SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop combination built around a 10-core, 16-thread Alder Lake processor and a 16 GB RDNA 3 graphics card. This pairing targets a specific performance tier where high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming meet substantial multi-threaded productivity power, all without reaching the extreme cost of flagship components. The data shows a balanced system that sits at the 69th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms a majority of tested configurations while leaving clear headroom for future upgrades.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip features a hybrid design typical of 12th Gen Core, combining performance and efficiency cores to deliver a 20 MB shared L3 cache alongside per-core L1 and L2 caches of 80 KB and 1.25 MB respectively. This is a desktop part with no integrated graphics, an unlocked multiplier, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Benchmark results place the i5-12600KF in the 79th percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 27799. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i5 is essentially on par with that older flagship. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, which is just 0.3% higher, indicating that the i5-12600KF trades blows with a highly regarded gaming CPU. In multi-threaded workloads, the processor shows strong scaling: it scores 7956 in 3DMark 16-thread tests and 7952 at max threads, while its single-thread score is 1016. Cinebench R23 results further illustrate this, with a multicore score of 23391 and a single-core score of 3302. This indicates that the CPU is not only capable of handling heavily parallel tasks but also excels in lightly threaded applications where single-core performance is critical.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math scores 87830, floating point math scores 67074, and extended instructions score 22003. Data encryption hits 18445, while data compression reaches 343231. The multithread score is 27575, and the single-thread score is 3925. These figures suggest a processor that is well-rounded, with particularly strong integer and floating-point performance that translates directly to compile times, video encoding, and simulation workloads. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1995 and 4-thread score of 3806 show that even at low thread counts, the chip maintains high efficiency, which is beneficial for older games or tasks that rely on fewer cores. Overall, the i5-12600KF offers performance that rivals previous-generation i9 processors, making it a formidable choice for a mid-range to upper-mid-range build.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this combination is exceptional. The CPU's single-thread score of 3925 in PassMark and 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, while the GPU delivers over 195 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 192 FPS in Minecraft at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive shooters and esports titles.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the 16 threads and robust multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 allows for simultaneous game capture and encoding, while the 3DMark max-thread score of 7952 ensures that background tasks like OBS do not starve the main game of CPU resources.

Video editing workloads, such as those in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, will find the i5-12600KF capable. The PassMark multithread score of 27575 and data compression score of 343231 indicate strong performance in timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting, though the 16 GB GPU memory is the primary asset for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D relies heavily on CPU cores. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9824 and R15 multicore score of 2357 demonstrate that this chip can handle complex scenes, but it is not a dedicated workstation part. It will outperform older 8-core CPUs significantly, as evidenced by its parity with the i9-10900K.

Software development sees a clear benefit from the 10 cores and high integer math score of 87830. Compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and executing test suites will be responsive, with the 20 MB L3 cache reducing latency on frequently accessed data.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but not wasteful. The high single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the 16 threads handle multitasking with ease. The absence of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory, but the RX 7700 handles all display output efficiently.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with its closest rivals being the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 (-0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE at 27712 (+0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 27887 (-0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D at 27896 (-0.3%). These deltas show that the i5-12600KF is statistically indistinguishable from a previous-gen i9 and a top-tier gaming Ryzen, which is impressive for a mid-range part.

The GPU, AMD Radeon RX 7700, scores an average of 15852, sitting in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (-1%), AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (+1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-1.7%). This places the RX 7700 in a competitive tier, slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti but close enough that the difference is minimal in synthetic tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2865, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 106028. PassMark G3D scores 20974, and GPU compute scores 10963.

The combined system percentile is 69, which indicates that this pairing is better than 69% of all tested combinations. The pair rank by FPS is 1787 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all games of 125.4. This average is skewed by highly optimized esports titles, but it confirms that the system is capable of high frame rates in a wide variety of games. The CPU's 79th percentile and GPU's 58th percentile show a slight CPU advantage, suggesting that the processor can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in heavily graphical tasks.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings is available for a wide range of games, confirming real-world performance. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports: Valorant runs at 447 FPS, CS:GO at 431 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 232 FPS. For AAA titles, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 152 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 70 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU working harder. Valorant drops to 381 FPS, CS:GO to 297 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 to 129 FPS. Rainbow Six Siege hits 152 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, and Warzone to 135 FPS. Flight Simulator runs at 57 FPS.

At 3840x2160, 4K gaming is possible but challenging. Valorant still hits 305 FPS, CS:GO 175 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 72 FPS. Warzone runs at 115 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 26 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator to 42 FPS. Heavily demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended are nearly unplayable at 9 FPS, and The Medium runs at 27 FPS.

The data shows a clear trend: this system is a 1080p high-refresh champion and a 1440p capable gamer, but 4K is only viable for less demanding or well-optimized games. For gamers targeting 144Hz at 1080p, this build delivers. For 1440p, expect to adjust settings from ultra to high for AAA titles to maintain 60+ FPS. The 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy mods, but the raw rasterization power limits 4K performance.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming and want the ability to step up to 1440p without compromise. The measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (195 FPS at 1080p) and Valorant (447 FPS at 1080p) makes it a top choice for competitive players using 144Hz or 240Hz monitors.

Content creators who edit video or work with 3D models will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and the PassMark multithread score of 27575. The 16 GB GPU memory is also a boon for rendering large textures or working with 4K timelines.

Software developers, especially those working on large codebases, will appreciate the integer math score of 87830 and the 10 cores for parallel compilation. The system's ability to handle virtual machines and containerized workloads is solid, given the 16 threads.

Students and office users who want a system that will not bottleneck for years will find this build sufficient. It is not a budget option, but the performance per dollar is strong relative to the i9-10900K it matches. Small business workstations running accounting software, databases, or CAD tools will see smooth operation.

The system is less suitable for 4K gaming enthusiasts or those who need extreme multi-threading for professional 3D rendering, as the GPU's 58th percentile and CPU's 79th percentile indicate limits at the highest resolutions and workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the Navi 32 chip and RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The GPU has 40 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores, relying on standard compute units for AI workloads. Its base clock is 1900 MHz, with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz, providing 19.5 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, yielding 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The GPU's pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. It delivers 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, indicating strong raw compute. The card has a TDP of 200 W, requires a 550 W PSU, and uses dual 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

In benchmark scores, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2865, which is modest. PassMark G3D scores 20974, while GPU compute reaches 10963. The PassMark DirectX 11 score is 186, DirectX 12 is 96, and DirectX 9 is 261. Geekbench OpenCL scores 106028. These numbers place the GPU in the 58th percentile, with its closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129, which is 1.7% higher. This suggests the RX 7700 is slightly behind the RTX 3060 Ti in synthetic tests but offers double the VRAM (16 GB vs. 8 GB typically).

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over rivals, allowing for larger texture sets and higher resolutions in professional 3D applications. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth ensures that memory-intensive workloads do not starve the compute units. The 40 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS at 1080p) suggests that ray tracing is not a primary strength. The FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS is strong for compute tasks, making this a capable GPU for OpenCL workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th Gen Alder Lake processors. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose based on budget and availability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck.

The suggested PSU for the system is 550 W, which provides headroom for the 125 W CPU and 200 W GPU. This leaves room for minor overclocks, as the CPU has an unlocked multiplier. However, upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade, as 550 W is the minimum for this configuration.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, as the RX 7700's 58th percentile is the lower performer in this pairing. The CPU's 79th percentile suggests it has headroom to drive a more powerful graphics card, such as a higher-tier Radeon or GeForce, without becoming a bottleneck. Memory upgrades are also viable, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to move to faster kits if they are on DDR4.

The platform's longevity is limited to the LGA 1700 socket, which supports 12th and 13th Gen processors, but not newer architectures. This means future CPU upgrades are possible within the same socket generation, but a motherboard change would be needed for newer chips. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives, but users with multiple high-speed expansion cards may find the lane count restrictive.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, which is only 0.3% higher, meaning the i5 matches a previous-generation flagship.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This is a significant amount of VRAM for its performance class.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures for Cyberpunk 2077 at different resolutions?

A: At ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58 FPS at 1920x1080, 43 FPS at 2560x1440, and 28 FPS at 3840x2160. These figures indicate that 1080p is playable, while 1440p requires settings adjustments.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding titles. For example, Valorant hits 305 FPS at 3840x2160, but Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 9 FPS. Most AAA games will require lower settings or resolutions.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, meaning this system outperforms 69% of all tested combinations. The pair rank by FPS is 1787 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 125.4 across all games.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 40 ray tracing cores based on RDNA 3.0 architecture. However, performance in ray-traced games is limited, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077's 58 FPS at 1080p.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which accommodates the 125 W TDP of the CPU and the 200 W TDP of the GPU. This leaves minimal headroom for overclocking or future upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that this system is balanced with a slight CPU advantage. The CPU's 79th percentile versus the GPU's 58th percentile suggests that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In gaming, this means the GPU is often the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. For example, at 1080p, the CPU can drive high frame rates, as seen in Valorant at 447 FPS, but the GPU limits performance in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS.

At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the gap between CPU and GPU performance narrows. The average FPS across all games is 125.4, but this is skewed by esports titles. In AAA games, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as evidenced by Red Dead Redemption 2 at 39 FPS at 1440p. At 4K, the GPU is heavily strained, with many titles falling below 30 FPS.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like data compression (343231 score) or integer math (87830 score), the CPU is not the limiting factor. The GPU's compute score of 10963 is lower than its rasterization score, indicating that compute-heavy workloads like machine learning or physics simulations will be GPU-limited. For gaming, the CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 7952 ensures it can handle modern game engines that utilize multiple cores, but the GPU's raw pixel throughput (236.1 GPixel/s) is the primary constraint at high resolutions.

The pair rank of 1787 out of 3732 supports this analysis: the system is in the top 48% of pairs by FPS, which is respectable but not top-tier. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles is 21 points, which is moderate. A more powerful GPU would shift the balance toward a CPU bottleneck, but the current pairing shows that the GPU is the primary limiter for gaming at 1440p and above, while the CPU is sufficient for all workloads. For users who prioritize higher resolutions, upgrading the GPU is the logical next step. For those who focus on 1080p gaming, this system is well-balanced and will not exhibit significant bottlenecks.