SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is an asymmetric desktop combination: a 65 W efficiency-focused 10-core Raptor Lake processor sitting beneath a 220 W Ada Lovelace graphics card that occupies the 83rd GPU percentile. The data raises an immediate question — can a CPU in the 62nd percentile of all processors keep a GPU in the 83rd percentile fed, or does the processor become the defining constraint of this build? Every score in this analysis comes from the benchmark database, and because no measured frame-rate rows exist for this exact pairing, all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4070 SUPER's PassMark G3D score of 29,995 and its 83rd-percentile position among all GPUs indicate graphics throughput strong enough for high-refresh play at 1440p, while the i5-13400E's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240 suggests the per-thread responsiveness needed to sustain high frame rates. The caveat is CPU headroom: at the 62nd CPU percentile, the processor will likely become the limiter before the GPU does at very high refresh rates in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: Streaming adds encoding and compositing load on top of gaming, and here the 10-core, 16-thread configuration becomes relevant. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,950 shows the CPU has sustained throughput available for concurrent background encoding, though the GPU's 224 tensor cores and NVENC-class Ada Lovelace hardware arguably carry the heavier share of stream encoding in practice.

Video editing: The combination is credible for timeline work. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,795 and Vulkan score of 205,624 indicate strong compute acceleration for effects and color grading, while 12 GB of GDDR6X provides room for 4K timelines. The CPU's R20 multi-core score of 9639 handles decoding, proxies, and export threads adequately but is not workstation-class.

3D rendering: With 7168 shading units, 56 RT cores, and an FP32 figure of 35.48 TFLOPS, the GPU does the heavy lifting in GPU-accelerated viewports and ray-traced previews. CPU-based final renders will take meaningfully longer than on higher-tier chips — the multi-core scores place this processor at the 62nd percentile, respectable but not extreme.

Software development: Compilation is a classic multi-thread workload, and 16 threads with a shared 20 MB L3 cache produce a workable build machine. The single-core score of 3260 in R23 matters for IDE responsiveness and single-threaded build steps, and ECC memory support adds a layer of correctness assurance unusual in a consumer desktop.

Student and office work: For documents, browsing, and video calls, this pairing is dramatically overqualified — the integrated UHD Graphics 730 alone could handle those tasks. The upside is silence and efficiency: a 65 W TDP processor keeps idle and light-load power draw low.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die — a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². That density underwrites the clock profile: a 1980 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, with 12 GB of GDDR6X running at 21 Gbps effective over a 192-bit bus for 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The bandwidth-per-GB ratio is worth questioning at high resolutions and with ray tracing enabled, but the benchmark data suggests it is not a defining constraint at this tier.

Rendering throughput is substantial. The card delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32, a pixel fill rate of 198.0 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s from 224 TMUs and 80 ROPs. The 56 ray-tracing cores and 224 tensor cores define the modern feature set: the former for hardware-accelerated ray intersection, the latter for DLSS-class upscaling and AI-assisted rendering. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature-level support confirms ray tracing and variable-rate shading capability at the API level.

The benchmark spread tells a coherent story. A 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 is a heavy modern GPU test, and the PassMark G3D result of 29,995 anchors the card's 83rd-percentile ranking. The GPU compute score of 17,108 on PassMark and the 205,624 Vulkan result on Geekbench indicate the card is not merely a gaming part — it holds its own in general compute. Against its nearest rivals by average score, the data shows it essentially tied with the Quadro M6000 24 GB (-0.1%), the RTX 5050 Mobile (-0.1%), and the Quadro M6000 (-0.2%), and only about 1% behind the RTX 4090 Mobile. Those equivalences are striking: a desktop Ada card measuring against former flagship mobile and professional parts is a sign of how far mid-range desktop silicon has climbed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side posts a consistent set of Cinebench results: 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core in R15, 9639 and 1360 in R20, and 22,950 and 3240 in R23. The single-to-multi ratio in R23 — roughly sevenfold — reflects the hybrid 10-core, 16-thread design's ability to scale. The processor's average benchmark score of 6638 places it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU side posts an average benchmark score of 43,223 and the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, built from the ten benchmark entries listed above. The combined percentile for the pairing is 73 — almost exactly between the two component percentiles, which is what one would expect from a build with no extreme outlier on either side.

The rival tables add context. On the CPU side, the i5-13400E's average score sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (-0.1%), Intel Core i9-9940X (-0.3%), i9-12900E (+0.4%), and Pentium Gold G6405 (+0.5%). That cluster is curious — it mixes a former high-end desktop chip with a budget dual-core, which hints the aggregate average blends single- and multi-core tests in a way that flattens architectural differences. The Cinebench-specific scores are more informative than the blended average for workload prediction.

Who Should Build It

1440p gamers are the natural audience. A GPU at the 83rd percentile with 12 GB of VRAM and DirectX 12 Ultimate support is squarely a 1440p-class card, and the CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for the majority of titles at that resolution, where the GPU does most of the work.

Content creators working in 1080p to 4K video benefit from the GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan compute scores and its 224 tensor cores, while accepting that CPU-bound exports run at mainstream rather than workstation speed.

Developers get a 16-thread machine with ECC support — a rare combination in consumer hardware — and strong single-thread responsiveness for tooling.

Small business workstations are arguably the best fit: the E-suffix processor's 65 W TDP, ECC compatibility, and dual DDR4/DDR5 support describe a machine designed for stability and efficiency, with the RTX card available for GPU compute tasks like simulation or inference.

Students building a do-everything machine get a system that handles coursework trivially and gaming seriously, though the GPU is more than most coursework requires.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap tells the story before any frame data does: 62nd percentile CPU versus 83rd percentile GPU is a 21-point skew toward the graphics card. At lower resolutions, where the CPU must issue more draw calls per frame, the i5-13400E will saturate first — the single-core score of 3240 in R23 is good but not elite, and competitive 1080p high-refresh play is where this build leaves performance on the table. At 1440p and especially 4K, the balance flips toward the GPU, and the pairing becomes well matched.

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, the scaling argument rests entirely on the benchmark scores: the GPU's 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth and 29,995 G3D score imply strong 1440p Ultra performance, while the CPU's mid-tier multi-core and single-core results suggest the frame-rate ceiling at 1080p will be set by the processor. The data implies a resolution-first strategy — raise resolution and quality settings, and the GPU becomes the meaningful limiter, which is exactly what a balanced build wants.

FAQ

Q: Is the i5-13400E fast enough for the RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: At 1440p and 4K, the benchmark data indicates yes — the GPU is the limiter there. At 1080p high refresh rates, the CPU's 62nd-percentile position means it will likely cap frame rates in CPU-bound titles before the GPU reaches its limit.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and is 12 GB enough?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity comfortably covers 1440p Ultra textures and is workable at 4K, though heavily modded or ray-traced scenarios at 4K are where the data would invite closer scrutiny.

Q: Can this system stream while gaming?

A: The CPU's 16 threads and R23 multi-core score of 22,950 provide headroom for concurrent encoding, and the GPU's 224 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated encoding paths. The build is viable for single-PC streaming, with the GPU expected to carry most of the encode load.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, so tuning is limited to stock behavior and memory/XMP adjustments.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 550 W, which must cover the 220 W GPU TDP alongside the 65 W CPU TDP and the rest of the platform.

Q: Were frame rates measured for this exact pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this combination; all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13400E supports ECC memory — unusual for a consumer desktop part and relevant for workstation or reliability-sensitive use.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13400E is a Raptor Lake-S design on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die, ten cores and sixteen threads, a 2.40 GHz base clock, and a 4.60 GHz boost clock. The hybrid architecture pairs performance cores with efficiency cores; the 10-core/16-thread split implies six performance cores with hyper-threading plus four efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not break this down explicitly. The cache hierarchy — 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 — gives the chip enough on-die storage to keep sixteen threads busy in throughput workloads.

The benchmark scores translate directly: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,950 handles rendering, compilation, and encoding at mainstream-desktop speed, while the 3240 single-core score keeps single-threaded applications and game logic responsive. Its average score of 6638 and 62nd percentile position frame it as an upper-mid-tier CPU — ahead of the majority of processors ever benchmarked, but well behind halo chips.

The "E" designation matters for interpretation: a 65 W TDP indicates an efficiency-binned part, meaning sustained all-core clocks will run conservatively under thermal and power limits compared to unlocked siblings. That is visible qualitatively in the multi-core scores, which are solid for the power envelope rather than class-leading outright. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and integrated UHD Graphics 730 round out a flexible platform profile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing an upper-mid-tier CPU with an upper-tier GPU. The Intel Core i5-13400E (13th Gen Raptor Lake, Socket 1700, released January 2023) contributes the 62nd percentile of all CPUs; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Ada Lovelace, AD104, released January 2024) contributes the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 73 defines the build's overall tier: a performance-class mainstream desktop, GPU-forward in character, suitable as a high-end gaming machine at 1440p or a GPU-accelerated workstation with a modest but efficient CPU behind it. Notably, the GPU's production status is listed as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor — relevant context for anyone specifying this part today. Its launch MSRP was 599 USD.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist in the database for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than a measured figure.

With that caveat stated, the estimates are reasonably well-grounded. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29,995 and its 83rd-percentile ranking place it among cards capable of 1440p Ultra play in modern titles, with 4K Ultra reachable in many games, particularly with upscaling enabled via the card's 224 tensor cores. The per-API PassMark results — 344 in DirectX 9, 273 in DirectX 11, 110 in DirectX 12, and 167 in DirectX 10 — show the expected pattern of API scaling, with the DX12 figure reflecting a stricter, more modern test rather than a performance regression.

At 1080p, expect the CPU to become the visible limiter: the i5-13400E's 62nd-percentile standing and R23 single-core score of 3240 suggest frame rates that plateau below what the GPU could otherwise deliver, especially in simulation-heavy or open-world titles. At 1440p Ultra, the estimated picture is strong and well-balanced — this is the resolution the scores point toward. At 4K, the GPU's 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 12 GB framebuffer become the primary determinants, with demanding ray-traced titles likely requiring upscaling to hold high frame rates. The overall estimate: a high-refresh 1440p machine and a competent 4K machine, with the caveat that these are score-derived estimates, not measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which supports the CPU's dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory configurations. DDR5 is the forward-looking choice; DDR4 is the compatibility choice for reuse. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes means a current-generation graphics slot link, though the RTX 4070 SUPER itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and cannot exploit Gen 5 bandwidth. ECC memory support adds an unusual reliability option for workstation duty.

Power is a straightforward calculation: the CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 220 W TDP, with the GPU's own suggested PSU rating of 550 W providing the guidance. The card draws through a single 16-pin connector, so a modern PSU with that connector — or an adapter — is a prerequisite. Physical fit matters too: the card is 267 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 42 mm wide in a dual-slot format, so compact cases need checking against those dimensions.

The upgrade path has two directions. The GPU-forward character of the build (83rd versus 62nd percentile) means the CPU is the first component to upgrade — a higher-tier Socket 1700 processor would raise the combined percentile directly, particularly for 1080p high-refresh play where the CPU currently caps performance. Alternatively, since the multiplier is locked, enthusiasts wanting more CPU performance would need a chip swap rather than overclocking. The GPU's end-of-life status also suggests that a next-generation replacement (the GeForce 50 series is listed as its successor) is the natural long-term graphics upgrade, and its launch MSRP of 599 USD provides the reference point for comparing what a successor should cost. Given that the memory, socket, and PCIe platform all have headroom beyond the current GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface, this build's foundation outlasts both of its current components.