SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring a 215 mm² die. It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid layout that suits modern multitasking workloads. The base clock sits at 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, delivering solid single-thread responsiveness when workloads demand it. The 65 W TDP keeps thermal requirements modest, making it compatible with a wide range of motherboards and cooling solutions on the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for this class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This large L3 helps with gaming and productivity tasks where data reuse is common. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility to choose between older, established memory or newer, faster modules. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds that prioritize data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the integrated UHD Graphics 730 is present for basic display output but not for serious gaming.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its mid-range positioning. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 22950 indicates strong all-core throughput, ideal for video rendering, code compilation, and 3D modeling. The single-core score of 3240 in the same test reflects capable per-thread performance for everyday applications and games that rely on fewer cores. Older Cinebench versions tell a similar story: R20 multicore at 9639 and single-core at 1360, while R15 multicore reaches 2313 and single-core 326. The average benchmark score of 6638 places this CPU in the 62nd percentile of all processors, meaning it outperforms a majority of alternatives. Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-13400E sits within a tight band: it trails the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X by 0.1% and the Intel Core i9-9940X by 0.3%, while leading the Intel Core i9-12900E by 0.4% and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 by 0.5%. This clustering suggests that for most real-world tasks, the i5-13400E delivers performance nearly identical to those older high-end chips, despite being a more modern, lower-power part.

Benchmark Performance

The data for this combination contains no measured FPS rows — the FACT PACK explicitly lacks measuredFps data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. Therefore, all frame rate discussion must be treated as estimated from the underlying benchmark scores rather than empirical results. This is an important caveat for any reader expecting direct gaming validation.

Looking at the CPU side, the i5-13400E's average benchmark score of 6638 and 62nd percentile ranking indicate a processor that handles productivity workloads with confidence. The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600, posts an average benchmark score of 15171 and sits in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon 680M leads by 0.7%, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560X trails by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti trails by 0.7%. This places the RX 7600 in a competitive mid-range tier, slightly outpacing some older or integrated solutions but not breaking into higher performance brackets.

The combined percentile for this build is 60, indicating that the pairing lands in the upper-middle range of desktop configurations. In GPU-specific benchmarks, the RX 7600 shows distinct strengths: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 34401. Passmark results vary by API generation, with DirectX 11 at 172, DirectX 10 at 84, DirectX 12 at 58, and DirectX 9 at 226. The G3D score of 16634 and G2D score of 984 provide additional context, while GPU compute reaches 8790. These numbers suggest the GPU is well-suited to DirectX 11 titles and general compute tasks, but its DirectX 12 and DirectX 10 scores are lower, which could indicate driver optimization or architectural trade-offs. For gaming, the estimated FPS picture is that this pairing will handle 1080p and 1440p at medium-to-high settings in most titles, but ultra settings at 4K will likely strain the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, produced on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die measures 204 mm² and contains 13,300 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². This is a compact, efficient design that fits into a dual-slot form factor measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, making it suitable for smaller cases. The base clock is 1720 MHz, the boost clock reaches 2655 MHz, and the game clock is rated at 2250 MHz — the boost figure is what most users will see under load, and it is reasonably high for this class.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB capacity may become a limitation in VRAM-heavy titles at higher resolutions or with texture packs. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is respectable for compute workloads but not class-leading.

Ray tracing is handled by 32 dedicated RT cores, a feature that is present but not the primary strength of this GPU. For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS suggests solid performance in GPU-accelerated previews and renders, though the 8 GB VRAM will cap scene complexity. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, allowing multi-monitor setups with high refresh rates. The power draw is 165 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth, though it is half the lanes of a x16 slot — this is unlikely to bottleneck gaming performance. In benchmark terms, the RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking and average score of 15171 indicate it competes directly with the RTX 3050 OEM, trailing by just 0.2%, and outperforms the Radeon 680M by 0.7%.

Who Should Build It

This desktop configuration targets users who need a balanced system for 1080p gaming and moderate productivity. The i5-13400E's 62nd percentile CPU ranking and the RX 7600's 57th percentile GPU ranking combine to a 60th percentile overall, making this a mid-range build that avoids extreme costs while covering most daily tasks. Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for high-refresh titles, while the CPU's single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth frame pacing in games that depend on per-thread performance.

Content creators who edit video or work with 3D models will benefit from the CPU's multicore strength — a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22950 handles rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute adds acceleration for effects and previews. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads, which reduce build times. Students and office workers get a system that handles document editing, web browsing, and multitasking without strain, thanks to the CPU's balanced single and multi-core scores. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and the 65 W TDP for power-efficient operation in always-on environments. The RX 7600's display outputs — 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 — support multi-monitor productivity setups, which is a practical advantage for spreadsheet-heavy roles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-13400E and the RX 7600 is skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 62nd percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 57th percentile, indicating that the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in most scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become constraints. The GPU's DirectX 12 Passmark score of 58 is notably low compared to its DirectX 11 score of 172, suggesting that DX12 titles could underperform expectations relative to the hardware's raw compute power.

For productivity tasks, the CPU dominates the workload, and the GPU's compute capability (21.75 TFLOPS) provides supplementary acceleration but is not the primary driver. The estimated FPS scaling, derived from benchmark scores, indicates that at 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most games, but at 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth limitation will cap performance. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI-driven game logic, the i5-13400E's single-core score of 3240 will hold up well. The gap between the CPU's 62nd and GPU's 57th percentile is small — roughly 5 percentage points — so neither component is massively over- or under-powered relative to the other. However, the lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are inferred from benchmark averages rather than direct testing, so real-world behavior could vary.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The i5-13400E uses DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so builders can choose their memory standard upfront and stick with it. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, leaving thermal and power headroom for a future processor upgrade in the same socket, though the motherboard's VRM quality will determine the ceiling. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes ensures that a newer GPU can be installed without interface bottlenecks, though the current RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible.

For the GPU, the 450 W suggested PSU provides a baseline for upgrades. A future GPU with a higher TDP would require a PSU upgrade, but the current 165 W TDP leaves room for additional components. The single 8-pin power connector is standard, but newer GPUs may require different connectors. The RX 7600's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means that upgrading to a GPU with a x16 interface will not improve performance on this board, as the slot is physically x8. Memory-wise, the dual-channel support and DDR4/DDR5 flexibility mean that adding more RAM or switching standards is possible without changing the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback if the GPU fails or is removed, which is a practical redundancy. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth, as the CPU has headroom to support it based on its 62nd percentile ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600's 57th percentile GPU ranking and the i5-13400E's strong single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 suggest this build can drive 1080p monitors at high refresh rates in esports and lighter titles. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 Passmark score of 58 indicates that DX12 games may not scale as well.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, with the 65 W TDP keeping thermals manageable. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute can assist with encoding offload, though the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI upscaling hardware.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22950 provides fast export and render times, while the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth aids in previewing effects. The 8 GB VRAM will limit the complexity of GPU-accelerated timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache handle geometry and scene setup, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS accelerates final renders. The 57th percentile GPU ranking means render times will be mid-pack, not exceptional.

Software development: The multi-core score of 22950 reduces compilation times, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long build sessions. The 62nd percentile CPU ranking indicates this is a capable developer machine.

Student and office work: The single-core score of 3240 handles document and spreadsheet tasks with ease, and the 65 W TDP keeps electricity costs low. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a backup if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400E with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, targeting the mid-range performance tier. The combined percentile of 60 places it above a majority of systems, with the CPU at 62nd and GPU at 57th percentile respectively. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 4.60 GHz boost clock and 20 MB L3 cache, while the GPU is a Navi 33-based RDNA 3.0 card with 8 GB GDDR6 and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The average benchmark scores — 6638 for the CPU and 15171 for the GPU — confirm a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This system is best suited for 1080p gaming and productivity workloads, with the CPU providing a slight edge in compute-heavy tasks. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all performance expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores provided.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The i5-13400E is in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13400E supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 165 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds