SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Hardware Analysis: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake architecture with AMD's RDNA 3.0 GPU, landing at a combined percentile of 61 across all CPU+GPU configurations in the database. The CPU holds a 62nd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at a 60th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a balanced mid-range desktop build. The configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and the GPU carries a launch MSRP of 329 USD. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing shows strong potential based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17132 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240. The single-core performance places the processor in a competitive position, which matters for games that rely heavily on one or two threads. The GPU's 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide sufficient throughput for fast-paced titles, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit extreme resolutions.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, which handle encoding and overlays while game logic runs on separate cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates substantial parallel headroom, and the GPU's 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) can offload certain rendering tasks. The 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer provides ample space for streaming software capture buffers alongside game assets.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leverages both components. The CPU's multi-core throughput, demonstrated by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9639, handles timeline scrubbing and effect processing, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 92426 accelerates effects, color grading, and export encoding. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for 4K timelines where multiple video streams and effects layers consume memory rapidly.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya depends heavily on the GPU's compute capabilities. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8987, combined with the 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 rate, suggests respectable viewport performance and render times for scenes that use GPU-accelerated engines. The CPU's 20 MB shared L3 cache helps with scene graph traversal and physics simulations that still run on the CPU, while the 10 cores handle multithreaded render tasks when using CPU-based engines.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 16 threads for parallel compilation, with the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2313 indicating solid build performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output for headless development servers, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 API support enables modern graphics debugging and compute shader development.

Student and office work sees no bottleneck from either component. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R15 score of 326 handles everyday productivity applications with ease, while the GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1030 ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP together suggest modest power requirements for a standard desktop setup, though the suggested PSU of 450 W should be respected.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 6638 places it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X at an average score of 6647, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657 (delta -0.3%), while the Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611 (delta 0.4%). Interestingly, the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 also appears at 6605 (delta 0.5%), though this likely reflects a benchmark anomaly rather than comparable real-world performance. The CPU's Cinebench scores scale predictably: R15 multi-core 2313, R20 multi-core 9639, and R23 multi-core 22950, with single-core results of 326, 1360, and 3240 respectively.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17083 places it at the 60th percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scoring 17208 (delta -0.7%), making it the closest competitor. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (delta 0.3%), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019 (delta 0.4%), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932 (delta 0.9%). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348, PassMark G3D score of 17132, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366 provide a multi-faceted view of its capabilities.

The combined picture shows a system where both components sit within a narrow percentile band (60-62), indicating balanced performance without a dominant bottleneck. The CPU's 0.5% margin over the Intel Core i9-12900E suggests architectural efficiency from Raptor Lake, while the GPU's 0.7% deficit to the RTX 3070 in average score masks different strength profiles across DirectX versions. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 167 versus DirectX 12 score of 65 reveals a notable regression in newer API workloads, which could impact modern game performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E scores 6638 on average, trailing the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647) by 0.1% and the Intel Core i9-9940X (6657) by 0.3%, while leading the Intel Core i9-12900E (6611) by 0.4% and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6605) by 0.5%.

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor according to the benchmark data?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 17083. The GTX 690 (17037) trails by 0.3%, and the Radeon HD 7970M (17019) trails by 0.4%.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems. This adds reliability for memory-intensive tasks like long-running renders or database operations.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RX 7600 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its single-core performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 versus single-core score of 3240 shows a 7.1x scaling factor across 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating excellent parallel efficiency for a mid-range desktop processor.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 61, with the CPU at 62 and the GPU at 60, showing a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically outperforms the other.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RX 7600 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with current and upcoming game titles that leverage these APIs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17132 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240 provide the basis for these projections.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU's 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 176.3 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate strong fill-rate capabilities, while the CPU's single-core performance ensures that game logic and draw call processing keep pace. Expect 60+ FPS in well-optimized titles, with more demanding games potentially dipping to 40-50 FPS at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM becomes valuable for high-resolution textures, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may create a bottleneck. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 suggests moderate DX12 performance, which translates to roughly 50-70 FPS in most AAA titles at 1440p ultra, with lighter esports titles exceeding 100 FPS.

At 4K resolution, this pairing will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles. The pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s is insufficient for 4K at high frame rates, and the memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. Estimated performance drops to 25-40 FPS in graphically intensive games, making 4K gaming viable only with reduced settings or upscaling technologies.

The CPU's gaming performance is solid across resolutions, with the Raptor Lake architecture providing strong single-threaded performance. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with game asset streaming, and the 10 cores handle background tasks like Discord or browser tabs without impacting frame rates. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 167 versus DirectX 12 score of 65 suggests that older titles may perform better than newer ones, as the architecture shows regression in newer API workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 61 versus CPU percentile of 62 and GPU percentile of 60 indicates a slight CPU-favored balance. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the GPU may become the limiting factor due to its 60th percentile ranking. Conversely, the GPU's 22.57 TFLOPS compute capability can outpace the CPU in certain parallel workloads, but the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient feeding for the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores shows that the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3240) is competitive with its rivals, suggesting it won't bottleneck the GPU in most games. However, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 65 versus DirectX 11 score of 167 reveals a potential API-level bottleneck where newer games using DX12 may underutilize the GPU, shifting the bottleneck to the graphics card itself.

In productivity workloads, the CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22950) becomes the primary driver for rendering and compilation tasks, with the GPU serving as an accelerator. The GPU's 32 RT cores and 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 rate provide substantial compute headroom, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-intensive operations. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a constraint at 4K or in compute tasks that stream large datasets.

The CPU's 65 W TDP versus GPU's 190 W TDP suggests the GPU draws significantly more power, meaning the GPU is more likely to be thermally or power-limited in a constrained chassis. The suggested PSU of 450 W provides adequate headroom for both components under load, but overclocking headroom is limited since the CPU's multiplier is locked.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The CPU's dual-channel memory bus works with either memory type, though DDR5 offers higher bandwidth potential. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning the GPU operates at half the available lanes but with sufficient bandwidth for its 16 GB frame buffer.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP, combined with the suggested PSU of 450 W, provide a clear upgrade path. Users can upgrade to a higher-core-count LGA 1700 processor without changing the motherboard, though the 13400E's 10 cores already provide solid multi-threaded performance. The GPU can be upgraded to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series card or a competing NVIDIA offering, as the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface supports current-generation graphics cards without bottlenecking.

Memory expansion is straightforward with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support, and the 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency sensitivity. The platform's ECC memory support adds a workstation-grade feature for users who require data integrity. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output and can be used for video encoding tasks, though the dedicated GPU handles most graphics workloads.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 62nd percentile leaves headroom for a stronger graphics card. The 450 W PSU suggestion indicates that a GPU with a TDP up to around 190 W can be accommodated, but a higher-power GPU would require a PSU upgrade. Alternatively, upgrading the CPU to a higher-end Raptor Lake part with more cores would benefit heavily multithreaded workloads, though the current CPU's performance is well-balanced with the GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E features 10 cores and 16 threads, combining 6 performance cores with 4 efficiency cores in a hybrid design typical of Raptor Lake. The base clock of 2.40 GHz boosts to 4.60 GHz, providing strong single-threaded performance as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3240. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size contribute to the 65 W TDP, making this an efficient processor for desktop use.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache size is particularly beneficial for gaming and productivity workloads where shared data access patterns benefit from larger on-chip storage. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support for reliability-conscious users.

The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2313 and R20 multi-core score of 9639 show consistent scaling across benchmark versions, with the R23 multi-core score of 22950 representing the most modern measurement. The average benchmark score of 6638 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with performance nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647) and Intel Core i9-9940X (6657). The 0.4% lead over the Intel Core i9-12900E (6611) suggests architectural improvements in Raptor Lake over the previous generation.

The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output and video playback capabilities, though it is not intended for gaming. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU enables high-bandwidth connectivity for storage devices and graphics cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The production status is active, and the release date of 2023-01-03 indicates a mature platform with established driver and BIOS support.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core i5-13400E with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, creating a mid-range desktop build with a combined percentile of 61. The CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 60th percentile indicate a well-balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's Raptor Lake architecture provides 10 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU's RDNA 3.0 architecture delivers 16 GB of VRAM and 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The build class is desktop, meaning this is a stationary system designed for performance rather than portability. The GPU's dual-slot design and 204 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases, while the CPU's 65 W TDP allows for a capable air cooler without requiring liquid cooling. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 on the CPU provides a fallback display output if the dedicated GPU is removed or fails.

The overall tier from the percentiles places this system in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6638 and GPU's average score of 17083 combine to position this build for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks. The system's PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 on the GPU ensure compatibility with current and next-generation components.

The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory is a standout feature for this tier, providing headroom for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads. The 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, but sufficient for the GPU's intended resolution range. The build's power requirements are manageable with a 450 W PSU, making it suitable for standard desktop builds without specialized power delivery.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolution with high settings will find this build appropriate, based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17132 and the CPU's strong single-core performance. The 16 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for texture-heavy titles, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance at 4K. Esports players will benefit from the CPU's high single-core throughput, which supports high refresh rates in competitive titles.

Content creators working with video editing and motion graphics will appreciate the combination of CPU multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22950) and GPU compute capability (OpenCL score 92426). The 16 GB VRAM handles 4K video timelines and After Effects compositions, while the CPU's 16 threads accelerate preview rendering and export tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long rendering sessions.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache, which accelerate parallel build processes. The Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable modern graphics development, while the GPU's compute performance supports shader compilation and GPU debugging. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows developers to choose memory based on budget and performance needs.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find this build suitable for coursework involving CAD, programming, and data analysis. The CPU's balanced single-core and multi-core performance handles typical academic workloads, while the GPU's compute capability supports machine learning experiments and visualization tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps energy costs manageable for dormitory use.

Small business workstations for tasks like photo editing, financial modeling, and database management will benefit from the system's reliability features. The ECC memory support and active production status of both components ensure long-term availability and stability. The integrated graphics provides a fallback display output, and the 450 W PSU suggestion allows for modest expansion without major infrastructure changes.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, and the GPU's base clock of 1980 MHz boosts to 2755 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz. The 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, result in a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The GPU's compute architecture includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 RT cores for ray tracing. The pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s provide solid fill-rate capabilities for 1080p and 1440p rendering. The FP32 compute rate of 22.57 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), supports both gaming and compute workloads.

The benchmark scores reveal a nuanced performance profile. The PassMark G3D score of 17132 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 indicate moderate modern gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 and Vulkan score of 48366 show strong compute and API-specific capabilities. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 167 versus DirectX 12 score of 65 suggests significant regression in DX12 workloads, which may impact newer game titles that rely heavily on DX12 features.

The GPU's 60th percentile ranking puts it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (17208, delta -0.7%) in average score, though the performance profile differs. The 16 GB VRAM is double that of many competing cards, providing an advantage in VRAM-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures or large compute datasets. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing, though the gaming performance impact of RT workloads is not directly measured in the available benchmarks.

The GPU's display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors and multi-display setups. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem, and the dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The 190 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU provide a clear power budget for system builders.