SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400

24,280 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a hybrid layout with cache distributed as 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool. This configuration positions it as a mainstream workhorse rather than an enthusiast part, and the benchmark data reflects that positioning clearly.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Core i5-13400 posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15953 and a Geekbench multicore score of 12289. The 3DMark 16-thread test yields 7315, while the max-thread result is nearly identical at 7310, indicating that the processor's thread scaling saturates around its 16-thread count with minimal headroom beyond. The PassMark multithread score of 23719 reinforces this profile. Single-thread performance is respectable but not class-leading: the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1786 and Geekbench single-core score of 2112 show a solid foundation for everyday responsiveness.

The processor's average benchmark score is 24280, placing it in the 76th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-1360P averages 24344 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H averages 24364 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U averages 24188 (0.4% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9654P averages 24465 (0.8% higher). These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i5-13400 trades blows with mobile and enterprise parts that occupy similar performance tiers despite very different intended use cases. The data shows a processor that delivers consistent, predictable throughput across both lightly and heavily threaded tasks, making it a dependable choice for mixed workloads.

For real workloads, the PassMark sub-scores provide granular insight. Integer math scores 77721, floating-point math scores 58786, and extended instructions score 19161. Data compression hits 301481, while encryption manages 15880. Random string sorting posts 30851, and prime number finding scores a modest 74. Physics simulation scores 1244. These figures indicate strong general-purpose compute capability, with particular strength in integer-heavy tasks and compression algorithms—useful for database work, file archiving, and scientific calculations. The single-thread PassMark score of 3538 confirms that older or poorly optimized software will still run adequately.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The CPU's 76th percentile standing and the GPU's 98th percentile standing provide the basis for these estimates, but they remain projections.

The Intel Core i5-13400's single-thread performance—Cinebench R23 single-core at 1786 and 3DMark single-thread at 959—suggests it can feed a high-end GPU in most gaming scenarios without becoming a bottleneck. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1883 and 4-thread score of 3461 indicate that games relying on a few heavily utilized threads will see adequate performance. Meanwhile, the 8-thread score of 5592 shows that modern titles using eight or more threads will be well-served.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, with its 98th percentile GPU ranking and average benchmark score of 184664, is an extremely powerful rendering component. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183725 (0.5% lower), while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109 (1.4% lower) and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050 (3.7% lower). This GPU sits at the top of the performance hierarchy, meaning any gaming bottleneck will almost certainly come from the CPU or the game engine rather than the graphics card.

At 1080p resolution, this combination would likely deliver very high frame rates in esports titles, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance keeping pace. At 1440p, the GPU's massive compute resources—65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and a 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth—would handle demanding AAA games with ease, though the exact frame counts depend on the specific title and optimization. At 4K, the GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate would allow maximum settings with high texture detail, but the CPU's 76th percentile standing might limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. Again, these are estimates; the absence of measured FPS data means they should be treated as directional guidance rather than precise predictions.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400 uses the Intel Socket 1700, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This flexibility is a significant advantage for builders, as it allows pairing the processor with either established DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits depending on motherboard choice and budget constraints. The memory controller does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation users who require error-correcting memory for data integrity.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for a modern graphics card or NVMe storage. The GPU in this build, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots and will operate without bandwidth limitations. The processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, which can serve as a fallback display output or aid in video encoding tasks even without a discrete GPU.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250 W and carries a suggested PSU rating of 600 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, so the total system power draw remains manageable within a 600 W unit, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and other peripherals. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, with a single 16-pin power connector. This form factor is compatible with most mid-tower and full-tower cases, though compact builds should verify clearance.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the more future-proof component. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation already sits at the 98th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within a 3.7% delta, meaning there is little headroom above it in the current market. The CPU, at the 76th percentile, has more room for improvement. Upgrading to a higher-core-count Socket 1700 processor would extend multi-threaded performance without requiring a motherboard change, though the current chip's 16-thread scaling suggests diminishing returns for most workloads. Alternatively, adding faster DDR5 memory (if not already installed) could improve memory-bound tasks, given the dual-channel bus.

# Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need extreme graphics compute power paired with a competent, mid-range CPU. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals in 3D rendering, scientific visualization, and AI inference, where the 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores provide substantial acceleration. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate are workstation-class figures that exceed consumer gaming needs.

Gamers at 4K resolution or those using high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors would benefit from the GPU's capabilities, provided their games are not CPU-limited. The CPU's 76th percentile standing means it will handle most gaming scenarios competently, but users prioritizing maximum frame rates in esports titles at 1080p might find the processor the limiting factor. Content creators editing high-resolution video or working with large 3D scenes would see strong performance, as the GPU's rendering throughput and the CPU's multi-threaded scores align well with these tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities for parallel workloads. Students and small business workstations handling general productivity, office applications, and light content creation would find this build overpowered but capable of handling any future demands without upgrades. The 10 nm process node and 65 W TDP also make the CPU efficient enough for sustained workloads in smaller form factors, though the GPU's dual-slot footprint and 250 W draw require adequate cooling and case space.

The build is less ideal for users on a strict component budget or those who primarily play older or lightly threaded games, as the GPU's power would go largely unused. Similarly, workloads that are purely single-threaded would not benefit from the GPU's massive parallel resources, and the CPU's 3538 single-thread PassMark score, while adequate, is not exceptional.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile GPU score and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive very high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. The CPU's 1786 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures that draw call and physics processing keep pace, though at 1080p with a low-end CPU bottleneck, frame rates could be constrained by the processor rather than the GPU.

Streaming: The GPU's 400 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities. The CPU's 16 threads handle encoding and game logic concurrently, and the 3DMark 8-thread score of 5592 indicates that even with a game running, there is thread headroom for streaming software. The 65 W TDP keeps thermals manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video Editing: The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM allow for smooth playback and rendering of high-resolution footage. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 301481 accelerates codec operations, while the 15953 Cinebench R23 multicore score speeds up export and timeline rendering. This combination handles 4K and even 8K workflows without stuttering.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 100 RT cores deliver industry-leading ray tracing and rasterization performance. The 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate ensures high-quality texture filtering, and the 32 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes and high-resolution textures. The CPU's 7310 max-thread 3DMark score feeds the GPU efficiently in viewport and simulation tasks.

Software Development: The CPU's 16 threads and 77721 integer math score handle compilation and code analysis efficiently. The 12289 Geekbench multicore score reflects strong parallel processing for build servers and test suites. The GPU can be leveraged for parallel computing tasks, such as machine learning model training or scientific simulations, using its tensor cores and OpenCL score of 175286.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but it provides a effortless experience with zero lag in any office application. The CPU's 3538 single-thread PassMark score ensures snappy UI response, while the GPU's power remains idle, drawing minimal power at idle. Students in engineering or design programs would benefit from the GPU's compute capability for CAD and simulation software.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and using the AD102 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors. It operates with a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU features 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units, delivering a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

Memory configuration includes 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large capacity and substantial bandwidth make the card suitable for massive datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-GPU rendering workloads. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference, respectively, with FP32 performance rated at 65.28 TFLOPS and FP16 at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184664. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 175286, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 194041. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183725 (0.5% lower), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147 (1.3% higher), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109 (1.4% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050 (3.7% lower). These deltas indicate that the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is at the very top of the GPU performance spectrum, trading the lead position with enterprise accelerators and the fastest consumer cards.

For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM is a decisive advantage, allowing entire scenes and texture sets to reside in graphics memory without swapping. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution rendering and real-time viewport interaction, while the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates GPU compute tasks like simulation and post-processing. The 400 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features such as denoising and upscaling, which are increasingly standard in professional rendering pipelines.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400 and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 76th percentile means that, in any workload that stresses the graphics card, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor. This is particularly true for gaming at lower resolutions, where the CPU's single-thread performance (959 in 3DMark single-thread) determines the maximum frame rate, while the GPU's massive compute resources go underutilized.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's 16 threads and 15953 Cinebench R23 multicore score can keep pace with the GPU in some scenarios, but the gap widens as GPU compute demands increase. For instance, in 3D rendering, the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 vastly exceeds the CPU's 58786 PassMark floating-point math score, meaning the GPU will finish rendering passes much faster than the CPU can prepare the next frame. This imbalance is acceptable for batch rendering, where the CPU idles during GPU compute, but it becomes a bottleneck in interactive workloads like real-time viewport navigation.

The absence of measured FPS data means the exact bottleneck behavior cannot be quantified, but the percentile difference—22 points between CPU and GPU—suggests that applications must be either GPU-bound or CPU-bound to avoid stalling. Games that scale well across 8 or more threads (as indicated by the 3DMark 8-thread score of 5592) will lean on the CPU's multi-core strength, while those that rely on a few threads will expose its single-thread limitations. The GPU's 98th percentile score guarantees that it will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario, making the CPU the primary upgrade target for users seeking higher frame rates.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400 scores 15953 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 12289 in Geekbench multicore, and 23719 in PassMark multithread, placing it in the 76th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184664, which is 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.3% lower than the A100 SXM4 40 GB, 1.4% higher than the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU rating of 600 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 600 W unit provides sufficient headroom for the system.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with an overall percentile ranking of 87, reflecting a high-performance pairing with a clear GPU emphasis. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24280, placing it at the 76th percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile. The gap between these percentiles indicates that the GPU is the dominant component in this build.

The CPU's best results come from Cinebench R23 multicore at 15953 and PassMark multithread at 23719, with the 3DMark max-thread score of 7310 confirming consistent scaling. The single-thread scores—959 in 3DMark, 1786 in Cinebench R23, and 3538 in PassMark—are adequate but not exceptional, aligning with the 76th percentile placement. The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.8% of the i5-13400's average score, making the performance tier very crowded.

The GPU's benchmark scores are dominated by Geekbench Vulkan at 194041 and Geekbench OpenCL at 175286. Its nearest rivals are within a 3.7% range, with the GeForce RTX 4090 D being the closest consumer competitor at 178050 (3.7% lower). The RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads its immediate rivals in most comparisons, establishing it as a top-tier GPU.

The combined picture is one of a workstation-grade GPU paired with a mid-range desktop CPU. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM, 65.28 TFLOPS FP32, and 98th percentile score make it suitable for the most demanding rendering and compute tasks, while the CPU's 16 threads and 76th percentile score provide competent support for general processing. The system excels in GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, AI inference, and high-resolution gaming, but the CPU will limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The data shows a build that prioritizes graphics compute above all else, with the processor playing a supporting role that is fully adequate for most professional and gaming applications.