SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 75th combined percentile, indicating a system with solid performance headroom above the median. The CPU, with a 79th percentile ranking, is the stronger component on paper, while the GPU, at the 71st percentile, is slightly less dominant relative to its peers. This configuration is characterized by a strong processor that can feed a capable graphics card across most workloads, with the balance shifting depending on the specific task and resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance dynamics between the Core i5-12600KF and the Radeon RX 6750 XT are workload-dependent. The CPU demonstrates exceptional single-thread capability with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1016 and a passmark_single_thread score of 3925, which positions it to handle game logic and physics calculations efficiently. However, the multi-threaded results, such as the 3dmark_max_threads score of 7952 and cinebench_r23_multicore score of 23391, reveal a processor that is capable but not at the top of its class, as indicated by its 79th percentile standing.

The GPU’s performance is anchored by a passmark_g3d score of 20700, which places it at the 71st percentile. In gaming scenarios, the balance between these two components is evident in the measured FPS data. At 1920x1080, the pair often achieves high frame rates, such as 195 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 152 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, suggesting the CPU is adequately feeding the GPU. As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, with frame rates dropping to 129 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 135 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, showing that the graphics card’s rendering capacity is the constraining factor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU load becomes even more pronounced, with frame rates falling below 60 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (28 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (26.7 FPS). This data indicates that while the CPU has the headroom to support higher frame rates, the RX 6750 XT’s 12 GB memory and bandwidth are not sufficient for consistent 4K gaming. In productivity tasks, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads drive a cinebench_r20_multicore score of 9824, which is strong, but the GPU’s compute score of 9550 in passmark_gpu_compute suggests a balanced system where neither component severely bottlenecks the other in mixed workloads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing is well-suited, as the CPU’s single-thread performance supports high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured data shows 442.4 FPS in Valorant and 429.9 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 1920x1080, indicating that the system can easily drive 144Hz or 240Hz monitors in esports scenarios. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for these less demanding titles, and the balance is optimal with the CPU not holding back the GPU.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads, which handle encoding and multitasking efficiently. The passmark_multithread score of 27575 and the 3dmark_16_threads score of 7956 indicate solid parallel processing capability, allowing for simultaneous game capture and broadcast without significant frame drops. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 40 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for modern APIs, though the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance is more modest for heavy 3D rendering.

Video editing tasks, such as those in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve, will leverage both the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 23391 is competitive for export and encoding work, while the GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 20700 helps with effects and timeline rendering. The 12 GB VRAM is beneficial for handling larger projects, and the system’s 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports smooth scrubbing and preview playback.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will stress the CPU’s multi-core performance, and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 7952 shows it can handle complex scenes. However, the GPU’s 26.62 TFLOPS FP16 performance is not top-tier, so render times will be moderate. The RX 6750 XT’s 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs provide adequate throughput for viewport work, but final frame renders may be slower than with higher-end cards.

Software development and compilation tasks are well-served by the CPU’s architecture. The Alder Lake design with 10 cores and 16 threads offers a good balance for parallel builds, and the passmark_integer_math score of 87830 indicates strong arithmetic performance. The system’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows developers to choose a platform that fits their budget, and the PCIe Gen 4 interface ensures fast storage access for large codebases.

Student and office work will find this system more than adequate. Daily productivity applications rely on single-thread performance, where the CPU excels with a geekbench_singlecore score of 2157. The passmark_data_encryption score of 18445 and passmark_data_compression score of 343231 show that archival and security tasks are handled swiftly. The GPU is underutilized in these scenarios, but its presence does not detract from the system’s responsiveness.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process from TSMC. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective, which provides sufficient data throughput for 1440p gaming but shows limitations at 4K, as evidenced by the measured FPS declines.

The GPU’s clock speeds are set at a base of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. These frequencies are high for the RX 6000 series, and the 2560 shading units operate at a peak FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS. The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the implementation is not as robust as dedicated RTX cards, leading to lower performance in ray-traced titles. The 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s, and the 160 TMUs achieve a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 71st percentile overall. The 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2548 is a modern DirectX 12 test, while the geekbench_opencl score of 16360 and geekbench_vulkan score of 98089 show compute capability. The passmark_g3d score of 20700 is the primary gaming metric, and the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which scores 25740 and is 1.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891, which is 0.5% ahead. This indicates the GPU is competitive with high-end mobile parts but not with desktop flagship cards.

In rendering workloads, the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB memory are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest titles, and the Vulkan 1.4 API support allows for efficient low-level access. However, the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, which could be a drawback for future workloads that rely on DLSS-like technologies.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build is targeted at gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolutions. The measured FPS data shows strong performance in esports titles, with 231.1 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X and 195 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p. At 1440p, the system still maintains playable frame rates in most titles, with 81.1 FPS in Assetto Corsa and 62 FPS in Control, making it a solid choice for high-refresh monitors up to 144Hz.

Content creators who work with video editing or streaming will appreciate the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM. The cinebench_r20_multicore score of 9824 and the passmark_gpu_compute score of 9550 indicate that the system can handle multi-track editing and live streaming without major stutters. The GPU’s 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs are adequate for effects-heavy timelines.

Software developers and engineers will find the CPU’s performance suitable for compilation and testing. The passmark_integer_math score of 87830 and the 3dmark_8_threads score of 6128 show strong parallel execution, and the support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers flexibility in system configuration. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes allows for fast NVMe storage, reducing build times.

Students and users in office environments will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but it offers room for growth. The single-thread performance, with a geekbench_singlecore score of 2157, ensures that everyday applications run smoothly. The GPU is not necessary for these tasks, but its presence means the system can handle occasional gaming or light rendering without a dedicated upgrade.

Small business workstations could benefit from this combination for tasks like 3D modeling or CAD, where the CPU’s multi-core performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities are relevant. The system’s 250 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP suggest a manageable power draw, though the suggested PSU is 600 W, indicating a need for a quality power supply.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm², and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides quick access to frequently used data, and the 20 MB L3 is sufficient for gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexibility in platform choice, though it does not support ECC memory.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 79th percentile overall. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1016 and cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 3302 highlight strong single-core performance, which is critical for gaming. The multi-core scores, such as cinebench_r23_multicore at 23391 and geekbench_multicore at 12137, show that the 16 threads handle parallel workloads well. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which has an average score of 27896 and is 0.3% behind, indicating the 12600KF is competitive with a high-end gaming CPU.

The passmark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 87830, floating point at 67074, and extended instructions at 22003. The passmark_physics score of 1539 is moderate, but the passmark_multithread score of 27575 shows good scaling. The CPU’s performance in data compression (343231) and encryption (18445) makes it suitable for archival and secure computing tasks.

For real workloads, the CPU’s Alder Lake architecture with a mix of performance and efficiency cores (though not explicitly listed) provides a balance between power consumption and performance. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz ensures high single-thread responsiveness, and the 20 MB L3 cache helps in games that rely on larger data sets. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required, which is already present in this build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-12600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides a clear upgrade path for users who wish to move to newer Alder Lake or Raptor Lake processors later. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU enables fast connectivity for graphics cards and NVMe drives, though the RX 6750 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully utilized.

The system’s TDP is 125 W for the CPU and 250 W for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This indicates that the current power supply has headroom for upgrades, but not significantly so. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, such as a more powerful Radeon or GeForce card, but the 600 W PSU might need to be upgraded concurrently if the new GPU draws more power.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose to keep their existing DDR4 kit or move to faster DDR5, which could improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The dual-channel memory bus is standard, and the lack of ECC support limits use in mission-critical servers but is fine for consumer workloads.

The socket 1700 platform is not the latest, but it offers a decent upgrade path within its generation. Users could upgrade to a higher-core-count CPU like an i7 or i9 from the same socket, provided the motherboard supports it. The PCIe Gen 4 support is current, and the 20 lanes are sufficient for a single GPU and multiple NVMe drives.

For future upgrades, the GPU is likely the first component to be replaced, given its 71st percentile ranking and end-of-life production status. The CPU’s 79th percentile means it has more longevity, and it can support newer GPUs without becoming a bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system at the 75th percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, which is slightly below the Intel Core i9-10900K’s score of 27872, a delta of -0.3%, and above the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE’s score of 27712, a delta of 0.3%. The CPU’s strongest results are in cinebench_r23_multicore (23391) and passmark_multithread (27575), while the single-thread score of 3925 in passmark is also notable.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26011, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891, a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856, a delta of 0.6%. The GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 20700 is its primary gaming metric, and the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2548 shows modern DirectX 12 performance. The passmark_gpu_compute score of 9550 is lower than the gaming score, indicating that compute tasks are not its primary strength.

The pair’s average FPS across all games is 127.2, with a rank of 1706 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top half of configurations. The measured FPS data shows a wide variance, from 442.4 FPS in Valorant to 31.3 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended at 1080p. This range highlights the GPU’s capability in esports titles and its limitations in the most demanding games.

Overall, the CPU is the stronger component, with a percentile rank 8 points higher than the GPU. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution gaming or productivity tasks, the system performs very well. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or heavy rendering, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but the overall system remains balanced for 1080p and 1440p usage.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i5-12600KF with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, and the GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based card with 12 GB of memory. The combination is designed for mainstream gaming and productivity, with a combined percentile of 75 indicating it is above the median.

The CPU’s 79th percentile rank places it in the upper tier of processors, and the GPU’s 71st percentile rank is slightly lower but still above average. The pair’s performance is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the measured FPS data, but it struggles at 4K with demanding titles. The system is best described as a high-end mid-range build, capable of handling most modern games at high settings.

The build’s overall tier is solidly in the upper-midrange segment. The CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores make it versatile, and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is a good match for current game requirements. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it offers a good balance of price and performance, with the CPU providing more headroom for future GPU upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, indicating the system outperforms 75% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s score of 27896.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which is sufficient for the 125 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP.

Q: What is the measured FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the system achieves 58 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 with ultra settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core i5-12600KF does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT has a boost clock of 2600 MHz.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured, shows this system’s gaming capability across various titles and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and older titles, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 429.9 FPS and Valorant hitting 442.4 FPS. More demanding games still perform well, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 152 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop but remain playable for most games. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 129 FPS, and Assetto Corsa hits 81.1 FPS. Heavier titles like Control run at 62 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS. The system is capable of driving 1440p monitors with high refresh rates in less demanding games.

At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates. Most titles fall below 60 FPS, with Counter-Strike 2 at 72 FPS being an exception. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12.1 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for consistent 4K gaming at ultra settings.

The data shows that the system is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU providing enough headroom to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The average FPS across all games is 127.2, and the pair ranks 1706 out of 3732, placing it in the upper half of tested configurations. For users seeking a balance between performance and cost, this build is a strong choice for high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds