SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop configuration that presents a stark contrast in generational capabilities. The CPU is a modern, high-performance 12th-generation Alder Lake processor, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing workstation card. Benchmark data indicates this combination operates at the 70th percentile overall, with the CPU far outclassing the GPU in relative performance. It is a system built for professional productivity and CPU-intensive tasks, where the graphics card provides adequate but not class-leading acceleration. The data indicates that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU and GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the components' synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile, indicating it is a mid-range performer by modern standards. For 1080p ultra settings, this hardware is estimated to handle most titles at 60 frames per second, though it may struggle with the most demanding AAA releases. The RTX 4000’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 is relatively low, suggesting that the card will not maintain high frame rates in future DirectX 12 titles at high detail settings.

At 1440p resolution, the performance picture dims considerably. The GPU’s FP32 compute power of 7.119 TFLOPS is modest, and the 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, while decent, is not exceptional. The estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would likely dip below the 60 FPS target in many games, requiring settings reductions for a smooth experience. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is particularly low, indicating that the card’s API performance is a significant weakness for modern gaming workloads.

For 4K gaming, the RTX 4000 is estimated to be largely unsuitable for ultra settings. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory may be sufficient for some titles, but the sheer computational load of 4K resolution will overwhelm the 2304 shading units. The estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would be in the low 30s or lower for most graphically intensive games. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 78844 is better than its DirectX 12 result, suggesting that Vulkan-based games may perform slightly better, but the overall verdict remains that this is not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming card.

The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3925 in PassMark ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is higher. The i5-12600KF’s boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides the necessary headroom for fast frame processing. The gaming experience will be dictated primarily by the GPU, and users should expect a 1080p-oriented experience with medium-to-high settings for modern titles. The lack of measured data makes these estimates conservative, but the GPU’s benchmark scores suggest it is a generation behind for serious gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are the strongest aspect of this configuration. The Intel Core i5-12600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This puts it on par with the Intel Core i9-10900K, which has an average score of 27872, a mere 0.3% difference. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE by 0.3% and is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27896. This is a remarkable position for a mid-range chip, demonstrating that the 10-core, 16-thread Alder Lake architecture delivers excellent multi-threaded performance.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23391 in multi-core, a figure that underscores its capability in rendering and heavy computational tasks. The single-core score of 3302 is equally impressive, ensuring responsiveness and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 12137 multi-core and 2157 single-core reinforce this narrative. The 3DMark thread tests show good scaling, with the 16-thread score of 7956 nearly matching the max-thread score of 7952, indicating that the hybrid architecture efficiently utilizes all available cores.

The GPU benchmarks paint a less flattering picture. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% faster), and the AMD Radeon 780M (1.1% faster). This positioning is surprising, as it suggests the old Quadro is competitive with a modern integrated GPU in terms of average synthetic scores. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 is respectable, but the overall average is dragged down by poor DirectX 10 and 12 results.

The combined percentile for the system is 70, which reflects the high-performing CPU being held back by the mid-tier GPU. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 is the most representative of general 3D performance, but it is not enough to boost the system into a high-end gaming or rendering tier. The data suggests that for compute-heavy workloads like encryption, where the CPU scores 18445 in PassMark, the system is excellent. For graphics-centric tasks, the system is merely average, with the GPU’s 61st percentile being the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users flexibility in choosing a memory kit, but the dual-channel memory bus means bandwidth is limited by the chosen module type. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 CPU lanes is modern and provides ample bandwidth for current high-speed SSDs and graphics cards, although the current GPU only uses the older PCIe 3.0 standard.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which is a modest requirement for a workstation card. This leaves significant headroom in a typical system PSU for future upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be a more modern GPU, as the CPU’s 79th percentile score is more than capable of driving a much faster graphics card. The CPU’s performance parity with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D indicates it will not bottleneck a high-end graphics card in most scenarios.

The motherboard socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so the upgrade path for the platform itself is limited to swapping within the 12th Gen family. However, the CPU’s strong performance means that it can be a long-lived component. The GPU, being end-of-life, is the clear candidate for replacement. Users looking to improve gaming or rendering performance should prioritize a GPU upgrade, as the CPU has ample headroom. The system’s single-slot GPU and single 8-pin power connector make installation easy, but the 241 mm length should be checked against case clearance.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can carry over older DDR4 modules to save on costs, or invest in faster DDR5 for a slight performance boost in memory-sensitive tasks. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support is a future-proofing feature, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs. The TDP of the CPU is standard for a desktop chip, and a capable air cooler is sufficient for stock operation, given the unlocked multiplier for overclocking is available if better cooling is installed.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s 61st percentile and low DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest that achieving frame rates above 144 Hz at 1080p is unlikely in modern titles. The CPU could handle the job, but the GPU is the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and strong multi-core score of 23391 in Cinebench R23 make it highly capable for software encoding for streaming. The GPU’s 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide some hardware assist, but the older architecture is less efficient than newer encoders. The CPU alone can manage a smooth streaming workload while gaming at moderate settings.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9824 and the PassMark Integer Math score of 87830 indicate excellent performance for video codecs and effects. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines, and the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with real-time previews. The overall experience will be smooth for most editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a powerhouse for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R23 score of 23391. For GPU rendering, the RTX 4000’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and it will be slower than many modern consumer cards. The 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die suggest a complex chip, but its age limits its render output.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3925 in PassMark and 3302 in Cinebench R23 make compilation times fast. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is not a major factor here, making this a very good development machine for coding and running virtual machines.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overqualified for basic office tasks. The CPU’s PassMark Single Thread score of 3925 ensures instant responsiveness in spreadsheets and word processors. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 846 is adequate for 2D desktop acceleration, and the low TDP components mean the system is efficient for long work sessions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated TU104, houses 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, with an effective data rate of 13 Gbps. The base clock is 1005 MHz, boosting up to 1545 MHz.

The GPU features 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI workloads. The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 14.24 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The card has a TDP of 160 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W.

In benchmark terms, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 is the strongest result, indicating decent compute performance for certain workloads. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is very low, suggesting that the card is poorly optimized for modern graphics APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 reinforces this weakness.

For rendering and compute, the 288 tensor cores are a notable feature, allowing for accelerated AI inference and deep learning tasks. The 36 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though the performance is a far cry from modern GeForce RTX 40-series cards. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures, but the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most professional applications. Overall, the GPU is a capable workstation part for its era, but it is outclassed by modern mid-range cards.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for professionals and developers who need strong CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads but have modest graphics requirements. The i5-12600KF’s 79th percentile CPU performance makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large projects, as the high single-thread and multi-thread scores will significantly reduce build times. The 16 threads and 10 cores are ideal for running multiple virtual machines or containers.

Content creators working on video editing will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 23391 beneficial for exporting and rendering timelines. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video preview, though not for complex 3D compositing. For 3D modelers who use CPU-based renderers, this system is a strong value, as the CPU is the primary workhorse. The GPU can handle viewport display and light GPU rendering tasks.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the system’s snappy performance in office applications. The CPU’s high single-thread score ensures that spreadsheet calculations and document formatting are instantaneous. The GPU’s low power draw of 160 W and the system’s overall efficiency make it a sensible choice for a shared workstation. The ECC memory is not supported, so this is not ideal for mission-critical scientific computing requiring error correction.

Gamers at 1080p who are willing to use medium settings will find an acceptable experience, but the GPU’s 61st percentile is a bottleneck. This is not a system for high-refresh or 4K gaming. Users who prioritize CPU power for tasks like data compression, where the PassMark score is 343231, will be very satisfied. This is a CPU-centric build, and the GPU is an afterthought for primary workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system balance is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i5-12600KF’s 79th percentile rating and an average score of 27799 dwarf the GPU’s 61st percentile and average score of 17789. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, data encryption (PassMark score of 18445), and physics calculations (PassMark score of 1539), the system will perform exceptionally well, with the GPU playing a minimal role.

In gaming, the bottleneck is almost always the GPU. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 3925 in PassMark ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the RTX 4000 cannot keep up. The estimated FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K would show a steep drop-off, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited system. The low DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in modern games.

For mixed workloads like 3D rendering, the bottleneck depends on the renderer. If CPU-based, the system will be fast. If GPU-based, the RTX 4000’s 7.119 TFLOPS will be the constraint. The 36 RT cores are present but underpowered, so ray tracing workloads will be slow. The CPU’s 20 MB of L3 cache is ample, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck for larger textures and scenes.

The combined percentile of 70 suggests a system that is above average but not balanced. The data indicates that the CPU is performing at a level that could support a much faster GPU, such as one in the 90th percentile, without becoming a significant bottleneck. Upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains for graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU would continue to provide a solid foundation for all other work.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop configuration is 70, indicating it performs better than 70% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The two CPUs are nearly identical in performance. The i5-12600KF has an average score of 27799, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, making the AMD chip only 0.3% faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this system suitable for modern gaming at high settings?

A: No. The GPU has a PassMark G3D score of 15117 and a low DirectX 12 score of 52, indicating it is only suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with no measured FPS data available for this pairing.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 160 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the graphics card.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 includes 36 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its performance is limited by its Turing architecture.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture and produced on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The chip has a TDP of 125 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700. It has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The die size is 215 mm², and it has a total of 20 MB of shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core.

Benchmark results show exceptional performance in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 are strong indicators of its capability in rendering and heavy computation. The PassMark Multithread score of 27575 confirms this, while the PassMark Integer Math score of 87830 and Floating Point Math score of 67074 show a balanced ALU and FPU design. The data compression score of 343231 is outstanding, making this CPU a top choice for archiving and file management tasks.

Single-threaded performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3302 and the PassMark Single Thread score of 3925 ensure snappy application responsiveness. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 is typical for a high-end desktop chip. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is the primary driver of this performance, and the architecture’s efficiency ensures that power consumption is kept in check at 125 W.

The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking places it in the upper echelon of all processors. It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i9-10900K and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, both of which are older flagship parts. This means the i5-12600KF offers flagship-level performance in a mid-range package. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives users flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 CPU lanes provides fast connectivity. For data encryption, the PassMark score of 18445 is high, making it suitable for security-conscious workloads. The 10 nm process node ensures it runs cooler than older 14 nm parts, but a dedicated cooler is still required. Overall, the CPU is the star of this configuration, offering excellent performance across a wide range of applications.