SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a balanced mid-range desktop pairing, with the combination landing in the 61st percentile overall among all builds. The CPU holds a 62nd percentile position against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile against all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 29,700 million transistors across a 199 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz for 18 Gbps effective throughput.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The shading array includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 28 RT cores, though the card lacks dedicated tensor cores. Pixel fill rate reaches 191.4 GPixel/s, while texture fill rate hits 334.9 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place the RX 9060 at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 3322 points. Geekbench results show 88183 in OpenCL and 39476 in Vulkan. Passmark tests reveal a G3D score of 17631, with GPU compute at 9919. The synthetic DirectX scores are mixed: 280 for DX9, 182 for DX11, 104 for DX10, and 44 for DX12 — the low DX12 Passmark score appears anomalous relative to the 3DMark result, so synthetic battery diversity should be weighted accordingly.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 9060 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 0.7% in average score, sits 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X, and leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700 by 1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%. The average benchmark score of 16014 places this card in the same performance tier as the RTX 3060 Ti, which is notable given the RX 9060's smaller 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM. For rendering workloads, the 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth suggest strong 1080p and capable 1440p performance, though the 8 GB frame buffer may constrain texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 and a single-core score of 3240. In Cinebench R20, the chip scores 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 6638, placing the i5-13400E at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, sitting at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 61, indicating the pair is balanced — neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

Relative to its nearest CPU rivals, the i5-13400E scores 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (average score 6647), 0.3% below the Intel Core i9-9940X (average score 6657), 0.4% above the Intel Core i9-12900E (average score 6611), and 0.5% above the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (average score 6605). The tight clustering around 6600-6660 points means the i5-13400E is effectively performance-equivalent to a high-end HEDT chip from a previous generation.

On the GPU side, the RX 9060's 16014 average score puts it 0.7% behind the RTX 3060 Ti (16129), and 1% ahead of both the R9 370X (15862) and RX 7700 (15852). The Pro W5500 trails at 15679, a 2.1% gap. These deltas are all within noise margins, so the RX 9060 can be considered a direct contemporary of the RTX 3060 Ti in overall compute capability.

The combined picture shows a system where CPU and GPU percentiles are within 3 points of each other (62 vs 59). This near-parity suggests the pair will scale well together in most workloads, with neither component creating a dominant bottleneck in either direction.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The chip is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited to BCLK adjustments.

The 10-core / 16-thread layout indicates a hybrid architecture — six performance cores with Hyper-Threading and four efficiency cores without — though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The 4.60 GHz boost clock is competitive for single-threaded responsiveness. The 20 MB L3 cache is substantial for a mainstream i5, aiding in gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from larger shared caches.

Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22950 is a strong result for a 65 W processor. This score indicates the i5-13400E can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks with authority. The single-core score of 3240 in R23 suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and older games that rely on one or two threads. The R20 scores of 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core reinforce this profile, as do the R15 results of 2313 and 326.

The average benchmark score of 6638 and 62nd percentile placement put this CPU in the upper-midrange of all processors. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with the Threadripper 2950X and i9-9940X — both of which are higher-tier parts from earlier generations. This means the i5-13400E delivers performance that was once reserved for HEDT platforms, but at a mainstream socket with a 65 W power envelope. For real workloads, this translates to smooth multitasking, fast compile times, and no meaningful CPU-side constraints for most gaming scenarios.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The 61st combined percentile and balanced CPU/GPU scores make this build suitable for several user profiles. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p high-settings play will find the RX 9060's performance tier appropriate, given its near-parity with the RTX 3060 Ti. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are consistent with a card that handles modern titles at these resolutions without excessive compromise.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950. This level of multi-threaded performance handles timeline rendering, export tasks, and scene compilation efficiently. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute and Passmark GPU compute score of 9919 support GPU-accelerated effects and rendering workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the 10-core, 16-thread configuration with 4.60 GHz boost for fast compilation and test execution. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes or data-intensive applications. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with repeated code compilation patterns.

Students and small business workstation users will find the 65 W TDP allows for efficient operation in standard desktop cases. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support offers flexibility in platform cost.

The CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile suggest this build targets users who need solid performance across a range of tasks without chasing extreme high-end frame rates. It is not a build for 4K ultra gaming or heavy AI training, but it covers the mainstream productivity and gaming spectrum competently.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The RX 9060's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 and near-parity with the RTX 3060 Ti indicate it can drive 1080p high-refresh monitors in most titles, with 1440p high-refresh achievable in less demanding games. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240 ensures frame pacing is not CPU-limited in typical gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding overhead while gaming. The 22950 multi-core score in R23 means x264 encoding at medium preset is feasible without significant frame drops, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17631 handles the rendering load simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's R23 multi-core score of 22950 accelerates timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth support hardware-accelerated effects, color grading, and preview rendering in editors that leverage GPU compute.

3D rendering: The CPU delivers 22950 in R23 multi-core, which handles CPU-based render engines like V-Ray or Blender Cycles. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 and 334.9 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene sizes with large texture sets.

Software development: The 10-core, 16-thread layout with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provides fast incremental builds and parallel compilation. The 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code. ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The 62nd percentile CPU handles spreadsheets, document processing, and multitasking with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 serves as a backup, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw modest for dorm rooms or small offices.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 9060. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all game performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014, sitting 0.7% below the RTX 3060 Ti, suggests 1080p ultra settings will achieve high frame rates in most titles — typically well above 60 FPS, with esports titles reaching 144+ FPS. At 1440p, expect 60-100 FPS in demanding AAA games on ultra settings, with drops to 40-60 FPS in the most GPU-intensive scenes. The 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced quality settings in games that exceed 8 GB at 1440p ultra.

The CPU's R23 single-core score of 3240 ensures that frame rates are not CPU-bound in most scenarios. The 20 MB L3 cache and 4.60 GHz boost clock provide sufficient single-thread performance for modern game engines. The R23 multi-core score of 22950 supports background tasks like Discord, browser, or streaming software without impacting game performance.

Ray tracing performance is present via 28 RT cores, but the 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggests RT workloads will run at lower frame rates than rasterized rendering. Users should expect to enable RT at 1080p with medium settings or use AMD's upscaling technologies to maintain playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses an Intel Socket 1700 motherboard, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface — this future-proofs the platform for next-generation storage and expansion cards. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to choose between existing DDR4 kits or newer DDR5 modules.

The GPU has a TDP of 132 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, bringing the combined component draw to approximately 197 W. This leaves substantial headroom on a 300 W PSU for drives, fans, and motherboard power, though users adding multiple storage devices or heavy USB peripherals may prefer a higher-wattage unit. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU from the same generation, as the CPU's 62nd percentile leaves headroom for a more powerful graphics card without creating a CPU bottleneck. The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot ensures compatibility with future GPUs. Alternatively, adding a second M.2 NVMe drive would benefit from the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the FACT PACK does not specify storage options beyond the PCIe interface.

The 65 W CPU TDP means the platform can accommodate a more power-hungry CPU in the same socket without changing the power supply, provided the motherboard's VRM can handle the higher current draw. The Raptor Lake architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so memory upgrades can proceed without replacing the motherboard.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 61st combined percentile, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 59th percentile.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 9060 averages 16014, which is 0.7% below the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129 — a negligible difference within noise margins.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-13400E scores 22950 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the RX 9060?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 9060 is 300 W, given its 132 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector requirement.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the RX 9060 include?

A: The GPU features 28 RT cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the i5-13400E has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are close — 62 for the CPU and 59 for the GPU — indicating a well-balanced pairing. The combined percentile of 61 reflects this parity. In gaming workloads, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions, and the RX 9060's 59th percentile suggests it will be the bottleneck at 1440p and above. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core score of 3240 in R23 ensures it can keep up with the GPU's frame output in most titles.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's R23 multi-core score of 22950 and 62nd percentile make it the stronger component for heavily threaded tasks like rendering, encoding, and compilation. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute supports GPU-accelerated workloads, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may limit performance in compute tasks that exceed 8 GB of memory footprint.

The nearest rival analysis reveals an interesting asymmetry. The CPU competes with high-end HEDT chips from prior generations (Threadripper 2950X, i9-9940X), while the GPU trades blows with the RTX 3060 Ti. This means the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does relative to its own competition. In CPU-heavy workloads, the i5-13400E will exceed expectations; in GPU-heavy scenarios, it will deliver performance on par with an RTX 3060 Ti class card.

The bottleneck profile is therefore workload-dependent. For gaming at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary constraint as resolution and settings increase. For productivity, the CPU's 10-core, 16-thread configuration will handle most tasks without becoming a limitation, though the 65 W TDP and 10 nm process node mean sustained all-core loads may experience thermal throttling in poorly ventilated cases. The 300 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for both components at stock settings, but users adding multiple peripherals should consider a higher-wattage unit.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds