SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600K

27,578 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12600K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 — Platform Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based Quadro GPU, targeting a desktop workstation configuration. The Core i5-12600K sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 5000 reaches the 67th percentile among GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 73. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from component benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors a desktop build with dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 modules. This flexibility means builders can choose between established DDR4 memory or newer DDR5, though the platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the processor itself, which covers a modern GPU and one or two NVMe drives at full bandwidth. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output, useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

The CPU carries a 125 W TDP, while the Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230 W. The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 550 W, which leaves headroom for the rest of the system. The Quadro requires a 6-pin plus 8-pin power connector setup and occupies a dual-slot form factor at 267 mm length, so case and PSU cabling must accommodate that layout. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is one generation older than the CPU's native PCIe Gen 4 — a potential bandwidth constraint for data-heavy workloads, though the practical impact on gaming and most professional apps is modest.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be a higher-core-count Alder Lake CPU, since the Socket 1700 board and DDR4/DDR5 memory can carry over. The GPU side could move to a newer workstation card with PCIe Gen 4 support to fully utilize the CPU's lanes. The platform's active production status for the CPU and the GPU's end-of-life status mean the CPU has fresh driver and BIOS support, while the GPU relies on legacy drivers. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows overclocking to extract additional performance, which could partially offset the GPU's age.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 packs 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. This large frame buffer is the card's standout feature — 16 GB supports high-resolution textures, large 3D scenes, and multi-application workflows that would exhaust 8 GB cards. The TU104 chip contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s.

Turing architecture brings 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores to the table. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the tensor cores accelerate AI inference and DLSS-style workloads. Raw compute reaches 11.15 TFLOPS for FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the GPU as a capable professional card for rendering and compute tasks, but the benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The passmark G3D score of 15616 lands in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with the nearest rival being the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB at just 1% higher average score. This indicates the Quadro's gaming-class performance is roughly on par with a mid-range consumer card from a similar era, despite its professional positioning.

The GPU compute benchmark score of 6525 reflects its parallel processing capability, while DirectX 12 performance scores just 59 in passmark, suggesting weak gaming optimization for modern APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 show stronger compute and cross-platform performance. The DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 scores of 113 and 140 respectively outperform the DirectX 12 result, indicating the card is better suited to legacy APIs than current gaming titles. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are the key assets, while the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles geometry and lighting calculations efficiently.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-12600K delivers strong multi-threaded results across benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 17491 multi-core and 1907 single-core. The Geekbench multicore score reaches 12599 with a single-core score of 2190. Passmark multithread hits 27608, with single-thread at 3926. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1016 single-thread to 7975 at 16 threads, with max-thread score of 7966 — nearly identical to the 16-thread result, confirming the CPU's 16 threads are fully utilized. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27578, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, exactly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X at 0% delta. The Ryzen 7 5800 trails by 0.2%, while the Ryzen 5 7600X leads by 0.2% and the Core Ultra 5 125H leads by 0.3% — all within a 0.5% band, making this CPU effectively performance-equivalent to those rivals.

The Quadro RTX 5000's average benchmark score of 21629 places it in the 67th percentile of GPUs. Its closest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856, just 1% higher. The RTX A4000 Mobile trails by 1.2%, while the Radeon HD 8970M and RX Vega M GL trail by 1.8% and 2.3% respectively. This clustering means the Quadro's raw gaming performance is comparable to these mid-range and older parts, not to modern high-end GPUs. The combined picture shows a CPU that is competitive with current mid-range processors, paired with a GPU that performs like a several-generation-old mainstream card. The CPU's 79th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile creates a noticeable performance gap — the processor can feed far more frames than the GPU can render.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry here is clear from the percentile data. The CPU sits 12 percentile points higher than the GPU in their respective distributions. This means the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor in most gaming and real-time graphics workloads. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7975 and single-thread score of 1016 indicate it can handle high frame-rate scenarios, but the GPU's DirectX 12 passmark score of 59 suggests it will struggle to keep up with modern game engines at high settings.

In compute-heavy professional tasks, the balance shifts. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are strong for large datasets, while its FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is respectable. The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 18485 and data compression score of 344071 show it handles these workloads well, but the GPU's compute score of 6525 in passmark indicates the GPU is not a compute powerhouse relative to its gaming peers. The combined percentile of 73 reflects a system where the CPU boosts the overall tier above what the GPU alone would achieve.

The lack of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark deltas. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, showing it performs consistently at its tier. The GPU's nearest rival is 1% faster on average, so the GPU is not underperforming its class — it is simply a lower-tier part. For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data processing, the i5-12600K will excel. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Quadro will cap performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can support high frame rates in esports titles based on its single-thread score of 3926 in Passmark and 1016 in 3DMark single-thread. However, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 and overall 67th percentile make 144 Hz gaming at high settings unrealistic for modern titles. A 60 Hz target at 1080p with medium settings is a more plausible estimate given the GTX 1060-level performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 10 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could offload some display tasks. The GPU's tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding features, but the lack of modern NVENC efficiency data means streaming quality is uncertain. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 27608 supports simultaneous gaming and encoding without severe frame drops.

Video editing: The 16 GB VRAM on the Quadro is a major asset for timeline scrubbing and effect previews at high resolutions. The GPU's OpenCL score of 78999 suggests competent GPU-accelerated effects, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17491 handles export encoding well. The dual-channel memory support for DDR4 or DDR5 provides adequate bandwidth for 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The Quadro's 16 GB memory and 448 GB/s bandwidth are ideal for large scenes and textures. The 3072 shading units deliver 11.15 TFLOPS FP32, which is workable for GPU rendering, but the 48 RT cores are limited for ray-traced workloads compared to newer cards. The CPU's 20 MB L3 cache and 10 cores assist with scene preparation and physics simulations.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 87776 and extended instructions score of 22002 indicate strong compilation and code analysis performance. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 79th percentile CPU ranking means this is a dependable development workstation. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most coding tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical student tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance of 3926 in Passmark ensures snappy application response, but the Quadro's 230 W TDP and dual-slot size are unnecessary for office suites. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle these tasks at lower power, making the discrete GPU optional for such use.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates below are estimates based on benchmark scores and the GPU's nearest rival performance. The Quadro RTX 5000's average benchmark score is 1% lower than the GTX 1060 6 GB, placing expected gaming performance at roughly that level. For 1080p resolution, modern AAA titles would likely run at medium to high settings with frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range, based on the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 140 being stronger than its DirectX 12 score of 59. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which favor CPU performance, could see higher frame rates thanks to the i5-12600K's single-thread strength.

At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth help with texture-heavy scenes, but the GPU's raw compute of 11.15 TFLOPS limits pixel throughput. Expect lower settings for playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in demanding titles, though the large frame buffer prevents texture pop-in. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6144 and 16-thread score of 7975 confirm it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 is the binding constraint. Older DirectX 11 titles should perform better, as the passmark DirectX 11 score of 140 is more than double the DirectX 12 result. These figures are estimates only — actual gaming performance could vary based on driver maturity, game optimization, and system configuration.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's large memory capacity for professional workloads. Content creators working with large video files or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the 16 GB VRAM, which prevents out-of-memory errors in rendering applications. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17491 and Passmark multithread score of 27608 support demanding creative applications. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads, with Passmark integer math at 87776 indicating rapid build times.

Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings expectations could use this system, but the GPU's 67th percentile limits high-refresh or high-detail gaming. The CPU's 79th percentile ensures no CPU bottleneck in games, but the GPU will cap frame rates. Students and office workers would find this over-specified and power-hungry — the 230 W GPU and 125 W CPU are excessive for document editing. Small business workstations handling CAD or scientific visualization could leverage the Quadro's certified drivers and 16 GB memory, even if gaming performance is modest. The combined 73rd percentile tier suggests a system that excels at productivity but is average for gaming.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-12600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose either memory type.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X?

A: The Core i5-12600K has an average benchmark score of 27578, which is exactly equal to the Ryzen 7 5700X's 27578, representing a 0% difference in performance.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is marked as end-of-life, with its release date in August 2018 and successors in the Workstation Ampere series.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, and it requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i5-12600K includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output and can handle basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Core i5-12600K uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports Alder Lake processors and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a 20 MB shared L3 cache. This hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact core mix. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide modern I/O connectivity.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1989 at 2 threads to 6144 at 8 threads and 7975 at 16 threads, with max-thread score of 7966 — indicating full utilization of all 16 threads. Cinebench R23 multicore of 17491 and single-core of 1907 demonstrate strong performance in both multi-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 3926 is particularly notable, as it shows excellent per-core performance for gaming and legacy applications. The 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.3%, confirms this is a well-balanced mid-range processor.

The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could push the boost clock beyond 4.90 GHz for additional performance. The 20 MB L3 cache aids in gaming and content creation, while the 10 cores handle multi-tasking effectively. The production status is active, with a launch MSRP of $289, and a release date of November 2021. The CPU's memory bandwidth is not specified in the fact pack, but dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support provides adequate throughput for most applications. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 adds flexibility for systems without a discrete GPU or for troubleshooting.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-12600K with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, creating a system that is stronger on the CPU side than the GPU side. The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile combine to a 73rd percentile overall, indicating a mid-to-upper tier system. The CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X exactly in average benchmark score, while the GPU performs within 1% of the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. This makes the build a capable productivity workstation with the 16 GB GPU memory for large datasets, but only mainstream gaming performance.

The platform's DDR4 and DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and active CPU production status give it upgrade headroom, while the GPU's end-of-life status means it is the component most likely to be replaced first. The 125 W CPU and 230 W GPU require adequate cooling and a 550 W PSU, which is modest for this class. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 73 places it above most systems but below high-end configurations. For users prioritizing CPU-heavy workloads like compilation, rendering, or multi-tasking, this is a solid choice. For gaming enthusiasts, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and a newer graphics card would be the logical first upgrade to balance the system.