SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600T

20,917 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that sits at the 86th percentile overall among all builds. This is a study in contrasts: a low-power, efficiency-focused 12th-gen processor paired with a top-tier workstation GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 20917 places it at the 74th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 184664 places it at the 98th percentile. The data suggests a system where the graphics card is the dominant component, capable of professional rendering and compute tasks that far exceed the processor’s mid-range standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a thermal design power of just 35 W. This low TDP is a defining characteristic; it signals a chip designed for efficiency and constrained thermal environments rather than raw multi-threaded throughput. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a standard configuration for this generation.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that is competent but not exceptional. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 14822, while the single-core score is 2092. The single-core performance is relatively strong, suggesting good responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. However, the multicore score reflects the physical limitation of 6 cores; it is not a powerhouse for heavily parallel workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding. The Geekbench scores corroborate this, with a multicore score of 7374 and a single-core score of 2048.

The PassMark results offer a more granular view. The integer math score is 54646, and the floating-point math score is 42295. Data compression scores 195924, while encryption scores 10205. The extended instructions score is 13140, and the find prime numbers test yields a low score of 76. These figures indicate a processor that handles general-purpose integer and floating-point operations well, but the low prime number score suggests that certain specialized workloads could be slower. The multithread score of 17446 and single-thread score of 3516 confirm that the chip’s strength lies in its frequency and architecture, not its core count.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-12600T is essentially tied. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE has an average score of 20900, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V scores 20897, also 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826, 0.4% behind. This shows that while the i5-12600T is a capable desktop chip, its performance level is comparable to a range of other low-power and mobile-oriented processors, reinforcing its efficiency-focused design.

FAQ

Q: What is the thermal design power of the Intel Core i5-12600T?

A: The CPU has a thermal design power of 35 W, which indicates a low-power, energy-efficient part.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, paired with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The i5-12600T’s average benchmark score is 20917, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE’s score of 20900.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is at the 98th percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-12600T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600T has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this build is 86, which places it in the upper tier of all desktop configurations. This is driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU’s 74th percentile is solid, but the GPU’s 98th percentile is what boosts the system’s overall standing. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 20917, while the GPU’s average is 184664, a massive disparity that highlights the GPU’s dominance in this pairing.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 1494 multicore and 210 single-core. The R20 results show 6225 multicore and 878 single-core. These scores are consistent with a mid-range 6-core processor. For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 175286, and the Vulkan score is 194041. These are high figures that indicate exceptional compute capability. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, has an average score of 183725, which is 0.5% lower. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is also 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell and 3.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The data shows a GPU that sits at the very top of the performance hierarchy, rivaling data-center class accelerators.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The CPU provides adequate, if unspectacular, processing power. The GPU provides elite-level compute and rendering performance. For workloads that rely on the GPU, this system is exceptional. For CPU-bound tasks, it is merely average. This is a critical distinction for potential users to understand.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the GPU is the performance ceiling and the CPU is the limiting factor in many scenarios. The CPU’s 74th percentile versus the GPU’s 98th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering or machine learning, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will operate at its full potential, but the CPU may struggle to feed it data quickly enough in certain workflows.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3516 in PassMark suggests that it can handle most game logic and physics calculations, but the multicore score of 17446 is modest. In gaming, where frame rates are often dictated by the CPU’s ability to process draw calls, this processor could become a bottleneck, preventing the GPU from reaching its maximum FPS potential. The data shows that the CPU is not in the same performance class as the GPU, so for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU will likely limit performance.

Conversely, in workloads that are purely GPU-bound, such as rendering a complex 3D scene or training a neural network, the CPU’s role is diminished. The GPU’s massive FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS and 32 GB of VRAM will be the primary drivers of performance. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU’s compute and memory subsystem. The low TDP of the CPU also suggests that the system’s power delivery and cooling are not designed for sustained all-core CPU boosts, which could further limit CPU performance under extended loads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It features the AD102 chip with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU has 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units. It includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, making it a formidable platform for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

Memory configuration is a key strength. The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, running at 18 Gbps effective. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are essential for handling large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes without running out of VRAM. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1).

Benchmark results confirm its elite status. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 place it at the 98th percentile. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, a data-center accelerator, and 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. This indicates that the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is not just a gaming card; it is a professional compute tool. The 400 tensor cores provide substantial AI acceleration, while the 100 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It requires a 250 W TDP and has a suggested PSU of 600 W, with a single 16-pin power connector.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for professionals who require massive GPU compute and memory capacity but do not need extreme CPU multi-threading. It is ideal for 3D artists and animators working with complex scenes in applications like Blender or Autodesk Maya, where the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance will drastically reduce render times. The 98th percentile GPU performance means it can handle 4K and 8K texture sets and high-poly models with ease.

Video editors working with high-resolution footage, such as 8K RAW, will benefit from the GPU’s encoding and decoding capabilities, though the CPU’s 35 W TDP may limit real-time playback in some codecs. Data scientists and machine learning researchers will find the 400 tensor cores and 32 GB of memory sufficient for training and inferencing moderate-sized models. The GPU’s similarity in performance to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB makes it a viable alternative for workstation use.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads adequate, but not fast. The single-core performance of 2092 in Cinebench R23 will help with compilation times, but the low TDP may cause the processor to throttle under sustained loads. Students and small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD or scientific computing will benefit, but the CPU’s 74th percentile ensures that general office tasks are handled without issue. The system is less suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming, where the CPU is likely to be a bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides some flexibility for builders, but the 35 W TDP suggests the motherboard should be chosen for its power delivery capabilities rather than overclocking features, as the CPU multiplier is locked. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature that can accommodate high-speed NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 600 W, and its TDP is 250 W. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W. This means a 600 W power supply provides significant headroom for the entire system, even with other components like drives and fans. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count 12th-gen or 13th-gen processor on the same socket, provided the motherboard’s BIOS supports it, to address the CPU bottleneck in gaming and CPU-bound tasks.

The GPU’s predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W, indicating that this is a mature product in NVIDIA’s professional lineup. The 16-pin power connector is standard for this class of GPU. The platform’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for a cost-effective build using DDR4 or a more future-proof build with DDR5, depending on the motherboard chosen.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a low-power, mid-range CPU with a top-tier workstation GPU. The Intel Core i5-12600T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a 250 W GPU with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, 12800 shading units, and 400 tensor cores, designed for professional rendering and compute. The system’s combined percentile is 86, placing it in the upper echelon of builds, but this is almost entirely due to the GPU’s 98th percentile ranking.

The CPU’s 74th percentile is respectable, but it is clearly the weaker link in this pairing. The build is best understood as a GPU-centric workstation where the CPU provides adequate support for I/O and general tasks, while the GPU handles the heavy lifting. The average benchmark score of 20917 for the CPU and 184664 for the GPU underscores this disparity. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $223, which is a modest cost for the platform, but the GPU’s cost is not detailed in the data.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for any game. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s performance is exceptional, at the 98th percentile, suggesting it can run most games at maximum settings in 4K resolution. However, the CPU’s performance is the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p with high frame rates, the i5-12600T’s single-core score of 3516 in PassMark will likely prevent the system from achieving the highest possible FPS. The GPU would be underutilized in these cases. At 4K resolution, the load shifts to the GPU, and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 65.28 TFLOPS compute power would allow for very high frame rates in demanding titles, though the exact numbers are unknown.

The 32 GB VRAM ensures that even the most texture-heavy games will not exceed memory capacity. The GPU’s RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which will improve visual fidelity in supported games. However, the lack of measured data means these are qualitative expectations. The system is likely capable of 4K gaming with high settings, but the CPU will bottleneck at lower resolutions where frame rates are CPU-limited.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is compromised by the CPU. The GPU is capable of very high frame rates, but the CPU’s 74th percentile and modest single-thread score of 3516 will limit performance at 1080p or 1440p. The system is better suited for 4K gaming where the GPU is the primary driver.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and dedicated hardware encoders handle video encoding efficiently. The CPU’s 6 cores may struggle with simultaneous gameplay and streaming software overhead, but the GPU can offload the encoding workload, making this a viable scenario.

Video Editing: The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are excellent for scrubbing timelines and applying effects in 4K or 8K. The CPU’s multicore score of 14822 in Cinebench R23 will handle rendering, but export times will be longer than with a higher-core-count CPU.

3D Rendering: This is a strong scenario. The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 400 tensor cores will accelerate rendering in GPU-based engines. The 32 GB VRAM allows for large scenes. The CPU’s role is secondary, so the low core count is less of a hindrance.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-core performance of 2092 in Cinebench R23 is good for compilation, but the low TDP of 35 W may cause thermal throttling during long builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks, making this a less optimal use of the system’s capabilities.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets. The CPU’s 74th percentile is more than sufficient for these tasks, and the GPU’s power is unused. This build would be a waste of resources for a purely productivity-focused user.