SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600T

20,917 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop build that sits in the 66th combined percentile of all systems. This pairing combines a low-power Alder Lake processor with an entry-level Ampere graphics card, targeting a balanced 1080p gaming and productivity machine. The data shows a system that trades raw top-end performance for efficiency, making it a practical choice for compact builds and everyday workloads, though it has clear limits in demanding scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3050 OEM is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process with a GA106 chip containing 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, while its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective and delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 128-bit bus. This memory configuration is adequate for modern titles at 1080p, but the 128-bit interface can become a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes or when enabling high-resolution asset packs.

The GPU features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations pipelines. For hardware-accelerated features, there are 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, enabling DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, which includes ray tracing and DLSS capabilities. The compute throughput is rated at 8.087 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. These figures place the card in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199.

Benchmark results show a balanced compute profile. The Passmark G3D score of 11857 is solid for 1080p gaming, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate capable performance in GPGPU tasks. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600, which scores 15171, a delta of 0.2% — essentially a statistical tie. It also sits close to the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, -0.5%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290, -0.6%). This proximity to both a modern integrated GPU and an older discrete card highlights that the RTX 3050 OEM is not a high-end performer; it is squarely in the mid-range entry tier. The DirectX 12 Passmark score of 58 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 86, suggesting that the card handles legacy APIs more efficiently than modern ones, which is a consideration for newer titles that rely heavily on DX12 features.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series. The i5-12600T uses the Alder Lake architecture and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the RTX 3050 OEM connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU has half the PCIe lanes of a typical x16 card, but for the RTX 3050's bandwidth requirements, the x8 link is not a practical bottleneck in most scenarios.

For a sensible next upgrade, the socket 1700 platform offers headroom for more powerful 12th-generation processors, though the 35 W TDP of the i5-12600T suggests the motherboard VRM design may be modest. The GPU has a 130 W TDP and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, which is a low bar. The power connectors are a single 8-pin, so most standard power supplies will have the necessary cabling. The GPU's dual-slot design and 242 mm length (9.5 inches) with a 112 mm height (4.4 inches) make it compatible with most mid-tower cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups.

Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card would require checking PSU headroom, as the 300 W suggested PSU is only sufficient for the current configuration. A more powerful GPU would likely need a higher-wattage unit, so that should be the first consideration. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the platform for faster SSDs, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is already a step behind the latest generation. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility in choosing RAM, but the actual bandwidth is limited by the dual-channel configuration, which is standard for this class of processor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600T is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². It runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz, with a 35 W TDP — a low-power variant that sacrifices frequency for efficiency. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, which is useful for troubleshooting or light workloads without the discrete GPU.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 14822 in multi-core and 2092 in single-core. The multi-core score is strong for a 35 W part, showing that the Alder Lake architecture scales well even at reduced power limits. The single-core score of 2092 is respectable, indicating good responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 6225 multi-core and 878 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1494 multi-core and 210 single-core. These results demonstrate consistent performance across different rendering workloads.

Geekbench scores of 7374 multi-core and 2048 single-core further confirm the CPU's balanced capability. Passmark tests show a multi-thread score of 17446, with single-thread at 3516. The data compression score of 195924 is high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 10205, while extended instructions reach 13140. Floating point math scores 42295, and integer math reaches 54646, indicating solid number-crunching ability. The find prime numbers score is 76, which is low, but this is a specific test that may not reflect real-world usage.

The CPU sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20917. Its nearest rivals are close: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE scores 20900 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V scores 20897 (0.1%), the AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845 (0.3%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826 (0.4%). This clustering means the i5-12600T is statistically on par with several other mid-range processors, but its 35 W TDP gives it a distinct efficiency advantage over higher-power parts. For real workloads, the Passmark physics score of 1212 is modest, while random string sorting at 20299 shows decent memory handling. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking (multiplier is not locked), but given the low TDP, overclocking headroom is likely thermal-limited.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a capable desktop for 1080p gaming and general productivity without requiring top-tier performance. The GPU's 57th percentile and CPU's 74th percentile suggest a machine that handles most games at medium-to-high settings in 1080p, though not at high refresh rates with all settings maxed. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 3050 OEM sufficient for competitive titles like esports shooters, where the CPU's single-thread performance of 2092 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates. For AAA single-player games, the GPU may require lowering settings to maintain smooth play.

Content creators working with photo editing, light video editing, or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength, particularly its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14822, which accelerates rendering times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p video editing timelines, and the CUDA cores (2304 shading units) can accelerate effects in supported applications. The Passmark data compression score of 195924 indicates the CPU is well-suited for file archiving tasks, which is useful for developers managing large codebases or students working with datasets.

Developers writing code will appreciate the 12 threads for parallel compilation, and the 18 MB of L3 cache helps with repeated data access. Students on a budget (though price is not discussed here) will find this a practical workstation for coursework, remote learning, and light gaming. Small business workstations using office applications will see no issues, as the CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's 2D acceleration (Passmark G2D score of 973) handle spreadsheets and web browsing smoothly. The low 35 W CPU TDP makes this an excellent choice for compact or passively-cooled cases where heat dissipation is a concern, though the GPU's 130 W TDP still necessitates adequate airflow.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-12600T and the RTX 3050 OEM is generally even for 1080p gaming, but the data reveals specific bottleneck scenarios. The CPU's 74th percentile is higher than the GPU's 57th percentile, indicating the CPU is the stronger component relative to its class. In CPU-bound workloads like physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 1212) or data encryption (10205), the processor will not hold back the GPU, but the GPU will limit overall system performance in graphics-heavy tasks.

For gaming at 1080p, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor in most modern titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 is low, suggesting that DX12 games may experience lower frame rates than expected from the G3D score of 11857. The CPU, with its boost clock of 4.60 GHz, can keep up with the GPU's demands in most scenarios, but at lower resolutions or with reduced graphics settings, the CPU could become the bottleneck in highly-threaded games. The Passmark multi-thread score of 17446 is moderate, so games that leverage many cores may push the CPU to its limits.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14822 is strong for rendering, and the GPU's compute score of 5779 in Passmark is adequate but not exceptional. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the bottleneck compared to higher-tier cards. The FPS scaling in games is not measured here, but the percentile gap suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield immediate benefits in gaming, while upgrading the CPU would benefit productivity tasks. The 35 W TDP of the CPU means that even under full load, it draws less power than the GPU's 130 W, so the system's thermal profile is dominated by the graphics card.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build sits in the 66th combined percentile of all systems, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, while the RX 7600 scores 15171, a delta of 0.2%. This makes the two GPUs statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: Does the i5-12600T support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and the CPU has a 35 W TDP, so a 300 W unit is the minimum recommendation, though a higher-wattage PSU is advisable for future upgrades.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, so the CPU can be overclocked in principle, but the 35 W TDP limits the practical overclocking headroom due to thermal constraints.

Q: What display outputs does the GPU provide?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its rivals?

A: The i5-12600T scores 2092 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and its nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, etc.) are all within 0.4% of its average score, indicating similar single-thread capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2092 provide a basis for these estimates.

For esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant at 1080p with high settings, the RTX 3050 OEM can likely achieve frame rates well above 60 FPS, potentially reaching 100-144 FPS in lighter scenes, thanks to the strong CPU single-core performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for these games, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth avoids major bottlenecks.

For AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the estimates are more conservative. Games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Valhalla may run at 40-55 FPS, requiring settings to be dropped to high or medium to hit 60 FPS. The DirectX 12 score of 58 suggests that DX12-based titles may see lower performance than DX11 ones, so older games using DX11 (score 86) could run more smoothly. The RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB of VRAM is at the edge of what modern AAA titles need, so texture quality may need to be reduced in some cases.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most demanding games, likely falling to 30-45 FPS on high settings. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU and GPU are more evenly matched. Ray tracing is supported via the 18 RT cores, but the 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient for heavy ray-traced workloads, so DLSS would be necessary to achieve playable frame rates in RT-enabled titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-12600T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a low-power 12th-generation Alder Lake processor, while the GPU is an entry-level Ampere card that has reached end-of-life status. The combined 66th percentile places this system in the mid-range tier, offering a balanced set of capabilities for mainstream users.

The build's strength lies in its efficiency: the CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP mean the system can be cooled with modest hardware, making it suitable for compact desktop cases. The GPU's 242 mm length and dual-slot design are standard, and the single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

This pairing is not aimed at enthusiasts seeking maximum performance; instead, it serves as a reliable workhorse for daily computing, 1080p gaming, and light creative work. The architecture is modern enough to support current APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6), and the PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures the platform is not immediately obsolete. However, the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a compromise, though it is unlikely to cause noticeable issues at this performance level.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 20917, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its best results are in Cinebench R23 (14822 multi-core, 2092 single-core) and Passmark multi-thread (17446), while the Passmark find prime numbers score of 76 is the weakest. The GPU scores an average of 15199, sitting in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score of 11857 is the headline number, while the DirectX 12 score of 58 is the lowest. The combined percentile for the system is 66th.

Looking at the rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (20900, 0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (20897, 0.1%), and the AMD EPYC 7J13 (20845, 0.3%). The GPU matches the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171, 0.2%) and trails the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, -0.5%) by a negligible margin. The overall picture is a system that performs consistently across CPU and GPU workloads, with no single component dramatically outperforming the other. This balance is the defining characteristic of the build, making it a predictable and dependable choice for its intended use case.