SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E is built on the LGA 1700 socket, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility is a significant advantage for system builders, as it allows for cost-conscious builds using existing DDR4 modules or higher-bandwidth DDR5 kits depending on market conditions and motherboard choice. The CPU natively supports ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class parts, which makes this pairing relevant for small business workstations where data integrity is paramount. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring that future high-speed NVMe storage or expansion cards will not be bottlenecked by the interface, even if the current GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 connection.

The RTX 3050 OEM has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU rating for the GPU alone is 300 W. The Core i5-13400E is rated at a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 10-core processor. Combining these two figures, a system with this pairing will not demand an excessive power supply; a quality 300 W unit would be the absolute minimum, but sensible builders would look for a bit more headroom to accommodate motherboard, storage, and fans. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, a standard that is widely supported on modern power supplies. Given the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP, the total system draw remains within the range of mainstream power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade path from this configuration depends on the user's priorities. For pure CPU-bound tasks, the LGA 1700 socket offers headroom for higher-core-count Raptor Lake parts, though the exact models are not listed in the data. For GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM sits at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, so a future swap to a higher-tier card would be a logical step, provided the PSU is upgraded accordingly. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 means that a future GPU upgrade will not be limited by the interface, even if the current card operates at PCIe 4.0 x8. The motherboard's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a platform upgrade does not necessarily require a memory upgrade, easing the financial burden of moving to a newer CPU later.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU and GPU pairing places it at the 60th percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU, Intel Core i5-13400E, achieves an average benchmark score of 6638, putting it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scoring 6647 (a delta of -0.1%), the Intel Core i9-9940X scoring 6657 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-12900E scoring 6611 (+0.4%). The data shows a virtual dead heat among these processors, meaning the i5-13400E performs on par with several high-end HEDT and previous-generation flagship chips, despite being a mainstream 10-core part.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, holds an average benchmark score of 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 15171 (a delta of 0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (-0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 15283 (-0.5%). The RTX 3050 OEM is effectively tied with these competitors, showing that it delivers performance in the same tier as the RX 7600, a more recent mainstream card, and the older GTX 580. The delta of -0.6% against the RTX 2060 (score 15290) indicates that the 3050 OEM is just a hair behind that previous-generation card.

The combined percentile of 60 suggests a balanced pairing where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers. The CPU's 62nd percentile against the GPU's 57th percentile indicates that in a purely synthetic workload, the processor will not be the limiting factor; the graphics card is the weaker link in the chain. For productivity tasks that rely heavily on CPU compute, this system will punch above its weight class, while for gaming, the GPU will set the performance ceiling. The data shows a system that is well-matched for 1080p gaming and entry-level content creation, with the CPU providing ample headroom for multitasking and background workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, with its high thread count and substantial cache, is designed to handle both gaming and threaded productivity workloads effectively.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 22950 in multi-core and 3240 in single-core tests. The multi-core score is a standout figure, placing it far above the typical mainstream processor. The single-core score of 3240 is also robust, ensuring snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications and games that rely on a single primary thread. The Cinebench R20 results show 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core, while R15 shows 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. These scores consistently show a processor that is about 35% faster in multi-core workloads than the average of all CPUs (given the 62nd percentile ranking), meaning it is well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

The architecture's 10 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores, a hybrid design that allows the operating system to schedule tasks efficiently, using the efficient cores for background tasks and the performance cores for demanding applications. This design contributes to the 65 W TDP, making it a thermally manageable part that can be cooled by a capable air cooler without requiring exotic liquid cooling solutions. The presence of UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics provides a fallback display output and hardware video encoding capabilities, which can be useful for troubleshooting or for systems that do not require a discrete GPU for basic tasks.

The average benchmark score of 6638 places the i5-13400E in the same performance tier as the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Intel Core i9-9940X, both of which are high-core-count parts from previous generations. This indicates that the i5-13400E offers exceptional multi-threaded performance for its class, making it a strong choice for users who need workstation-level compute power without the associated platform costs of HEDT systems. For real workloads, this translates to faster video exports, quicker code compilation, and smoother multitasking when running multiple virtual machines or containerized applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile. This 5-percentage-point gap indicates that in gaming scenarios, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the component that caps frame rates, as the CPU has more relative headroom to feed frames to the GPU. For CPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts; the CPU's high core count and strong Cinebench scores will drive performance, and the GPU's compute capabilities (5779 in Passmark GPU Compute) will assist in acceleration but will not be the primary bottleneck.

In terms of FPS scaling, the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means we must infer from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 suggest that at 1080p resolution, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most modern titles, as the CPU can easily maintain high frame rates. However, at lower resolutions or in esports titles with low graphical demands, the CPU's strength will become more apparent, potentially allowing the GPU to work closer to its maximum capacity. Conversely, in heavily threaded games that utilize multiple cores, the i5-13400E's 16 threads will prevent stuttering or frame dips that might occur on lower-core-count CPUs.

The RTX 3050 OEM's texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s are modest figures that will constrain performance at higher resolutions. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may become a limiting factor at 1440p with high-resolution textures. The CPU, with its 20 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel memory support, will not bottleneck the GPU in typical gaming workloads, as the data shows the CPU is more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is to its peers.

The system's combined percentile of 60 indicates that neither component is drastically over- or under-powered relative to the other. This is a well-balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, where the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU will ensure smooth minimum frame times. For productivity workloads that are not GPU-accelerated, the CPU will dominate the performance equation, making this a versatile system that can handle both gaming and content creation without a significant imbalance in either direction.

Gaming Performance

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct game testing.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240, this system is estimated to deliver smooth 1080p gaming experiences at high settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures, and its 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth should handle typical game assets without significant stuttering. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that game logic and physics calculations will not become a bottleneck, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential.

At 1080p resolution, the RTX 3050 OEM is expected to achieve frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range for AAA titles at high settings, based on its performance parity with the RX 7600 (delta of 0.2%) and its slight deficit to the RTX 2060 (delta of -0.6%). Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, which are less demanding on the GPU, should see frame rates well above 100 FPS, limited primarily by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls. The CPU's 4.60 GHz boost clock and 16 threads provide ample headroom for high-refresh-rate gaming in these lighter titles.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel rate will become more significant constraints. The pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s suggests that the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles at this resolution with high settings. Users would need to lower settings to medium or high to achieve playable frame rates. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking indicates that it is an entry-level performer for 1440p, better suited for 1080p gaming as its primary use case.

Ray tracing performance, while supported by the 18 RT cores, will be limited by the GPU's overall compute throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS. Enabling ray tracing effects will likely halve frame rates, making it a feature to use sparingly in less demanding titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics APIs, but the hardware's raw performance will be the deciding factor for ray-traced workloads. Overall, the estimated gaming picture is one of a solid 1080p machine that can handle most titles at high settings, with the CPU providing a stable foundation for frame delivery.

Who Should Build It

This system is primarily targeted at entry-level desktop gamers who prioritize 1080p gaming on a budget. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking ensures that it will not be a bottleneck for the GPU's 57th percentile performance, making it a sensible match for users who want consistent frame rates in popular titles without spending on a higher-tier GPU. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and the CPU's 16 threads make this a capable platform for playing the latest games at medium-to-high settings at 1080p.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 particularly appealing. This score indicates that the i5-13400E can handle 1080p video exports and basic 3D scene rendering with ease, making it suitable for hobbyist YouTubers or freelance editors who need a reliable workhorse without the cost of a workstation-class CPU. The GPU's compute score of 5779 in Passmark GPU Compute also provides moderate acceleration for rendering tasks that utilize CUDA.

Software developers and students in computer science will benefit from the CPU's high thread count for compiling code and running virtual machines. The 65 W TDP makes this an efficient choice for a system that may run for extended periods during development sessions. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for developers who run long simulations or handle sensitive data, as it provides an extra layer of data integrity. Small business workstations that handle office productivity, financial modeling, or database management will find the CPU's single-core performance (3240 in Cinebench R23) more than adequate for daily tasks, while the GPU provides enough power for basic graphical needs.

The system is not suited for high-end 4K gaming or professional-grade 3D rendering, as the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM will be limiting factors. However, for the target audience of mainstream gamers and entry-level creators, this pairing offers a balanced set of capabilities that cover a wide range of use cases without significant compromises in any single area.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame times remain low in competitive titles, allowing the GPU to push frame rates high at 1080p. The GPU's G3D score of 11857 suggests that users can expect frame rates exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding esports titles, though AAA games will likely hover around 60-80 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide enough headroom to encode a 1080p stream while gaming, as the multi-core score of 22950 indicates strong parallel processing capabilities. The GPU's NVENC encoder, while not explicitly scored, is part of the GeForce 30-series architecture and can offload encoding tasks from the CPU, though the exact performance is not measured in the data.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 makes quick work of 1080p video exports in software like Premiere Pro, which utilizes multiple cores for rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM can handle GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, with the Passmark G2D score of 973 ensuring smooth timeline scrubbing and UI responsiveness.

3D rendering: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads deliver strong performance in CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R20 score of 9639 indicating solid throughput for Blender's Cycles engine. The GPU can assist with CUDA-accelerated rendering, but its 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's high thread count and 20 MB of L3 cache allow for fast compilation of large codebases, with the multi-core performance rivaling the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (delta of -0.1%). The system's 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low during long build sessions, and the ECC memory support provides reliability for critical applications.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, while the GPU's Passmark G2D score of 973 ensures smooth 2D acceleration for multiple monitors. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, making this a versatile system for academic or professional environments.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor that sits at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card that sits at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 60 places this system firmly in the mid-range tier of desktop configurations, offering a balance of CPU and GPU performance that is suitable for mainstream gaming and entry-level productivity.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 6638 puts it in the same league as high-end previous-generation parts like the Intel Core i9-9940X (score 6657, delta -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (score 6647, delta -0.1%), demonstrating exceptional value in CPU compute. The GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (score 15171, delta 0.2%), confirming that the RTX 3050 OEM delivers comparable graphics performance to a newer mainstream card.

This pairing represents a sensible mid-range desktop configuration where the CPU is slightly more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming, content creation, and software development, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU offering adequate graphics power for most mainstream tasks. The platform's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, ensures that this build has a viable upgrade path for future components.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of this desktop build is 60, placing it in the mid-range tier of all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400E compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, while the Threadripper 2950X scores 6647, resulting in a delta of -0.1%, meaning they perform virtually identically.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and small business applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3050 OEM is 300 W, and it requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM's performance compare to the RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, while the RTX 2060 scores 15290, a delta of -0.6%, indicating the 3050 OEM is slightly slower.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds