SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400

24,280 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D represent a stark pairing of a mid-range 13th Gen Raptor Lake processor with a flagship Blackwell 2.0 graphics card. This combination creates a desktop system where the GPU is the undisputed performance king, while the CPU provides a solid, efficient foundation. The data indicates a significant imbalance in raw compute capability, but the benchmark scores reveal a nuanced picture of what this build can handle across various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-S architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mid-range chip, consisting of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, reflecting its position as a versatile drop-in option for existing platforms. Its integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides basic display output, though it is not intended for gaming or compute tasks.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 76th percentile of all processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15953 points in multi-core and 1786 points in single-core. The multi-core score demonstrates strong throughput for applications that leverage all 16 threads, such as video encoding and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 1786 indicates responsive performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 12289 (multi-core) and 2112 (single-core) corroborate this profile, showing a processor that is well-rounded but not class-leading. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear progression from 959 points in single-thread to 7315 points in 16-thread and 7310 in max-thread tests, indicating that performance scales efficiently with added threads. PassMark scores reinforce this, with a multi-thread score of 23719 and a single-thread score of 3538.

The nearest rivals provide context for its positioning. The i5-13400 sits within a tight cluster of competitors. It is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-1360P and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H, and 0.8% behind the AMD EPYC 9654P—a distinction that highlights the 13400's efficiency given the EPYC is a server-class chip. Conversely, it is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U. This demonstrates that the i5-13400 delivers performance comparable to mobile and enterprise parts, making it a highly competitive desktop option in its segment. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU can handle compilation, photo editing, and moderate video rendering without bottlenecking, though it will be the limiting factor when paired with the monstrous RTX 5090 D in GPU-bound tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature ecosystem. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between cost-effective DDR4 kits or higher-bandwidth DDR5 modules, both operating in dual-channel mode. The processor provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs. This platform is a sensible choice for a new build, as it offers a wide range of compatible motherboards from budget to premium tiers. However, the socket is not forward-compatible with newer generations, meaning a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard.

The power supply requirements are heavily dictated by the GPU. The RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU rating of 950 W. The i5-13400's 65 W TDP is modest in comparison, leaving ample headroom in the power budget for the GPU to draw its peak power without stressing a quality 950 W unit. The system uses a single 16-pin power connector for the GPU, a standard for high-end cards. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor, such as an i7 or i9, to better balance the system's compute capabilities with the GPU's immense power. This would improve CPU-bound scenarios like physics calculations and high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit content creation workloads that require large data sets.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a desktop system in the 84th percentile overall, reflecting the immense power of the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24280, placing it in the 76th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 77712, placing it in the 92nd percentile. This substantial gap in percentile performance highlights the divergent capabilities of the two components. The CPU is a strong mid-range performer, while the GPU is a top-tier flagship.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 5090 D scores 14326, a figure that showcases its DirectX 12 rendering prowess. For compute workloads, the GPU achieves 310674 in Geekbench OpenCL and 376915 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating exceptional parallel processing power. The PassMark G3D score of 44065 and GPU Compute score of 28396 further solidify its position. The CPU's Cinebench R20 scores of 8526 (multi-core) and 1203 (single-core) are solid, but they are dwarfed by the GPU's output. The data shows that in a system like this, the CPU will manage system-level tasks and game logic, while the GPU handles the vast majority of the rendering and compute load. The nearest GPU rivals are notably older or lower-tier parts, with the RTX 5090 D being 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, illustrating that its direct competition is mostly previous-generation mobile parts, a signal of its current flagship status.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated tasks above all else. The RTX 5090 D is a professional-grade compute monster, making this build ideal for content creators working with 3D rendering, video editing, and complex visual effects. The 92nd percentile GPU score and its 32 GB of VRAM are suited for rendering large scenes and high-resolution textures without out-of-memory errors. For game developers, this system can compile shaders and run GPU-based simulations with ease. The CPU's 76th percentile score is sufficient for general coding, compiling, and running multiple development tools concurrently.

For students and researchers in fields like machine learning or data science, the GPU's compute scores are the primary draw. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the 310674 OpenCL score indicate powerful parallel processing for training models and running simulations. Small business workstations that need to handle heavy CAD, architectural visualization, or AI workloads would benefit from this configuration. However, for gamers, this build is overkill unless they are targeting 4K resolution with the highest settings. The CPU may hold back the GPU in 1080p and 1440p scenarios where frame rates are more dependent on processor speed. This is not a balanced build; it is a specialized tool for users who know their work is GPU-bound.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system is in the 84th percentile of all builds.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H?

A: The i5-13400 is 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for a system with this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5090 D is 950 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13400 support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for the RTX 5090 D's chip?

A: The GPU uses a 5 nm process node manufactured by TSMC.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5090 D?

A: The launch MSRP is 2,299 USD.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a flagship desktop GPU built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It is a massive chip, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a staggering 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. Its base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The core configuration is immense, featuring 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 Tensor Cores.

The benchmark data highlights its dominance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 14326. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 310674 and 376915, respectively, underscore its compute capability for non-gaming tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 44065 is exceptionally high, and the GPU Compute score of 28396 shows strong general-purpose processing. Its pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 104.8 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. For rendering, this means the GPU can handle 4K and 8K video editing, complex 3D scenes, and AI-accelerated features with massive headroom. The 170 RT cores and 680 Tensor Cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, making it a top choice for professionals using applications that leverage these features, such as DLSS in games or denoising in rendering software. The 92nd percentile ranking confirms it is among the fastest GPUs available, and its nearest rivals are all lower-tier or older parts, demonstrating its position at the top of the performance stack.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not empirical data. The benchmark data suggests extreme performance potential. Given the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 and its 92nd percentile ranking, frame rates at 4K resolution would be exceptionally high in most modern titles.

The primary limitation in gaming will be the CPU. At 1080p and 1440p, the i5-13400's single-thread score of 1786 in Cinebench R23 and 959 in 3DMark single-thread will likely become the bottleneck, preventing the GPU from reaching its maximum frame output. In CPU-intensive titles, this could result in frame rates that are high but not as high as the GPU's raw power suggests. At 4K, the load shifts to the GPU, and the system should deliver excellent performance, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in most AAA games with ultra settings. The 32 GB of VRAM ensures that even the most demanding texture packs and resolutions will not exceed memory capacity. The data indicates that this is a 4K-focused gaming machine, where the CPU is sufficient to keep up, and the GPU can stretch its legs. For competitive esports titles at lower resolutions, the CPU might be a limiting factor, but the frame rates should still be well above playable thresholds.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. It is a configuration that marries a mainstream, power-efficient processor with a halo-tier, power-hungry graphics card. The combined percentile of 84 places it in the upper echelon of all systems, driven almost entirely by the GPU's 92nd percentile performance. The CPU, in the 76th percentile, is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not in the same league as the GPU. This pairing is best described as a "GPU-first" workstation or a high-end 4K gaming rig where the user's primary concern is graphics and compute performance. The massive disparity in TDP—65 W for the CPU versus 575 W for the GPU—shows where the system's energy and thermal budget is directed. It is a powerful, albeit lopsided, configuration that prioritizes one component over the other, making it a niche choice for specific professional or enthusiast use cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the dominant component, and the Intel Core i5-13400 will be the limiting factor in many scenarios. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and machine learning, the CPU is sufficient to feed the GPU data, and the system will perform at near-GPU-limited speeds. The GPU's average benchmark score of 77712 is more than three times the CPU's 24280, showing a massive gap in raw compute throughput.

However, in CPU-bound tasks, the imbalance becomes apparent. In gaming at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will cap the frame rate. The 3DMark single-thread score of 959 is significantly lower than the GPU's capabilities, meaning the CPU will struggle to issue draw calls quickly enough to keep the GPU fully utilized. This is evidenced by the fact that the CPU's nearest rivals include mobile parts like the i7-1360P, indicating its performance is closer to laptop chips than to high-end desktop CPUs. In this pairing, the CPU is the bottleneck for any workload that requires high-frequency, low-latency processing, such as physics calculations in games or certain simulation tasks. For tasks like 4K gaming or GPU rendering, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, but the CPU will still prevent the system from achieving its theoretical maximum in mixed workloads. The system is balanced only in the sense that the CPU is capable enough to avoid being a catastrophic bottleneck for the GPU in its intended high-resolution, high-compute use cases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds