SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400

24,280 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific intersection of modern CPU throughput and professional-grade GPU features. The processor delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class, while the graphics card brings 16 GB of VRAM and dedicated ray tracing capabilities from the Turing architecture. However, this combination presents a notable imbalance: the CPU operates at a high percentile ranking, while the GPU's benchmark scores place it closer to mid-range gaming hardware. The data indicates a system where the processor is capable of feeding demanding workloads, but the graphics card may throttle high-refresh-rate gaming and heavy real-time 3D rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 72, indicating it outperforms the majority of recorded system configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1360P?

A: The Core i5-13400 has an average benchmark score of 24280, which is 0.3% lower than the Core i7-1360P's score of 24344. This difference is effectively negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000's average score of 21629 is 1% lower than the GTX 1060 6 GB's score of 21856, placing them in a very similar performance tier despite the significant differences in their feature sets.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The Core i5-13400's boost clock of 4.60 GHz is factory-set, and the data does not indicate any unlocked multiplier for manual overclocking.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 features a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps effective, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400 has a launch MSRP of $221.

Q: Which component is more likely to bottleneck in gaming workloads?

A: Based on the benchmark scores, the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark and its 76th percentile ranking suggest it can handle frame generation, but the GPU's 67th percentile ranking indicates it will constrain maximum frame rates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Consequently, the following discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The data clearly indicates that the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the primary determinant of gaming frame rates. Its PassMark G3D score of 15616 and its 67th percentile ranking place it in a performance bracket similar to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a capable 1080p-class card from a previous generation. Therefore, users should expect solid performance at 1080p for most titles, but the GPU's compute and shading capabilities will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings in demanding modern games.

The CPU's performance, however, will not be the bottleneck. The Core i5-13400's 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and its 2-thread score of 1883 indicate strong per-core performance that can keep up with the GPU's output at lower resolutions. The gap between the GPU's percentile (67th) and the CPU's percentile (76th) suggests that in lighter esports titles, where the CPU load is higher relative to the GPU, the system could still achieve high frame rates. However, for graphically intensive AAA games, the estimated FPS will be moderate, and users should adjust settings to medium or high to maintain smooth gameplay. The data suggests a system better suited for 1080p gaming than for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The benchmark results demonstrate a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 959 in single-thread to 7315 in 16-thread tests, showing a near-linear scaling that indicates efficient utilization of the hybrid core layout.

Real-world workload analysis from the data shows a strong all-rounder. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15953 is substantial, suggesting the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 1786 in the same test is also robust, which is critical for snappy system responsiveness and applications that rely on a few fast threads. The PassMark scores reinforce this versatility: integer math at 77721 and floating-point math at 58786 show strong arithmetic capability, while data compression at 301481 and encryption at 15880 indicate the CPU can manage storage and security tasks efficiently. With a 76th percentile ranking, the i5-13400 sits comfortably above the median CPU, offering performance that rivals the Intel Core i7-1360P, which is only 0.3% faster on average.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a fundamental imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 24280 places it in the 76th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 21629 places it in the 67th percentile. This 9-percentile-point gap suggests that the processor is capable of driving more demanding graphics hardware than what is installed. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 1244 indicates the processor is the active component, and it performs admirably. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Evidence for the bottleneck comes from the GPU's nearest rivals. The Quadro RTX 5000's score is 1% lower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a mid-range card from a previous era. This indicates that the GPU's raw shading power is not in the same league as the CPU's modern multi-threaded capabilities. For example, in a game that relies heavily on pixel shading, the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the ceiling, potentially preventing the CPU from reaching its full frame-generation potential. Conversely, in a game with complex AI or physics simulations, the CPU's 16 threads will be utilized, and the system will feel responsive, but the visual frame rate will still be capped by the GPU. The system is well-balanced for professional workloads that use the GPU's compute features, but for gaming, it is clearly GPU-limited.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 67th percentile and its performance similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB suggest that hitting frame rates above 144 FPS in modern titles at 1080p is unlikely, and 240 Hz would be out of reach. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (959 in 3DMark single-thread) is wasted in this scenario.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. With 16 threads and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15953, it can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. However, the GPU's performance limitations will restrict the game's quality settings, potentially affecting the stream's visual fidelity.

Video Editing: The combination is competent for video editing. The CPU's multicore strength will accelerate export times and effects rendering, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for large timelines and 4K previews. The PassMark data compression score of 301481 also aids in handling codecs.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8526 and a 3DMark max-thread score of 7310. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 384 tensor cores can accelerate specific renderers, but its raw FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is not class-leading, making it a secondary accelerator.

Software Development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallelism for compiling code. The PassMark integer math score of 77721 and extended instructions score of 19161 indicate robust handling of compilation and virtualization tasks.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 3538 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU's professional features are unnecessary for office productivity, but the system will handle all such tasks with ease.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals who need the specific capabilities of the Quadro RTX 5000, such as certified drivers and 16 GB of VRAM, but who also require a responsive and powerful CPU for non-GPU tasks. The target user is a content creator working in 3D modeling or video editing who relies on the GPU for CUDA-accelerated effects and rendering, and the CPU for scene setup and timeline scrubbing. The data shows the CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures it will not hold back professional applications.

For gamers, this is not a sensible choice. The GPU's performance tier, as indicated by its 67th percentile and its closeness to the GTX 1060 6 GB, is more suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. The system is more appropriate for small business workstations that require reliable hardware for CAD, architectural visualization, or scientific computing, where the CPU's multi-threading and the GPU's large memory pool are more valuable than raw gaming FPS. Students in engineering or design fields could benefit if their coursework involves GPU compute, but for general use, the configuration is excessive.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a comprehensive benchmark suite that shows its strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1786 in single-core and 15953 in multi-core. Geekbench results show 2112 for single-core and 12289 for multi-core. The PassMark suite is extensive: single-thread at 3538, multithread at 23719, integer math at 77721, floating-point math at 58786, and data encryption at 15880. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24280, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1360P, is only 0.3% faster, showing the i5-13400 is a top-tier performer.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more mixed. It achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and a Vulkan score of 92309. In PassMark, it scores 15616 in G3D and 6525 in GPU compute. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 59, which may indicate architectural limitations in newer APIs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. It is 1% slower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which underscores its position as a mid-range performer despite its professional branding. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a high-end part, and the GPU is a mid-range part, leading to an overall combined percentile of 72.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-13400 processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 graphics card. The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with a 230 W TDP. The system's combined percentile is 72, which indicates it performs better than roughly 72% of all recorded builds, but this figure is pulled down significantly by the GPU's lower standing. The CPU is in the 76th percentile, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. This positions the overall system as a strong professional workstation that is hampered in pure graphics performance tasks. It is a desktop-class system that prioritizes CPU throughput and GPU memory capacity over high-end gaming frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the TU104 chip using TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² containing 13,600 million transistors. It features 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The card is equipped with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. It operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz yielding 14 Gbps effective speed. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

In terms of raw throughput, the GPU delivers 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.30 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. Despite these specifications, the benchmark scores indicate that the card's gaming performance is modest, as evidenced by its 67th percentile ranking and its similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB. However, the large VRAM pool and the presence of RT and tensor cores make it a specialized tool for professional rendering and compute tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 reflects its shading capabilities, but the low DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that it may not be optimized for modern gaming APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature. The platform's upgrade path is limited to other 13th-generation or 12th-generation processors on the same socket. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier CPU in the same generation, but the data shows the i5-13400 is already a strong performer, with a 0.3% deficit to the Core i7-1360P. The TDP of 65 W means the CPU is efficient and does not require an aggressive cooling solution.

The GPU's upgrade path is more straightforward. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with newer slots. The card requires a 550 W suggested PSU, and its 230 W TDP is moderate. Given that the current GPU is the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, the most impactful upgrade would be to a graphics card with a higher benchmark score. The data suggests that the CPU has enough headroom to support a significantly more powerful GPU, as its 76th percentile ranking is well above the GPU's 67th percentile. Any future upgrade should focus on replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a card that has a higher PassMark G3D score to alleviate the current performance bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds