SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange of the hardware spectrum. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, combines 10 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit bus to the table. Together, they occupy the 67th percentile among all combined CPU and GPU pairings, indicating a system that is positioned above the majority of configurations while not reaching the top tier. The data in this analysis is derived strictly from the provided benchmark scores and specifications, offering a methodical look at what this combination can deliver for various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel. Its configuration, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, is designed to balance multi-threaded throughput with single-thread responsiveness. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This setup supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes directly from the processor. It also includes UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes that secondary.

Benchmark results for the CPU place it in the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, which is a solid middle-ground position. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 22950 points in the multicore test and 3240 points in the singlecore test. The multicore score indicates strong performance for heavily threaded tasks, while the singlecore score suggests capable responsiveness for everyday applications. Looking at the older Cinebench R20 tests, the multicore score is 9639 and the singlecore score is 1360. In Cinebench R15, the multicore result is 2313 and the singlecore is 326. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6638.

Comparing the i5-13400E to its nearest rivals, which are listed with their average scores and delta percentages, the data shows a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an average score of 6647, which is only 0.1 percent higher than the Intel part, meaning the i5-13400E is effectively neck-and-neck with that high-end desktop processor. Similarly, the Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657, putting the i5-13400E 0.3 percent behind it. Conversely, the i5-13400E is 0.4 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900E, which scores 6611, and 0.5 percent ahead of the Intel Pentium Gold G6405, which scores 6605. These small deltas indicate that the i5-13400E performs in a very competitive band, where architectural differences produce only minor average score variations. For real workloads, this means the CPU is well-suited for tasks like video editing, software compilation, and multitasking where the 16 threads can be utilized effectively, while the singlecore performance ensures that lighter, more interactive tasks remain snappy.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is defined by their individual benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU, as noted, holds the 62nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 6638. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, achieves a higher standing at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27425. When the two are considered as a pair, the combined percentile is 67, which reflects a system that is slightly more GPU-dominant in terms of overall capability relative to other components.

Delving into the GPU-specific scores, the Radeon RX 6700 XT shows strong results across various API tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2435, which is a measure of modern gaming performance under DirectX 12. The Geekbench tests show a Metal score of 130896, an OpenCL score of 44152, and a Vulkan score of 93500. These numbers indicate strong compute performance across different frameworks, which is relevant for content creation and GPU-accelerated tasks. The Passmark suite provides further granularity, with a G3D score of 19786 and a GPU compute score of 9336. The older DirectX tests show scores of 124 for DX10, 173 for DX11, 77 for DX12, and 242 for DX9, while the G2D score is 951.

The GPU’s nearest rivals highlight its position in the market. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has an average score of 27435, which is exactly 0 percent different from the RX 6700 XT, indicating a statistical tie in average performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565, placing the AMD card 0.5 percent behind it, which is a remarkable result for a comparison against a top-tier desktop GPU. Conversely, the RX 6700 XT is 1.1 percent ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell, which scores 27135, and 1.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, which scores 27839. These deltas show that the RX 6700 XT is positioned in a performance band that rivals both mobile and desktop solutions from NVIDIA, making it a versatile option for 1440p gaming and mid-range rendering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Navi 22 chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a die size of 335 mm², which gives a transistor density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 40 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for ray-traced effects, though the architecture does not have dedicated tensor cores, which are found in some competing NVIDIA products.

Memory specifications for the RX 6700 XT are substantial. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz with a 16 Gbps effective rate, which supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The GPU clocks are set at a base of 2321 MHz, a boost of 2581 MHz, and a game clock of 2424 MHz. These clock speeds are relatively high, which contributes to the GPU’s strong fill rates. The pixel rate is 165.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 413.0 GTexel/s, indicating the GPU can handle high-resolution rendering with dense detail. The FP32 performance is 13.21 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 26.43 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, which is beneficial for compute tasks that can use reduced precision.

For rendering and compute workloads, the benchmark scores show that the RX 6700 XT is a capable performer. The Passmark G3D score of 19786 and the GPU compute score of 9336 indicate that it can handle both graphics and non-graphics tasks well. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 44152 is particularly relevant for applications that use OpenCL for acceleration, such as some video editors and renderers. The 12 GB of VRAM is a key advantage, as it allows the GPU to load larger models and textures without running out of memory, which is a common limitation in lower-VRAM cards. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can flow quickly to the compute units, reducing bottlenecks in memory-intensive operations. The presence of 40 ray tracing cores means that the GPU can handle ray-traced workloads, though the performance in such scenarios is likely to be more modest compared to cards with more dedicated RT hardware.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400E and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is generally well-matched, but the data reveals where each component takes the lead. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 72nd percentile suggest that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. This means in gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions where the rendering load is heavier, while the CPU can keep up with the frame generation demands. Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like physics simulation, AI logic, or frame rate calculations at lower resolutions, the CPU may become the bottleneck, though its 16 threads provide ample headroom for most gaming workloads.

The combined percentile of 67 indicates that the pair is well above average, and the FPS scaling in games would typically follow the GPU’s lead. Since there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, we can only infer from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s singlecore score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to avoid severe bottlenecks in most games, even at high refresh rates, while the GPU’s 72nd percentile position means it can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, the GPU would likely be the primary constraint, as the rendering load increases significantly. In productivity tasks, the balance shifts depending on the workload. For video editing, the GPU can accelerate effects and encoding, while the CPU handles the timeline and encoding logic. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s compute power can work in tandem, though the specific application’s optimization for one over the other will determine the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT have a combined percentile of 67 among all CPU and GPU pairs, indicating they sit above the majority of systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.1 percent lower than the Threadripper 2950X’s score of 6647, making them nearly identical in average performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Radeon RX 6700 XT has a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s on a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, which provides ample throughput for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 40 ray tracing cores based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, enabling hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in games and applications.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing flexibility in motherboard and memory choices.

Q: How does the GPU’s score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 compare to its rivals?

A: The GPU scores 2435 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, has a similar average score, indicating a close performance match.

Q: What is the power draw of the GPU and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 230 W and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which should provide sufficient headroom for the entire system when paired with the 65 W TDP CPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform for this build is centered on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The Intel Core i5-13400E uses this socket, and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in choosing a motherboard and memory kit. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides a high-bandwidth connection for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, ensuring that the platform is not a bottleneck for future components.

The GPU, which is end-of-life, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU also requires a 550 W PSU, which is a modest requirement for its performance class. For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider moving to a newer generation GPU that supports PCIe Gen 5, though the current RX 6700 XT’s performance is still competitive. On the CPU side, the socket 1700 platform has a finite upgrade path, as it supports the 13th Gen and some 14th Gen parts, but users looking for a long-term upgrade path would eventually need to move to a new socket. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, leaving room for a more powerful GPU later without changing the cooling solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 72nd percentile and strong DirectX 12 score of 2435 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggest it can handle high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU’s singlecore score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 ensuring frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s compute score of 9336 in Passmark indicates it can handle the additional load of encoding and scene compositing without a significant performance drop.

Video Editing: The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are beneficial for handling high-resolution footage and effects, while the CPU’s multicore score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 supports timeline rendering and export tasks.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.21 TFLOPS work together for render tasks, with the GPU’s OpenCL score of 44152 indicating strong acceleration in applications that utilize this API.

Software Development: The CPU’s multicore performance and 16 threads allow for fast compilation times, while the GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate certain testing and simulation tasks, though the CPU is the primary driver here.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s singlecore performance and the GPU’s G2D score of 951 ensure that everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work are smooth, and the 10 cores provide plenty of headroom for multitasking.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs an Intel Core i5-13400E with an AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The system occupies the 67th combined percentile, which places it in the upper-midrange tier of performance. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part that delivers a 62nd percentile standing among all CPUs, while the GPU is a Navi 22-based RDNA 2.0 card that achieves a 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The combination is well-suited for a wide range of tasks, from gaming at high refresh rates to content creation and productivity. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth make it a strong choice for 1440p gaming, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle multi-threaded workloads effectively. This pairing is a balanced desktop system that offers a good mix of gaming and compute performance, sitting comfortably above average in the overall hardware landscape.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at gamers who want high-refresh-rate performance at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s 72nd percentile and strong DirectX 12 scores indicate it can handle demanding titles at these resolutions, while the CPU’s singlecore performance ensures smooth frame pacing. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the 12 GB of VRAM and the CPU’s 16 threads, which accelerate rendering and export workflows. Software developers who need fast compilation times will find the multicore score of 22950 in Cinebench R23 useful for building large projects. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, with the CPU’s 10 cores providing headroom for multitasking. Small business workstations that require a balance of CPU and GPU performance for tasks like CAD or data analysis would also find this pairing suitable, as the GPU’s compute score of 9336 supports acceleration in many professional applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 and its 72nd percentile position suggest that it is capable of high frame rates in modern games at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings. The CPU’s singlecore score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 indicates that it will not typically bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. For 1080p gaming, the GPU is likely to deliver very high frame rates, often exceeding the refresh rate of standard monitors, making it suitable for competitive gaming. At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures, and frame rates are expected to remain high, though they may drop in the most demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU would be the limiting factor, and users would need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates. The presence of 40 ray tracing cores means that ray-traced effects are possible, but performance in such scenarios will be more modest, and users may need to use upscaling or reduce settings. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is strong for 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU being the primary driver of frame rates.