SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pairing represents a high-performance desktop configuration built around Intel’s Alder Lake architecture and AMD’s RDNA 2.0 graphics. The CPU, a 10-core, 16-thread part with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, ranks at the 85th percentile among all GPUs. Together, this build achieves a combined percentile of 82, placing it firmly in the upper tier of desktop systems for both productivity and gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-12600KF is built on Intel’s Alder Lake-S architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It is a desktop-class processor with 10 cores and 16 threads, which indicates a hybrid design—though the exact P-core/E-core split is not detailed in the data, the thread count implies that some cores are hyper-threaded. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz position this as a high-frequency part, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking.

Benchmark scores reveal a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23391 in multicore and 3302 in single-core. The single-core score is particularly notable, placing it among the fastest processors for lightly-threaded tasks. The 3DMark results show scaling from a single-thread score of 1016 to 7956 in the 16-thread test, and 7952 at max threads. This scaling is nearly linear, indicating that the core configuration is efficient under heavy parallel loads. The Geekbench scores of 2157 single-core and 12137 multicore reinforce this picture. PassMark results are extensive: integer math at 87830, floating-point math at 67074, and data compression at 343231. The multithread score of 27575 and single-thread score of 3925 both contribute to an average benchmark score of 27799.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 12600KF is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-10900K, which scores 27872, a delta of -0.3%. It is also within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, and it trails the Ryzen 7 5800X3D by only 0.3%. This means that in terms of raw average performance, the 12600KF is statistically indistinguishable from these parts. The practical implication is that the processor is well-balanced; it does not win or lose by a meaningful margin against its direct competition. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle multi-threaded rendering tasks—as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score—while also delivering excellent responsiveness in single-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 are strong indicators for high-refresh-rate gaming. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 236.9 FPS at 1080p and 157 FPS at 1440p, while Valorant reaches 492 FPS at 1080p. These numbers show that the CPU can keep up with the GPU in frame-rate-limited scenarios.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides enough parallel headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 343231 and multithread score of 27575 suggest that background tasks like streaming software will have minimal impact on frame rates. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the system maintains 150.5 FPS at 1080p, leaving ample CPU capacity for concurrent encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and Geekbench multicore score of 12137 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6128 shows that the CPU scales well with moderate thread counts typical of video editing software. This is not a workstation-class chip, but it is more than sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects.

3D rendering: In Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 2357 and single-core score of 332 demonstrate that the CPU can handle both interactive viewport work and final-frame renders. The PassMark floating-point math score of 67074 is particularly relevant for physics simulations and ray-tracing calculations. This CPU will not compete with HEDT parts, but it holds its own in a 79th-percentile position.

Software development: The PassMark extended instructions score of 22003 and data encryption score of 18445 are relevant for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code paths. The 3DMark max threads score of 7952 indicates that parallel builds will benefit from the core count, though the 125W TDP should be considered for sustained load scenarios.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance, as measured by a Geekbench score of 2157, ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The PassMark single-thread score of 3925 is more than adequate for daily productivity. The processor supports DDR4 memory, which allows for cost-effective builds, though the data does not specify pricing for memory. For typical office tasks, this CPU is overkill, but it leaves headroom for future multitasking.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 7 nm process, with a die size of 520 mm² and 26,800 million transistors. The GPU features 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. It has 72 ray-tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores, indicating that AI acceleration is not a primary focus. The clock speeds are a base of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus.

The compute capabilities are substantial. The FP32 performance is 20.74 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 41.47 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 648.0 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong rasterization performance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3689. Geekbench results include a Metal score of 181337, OpenCL of 171304, and Vulkan of 136875. PassMark G3D score is 24980, and the GPU compute score is 13245. The average benchmark score is 48477, placing it at the 85th percentile among all GPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6800 XT is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, which scores 47743. It trails the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 3%, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 3%. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is a critical factor for 4K textures and high-resolution rendering. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous for modern titles and allows for high-resolution texture packs without exceeding memory limits. For rendering workloads, the 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance is competitive, though the lack of tensor cores means that features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; the GPU relies on standard rasterization and its 72 RT cores for ray-traced effects.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who play at 1440p and 4K resolutions. At 2560x1440, the system delivers 135 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 157 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 184 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege. At 3840x2160, it still manages 115.4 FPS in Warzone and 101 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, which is playable for high-refresh 4K monitors. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that future titles with high-resolution assets will not be bottlenecked by memory capacity.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 23391 Cinebench R23 score and the GPU’s 20.74 TFLOPS sufficient for moderate workloads. The CPU’s 10 cores handle multi-threaded exports, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. For developers, the CPU’s PassMark extended instructions score of 22003 indicates strong performance in compilation tasks, and the 16 threads allow for parallel builds.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than necessary, but the high single-thread performance ensures no lag in productivity applications. Small business workstations that require occasional rendering or large data processing will benefit from the 82nd combined percentile. The desktop class means this is a stationary unit, not a laptop or mini-PC, which suits users who prioritize performance over portability. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, but the CPU is active, meaning the platform is still viable for new builds if a GPU is sourced.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, with a percentile rank of 79. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, a delta of -0.3%. This near-tie means that in most applications, the 12600KF is interchangeable with the older i9 in terms of raw performance. The CPU’s best scores are in Cinebench R23 multicore at 23391 and PassMark multithread at 27575. The weakest area is single-thread, but even that is strong at 1016 in 3DMark and 3925 in PassMark.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 48477, with a percentile rank of 85. It is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, but 3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24980 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 are solid for its class. The combined percentile is 82, indicating that the pairing is well-matched; the CPU is slightly below the GPU in percentile ranking, but the difference is within a reasonable range.

The measured FPS data across games shows an average of 154.1 FPS at all resolutions, with a pair rank of 1093 out of 3732 pairs. This places the combination in the top 30% of all tested pairs. The highest FPS is in Valorant at 492 FPS at 1080p, and the lowest is in Ark: Survival Ascended at 34 FPS at 1080p. This wide range reflects the varying demands of different game engines. Overall, the system is capable of high frame rates in esports and moderate frame rates in demanding AAA titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type and does it support overclocking?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has an unlocked multiplier, which allows for overclocking.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what PSU is recommended?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the memory support field lists both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray-tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 72 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray-tracing features.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all tested desktop configurations.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 154.1, with a pair rank of 1093 out of 3732.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is specific to Alder Lake. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the data does not specify which memory type is used in the benchmark configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 700 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so a power supply with headroom is recommended for overclocking.

A sensible upgrade path would involve moving to a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, but the data does not list specific compatible models. The GPU is end-of-life, so a future upgrade would involve a newer generation GPU, though the specific performance gains are not quantified in the data. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that modern GPUs will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The dual-channel memory controller supports both memory types, allowing for flexibility in memory upgrades. For users seeking more CPU performance, the 79th percentile leaves room for improvement, but the current processor is well-balanced with the GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build consisting of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. The CPU is part of the Core 12th Gen series, and the GPU is from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary tower configuration. The combined percentile of 82 places this system in the upper tier of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 85th percentile are close, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

The system is designed for high-performance gaming and content creation. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads handle multi-threaded productivity tasks, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and rendering. The average FPS of 154.1 across all games indicates that this is a capable gaming system, but the wide range of scores shows that it is not a top-tier 4K gaming rig for all titles. The build is best suited for 1440p gaming with high refresh rates, as evidenced by the 135 FPS in Warzone and 157 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at that resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are close, with the GPU at 85 and the CPU at 79, indicating a well-balanced system. However, the data shows that the CPU is the limiting factor in some scenarios. In 3DMark, the CPU’s max threads score of 7952 is lower than the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 when normalized to their respective benchmarks. In gaming, the frame rates at 1080p are often higher than at 1440p or 4K, which suggests that the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 70.1 at 1080p to 54.9 at 1440p and 31.7 at 4K. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. In contrast, in Valorant, the FPS drops from 492 at 1080p to 455.6 at 1440p and 367.7 at 4K, which shows that the CPU is more of a limiting factor at lower resolutions, where the GPU has more headroom. The pair rank of 1093 out of 3732 suggests that this combination performs well but not exceptionally, meaning there is a slight imbalance.

The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1995 and single-thread score of 1016 indicate strong performance in lightly-threaded games, but the GPU’s 20.74 TFLOPS can outpace the CPU in some scenarios. In heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU’s 23391 Cinebench R23 score is competitive, but the GPU’s FP32 performance is higher. Overall, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: the CPU limits at 1080p in esports titles, while the GPU limits at 4K in AAA games.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this system is extensive, covering 54 games at three resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 522 FPS, Valorant hits 492 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 281 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck for high-refresh monitors in competitive games. In more demanding titles at 1080p, the system still performs well, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 150.5 FPS and Doom at 174.9 FPS.

At 1440p, the system remains strong for high-refresh gaming. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 157 FPS, but this is still above 144 Hz. Call of Duty: Warzone holds at 135 FPS, and Fortnite drops to 73.6 FPS. The demanding Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 54.9 FPS at 1440p, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh. At 4K, the system’s performance varies widely. Esports titles like Valorant (367.7 FPS) and Rainbow Six Siege (101 FPS) remain playable, but AAA titles suffer: Cyberpunk 2077 at 31.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11 FPS.

The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 154.1, which is skewed by high frame rates in esports titles. The data is measured, not estimated, so these figures are reliable. For a balanced gaming experience, the system is best suited for 1440p, where it delivers high frame rates in most titles and playable frame rates in the most demanding games. At 4K, users will need to lower settings for AAA titles, but the 16 GB VRAM ensures that texture quality can remain high.