SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that targets a solid mid-range performance tier. The CPU, a 13th Gen Raptor Lake part, combines 10 cores with 16 threads, while the GPU, an RDNA 2.0 architecture card, brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. Together, they sit at the 67th combined percentile for all hardware configurations, indicating a balanced system that sits above the majority of competing builds. The benchmark data shows this is a capable combination, though the lack of measured FPS figures means gaming performance must be inferred from synthetic scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It features a hybrid configuration of 10 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosting up to 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning it is not unlocked for overclocking, which is typical for the E-series embedded-focused variants.

In Cinebench testing, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22950 places it well ahead of many desktop processors, while the single-core score of 3240 shows solid per-thread capability. The Cinebench R20 results (9639 multicore, 1360 single-core) and R15 results (2313 multicore, 326 single-core) follow a similar pattern. The average benchmark score of 6638 puts the i5-13400E at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 62% of processors in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-13400E is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which scores 6647 (a -0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i9-9940X at 6657 (-0.3% delta). It edges out the Intel Core i9-12900E by 0.4% and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 by 0.5%. This is notable because the i5-13400E competes directly with high-core-count HEDT parts from previous generations, offering similar multi-threaded performance with a more modern architecture. The 16 threads handle heavily parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation effectively, while the 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across 12th and 13th Gen Core processors. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and platform cost. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a meaningful feature for small business workstations or entry-level servers where data integrity is critical. PCIe connectivity comes from Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage, though the RX 6750 XT itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The platform's power requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which means a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads. For the GPU, the suggested PSU is 600 W, and the card itself draws 250 W under load. This leaves headroom for a system with several drives and peripherals without requiring an excessive power supply. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, so the PSU must have these available.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to move to a higher-tier 13th Gen Core i7 or i9 processor on the same socket, provided the motherboard's VRM and BIOS support it. This would improve multi-threaded performance significantly without changing the platform. On the GPU side, the RX 6750 XT has a successor in the Navi III generation, so upgrading to a newer Radeon card or a higher-end NVIDIA option would be straightforward, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface remains compatible. The 65 W CPU TDP means that even with a more powerful GPU, the overall system power draw stays manageable within a 600 W PSU, though a larger unit may be prudent for future high-end GPUs.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13400E support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU runs at a base clock of 2.40 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz, and the inability to adjust the multiplier means performance tuning is limited to memory and platform settings.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The i5-13400E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide, and what version?

A: The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This is sufficient for a single high-end graphics card and is backward compatible with the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the TDP of the i5-13400E, and what does it imply for cooling?

A: The TDP is 65 W. This is a low power draw for a 10-core processor, meaning a standard air cooler is adequate, and the system does not require exotic liquid cooling solutions.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is 549 USD. This was the price at release, and the card is now end-of-life, so actual street pricing may differ.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900E in benchmarks?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-12900E's score of 6611. They are effectively equivalent in overall performance despite the different core configurations.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RX 6750 XT is end-of-life. It was released on 2022-03-02, and its successor is the Navi III generation.

Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high settings, as the GPU's 71st percentile position indicates strong rasterization performance. The 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for modern game textures, and the CPU's 62nd percentile ensures it won't bottleneck most gaming scenarios. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 16 threads of the i5-13400E, which deliver Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 22950, placing it in line with older high-end HEDT chips.

Developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will appreciate the thread count and ECC memory support, which adds stability for long-running processes. Students building a versatile machine for coursework and light gaming will find the combination capable, though the 549 USD launch MSRP of the GPU may push the build beyond a strict budget. Small business workstations that need reliable multi-threaded performance for productivity suites, database work, or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's 65 W TDP and ECC support, reducing power and cooling costs in office environments.

The 67th combined percentile means this build outperforms roughly two-thirds of all systems in the database, making it a solid choice for users who want a single machine that handles both work and play without compromise. For gamers at 1080p, the system will be even more comfortable, as the CPU's single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to keep frame rates high in CPU-bound titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 6638, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, scores 6647, a negligible 0.1% difference, confirming that the i5-13400E delivers HEDT-class multi-threaded performance at a mainstream power envelope. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26011, which puts it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891 (0.5% slower), followed by the AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% slower) and the AMD FirePro D700 at 25842 (0.7% slower). Interestingly, it also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%, which had a score of 25740.

In GPU-specific tests, the RX 6750 XT shows strong DirectX 12 performance with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2548. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 is much higher than the Metal score of 137249, indicating the card is optimized for Vulkan and DirectX workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 20700 is robust, while the GPU compute score of 9550 shows solid compute throughput. The combined system percentile of 67 means the pairing sits comfortably above the median, and the near-parity between CPU and GPU percentiles (62 vs 71) suggests a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 7 nm process, with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The card has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS and FP16 of 26.62 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The 40 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT effects, though the RDNA 2.0 implementation is less performant than competing architectures in heavy RT workloads. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming with high texture quality, and the 12 GB VRAM capacity allows for large texture packs without exceeding memory limits. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines.

In rendering scenarios, the FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS is competitive for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, though it is not a top-tier compute card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 16360 and Vulkan score of 98089 indicate strong general-purpose compute performance, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 9550 reinforces this. The card is dual-slot and requires a 600 W PSU, with power connectors of one 6-pin and one 8-pin. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high refresh rate monitors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 71st percentile and the CPU's 62nd percentile suggest that at 1080p and 1440p, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for modern games at high settings, and the 40 ray tracing cores allow for RT effects at reduced performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's strong rasterization performance should push well over 100 FPS in esports titles and competitive shooters, while more demanding AAA games may hover around 60-90 FPS depending on optimization. At 1440p, the system should remain very playable, with many games achieving 60+ FPS on high settings, though ultra settings with heavy RT may require adjustments. 4K gaming is possible but will likely require lower settings or upscaling, as the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not sufficient for consistently high frame rates at that resolution.

The CPU's single-core performance, measured at 3240 in Cinebench R23, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games. However, in CPU-heavy titles like strategy games or simulation games, the 4.60 GHz boost clock will help maintain stable frame times. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the synthetic benchmark scores indicate a well-balanced system for 1440p gaming.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13400E with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile of 67 places this system above the majority of builds in the database, indicating a solid mid-to-high-tier performance level. The CPU provides 10 cores and 16 threads with a 62nd percentile ranking, while the GPU offers 12 GB VRAM and a 71st percentile ranking. This is a desktop-class system designed for users who need a versatile machine for gaming, content creation, and productivity.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP mean the system has modest power requirements, with a 600 W PSU being the suggested minimum. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders options to manage costs. The GPU is end-of-life, but its performance remains competitive, as evidenced by its 71st percentile and the 1.1% advantage over the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. Overall, this is a balanced build that avoids significant weak points, making it a reliable choice for a wide range of applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing, with the CPU at the 62nd percentile and the GPU at the 71st percentile. The 9-point gap means the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers, so in gaming scenarios, the CPU may become the limiting factor at lower resolutions where frame rates are very high. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will be the primary constraint in CPU-bound titles, potentially preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. However, the 4.60 GHz boost clock and strong Cinebench single-core score of 3240 mitigate this.

In multi-threaded workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling, the CPU's 16 threads at the 62nd percentile provide adequate throughput, but the GPU's compute capabilities (13.31 TFLOPS FP32) may be the bottleneck for GPU-accelerated tasks. The Passmark GPU compute score of 9550 is respectable but not exceptional, so compute-heavy applications may see the GPU limiting performance.

In GPU-bound scenarios at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as its 71st percentile is still below top-tier cards. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p will show a noticeable drop, consistent with the GPU's bandwidth and compute limits. The balanced nature of this build means neither component will consistently hold back the other across all workloads, making it a flexible system that performs predictably across gaming and productivity tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds