SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 represents a distinct desktop configuration with a clear performance hierarchy. The CPU, operating at a 65 W TDP, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, a Radeon RX 9000 series part, achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and a Passmark G3D score of 25381, positioning it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile of 66 indicates that while the GPU holds a slight edge in relative performance, neither component is dramatically outclassing the other in aggregate metrics, though workload-specific analysis reveals where the bottleneck lies.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a system where the GPU is the primary driver for gaming and graphics workloads, but the CPU is not a passive participant. The GPU’s 69th percentile rank is 7 points higher than the CPU’s 62nd percentile, suggesting that in GPU-bound tasks, the processor has sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card. However, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638 puts it in a statistical tie with rivals like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (deltaPct: -0.1) and the Intel Core i9-9940X (deltaPct: -0.3). This indicates that the 13400E is a capable performer, but its single-threaded and multi-threaded ceilings are well-defined.

In gaming scenarios, the balance leans heavily toward the GPU. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the CPU is capable of handling modern game engines, but the RX 9070’s specifications—such as 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth—suggest it can generate frame rates that might exceed the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls at lower resolutions. The data shows the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3240, which is a solid but not exceptional result; this could become the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming where frame times are short and the CPU must keep pace.

For content creation and multi-threaded workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 is robust, but it lags behind its own single-thread performance relative to the GPU’s compute prowess. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 dwarfs the CPU’s aggregate scores, indicating that tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that can leverage GPU acceleration will be heavily GPU-bound. Conversely, tasks that rely on CPU logic, such as physics calculations or compilation, will be CPU-bound. The system’s combined percentile of 66 suggests that, on average, the GPU will be waiting on the CPU in some scenarios, but the gap is not severe enough to constitute a critical bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R20 score of 1360 and R23 score of 3240 provide a baseline for frame pacing. The RX 9070, with its 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 2520 MHz boost clock, has the raw power to produce high frame rates, but the CPU’s performance headroom may limit maximum FPS. The data suggests this pairing is better suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 69th percentile rank becomes the dominant factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads are sufficient for encoding a stream while gaming, but the lack of a dedicated hardware encoder specification in the data means the workload falls to the CPU. The multi-core score of 22950 suggests it can handle the extra load, but users may need to rely on GPU encoding via the Radeon’s media engine, which is not detailed. The CPU’s 65 W TDP indicates it will not throttle under sustained load, providing consistent performance for streaming sessions.

Video Editing: The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are suited for timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 demonstrates strong compute capability, which accelerates exports and previews. The CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22950 handles codec decoding and timeline management, but the GPU will be the primary accelerator for most modern editing suites.

3D Rendering: This workload heavily favors the GPU. The RX 9070’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 56 RT cores provide substantial raw compute for ray tracing and rasterization. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 14737 reinforces this. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9639 is adequate for scene preparation, but rendering times will be dictated by the GPU’s performance.

Software Development: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are well-suited for compilation and parallel build tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 places it in a competitive position, nearly matching the Intel Core i9-12900E (deltaPct: 0.4). The 20 MB of shared L3 cache aids in handling large codebases, while the GPU is largely idle unless used for testing or simulation.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is entirely CPU-bound, and the 13400E is overqualified. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 326 ensures snappy responsiveness for office applications, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 can handle basic display output, allowing the RX 9070 to remain idle, which is efficient for light workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, providing a substantial single-thread performance ceiling as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which is adequate for gaming and productivity but not exceptional for server-style workloads.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638 places it at the 62nd percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X at a deltaPct of -0.1, indicating near-identical aggregate performance. This is a notable result: a mainstream desktop chip matching a high-end HEDT processor from a previous generation. The multi-threaded Cinebench R20 score of 9639 and R23 score of 22950 reflect strong multi-core scaling, but the single-core scores (1360 in R20, 3240 in R23) are the more telling metrics for gaming and everyday responsiveness.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This is a future-proofing feature, but the practical impact depends on the GPU and storage devices. The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic; it means the CPU is power-efficient and suitable for compact builds, but it also caps sustained multi-core performance compared to higher-TDP parts. The lack of an unlocked multiplier prevents overclocking, so users are bound to the 4.60 GHz boost clock.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize GPU performance while still requiring a competent CPU for non-graphics tasks. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K will find the RX 9070’s 69th percentile rank provides the necessary frame rates, while the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3240) ensures it does not become a significant hindrance at these resolutions. Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 36.13 TFLOPS compute, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle multitasking.

Software developers and engineers will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 22950, which is competitive with older high-end parts like the Intel Core i9-9940X (deltaPct: -0.3), making this a viable workstation for compilation. Students and small business users will find the system overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the integrated UHD Graphics 730 offers a fallback for troubleshooting or low-power scenarios. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 220 W TDP of the GPU make this a pairing suitable for a mid-tower desktop with adequate cooling, but not for small form factor cases with stringent thermal constraints.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility at build time, but the socket is a dead end for future CPU upgrades; newer generations from Intel have moved to different sockets. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the RX 9070’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth utilization.

Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory capability. This allows users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the data does not specify a memory bandwidth figure. The GPU’s 550 W suggested PSU is a key consideration; the system’s total power draw is within this range, but users should ensure their PSU has the required 2x 8-pin connectors for the GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on a newer platform, but this would require a motherboard change. Alternatively, adding a second RX 9070 is not supported, as the data does not indicate multi-GPU support, so the primary upgrade path is storage or memory.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a high-end graphics card built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, using the Navi 48 chip fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz, with memory clocked at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is robust: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU includes 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 56 RT cores for ray tracing. The pixel rate is 322.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 564.5 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 36.13 TFLOPS. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and requires a 550 W PSU.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539. The Passmark G3D score of 25381 places it at the 69th percentile, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (deltaPct: 0.6), indicating the RX 9070 is slightly faster. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23877 is competitive, but the wide variance in Passmark sub-scores (DirectX 9: 343, DirectX 11: 281, DirectX 12: 74) suggests that legacy DX9 and DX11 titles may not be optimized for this architecture. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for texture-heavy modding and high-resolution assets.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 66, indicating the configuration outperforms 66% of all tested combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6638, which is 0.1% lower than the Threadripper 2950X’s score of 6647, making them statistically equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 has a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, derived from 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked; the base clock is 2.40 GHz and the boost clock is 4.60 GHz, with no unlocked multiplier feature.

Q: What is the required power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process using the Raptor Lake architecture, with a die size of 215 mm².

Q: How does the GPU perform in legacy DirectX 9 workloads?

A: The Passmark DirectX 9 score is 343, which is higher than its DirectX 11 score of 281 and DirectX 12 score of 74, suggesting better performance in older APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400E with the AMD Radeon RX 9070. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a high-end RDNA 4.0 card with a 220 W TDP. The system’s combined percentile of 66 places it in the upper third of all configurations, with the GPU’s 69th percentile being the stronger component. The CPU’s 62nd percentile is not a weak point, but it is the lower-bound of the pairing. This is a balanced desktop system for gaming at high resolutions and productivity tasks that can leverage GPU acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6638, with specific results including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 and a single-core score of 3240. It sits at the 62nd percentile against all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23877, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and a Passmark G3D score of 25381. It sits at the 69th percentile against all GPUs. The combined picture shows a GPU that is 7 percentile points higher than the CPU, indicating that in mixed workloads, the GPU will often be the performance driver, but the CPU is not a bottleneck for most applications. The CPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X with a deltaPct of -0.1, while the GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z with a deltaPct of 0.6.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RX 9070’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM suggest it can handle high-resolution textures and modern effects. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3240 provides a baseline for frame pacing. At 1080p, the CPU may limit maximum FPS in esports titles, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 69th percentile rank becomes the dominant factor. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 74 is low, which may indicate poor optimization for DX12 titles, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 contradicts this, suggesting the Passmark test is not representative. Users should expect strong performance in modern titles, but legacy DX9 and DX11 games may show inconsistent results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds