’s performance should be sufficient to avoid major frame rate drops.

For streaming, the GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC encoder are not explicitly benchmarked in the provided data, but the high compute scores in Geekbench OpenCL (199267) and Passmark GPU compute (18372) suggest it has ample headroom for encoding and rendering tasks simultaneously. The CPU’s 16 threads are also beneficial for handling the encoding workload alongside the game, as the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22950 indicates it can manage multiple demanding tasks concurrently without severe performance degradation.

Video editing is a workload that benefits from both strong multi-core CPUs and high-bandwidth GPUs. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 is solid for rendering and exporting timelines, while the GPU’s 16 GB of memory and high texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s will accelerate effects, transitions, and color grading. The combined percentile of 69 suggests this system will handle 4K video editing with relative ease, though the CPU’s 62nd percentile might be a slight limiting factor on very complex timelines with heavy effects stacks.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads will be fully utilized, and the Cinebench scores are a direct measure of this capability. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS makes it a potent renderer for GPU-accelerated engines like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender, and its 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores will accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising tasks. This system should be very productive for individual artists or small studios working on moderately complex scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads for parallel compilation, and the single-core performance is adequate for fast code indexing and IDE responsiveness. The GPU is less critical for standard development but is useful for tasks like shader compilation or running local machine learning models, where the 264 tensor cores provide significant acceleration. The data suggests this is a capable development workstation, especially for game development or applications that leverage GPU compute.

For student and office work, this system is vastly overqualified. The CPU’s single-core performance is excellent for spreadsheet calculations and web browsing, and the GPU is entirely unnecessary for such tasks. However, for students in engineering or creative fields who need to run CAD software, render 3D models, or edit video, this system would provide a very smooth experience, eliminating any potential for slowdowns in complex projects.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a gamer who wants to play at high resolutions with ultra settings and high refresh rates. The GPU’s 76th percentile score and its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory indicate it is well-prepared for 4K gaming, and the CPU’s strong single-core performance will ensure the system remains responsive. This is not a budget-conscious build; it is a performance-focused system for enthusiasts who want a top-tier gaming experience without stepping into the absolute highest echelon of hardware.

Content creators, specifically video editors and 3D artists, are also a key audience. The CPU’s multi-core performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities make this a balanced machine for rendering and exporting. The 16 GB of VRAM is particularly valuable for 3D work, as it can hold large textures and complex scenes without spilling over into system memory. The ECC memory support of the CPU is a bonus for those who need data integrity in long rendering sessions.

Software developers who work on graphics-intensive applications or machine learning models will find the tensor cores valuable. The 264 tensor cores provide a significant acceleration for AI inference and training tasks, and the CPU’s 16 threads are useful for running multiple virtual machines or containers. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is forward-looking, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0, ensuring compatibility with current and future storage devices.

Small business workstations that need to handle demanding tasks like CAD, simulation, or financial modeling would also benefit from this build. The CPU’s performance is comparable to older HEDT chips, and the GPU can accelerate CUDA-based applications. The Active production status of the CPU and the ECC memory support make it a reliable choice for a professional environment, though the “End-of-life” status of the GPU suggests that procurement should be done in a timely manner.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th Gen Core processors. This socket is considered mature, and while it supports the current CPU, a future upgrade would likely require a new motherboard, as Intel is expected to move to a new socket for subsequent generations. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which is a key decision point for building on this platform. Choosing DDR5 now provides a higher bandwidth foundation, but it is also more expensive.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. This is not a bottleneck, as PCIe 4.0 x16 is more than sufficient for current GPUs, but it means the system is ready for a future GPU that might take advantage of Gen 5. The motherboard should be chosen to support the CPU’s power requirements, given its 65 W TDP.

The GPU has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. This leaves a reasonable amount of headroom for the rest of the system, including the CPU and peripherals. A 600 W PSU is the minimum, but a higher-wattage unit would provide more stability and allow for future upgrades. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is very low, so the total system power draw is dominated by the GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a new GPU on a newer generation, but the CPU might need to be upgraded first for certain workloads, given that its 62nd percentile is lower than the GPU’s 76th percentile. The platform is not ideal for a massive CPU upgrade without changing the motherboard, so a full platform refresh might be the next logical step in a few years.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 31811 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569 are strong indicators of high-end gaming performance. The data suggests that this system will be capable of running modern games at ultra settings with high frame rates.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU’s single-core performance is often the limiting factor, and the i5-13400E’s score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is good enough to drive very high frame rates, likely well over 144 FPS in most titles. The GPU will be underutilized at this resolution, as it is powerful enough for 4K. At 1440p, the balance shifts more to the GPU, and this pairing should deliver excellent frame rates, often exceeding 144 FPS in competitive shooters and maintaining 60-100 FPS in demanding AAA titles at ultra settings.

At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB of VRAM and 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth are critical. The data suggests that this system can handle 4K gaming at high settings, achieving 60 FPS or more in most games, with some very demanding titles requiring a slight reduction in settings to maintain a smooth experience. The high memory bandwidth and texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s will help with high-resolution textures. Overall, the estimated performance is that this is a top-tier gaming system for high-refresh 1440p and solid 4K gaming, but the exact FPS will vary by game.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 69 is higher than either the CPU’s 62nd or the GPU’s 76th percentile, which is a positive sign for system balance. However, there is a discrepancy that points to the CPU as the potential limiting factor in some scenarios. The CPU’s lower percentile suggests that for heavily multi-threaded workloads, the i5-13400E might not fully saturate the GPU’s capabilities. In gaming, this is less of an issue, as the single-core performance is strong enough to keep up with the GPU in most cases.

The FPS scaling data is not available, but based on the scores, the GPU is clearly the stronger component. For tasks like 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will be the bottleneck, which is the desired scenario for gaming, as it means the system is utilizing the most expensive component fully. For CPU-bound tasks like physics calculations or AI in games, the CPU might become the limiting factor, but its performance is still sufficient for a smooth experience.

The GPU’s TDP of 285 W and the CPU’s TDP of 65 W mean that the power delivery is heavily skewed toward the GPU. This is typical for a gaming system, and the suggested 600 W PSU is adequate for this pairing. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is a key asset, and it is unlikely to be a bottleneck in the near term. In summary, the data indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver, and the CPU is a capable partner that will not hold the system back in most workloads, but could be the first component to be upgraded for the most demanding multi-threaded tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system, combining the Intel Core i5-13400E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The system is positioned in the upper-middle tier of performance, with a combined percentile of 69. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread part from the Raptor Lake generation, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The pairing is designed for high-performance gaming and demanding productivity workloads.

The GPU is the defining component of this build, given its 76th percentile score and its high-end specifications. The CPU, while not as highly ranked, still performs at a level comparable to older HEDT parts, making this a well-rounded system. The overall tier is that of an enthusiast desktop, suitable for 1440p and 4K gaming, as well as serious content creation. The system is not at the absolute top tier, but it is certainly above average and capable of handling the vast majority of tasks with ease.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which indicates the system performs better than 69% of all other CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400E compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X in average benchmark score?

A: The Core i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, while the Threadripper 2950X has a score of 6647, making the Threadripper only 0.1% faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, which is a high figure that helps with high-resolution textures and heavy compute workloads.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 600 W, which is based on its 285 W TDP.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in system building.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank against all other GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in the 76th percentile against all GPUs, indicating it is a high-performing graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is based on the AD103 chip and the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 121.1M / mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz, effective to 21 Gbps. The memory subsystem is substantial, with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This is a key specification for high-resolution gaming and professional workloads.

The GPU features 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It has 66 RT cores for ray tracing and 264 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS, which is a measure of its raw compute power, and the FP16 performance is identical at 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1). These specifications are reflected in its benchmark scores, with a Passmark G3D score of 31811 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199267.

The benchmark data shows that the GPU is a very strong performer, sitting in the 76th percentile. Its average benchmark score of 31087 is closely matched by rivals like the TITAN RTX, which is only 1.9% behind. The GPU’s performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (5569) suggests it is well-suited for modern graphics APIs. The high compute scores indicate it is not just a gaming card but also a capable compute accelerator for rendering and AI tasks. The 264 tensor cores are particularly relevant for DLSS and other AI-based features. The GPU is a triple-slot card, 310 mm long, and requires a 16-pin power connector. It is marked as End-of-life, with a predecessor in the GeForce 30 series and a successor in the GeForce 50 series, meaning it is a previous-generation product but still highly relevant in terms of performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds