SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600T

20,917 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a low-power 35 W Alder Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA’s flagship Ada Lovelace GPU. The Intel Core i5-12600T is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a 2.10 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock, while the RTX 4090 is a 450 W, 24 GB GDDR6X monster. The benchmark database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all frame rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores, not observed gameplay. The combined percentile for this desktop build is 81, placing it in the upper tier of all tracked configurations.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for the i5-12600T + RTX 4090 pairing, frame rates must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 and Passmark G3D score of 38194 indicate extreme rasterization headroom, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2092 and Geekbench single-core score of 2048 suggest adequate per-thread throughput for most titles.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 4090 would likely be the dominant factor, with estimated FPS in esports and older AAA titles frequently exceeding 200 frames per second. The i5-12600T’s single-core performance percentile of 74 versus all CPUs means it can feed the GPU reasonably well in lightly-threaded scenes, though 1080p high-refresh gaming may show occasional CPU limitations in titles that rely on heavy draw calls. At 1440p, the GPU remains the bottleneck in most scenarios, and estimated FPS would still be very high — typically above 150 in optimized titles. At 4K, the RTX 4090’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth would push frame rates well above 100 in demanding titles, with the CPU becoming nearly irrelevant.

The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores align: the GPU’s 88th percentile versus all GPUs and the CPU’s 74th percentile suggest a system where the graphics card sets the ceiling. For ray tracing workloads, the 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores provide substantial acceleration, so even at 4K with RT enabled, estimated FPS would remain playable in most titles, though the CPU’s 35 W TDP may limit sustained performance in CPU-heavy scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20917, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (avg score 20900, deltaPct 0.1) and Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (avg score 20897, deltaPct 0.1), showing the i5-12600T sits nearly at parity with those parts. The gap to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M’s GPU score is not relevant here; for CPU comparisons, the deltaPct values of 0.1-0.4 indicate this is a mid-pack processor within its peer group, not a standout.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60347, at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Pro A60 (avg score 60326, deltaPct 0) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (avg score 60140, deltaPct 0.3), meaning the RTX 4090’s raw score is essentially tied with those workstation cards in aggregate benchmarks. However, the RTX 4090’s specific gaming and compute scores — 38194 in Passmark G3D and 26613 in Passmark GPU Compute — are far above those rivals in graphics workloads.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the clear performance leader. The CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile create a 14-point gap, indicating the processor is the weaker link in this pairing. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance — the system is strong overall, but the CPU holds it back from being a top-tier configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600T is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S processor on a 10 nm process, built on a 163 mm² die. Its 2.10 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock are modest, but the 35 W TDP makes it a power-efficient choice. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark scores reveal a mixed profile. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14822 and Geekbench multicore score of 7374 indicate solid multi-threaded performance for a 6-core part, while single-core scores of 2092 (R23) and 2048 (Geekbench) show competent per-thread speed. Passmark integer math score of 54646 and floating point math score of 42295 suggest strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 195924 highlights efficiency in that workload.

The percentile of 74 versus all CPUs confirms this is an above-average processor, but not a high-end one. In real workloads, the 6 cores handle gaming and office tasks well, but the 12 threads limit heavy rendering or encoding compared to higher-core-count parts. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz helps single-threaded tasks, and the L3 cache of 18 MB is adequate for most applications. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means no overclocking headroom, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though it is irrelevant when the RTX 4090 is installed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the RTX 4090 outclasses the i5-12600T. The GPU’s 88th percentile versus all GPUs is 14 points higher than the CPU’s 74th percentile. In gaming, this means the CPU will frequently be the limiting factor, particularly at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2092 in Cinebench R23 may struggle to keep up with the GPU’s frame generation capacity, leading to CPU-bound scenarios in competitive titles.

At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts toward the graphics card. The RTX 4090’s 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,290.2 GTexel/s texture rate are so high that even at 4K, the CPU may still lag in some titles. The 35 W TDP of the CPU is a constraint — it cannot boost as aggressively or sustain high clocks under heavy load compared to a 125 W part, so multi-threaded gaming scenarios that use 6 cores or more will see the CPU throttle or run at lower clocks.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance is more favorable. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 17446 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14822 handle productivity tasks reasonably, but the GPU’s compute scores (26613 in Passmark GPU Compute) dwarf the CPU for parallel workloads. The system is GPU-heavy in every scenario except very light tasks where the CPU’s integrated graphics could suffice, but that is not relevant with a discrete GPU present.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4090 can produce frame rates far above 144 Hz in most titles, but the i5-12600T’s single-core score of 2048 in Geekbench may cap performance in CPU-bound games. Expect 144 Hz to be achievable in most titles, though 240 Hz monitors may see the CPU as the limiting factor.

Streaming: The GPU’s NVENC (via tensor cores) can handle encoding without taxing the CPU. The i5-12600T’s 12 threads are sufficient for game capture and stream encoding, though the 35 W TDP means the CPU may not sustain high clocks during simultaneous gaming and encoding. The GPU’s 512 tensor cores offload most of the work.

Video editing: The RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate rendering and effects. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14822 handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding adequately, but 4K or 8K projects will rely heavily on the GPU’s compute power.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 128 RT cores and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth excel at ray-traced renders. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 54646 supports geometry processing, but the GPU is the primary engine. For CPU-based renderers, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is a bottleneck.

Software development: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2048 and Passmark single-thread score of 3516 handle compilation and IDE responsiveness well. The 18 MB L3 cache aids code builds. The GPU’s compute power accelerates AI/ML workloads in development.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it efficient for basic tasks, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup. The system is massively overprovisioned for document editing, web browsing, or spreadsheet work, but the low power draw of the CPU keeps energy use reasonable.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who want maximum graphics performance in a desktop chassis. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings will benefit most from the RTX 4090’s 88th percentile GPU performance, while the CPU’s 74th percentile is sufficient to avoid major issues at those resolutions. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth, though they should be aware of the CPU’s limitations in CPU-bound render tasks.

Developers using AI/ML frameworks will find the GPU’s tensor cores valuable, and the 24 GB VRAM supports large model training. Students or office workers would be better served by a cheaper build, as this pairing is overkill for basic productivity. Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for design or simulation tasks could use this, but the high GPU cost requires justification.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is not portable. The RTX 4090 is triple-slot and 304 mm long, requiring a spacious case. The 450 W GPU TDP and 35 W CPU TDP suggest a total system draw that is heavily GPU-weighted, so the suggested 850 W PSU is appropriate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with Alder Lake architecture, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The platform provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The RTX 4090 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it is fully compatible with the available lanes. The CPU is from the 12th generation, meaning it is two generations behind current parts, but the socket 1700 platform may support 13th and 14th generation processors with a BIOS update.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a 13th or 14th generation i7 or i9, which would raise the CPU percentile from 74 toward the 90s and better match the GPU’s 88th percentile. However, the 35 W TDP of the current CPU limits the cooling and power delivery design; upgrading to a higher-TDP part may require a new motherboard with better VRMs. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor, so any future GPU upgrade would be a lateral move or a shift to newer architecture.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose based on motherboard and budget. The 18 MB L3 cache is fixed, so CPU upgrades are the primary path. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are forward-looking, but the RTX 4090’s PCIe 4.0 interface is not a bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: Is the i5-12600T sufficient for the RTX 4090?

A: The CPU’s 74th percentile versus all CPUs is lower than the GPU’s 88th percentile, so the processor will limit performance in CPU-bound tasks, particularly at 1080p. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

Q: What resolutions can this build handle?

A: Benchmark scores suggest 1440p and 4K gaming at ultra settings are viable, with the GPU’s 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate providing ample fill rate. 1080p is also possible, but the CPU may cap frame rates.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 4K textures and large AI models.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the i5-12600T has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false), so it cannot be overclocked. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz is the maximum.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4090 is 850 W. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is negligible, so the GPU’s 450 W TDP is the primary consideration.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the production status of these parts?

A: The CPU is listed as Active, while the GPU is End-of-life. The RTX 4090’s successor is the GeForce 50-series.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using a 5 nm TSMC process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. Its base clock is 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The 24 GB GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The GPU has 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores.

Benchmark results show strong performance: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223, Passmark G3D score of 38194, and Passmark GPU Compute score of 26613. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 255416 and Vulkan score of 271631 indicate excellent compute and API efficiency. The GPU’s 88th percentile versus all GPUs confirms its high-end status, though its nearest rivals in average score include the Intel Arc Pro A60 (deltaPct 0) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (deltaPct 0.3), which are workstation cards with different strengths.

The 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate make this GPU a rendering powerhouse. The 128 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 512 tensor cores support DLSS and AI workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with all modern titles. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Power requirements are significant: 450 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector. The triple-slot design (304 mm length, 137 mm height, 61 mm width) requires a large case. The suggested PSU is 850 W. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor, but current benchmark scores place it at the 88th percentile, so it remains competitive.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a low-power Intel Core i5-12600T with the flagship NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU’s 6 cores, 12 threads, and 35 W TDP provide modest processing power, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM, 82.58 TFLOPS, and 88th percentile ranking make it a top-tier graphics solution. The combined percentile of 81 reflects a system that is strong overall but imbalanced toward the GPU.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is a stationary workstation or gaming rig. The CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile highlight the gap between components — the processor is the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios. For gaming at 1440p or 4K, this is a capable pairing. For productivity, the GPU accelerates rendering and compute, but the CPU’s 6-core/12-thread configuration is a bottleneck for heavily threaded CPU workloads.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $223, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 1,599 USD, but these figures are historical and do not reflect current pricing. The system’s overall tier, based on the 81st combined percentile, places it in the upper segment of tracked builds, though the CPU keeps it from being a top-10 configuration. Users seeking maximum graphics performance with an efficient processor will find this build suitable, while those needing CPU-heavy workloads should consider a higher-core-count part.