SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600K

27,578 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600K and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets the upper end of the performance spectrum, with a combined percentile of 89. The CPU holds a 79th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 98th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing combines a high-multithreaded mid-range processor with a top-tier workstation GPU, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward GPU-accelerated professional workloads rather than balanced gaming. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 89th combined percentile across all desktop configurations. This places it in the top tier of systems, though the CPU at the 79th percentile is notably weaker than the GPU at the 98th percentile, indicating a lopsided build.

Q: How does the Core i5-12600K compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-12600K has an average benchmark score of 27578. This is exactly equal to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (deltaPct 0), 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (scoring 27535), and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (scoring 27636). The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is 0.3% ahead at 27507.

Q: What is the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's standing against other top GPUs?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 184664 places it 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725), 1.3% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147), 1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182109), and 3.7% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050). It holds the 98th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What kind of memory does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation use, and is it fast?

A: The GPU uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is substantial for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics that could serve as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-12600K includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. This can be useful for basic display output or troubleshooting when the discrete GPU is not installed, though it does not contribute to the benchmark performance scores.

Q: What are the key architectural details of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die size. The GPU uses the AD102 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 609 mm² and 76,300 million transistors.

Q: Is this a gaming or workstation oriented pairing?

A: The data strongly indicates workstation orientation. The GPU is in the 98th percentile with 32 GB of VRAM and 100 RT cores, while the CPU is in the 79th percentile. The CPU's performance is sufficient but not exceptional, making it a supporting component for the dominant GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation dominates this pairing's measured performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175286, and its Vulkan score is 194041. The average benchmark score of 184664 puts it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms nearly every other graphics card in the database. This is a massive gap over the CPU's performance. The closest GPU rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183725, which is only 0.5% behind. The A100 SXM4 40 GB is 1.3% ahead at 187147. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell trails by 1.4% at 182109, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D is 3.7% behind at 178050.

The CPU's benchmark results are more modest. The i5-12600K achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17491 and a single-core score of 1907. In Geekbench, it scores 12599 multicore and 2190 single-core. Its 3DMark scores scale from 1016 single-thread to 7975 with 16 threads and 7966 with max threads. The Passmark multithread score is 27608, with integer math at 87776 and floating-point math at 67217. The average benchmark score of 27578 places it at the 79th percentile, which is respectable but far from the GPU's elite standing.

The combined picture is clear: this system's benchmark data shows a GPU that is roughly 6.7 times more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its own peers. The GPU's percentile ranking (98th) versus the CPU's (79th) illustrates a 19-point gap. For any workload that leverages the GPU, this system will perform exceptionally. For CPU-bound tasks, it will perform adequately but not at the top tier. The data shows no measured FPS for any game, so that discussion is strictly estimated from these benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 215 mm². It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though memory bandwidth is not specified. It has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong single-threaded performance and decent multi-threaded scaling. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1907 is high, indicating good responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The multicore score of 17491 shows that the 10 cores scale well, though the 16 threads do not double the single-core performance, which is typical for hybrid architectures. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1989 with 2 threads to 7975 with 16 threads, a 4x improvement that confirms good multi-threading efficiency.

In real workloads, this CPU is well-suited for gaming where single-thread performance matters most. The Passmark single-thread score of 3926 supports this. For content creation, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9821 indicates solid rendering capability, but it is not in the same league as the GPU's compute power. The data compression score of 344071 in Passmark suggests strong performance in archival tasks. The encryption score of 18485 is moderate. The i5-12600K sits exactly at the average score of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (deltaPct 0), making it a direct competitor in multi-threaded workloads. It is slightly ahead of the Ryzen 7 5800 by 0.2% and slightly behind the Ryzen 5 7600X by 0.2%.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU's 79th percentile versus the GPU's 98th percentile creates a clear bottleneck scenario. In GPU-accelerated workloads, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU will need to keep up with feeding it data. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so there is no interface bottleneck.

For gaming, the CPU becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions where frame rates are high. The CPU's single-thread score of 1016 in 3DMark suggests it can handle high frame rates, but the GPU's raw power means that in many scenarios, the CPU may not generate frames fast enough to fully utilize the GPU. At higher resolutions, the GPU workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The data shows no measured FPS scaling, so this is estimated from the scores.

For professional workloads like 3D rendering or scientific computing, the GPU is so powerful that the CPU's role is reduced to data preparation and orchestration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17491 is sufficient for these tasks, but it will not be the performance limiter—the GPU will handle the heavy lifting. The Passmark floating-point math score of 67217 indicates the CPU can process some compute tasks, but the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarfs it. The bottleneck in this system is the CPU for gaming at high refresh rates, while the GPU is the bottleneck for resolution-heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die is massive at 609 mm² and contains 76,300 million transistors. It has 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The GPU includes 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, making it a serious contender for ray tracing and AI workloads. The FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory is a key strength: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. This places it in the top tier of GPU memory capacity, rivaling the A100 SXM4 80 GB. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz.

The benchmark scores are exceptional. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 are in the top 2% of all GPUs. The average score of 184664 puts it ahead of the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1.4% behind, and the RTX 4090 D is 3.7% behind. For rendering, this GPU will handle massive scenes with large textures due to the 32 GB VRAM. The 100 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 400 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and DLSS techniques. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the GPU is not starved for data.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who need maximum GPU compute performance without the premium of a top-tier CPU. The 98th percentile GPU makes it ideal for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing with heavy effects, and scientific simulation. The 32 GB VRAM is sufficient for large datasets, AI model training, and high-resolution textures. The CPU's 79th percentile is adequate for these tasks, providing enough single-thread performance for application logic and enough multi-thread performance for pre-processing.

Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's raw power, though the CPU may hold back frame rates at lower resolutions. Content creators who work with 4K or 8K video will find the GPU's encoding and rendering capabilities transformative. Software developers working on GPU-accelerated applications will appreciate the 400 tensor cores for CUDA and AI workloads. Students in computer graphics or machine learning fields can use this system for coursework. Small business workstations that need to render architectural visualizations or product designs will find the GPU's performance compelling. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for flexible memory upgrades.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU is in the 98th percentile, capable of pushing high frame rates at 1440p or higher. The CPU's single-thread score of 1907 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won't bottleneck at 60-100 FPS, but at 200+ FPS the CPU may become the limiting factor. Estimated gaming performance is excellent at 4K, where the GPU is the primary driver.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 threads, which is sufficient for encoding at moderate bitrates. The GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores can handle NVENC and AI-enhanced streaming features. The Passmark multithread score of 27608 indicates the CPU can manage streaming overhead while gaming, though the GPU is the star.

Video editing: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 GB VRAM make it ideal for real-time 4K or 8K timeline playback with effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17491 handles decoding and encoding tasks. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth scrubbing through high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: This is the primary use case. The GPU outperforms the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% in average score, making it a top-tier renderer. The 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 32 GB VRAM holds large scenes. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9821 handles scene management.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance (3926 in Passmark) provides snappy compilation for smaller projects. The GPU's 400 tensor cores are valuable for developing and testing machine learning models. The 32 GB VRAM allows for large model training without out-of-memory errors.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display, but the discrete GPU is massive overkill. The system is best suited for engineering or graphics students who need serious compute power.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12600K with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Alder Lake processor with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is a dual-slot 250 W workstation card. The combined percentile is 89, placing it in the upper tier of all desktop systems. The CPU holds the 79th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU holds the 98th percentile among all GPUs.

The pairing is not balanced: the GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU. This is a workstation-focused build where the GPU does the heavy lifting. The CPU provides solid single-thread performance and adequate multi-thread performance, but it is a mid-range processor paired with a top-tier GPU. The data suggests this is a deliberate choice for users who prioritize GPU compute over CPU compute. The GPU's performance is within 1.3% of the A100 SXM4 40 GB, which is a data center-class GPU, indicating the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a serious professional tool.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports the 12th Gen Alder Lake architecture and is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, depending on the motherboard. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU does not support ECC memory.

The GPU requires a 600 W suggested PSU, and the CPU has a 125 W TDP. This gives a combined TDP of 375 W, leaving headroom in a 600 W PSU for other components. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length. The platform supports PCIe 4.0, which is the current interface for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same LGA 1700 socket, such as a Core i9 from the 12th Gen series, to better match the GPU's performance tier. This would reduce the bottleneck in gaming and improve multi-threaded CPU workloads. Alternatively, upgrading the memory to faster DDR5 modules would improve the CPU's memory bandwidth, though the data does not specify a memory bandwidth figure. The GPU is already at the 98th percentile, so a GPU upgrade is unnecessary for most workloads. The platform has room for additional storage via the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the PSU has headroom for a more power-hungry CPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600K

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds