SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3070 graphics card, targeting a balanced mid-range desktop build. The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,950 and a single-core score of 3,240, while the GPU posts a Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162. The combined system sits at the 62nd percentile among all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimated from the underlying benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070's Passmark G3D score of 22,214 places it slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT by 0.7%, indicating strong 1440p potential. The i5-13400E's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,240 ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly in most titles, making this a capable 144Hz-class setup at 1080p and a solid 60-100Hz performer at 1440p, though exact frame rates vary by title.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads (10 cores) provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates, but the RTX 3070's 184 tensor cores and dedicated NVENC hardware (implied by the Ampere architecture) offload the encoding workload efficiently. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 indicates strong compute headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding tasks.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 22,950 puts the i5-13400E within 0.4% of the Core i9-12900E and just 0.1% behind the Threadripper 2950X, suggesting timeline scrubbing and export tasks will perform well. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects previews and render acceleration in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 MB shared L3 cache and 16 threads handle viewport simulation and physics calculations, while the GPU's FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and 46 RT cores provide substantial ray-tracing and rasterization throughput for applications like Blender or Octane. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 11,195 indicates solid compute workloads, though not class-leading.

Software development: The 10-core, 16-thread layout with a 4.60 GHz boost clock handles compilation tasks efficiently. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds or server-style workloads.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, and the CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest for all-day operation. Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,360 ensures snappy UI responsiveness in productivity suites, while the 62nd CPU percentile means this system outpaces the majority of office machines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,638 places it at the 62nd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, scores 6,647 (0.1% faster), and the Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6,657 (0.3% faster). The i9-12900E scores 6,611 (0.4% slower), showing this chip sits in a tight cluster of high-core-count parts. Cinebench R23 results show a multi-core score of 22,950 and single-core of 3,240, with Cinebench R20 at 9,639 multi-core and 1,360 single-core. The R15 results are 2,313 multi-core and 326 single-core.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,208 places it at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17,083 (0.7% slower), while the NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17,468 (1.5% faster). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 highlights strong compute capability, while Geekbench Vulkan scores 21,022. Passmark results show G3D at 22,214 and GPU Compute at 11,195. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 provides a modern DirectX 12 workload reference.

The combined picture shows a system where both components sit within one percentile point of each other (62% CPU, 61% GPU), suggesting a well-matched pairing. The CPU's multi-core strength relative to its single-core performance indicates the 10-core configuration delivers balanced throughput, while the GPU's G3D score confirms it competes with modern mid-range cards despite being end-of-life.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, built by Intel with a die size of 215 mm². It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, and the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not available — builders should rely on the factory boost behavior.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 22,950 is roughly 7x the single-core score of 3,240, which is a typical scaling ratio for a 10-core part. This indicates good thread scaling across the 16 threads. The R20 results show similar scaling: 9,639 multi-core versus 1,360 single-core (about 7.1x). The R15 results show 2,313 versus 326 (about 7.1x). This consistency across test versions suggests the processor scales predictably with thread count.

The 0.4% advantage over the Core i9-12900E in average benchmark score shows the 13th-generation architecture delivers a small generational uplift. The near-tie with the Threadripper 2950X (0.1% slower) is notable because the Threadripper is a high-end desktop platform part, indicating the i5-13400E punches above its mainstream positioning in multi-threaded workloads. The 20 MB L3 cache is substantial for a mid-range part, benefiting workloads with large working sets. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration gives builders choice between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The GPU's 61st percentile and the CPU's 62nd percentile combine to deliver high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance. The RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM handles current titles at these resolutions, while the CPU's single-core strength prevents bottlenecking in most games.

Content creators working in mixed CPU/GPU workflows: Video editors benefit from the CPU's 22,950 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for export tasks and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM for GPU-accelerated effects. The 0.1% performance parity with the Threadripper 2950X in average CPU score confirms this chip handles heavy multi-threaded creation tasks.

Developers compiling large codebases: The 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache reduce compile times, while ECC memory support provides stability for long-running build processes. The 4.60 GHz boost clock helps single-threaded tooling like linters and formatters.

Students needing one machine for everything: The 65 W TDP means this system can run in smaller cases with modest cooling, and the integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a backup if the discrete GPU is removed for troubleshooting. The 62nd combined percentile ensures it handles coursework plus gaming.

Small business workstations: The combination of ECC memory support, dual memory type compatibility, and the CPU's 62nd percentile performance makes this suitable for financial modeling, database work, or CAD applications where data integrity matters. The GPU's compute scores support GPU-accelerated productivity tools.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 uses the GA104 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The 46 RT cores handle ray-tracing workloads, while 184 tensor cores accelerate AI and DLSS tasks. The base clock is 1,500 MHz with a boost of 1,725 MHz, delivering FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and FP16 at 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 14 Gbps effective, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s. The card draws 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU, uses a single 12-pin power connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor at 242 mm length. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,214 places it 0.7% ahead of the RX 7600 XT, confirming it remains competitive with newer mid-range cards despite being end-of-life. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 indicates strong compute throughput for non-gaming workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 provides a modern API reference point. The 61st percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 60% of all GPUs in the database, making it a strong choice for high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The following estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3070's Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and the CPU's single-core strength suggest this system can maintain high frame rates in competitive titles like shooters and MOBAs, likely exceeding 144 FPS in well-optimized games. The CPU's 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures minimal frame-time spikes in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle most titles, but games with heavy texture requirements may show stutter. Frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range are realistic for AAA titles, with lower settings pushing higher. The 0.7% performance advantage over the RX 7600 XT in G3D suggests parity with that card's known 1440p performance.

At 4K, this pairing will struggle with ultra settings. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM limit it to lower settings or older titles for playable frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance, but 4K ultra is beyond the card's intended scope.

Ray-tracing workloads will leverage the 46 RT cores, but expect significant frame rate drops in heavy RT games. DLSS, powered by the 184 tensor cores, can recover some performance, but this is not a dedicated RT powerhouse.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are nearly identical — 62nd for the CPU and 61st for the GPU — indicating a well-balanced pairing. In CPU-bound workloads like strategy games, simulation titles, or productivity tasks, the i5-13400E's single-core score of 3,240 (Cinebench R23) ensures it does not bottleneck the GPU. The 0.4% advantage over the i9-12900E in average CPU score confirms the processor has headroom.

In GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions, the RTX 3070 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 61st percentile versus the CPU's 62nd means the graphics card is slightly the weaker component, which is typical for gaming builds where the GPU carries the rendering load. The 8 GB VRAM may cause capacity bottlenecks in texture-heavy titles at 1440p and above, independent of raw compute performance.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP create a combined thermal load that is manageable with mid-range cooling. The 550 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for the rest of the system, though aggressive overclocking of other components is not advised given the locked CPU multiplier.

For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide balance with the GPU's compute capabilities. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 11,195 shows the GPU can offload parallel tasks, but the CPU's 22,950 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means it handles single-threaded tasks without waiting on the GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for 1440p gaming?

A: Yes, with caveats. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 22,214 and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support 1440p gaming at high settings, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer titles. The CPU's 62nd percentile ensures no meaningful bottleneck.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to the RX 7600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 17,208 is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 17,083, making them effectively equivalent in raw performance. The RTX 3070 adds 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores for ray tracing and DLSS.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,950 places it within 0.1% of the Threadripper 2950X, and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects and exports in GPU-accelerated editors.

Q: What memory should I use with this CPU?

A: The i5-13400E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The data does not specify a bandwidth advantage for either, so the choice depends on platform pricing and availability.

Q: How much power supply do I need?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. A 550 W unit provides adequate headroom, though the RTX 3070 uses a 12-pin connector that may require an adapter.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so performance is fixed at factory boost behavior. The 4.60 GHz boost clock is the maximum achievable without external clock generator manipulation.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory support as true. This is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and benefits workstation or server-style workloads where data corruption is a concern.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports Raptor Lake and earlier 12th-generation parts. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility when upgrading memory. The PCIe implementation includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing high-bandwidth SSDs and future GPU upgrades to run at full speed. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP mean the existing 550 W suggested PSU has headroom for minor upgrades, but a GPU upgrade to a higher-TDP card would require a PSU change. The GPU is end-of-life, so a natural upgrade path is to the GeForce 40 series, which is the successor per the data. The CPU is still active in production, and its 62nd percentile performance means it will remain relevant for several more years.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU within the same generation or a newer GeForce 40-series card, provided the PSU is upgraded accordingly. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads have sufficient headroom to support a faster GPU without becoming the bottleneck, given its 0.4% advantage over the i9-12900E in average score. Alternatively, adding more memory or switching from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already using it) could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 20 MB L3 cache and 4.60 GHz boost clock make this CPU a solid foundation for a multi-year system, with the GPU being the likely first upgrade target due to its end-of-life status and 8 GB VRAM limitation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds