SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400

24,280 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop configuration that targets mainstream 1080p gaming and productivity. The FACT PACK for this combination contains no measured FPS data for any game, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU has significant headroom over the GPU, particularly for tasks that leverage multi-threading.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data available for this specific CPU-GPU combination; the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, gaming performance must be estimated from the component benchmark scores. The RTX 3050 OEM positions in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199. This is a lower-mid-range standing, suggesting it can handle most titles at 1080p, but frame rates will vary significantly by game and settings. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and DirectX 12 score of 58 indicate modern API support is present but not class-leading.

For ultra settings at 1080p, the data suggests the RTX 3050 OEM is the primary limiting factor. The CPU, scoring in the 76th percentile with an average benchmark score of 24280, is far more capable and would rarely bottleneck the GPU. In less demanding esports titles, the high single-threaded performance of the i5-13400, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2112, could allow the GPU to reach its full potential. Conversely, in graphically intensive AAA games, the estimated frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The estimated FPS figures are purely projective. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 is close to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 7600, which has an average score of 15171 (a delta of just 0.2% from the RTX 3050 OEM). This proximity suggests the RTX 3050 OEM should perform similarly to that class of GPU in rasterized workloads, meaning 1080p ultra settings may require adjustments to high or medium presets to maintain smooth frame rates. The lack of measured data makes exact FPS predictions impossible, but the benchmark scores point to a 1080p-focused gaming experience where the CPU will not be the bottleneck.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz, and it has a TDP of 130 W. The memory bandwidth is a clear constraint for this card, especially at higher resolutions, but for 1080p gaming, it is adequate for most titles.

The RTX 3050 OEM is equipped with 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and DLSS features. The FP32 performance is rated at 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate a capable entry-level ray tracing card, though the 18 RT cores will struggle with heavy ray-traced workloads, where the 130 W power envelope limits sustained performance.

Benchmark results show the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 5779 suggests that compute-heavy rendering tasks, such as Blender or video encoding, will be moderate. The GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 places it in the 57th percentile, and its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, has a similar average score of 15171 (deltaPct 0.2%). This indicates the RTX 3050 OEM is not a high-end renderer; rather, it is a balanced card for 1080p gaming and light content creation. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games, but its 128-bit bus limits memory scalability.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, the Intel Core i5-13400, has an average benchmark score of 24280, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU, the RTX 3050 OEM, has an average benchmark score of 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 67, which reflects a system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1360P with an average score of 24344 (deltaPct -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H with 24364 (deltaPct -0.3%), showing the i5-13400 is competitive with mobile high-end parts.

Specific CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15953 and a single-core score of 1786. The Geekbench multi-core score is 12289, and the single-core score is 2112. In the PassMark suite, the CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 23719 and a single-thread score of 3538. These figures underscore a strong multi-threaded performer for its class. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and DirectX 12 score of 58 are moderate, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 57103 is respectable.

The combined picture is one of imbalance in favor of the CPU. The CPU sits 19 percentile points higher than the GPU. This means in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI workloads, the system will perform well, but in GPU-bound scenarios, like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the GPU will cap the system's overall throughput. The data suggests this pairing is designed for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks but still need a discrete GPU for graphics workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 76th percentile ranking indicates that the GPU will limit frame rates in most gaming scenarios. The estimated FPS scaling between 1080p and higher resolutions would show diminishing returns, as the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8.087 TFLOPS compute become saturated. The CPU, with its high multi-threaded score of 23719 in PassMark, will not be the constraint in these cases.

Conversely, the CPU is the limiting factor in specific tasks like data compression and encryption, where it scores 301481 and 15880, respectively. These workloads rely heavily on core count and architecture, not the GPU. However, for typical gaming, the GPU is the weak link. The deltaPct between the RTX 3050 OEM and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 680M, is -0.5%, suggesting similar GPU performance. The CPU's headroom means that upgrading the GPU later would yield significant FPS gains without changing the processor.

In summary, the balance is skewed. For a gaming build, the i5-13400 is overqualified, while the RTX 3050 OEM is underqualified for the CPU's potential. This is not a bad thing, as it provides a clear upgrade path. The system will run smoothly in CPU-heavy applications, but gamers will see the GPU as the ceiling for graphical performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The processor has a TDP of 65 W and integrates UHD Graphics 730.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are robust. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15953 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for tasks like video rendering and compile jobs. The single-core score of 1786 is also solid, ensuring responsive performance in everyday applications and games. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12289 and single-core score of 2112 reinforce this. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23719 and integer math score of 77721 are high, suggesting the CPU excels in number-crunching tasks.

In real workloads, the i5-13400 is a versatile performer. The 20 MB L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and data-heavy tasks. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9654P, has a deltaPct of -0.8%, which is surprising for a server chip but highlights the i5's strong consumer performance. The architecture supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is future-proof for storage and GPUs. The lack of ECC memory support limits its use in critical server environments, but for a desktop workstation, this pairing is excellent for software development and content creation.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is best suited for users who need a strong CPU for multi-threaded tasks but do not require top-tier GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this combination adequate, as the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile standing can handle most titles at medium to high settings, though not ultra. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15953, but the GPU will be a bottleneck in GPU-accelerated renders. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 23719 for compiling code and running virtual machines.

Students and small business workstations are ideal candidates. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking for office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, though the discrete GPU is present for more demanding visual work. The CPU's data encryption score of 15880 is useful for security-sensitive tasks. The 65 W TDP makes it an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs all day.

The build is not for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is too limited. However, for a budget-conscious builder who wants a balanced system for work and play, this pairing is logical. The CPU's headroom means that if the user later upgrades to a more powerful GPU, the system will scale well without needing a new processor.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 67, which positions this desktop build in the upper-midrange tier, with the CPU at 76 and the GPU at 57 percentiles.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory choice.

Q: What is the RTX 3050 OEM's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is a limiting factor for high-resolution gaming.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1360P?

A: The i5-13400 has an average benchmark score of 24280, which is -0.3% lower than the i7-1360P's score of 24344, indicating nearly identical overall performance.

Q: Is the RTX 3050 OEM still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life", and its successor is the GeForce 40 series.

Q: What is the power supply headroom for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3050 OEM is 300 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 130 W, leaving ample headroom for a system with this CPU.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-13400 includes UHD Graphics 730, which can be used for basic display output if the discrete GPU is not required.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i5-13400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The build's combined percentile is 67, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all possible configurations. The CPU is a high-performing mainstream part, ranking in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, which is above average. The GPU, in contrast, ranks in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, which is slightly above the median but not exceptional.

The pairing is a classic CPU-heavy configuration. The i5-13400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, making it a powerful and efficient desktop chip. The RTX 3050 OEM is a dual-slot, 130 W GPU with 8 GB of VRAM, suitable for 1080p gaming. The build class is explicitly "desktop", and the overall tier is defined by the 67th combined percentile, which suggests it is a capable but not extreme system. It targets users who need CPU power for productivity and can tolerate mid-range GPU performance for gaming.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3538 in PassMark supports high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and 8.087 TFLOPS will limit performance to 1080p. The RTX 3050 OEM cannot sustain high-refresh rates in AAA games, but with low settings, it may approach 144 FPS in less demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-thread score of 23719 in PassMark is robust, allowing for x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC (implied by tensor cores) would offload encoding, but the 130 W TDP and 57th percentile standing suggest a moderate streaming experience at 1080p.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15953 helps with timeline rendering, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 will slow down effects and GPU-accelerated exports. This is a capable entry-level video editing rig for 1080p projects, but not for high-resolution workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and 16 threads benefit CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8526. The GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 5779 indicates it can assist, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are bottlenecks for complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 12289 and data compression score of 301481 make it excellent for compiling code and handling databases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong, cost-effective developer machine.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 76th percentile and integrated UHD Graphics 730 ensure smooth multitasking in Office suites and browsers. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks, making the system quiet and efficient.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-13400 is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This platform is mature, and while socket 1700 is not forward-compatible with newer generations, it offers a solid foundation. The GPU, with a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaves significant headroom for upgrades; a more powerful GPU with a higher TDP would still fit within a typical 500-600 W power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking means it can handle a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the current GPU is a slight limitation, but a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 would work fine. The platform's support for DDR5 memory allows for a future memory upgrade, though the current dual-channel setup is sufficient. The 65 W CPU TDP means cooling is not a concern, and the socket allows for a potential CPU upgrade within the 13th Gen family, such as an i7 or i9, if more cores are needed. Overall, the upgrade path is clear: prioritize the GPU for gaming, and consider memory or CPU only if specific workloads demand it.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds