SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The chip features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, supported by a 65 W TDP. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking headroom), but its performance class places it firmly in the mid-range desktop segment. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class parts. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Integrated graphics are present in the form of UHD Graphics 730, which is adequate for basic display output but not for gaming.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the i5-13400E scores 22950 points in multi-core and 3240 points in single-core. The multi-core result indicates that the hybrid core arrangement—likely a combination of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact breakdown—scales well under sustained multi-threaded workloads. The single-core score of 3240 is competitive for tasks that rely on single-thread responsiveness, such as legacy applications or lightly-threaded productivity software. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. These numbers follow the expected scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions, with the R23 multi-core score being roughly 2.4x the R20 score, reflecting the increased workload complexity in the newer benchmark iteration.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 6638, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. This percentile position indicates that the i5-13400E outperforms a majority of tested processors, but it is not at the extreme high end. The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 6647, which is 0.1% higher; the Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657, which is 0.3% higher; the Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611, which is 0.4% lower; and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 scores 6605, which is 0.5% lower. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i5-13400E sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. The presence of older high-core-count parts (Threadripper 2950X, i9-9940X) and a newer efficiency-focused chip (i9-12900E) shows that the i5-13400E trades blows with much more expensive or higher-tier parts in aggregate benchmarks. The Pentium Gold G6405 is an outlier in this group, suggesting the average score is heavily influenced by specific workload characteristics rather than raw core count.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates that the i5-13400E can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation tasks with reasonable speed. Single-core performance of 3240 ensures that day-to-day desktop responsiveness, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing remain snappy. The 65 W TDP means this processor is suitable for compact desktop builds with modest cooling requirements—a capable air cooler would suffice. The L3 cache is 20 MB shared, with 1.25 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, providing adequate cache hierarchy for the 10-core configuration. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, which offers a clear upgrade path within the same generation.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a high-end desktop GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito, and built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, Navi 31, contains 57,700 million transistors across a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1 million per mm². This GPU is equipped with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, with an effective data rate of 20 Gbps. For compute, the RX 7900 XT features 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. Ray tracing is handled by 84 dedicated RT cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 103.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds are notable: the base clock is 1387 MHz, the boost clock reaches 2394 MHz, and the game clock is listed at 2025 MHz. These clocks, combined with the high memory bandwidth, position the RX 7900 XT as a strong performer for 1440p and 4K gaming, as well as for GPU-accelerated rendering tasks. The 20 GB VRAM capacity is generous, allowing large textures and complex scenes to be loaded without spilling into system memory. The 800 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data-intensive workloads, such as 4K texture streaming or machine learning inference, have sufficient throughput. The TDP is 300 W, requiring a 700 W suggested PSU and two 8-pin power connectors. The card is dual-slot with dimensions of 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, making it a large but manageable addition to most mid-tower cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, offering modern connectivity options.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its high-end positioning, but with some caveats. The PassMark G3D score is 29009, which is an excellent result for gaming and general GPU compute. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 71068, indicating strong performance in Vulkan-based applications and games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a modern ray-traced benchmark, and this score suggests solid DirectX 12 performance. However, the PassMark DirectX 10 score is 158, DirectX 11 is 340, DirectX 12 is 110, and DirectX 9 is 322—these legacy benchmark scores are oddly low compared to the G3D and Vulkan results. The PassMark G2D score is 1232, which is modest for 2D tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 12756, which is a moderate result for compute workloads. The PassMark GPU Compute score is 16828, which is respectable for general-purpose compute.

The average benchmark score for the RX 7900 XT is 13745, placing it at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (an integrated GPU) with a score of 13812, which is 0.5% higher; the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (a laptop workstation GPU) with 13821, also 0.5% higher; the AMD Radeon RX 570X (an older mid-range card) with 13871, which is 0.9% higher; and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (a newer generation card) with 13543, which is 1.5% lower. These deltas are all within a small range, indicating that the RX 7900 XT's average score is tightly clustered with these diverse rivals. The 55th percentile is lower than one might expect for a flagship-class GPU, but this is due to the average benchmark score being dragged down by the low legacy DirectX scores. In modern workloads, the RX 7900 XT is clearly a high-end part, as evidenced by the 29009 PassMark G3D and 71068 Vulkan scores.

For rendering workloads, the 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 provide substantial compute power for 3D rendering, video effects, and scientific simulations. The 84 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is supported in DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, with a release date of 2022-11-02 and a successor in Navi IV. The launch MSRP is 899 USD, though this price is historical and no longer reflects current market conditions.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for the Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT places this pairing at the 59th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This is a balanced mid-to-high tier configuration, where the CPU and GPU are each in the upper half of their respective categories, but neither is at the absolute top. The CPU's percentile is 62, while the GPU's percentile is 55, indicating that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own field.

In CPU benchmarks, the i5-13400E's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 is the standout number. This puts it roughly 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-9940X in average score, but 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900E and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Pentium Gold G6405. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3240 is competitive for the desktop segment, though the FACT PACK does not provide direct rival comparisons for single-core performance. The Cinebench R20 and R15 scores of 9639/1360 and 2313/326, respectively, show consistent scaling.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is the most relevant modern gaming benchmark. The PassMark G3D score of 29009 is the strongest indicator of raw gaming performance, while the Vulkan score of 71068 suggests excellent API efficiency. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756 is relatively modest, indicating that compute-heavy workloads may not scale perfectly with the GPU's theoretical FP32 throughput. The average GPU benchmark score of 13745 is within 1.5% of its nearest rivals, showing that the RX 7900 XT's performance is well-understood within the database.

The combined picture is one of a system that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and capable of 4K gaming, though the GPU's 55th percentile suggests that top-tier 4K performance may require a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 62nd percentile ensures that it will not be a significant bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, as its multi-core and single-core scores are both robust. For productivity tasks, the CPU's 22950 multi-core score and the GPU's 29009 G3D score indicate that this pairing can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software development workloads with ease. The data shows a system that is more CPU-favorable than GPU-favorable in relative terms, but both components are competent for their respective roles.

# Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need a desktop system for high-refresh gaming and content creation without going to the absolute extreme of enthusiast hardware. Gamers playing at 1440p will benefit from the RX 7900 XT's strong G3D score and the i5-13400E's solid single-core performance, which together support high frame rates in most titles. For 4K gaming, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the 55th percentile suggests that ultra settings at 4K may require adjustments in some games.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find the CPU's 22950 multi-core score and the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance to be a capable combination for rendering and effects work. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds. Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity, data analysis, or light CAD work will find this pairing more than adequate, though it may be overkill for purely office-based tasks.

Specifically, this build suits gamers who want a smooth 1440p experience with high refresh rates (144 Hz or higher), as the GPU's 29009 G3D score is well above the threshold for such workloads. It also suits professionals who run GPU-accelerated renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles or similar) and need the 20 GB VRAM for large scenes. The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it easy to cool in a compact case, while the GPU's 300 W TDP requires adequate airflow but is manageable in a standard mid-tower. This is not a build for budget-constrained buyers, but rather for those who prioritize performance within a reasonable power envelope.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-13400E scores 22950 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT has 84 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7900 XT has a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The i5-13400E uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 59 among all CPU+GPU combinations.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29009 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates at 1440p in most modern titles. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance should allow the GPU to reach near-peak utilization, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in esports titles. At 1440p, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for ultra settings in AAA games, with estimated frame rates in the 80-120 FPS range for demanding titles and 120-144+ FPS for lighter games. At 4K, the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports 4K gaming, but the 55th percentile suggests that ultra settings may drop below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenarios, so users may need to adjust settings to high rather than ultra.

The GPU's Vulkan score of 71068 indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based games, which often see better frame pacing and lower overhead than DirectX 11 titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 confirms that DirectX 12 games will run well. For ray-traced games, the 84 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the performance will vary by title; the RX 7900 XT is not the absolute fastest for ray tracing, but it is competent. Overall, this pairing is estimated to be an excellent 1440p gaming machine and a good 4K gaming machine with moderate settings adjustments.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is relatively even, but the data shows that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peer group than the GPU. The CPU's percentile is 62, while the GPU's is 55, a 7-point difference. This suggests that in CPU-bound workloads (e.g., physics simulation, strategy games, or software compilation), the CPU will hold up well, and the GPU may reach its limits before the CPU does. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads (e.g., 4K gaming, rendering), the GPU will be the primary limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom.

In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 3240 is strong, so the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the 55th percentile indicates that the GPU will be the limiting component in most graphically demanding titles. For productivity workloads, the CPU's 22950 multi-core score and the GPU's 29009 G3D score suggest that neither component will be a severe bottleneck for tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, though the GPU's 12756 OpenCL score shows that compute-heavy tasks may not scale perfectly with the GPU's theoretical FP32 throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports a balanced pairing: the CPU's 62nd percentile ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, and the GPU's 55th percentile means the system's overall gaming performance is limited by the GPU, which is typical for a gaming-focused build. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 300 W TDP of the GPU mean that power delivery is not a bottleneck, provided a 700 W PSU is used. Overall, the data shows a system where the CPU is slightly overqualified for the GPU, which is a good position to be in for future GPU upgrades.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-13400E, a mid-range Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, a high-end RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The CPU is a 10-core/16-thread part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 300 W card with 20 GB of VRAM. The overall tier of this system, based on the combined percentile of 59, is solidly mid-to-high range. It is not an extreme enthusiast setup (which would likely exceed the 90th percentile), but it is well above the average desktop configuration, which would sit near the 50th percentile.

The CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 55th percentile indicate that this build is more CPU-favorable than GPU-favorable in relative terms. This is a deliberate balance: the i5-13400E provides strong multi-threaded performance for productivity, while the RX 7900 XT delivers high-end gaming performance. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, which may affect long-term availability, but its performance remains relevant. The CPU is an active production part, ensuring continued support. This pairing is suitable for a single-system setup that handles both gaming and work without requiring two separate machines.

In terms of physical requirements, the build needs a motherboard with Intel Socket 1700, a 700 W PSU, and a case with enough clearance for a 276 mm GPU. The CPU's 65 W TDP allows for a compact air cooler, while the GPU's dual-slot design requires standard PCIe slot spacing. The system supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. Overall, this is a versatile desktop build that is well-suited for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation, with the caveat that it is not at the absolute modern of performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, this system is estimated to deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with the GPU's 29009 G3D score and the CPU's 3240 single-core score supporting refresh rates of 120 Hz or higher in many games. For esports titles at 1080p, the system is expected to handle 144+ FPS with ease.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for software encoding at 1080p60, while the GPU's 20 GB VRAM ensures that game capture does not impact performance. The 22950 multi-core score means that streaming and gaming simultaneously will not cause significant frame drops.

Video editing: The i5-13400E's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 accelerates timeline rendering and export times, while the RX 7900 XT's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 provides GPU acceleration for effects and color grading. The 20 GB VRAM is ample for 4K video projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's FP32 and FP16 throughput (51.48 TFLOPS and 103.0 TFLOPS) accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 84 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, and the 800 GB/s bandwidth helps with large texture sets.

Software development: The 10 cores and 16 threads compile code efficiently, and the ECC memory support enhances system stability for long-running builds. The CPU's 62nd percentile ensures that it outperforms a majority of processors in compilation tasks.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for word processing and web browsing, but the CPU's single-core performance ensures snappy responsiveness, and the GPU's 1232 G2D score handles 2D graphics tasks without issue. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a workstation that may run all day.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds