SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600HX

33,375 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-12600HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

This mobile pairing combines a 12-core Alder Lake-HX processor with an Ada Lovelace entry-level discrete GPU, landing at the 73rd percentile overall among laptop builds. The CPU is the stronger component here, sitting at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 63rd percentile against all GPUs. This is a balanced mid-range laptop platform that favors productivity and CPU-heavy tasks more than it does high-end gaming. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, this platform can plausibly drive 144Hz-class displays in esports titles, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile standing and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place a hard ceiling on frame rates in demanding titles. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 sits within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 0.5% of the RTX 2000 Ada Generation, indicating desktop-class 1080p capability rather than high-refresh 1440p performance. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3623 ensures the processor will not be the primary limiter in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 80 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-assisted features, making this a viable streaming laptop for 1080p broadcasts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 and 16 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming software. The 12-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock can handle the multi-threaded encoding workload while maintaining game performance, though the 50 W GPU TDP may limit sustained encoding quality at higher bitrates.

Video editing: The combination of 18 MB of shared L3 cache and the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 24681 makes timeline scrubbing and export rendering reasonably responsive. The GPU’s 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM are adequate for 1080p editing timelines with moderate effects, while the 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores accelerate effects that leverage ray tracing or AI denoising. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8699 places this CPU well ahead of typical thin-and-light processors, suggesting export times will be shorter than mainstream laptops.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 puts it 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14701E, indicating strong multi-threaded rendering performance for a mobile part. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s provide usable but not exceptional GPU-accelerated rendering performance. Blender and similar applications will favor the CPU’s 12 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU can accelerate viewport rendering and final frame output for scenes that fit within 6 GB of VRAM.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 79339 and data compression score of 292256 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and version control operations. The 16 threads and 4.60 GHz boost clock ensure responsive builds for most projects, while the 83rd CPU percentile means this processor outperforms roughly 83% of all CPUs in the database. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows for flexible memory configurations, though the dual-channel bus width is standard for mobile platforms.

Student and office work: The PassMark single-thread score of 3623 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 294 provide snappy application launches and responsive document editing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life. The 55 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP together suggest a laptop that requires a substantial power brick but delivers desktop-like responsiveness for productivity workflows.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, with an 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile. This imbalance means CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering will see the processor fully utilized while the GPU remains underutilized. The PassMark data compression score of 292256 and floating-point math score of 58378 highlight the CPU’s strength in parallel integer and floating-point workloads, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 shows more modest graphics capability.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and quality settings. The GPU’s 96-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are notably narrow for a discrete graphics solution, limiting performance in memory-bandwidth-sensitive titles. The CPU’s single-thread performance, however, is strong enough that frame rates at 1080p with high settings will be GPU-limited in most modern titles, leaving CPU headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord.

The PassMark physics score of 1504 indicates the CPU handles physics calculations efficiently, which matters in games with complex destructible environments or large-scale simulations. The GPU’s pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s provide a balanced fill-rate profile for 1080p rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM capacity will become a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles at higher settings. The 50 W GPU TDP suggests thermal and power constraints that will cap sustained boost clocks during extended gaming sessions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 1964 socket means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, eliminating any possibility of processor upgrades. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, allowing for memory speed upgrades but not capacity expansion beyond what the laptop’s SO-DIMM slots permit. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for next-generation NVMe storage, though the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the RTX 4050 Mobile’s performance class.

The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined 105 W TDP of CPU and GPU indicates a modest power supply requirement typical of mid-range gaming laptops. The GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the motherboard slot, which simplifies servicing but limits overclocking potential. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and 55 W TDP suggest some tuning headroom for enthusiasts willing to manage thermals.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be additional or faster memory, given the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and the CPU’s sensitivity to memory bandwidth in multi-threaded workloads. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would leverage the CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for faster load times and data transfer. The GPU, being mobile and soldered, is not upgradeable, so users seeking better gaming performance would need to consider a new laptop rather than a component swap.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find this pairing adequate, particularly in esports and older titles where the GPU’s 14423 PassMark G3D score provides sufficient headroom. Content creators working with 1080p video timelines and light 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, including the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 20714. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 79339 and the 16-thread configuration.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU’s 83rd percentile performance suitable for simulation software and development environments, while the GPU handles CAD viewports and basic rendering tasks. Small business workstations running virtualization, database applications, or data analysis tools will leverage the CPU’s 18 MB L3 cache and PassMark multi-thread score of 24681. The platform is less suitable for users seeking high-refresh 1440p gaming or heavy GPU-accelerated rendering, where the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth present clear limitations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs deliver a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and DLSS-based upscaling, features that can extend the GPU’s useful lifespan in games that support these technologies.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 16 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth figure is the GPU’s most significant weakness, as modern games at high textures can exceed 6 GB of VRAM usage at 1080p, forcing the memory controller to swap data more frequently. The FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS and FP16 performance at 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate balanced compute capability for both gaming and light compute workloads.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 reflect strong compute performance for a mobile GPU, placing it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 in average benchmark score. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5947 suggests capable but not exceptional compute throughput for tasks like video encoding or machine learning inference. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs and future game titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 and 63rd percentile ranking suggest 1080p gaming performance comparable to desktop-class mid-range GPUs from the previous generation. The CPU’s 3623 single-thread PassMark score ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 would likely run in the 40-60 FPS range, with DLSS enabled potentially pushing higher. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant could exceed 144 FPS at competitive settings, given the GPU’s 140.4 GTexel/s texture rate and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. At 1440p, the GPU’s 96-bit memory bus and 6 GB VRAM would limit performance to 30-50 FPS in most AAA titles, making 1080p the practical resolution for this platform.

The GPU’s 20 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates only in titles with light ray-tracing workloads or when combined with DLSS upscaling. The tensor cores’ AI acceleration provides meaningful performance gains in supported titles, potentially recovering 20-40% of the frame rate lost to ray tracing. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1504 indicates adequate physics computation for gaming, but the GPU’s 50 W TDP will cause performance to vary based on laptop cooling solutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HX is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the core distribution. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts to 4.60 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows for sustained multi-core performance in a mobile chassis.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The PassMark data compression score of 292256 and data encryption score of 17506 reflect strong throughput for these specific workloads, while the extended instructions score of 17328 indicates solid SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 83 is modest, suggesting this CPU is not optimized for single-threaded integer loops.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 places this CPU in strong contention with recent mobile processors, coming within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2924 is competitive for a mobile part, though not class-leading. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, a feature typically reserved for workstation platforms, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for high-bandwidth peripherals.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU-GPU combination good for 1080p gaming?

A: Yes, based on the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 and 63rd percentile ranking, 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is feasible. However, the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality in the latest titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to recent AMD and Intel processors?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33375 is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701E, while being 0.5% lower than both the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and AMD Ryzen 5 240.

Q: Can this GPU handle ray tracing?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores, enabling ray-traced effects in supported games. Performance will be limited by the 50 W TDP and 6 GB VRAM, so DLSS upscaling is recommended for playable frame rates.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The memory bus width is standard dual-channel, and the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard. The platform does not support CPU upgrades, though memory and storage can be upgraded depending on laptop design.

Q: Does this platform support PCIe Gen 5 storage?

A: Yes, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for high-speed NVMe storage, though the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19049 is within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation, indicating desktop-class 1080p performance in a mobile form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33375 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244, 0.4% slower), Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (33537, 0.5% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 240 (33542, 0.5% faster), and Intel Core i7-14701E (33206, 0.5% slower). Key CPU results include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20714, single-core at 2924, PassMark multi-thread at 24681, and PassMark single-thread at 3623.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19049 places it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036, 0.1% slower), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.1% slower), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, 0.2% faster), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.5% slower). Notable GPU results include PassMark G3D at 14423, Geekbench OpenCL at 74748, Geekbench Vulkan at 75235, and PassMark GPU compute at 5947.

The combined percentile of 73rd indicates this pairing outperforms roughly 73% of all laptop configurations in the database. The data reveals a platform where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms, with the processor ranking 20 percentile points higher than the graphics chip. This suggests a laptop designed for productivity and content creation first, with gaming capability as a secondary consideration. The CPU’s 12 cores and 16 threads provide substantial multi-threaded throughput for rendering and compilation, while the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth define clear boundaries for graphics-intensive workloads. Buyers seeking balanced performance for mixed workloads will find this pairing competitive, while those prioritizing gaming frame rates should consider configurations with stronger GPUs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds