SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 represents a desktop configuration that sits in the upper tier of benchmark performance, with a combined percentile of 77. This analysis is based on synthetic benchmark scores, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the CPU and GPU’s respective benchmark scores, not from direct frame rate measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly states that no measured FPS rows exist for this CPU-GPU pairing, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data provides no direct in-game performance metrics, so the analysis relies on the CPU’s 79th percentile and the GPU’s 75th percentile to infer capability.

In synthetic 3DMark tests, the GPU scores 2014 in Steel Nomad DX12, which is a low DirectX 12 result. However, this score is relative to the GPU’s overall average benchmark score of 30433 and its 75th percentile rank. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18931 indicates a strong DirectX 11 and 12 performer, while its DirectX 9 score of 250 and DirectX 10 score of 115 are less relevant for modern titles. The CPU’s 3DMark scores, particularly the 16-thread score of 7956 and max-thread score of 7952, suggest that the processor can feed the GPU in multi-threaded scenarios.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is a critical factor. The i5-12600KF scores 1016 in 3DMark single-thread and 3925 in PassMark single-thread, which are strong results that should prevent significant bottlenecks in most titles. The GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 160-bit bus width may limit performance at higher resolutions or with heavy texture loads. The estimated frame rates are likely to be high at 1080p, with the CPU capable of driving high refresh rates in esports titles, while the GPU provides a solid foundation for graphically demanding games.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The Radeon RX 6700’s 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 156.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle 1440p gaming, but the CPU’s relative strength means that the GPU will likely be the primary limiter. In 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute capabilities become the dominant factor, and the 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint in the most demanding titles. The data indicates that this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the CPU and GPU complement each other effectively.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900K with an average score of 27872 and a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the i5-12600KF is 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896 on average, with a deltaPct of -0.3, indicating the i5-12600KF trails by 0.3%. Conversely, the i5-12600KF is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U. This places the i5-12600KF in a highly competitive position, essentially on par with these upper-tier processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 30433, ranking in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a mixed picture: it is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA CMP 70HX, 0.2% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M60, 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800, and 1.6% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The Radeon RX 6700’s performance is thus closely clustered with these cards, with a slight edge over the RX 6800 and RTX 3070 Ti.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve a combined percentile of 77, indicating a well-matched pair. The CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile are close, suggesting that neither component dramatically overshadows the other in overall performance. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 23391, and the GPU’s compute scores, like the PassMark GPU Compute of 8240, reinforce this balance. The data shows a configuration that is slightly stronger on the CPU side, but the GPU is capable of keeping pace in most workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it was released on 2021-11-03 with a launch MSRP of $264.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and the Geekbench multicore score of 12137 indicate that the CPU excels in heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 27575 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 7952 corroborate this. In single-threaded tasks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3302 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2157, which are competitive for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 3925 is notably high, suggesting excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks.

The CPU’s architecture, with its hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, is reflected in the scaling of scores across thread counts. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7952, indicating that the CPU reaches its full potential with 16 threads. The 8-thread score of 6128 and 4-thread score of 3806 show a linear scaling pattern, which is typical for Alder Lake. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles multi-tasking, video encoding, and 3D rendering with ease, while still providing high single-thread performance for gaming and legacy applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 3925 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1016, is sufficient to drive high-refresh-rate monitors in most titles. The GPU’s 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 156.8 GPixel/s pixel rate support high frame rates at 1080p, with estimates suggesting the pairing is well-suited for 144Hz gaming.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads, demonstrated by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 18445 indicates solid performance for encryption tasks, which is relevant for stream security. The GPU’s compute capabilities, with a PassMark GPU Compute score of 8240, can also assist with encoding if used.

Video Editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded strength, shown by a PassMark multithread score of 27575, accelerates rendering and export times. The GPU’s 10 GB of VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p video timelines, and the 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports hardware-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2357 and R20 multicore score of 9824 indicate strong performance in CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 2304 shading units provide substantial compute for GPU-accelerated renderers, with the RT cores enabling ray-traced workflows.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 and 2157 in Geekbench single-core ensure fast compilation for single-threaded tasks. The 16 threads and 20 MB of L3 cache handle parallel builds efficiently, as seen in the PassMark integer math score of 87830.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3925 ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The GPU is overkill for basic office tasks, but it provides headroom for light photo editing or casual gaming, with the PassMark G2D score of 936 indicating solid 2D performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing, with the CPU’s 79th percentile slightly ahead of the GPU’s 75th percentile. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3925, is likely sufficient to keep the GPU fed, making the GPU the limiting factor. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2014 and PassMark G3D score of 18931 suggest it is the primary determinant of frame rates.

At higher resolutions, the gap widens. The GPU’s 160-bit memory bus and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, potentially constraining performance at 1440p and 4K. The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, such as the PassMark multithread score of 27575, are unlikely to be the limiting factor in these scenarios. For CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the stronger component, with its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 outpacing the GPU’s compute in some tasks.

The data shows that the CPU is more capable relative to its peers than the GPU. The i5-12600KF’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, is only 0.3% faster, while the Radeon RX 6700 is 1.6% faster than the RTX 3070 Ti. This suggests that in gaming, the GPU will often be the bottleneck, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU’s headroom is not fully utilized. In productivity, the CPU’s strength is more apparent, making it the dominant component in multi-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, based on the CPU’s 79th percentile and the GPU’s 75th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-12600KF has an average score of 27799, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s score of 27896.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how might it affect gaming?

A: The Radeon RX 6700 has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s over a 160-bit bus, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may limit performance at 4K with high texture settings.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the boost clock is 4.90 GHz, allowing for manual overclocking beyond the default settings.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 3302 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is a strong result for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

Q: How does the GPU’s PassMark G3D score compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The GPU’s PassMark G3D score is 18931, and its average benchmark score is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti’s average score of 29945.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3925, ensures high frame rates in esports and competitive titles, while the GPU’s 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles graphically demanding games at these resolutions. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for current titles at these settings, but users planning for 4K gaming should consider the GPU’s memory bus limitations.

Content creators will find this pairing suitable for video editing and 3D rendering. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 accelerates export times, and the GPU’s 2304 shading units and 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance support GPU-accelerated effects. The 36 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering, though the 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large scenes.

Software developers benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and high single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23, which speeds up compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 87830 indicates strong performance in parallel workloads. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3925 ensures a responsive experience, and the GPU can handle light gaming or creative projects. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded performance for data processing or virtualization will also benefit from the CPU’s capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This allows for a choice between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum memory speeds. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and an additional NVMe SSD.

The GPU has a TDP of 175 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, leaving headroom for upgrades within the same power envelope. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the combined power draw is well within a standard 650 W PSU’s capacity. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the GPU, as the CPU’s 79th percentile suggests it can handle a more powerful graphics card without becoming a significant bottleneck. The CPU’s socket and memory support mean that upgrading to a higher-tier Alder Lake or Raptor Lake processor is possible, though the FACT PACK does not list specific model compatibility.

For memory, the dual-channel support and 20 MB of L3 cache are adequate for most workloads. The CPU’s 215 mm² die size and 10 nm process node are notable, but they do not directly affect the upgrade path. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support is forward-looking, and the 20 lanes provide flexibility for additional expansion cards or storage. The GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures it is not bandwidth-limited.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration, combining the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6700. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and a TDP of 125 W. The GPU is a Radeon RX 6000 series card with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory, a boost clock of 2450 MHz, and a TDP of 175 W.

The overall tier is high, with a combined percentile of 77. The CPU’s 79th percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile place this build above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27799 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, while the GPU’s average score of 30433 is slightly higher than the RTX 3070 Ti. This pairing represents a balanced, upper-mid-range to high-end desktop configuration, suitable for demanding gaming and productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective, across a 160-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth with 10 GB of GDDR6.

The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It features 36 RT cores for ray tracing, and its compute capabilities include 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.58 TFLOPS FP16. The pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s. The card is dual-slot, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark scores show a strong overall performer. The PassMark G3D score of 18931 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 97841 indicate solid compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 is lower, but this is a specific test. The GPU’s 75th percentile and average score of 30433, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti, demonstrate its competitiveness. For rendering, the 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 provide substantial raw compute, while the 36 RT cores enable ray-traced workloads, though the 10 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor for very large scenes.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds