SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600HX

33,375 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600HX pairs with the AMD Radeon 740M in a laptop-class build that lands at the 68th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. This is a 12th-generation Alder Lake-HX mobile processor with 12 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 4nm RDNA 3.0 integrated graphics solution from AMD. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and a Vulkan score of 15568. This places it in the lower-middle range for integrated graphics, meaning it can handle esports titles at modest settings, but it will not drive high refresh rates in demanding AAA games at high detail. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2924 keeps frame pacing stable, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS limits overall pixel pushing.

Streaming: The i5-12600HX’s 16 threads give it headroom for encoding workloads while gaming, and its PassMark multi-thread score of 24681 confirms solid parallel processing capability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can assist with Quick Sync duties, but the Radeon 740M has no dedicated tensor or encoding hardware listed in the data, so offloading encoding to the CPU is likely the better route. The combined 68th percentile pairing suggests a workable but not ideal streaming setup.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8699 and R23 multi-core score of 20714 show a capable processor for timeline editing and export tasks. The GPU’s 4 RT cores and 256 shading units provide some acceleration for effects and renders, but its 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest. Expect smooth 1080p editing with lighter effects; 4K work will be slower but not impossible given the CPU’s 12 cores.

3D rendering: The CPU is the clear workhorse here, with a PassMark floating-point math score of 58378 and integer math score of 79339. The Radeon 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS is not competitive for GPU rendering, but for CPU-based renderers like Cinebench, the i5-12600HX’s R20 multi-core score of 8699 indicates solid performance. The 18 MB of L3 cache shared across 12 cores helps with scene complexity.

Software development: The 12 cores and 16 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the PassMark data compression score of 292256 indicates strong throughput for build tools. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3623 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) means modern graphics APIs are available for testing, though its 53rd percentile ranking limits GPU-accelerated workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is more than adequate for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 single-core score of 294 and R23 single-core score of 2924 ensure snappy application launches. The GPU’s 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs handle basic display output without strain, and the system’s shared memory architecture means the 740M draws from system RAM as needed.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-12600HX achieves an average benchmark score of 33375, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result for a mobile processor, putting it just 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (avg score 33244) and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (avg score 33537). The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 is particularly noteworthy, showing excellent sustained multi-threaded performance for a 55W TDP part. Single-core performance is also solid, with an R23 score of 2924 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3623.

The AMD Radeon 740M, by contrast, achieves an average benchmark score of 12870, sitting at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 place it within 0.4% of the AMD FirePro W5100 (avg score 12847) and 0.3% of the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (avg score 12831). The 740M is slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (avg score 12830) by 0.3% but trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 (avg score 12928) by 0.4%. This positions the 740M as a mid-pack integrated GPU, capable of light gaming and acceleration but not a discrete-class performer.

The combined picture shows a significant CPU-centric imbalance: the processor sits in the top 17% of all CPUs, while the GPU sits near the middle of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this gap, meaning the system’s overall performance is dragged down by the GPU in graphics-bound tasks. For CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the i5-12600HX performs at a level comparable to much newer mobile chips, as evidenced by its near-tie with the Ryzen 5 8645HS and Core Ultra 7 255H.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-12600HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-12600HX has an average benchmark score of 33375, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244) and 0.5% lower than both the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (33537) and AMD Ryzen 5 240 (33542). It also sits 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14701E (33206).

Q: What is the Radeon 740M’s position among other GPUs?

A: The Radeon 740M has an average benchmark score of 12870, placing it at the 53rd percentile. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830), and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928).

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, primarily through the CPU. The i5-12600HX’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20714 and PassMark floating-point math score of 58378 provide strong CPU rendering performance. The Radeon 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited.

Q: What memory types does the i5-12600HX support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the Radeon 740M uses system-shared memory, meaning the GPU’s bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: Is the Radeon 740M suitable for modern gaming?

A: The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can run lighter titles at playable frame rates. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is compatible with modern APIs, but its 256 shading units and 8 ROPs limit high-detail performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance like?

A: The i5-12600HX scores 2924 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3623 in PassMark single-thread. These results are competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, though the 83rd percentile overall ranking is driven more by its 12-core multi-threaded strength.

Q: How does this pairing compare to other laptop builds?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning this pairing outperforms 68% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU contributes the majority of that strength; the GPU’s 53rd percentile is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower in a laptop format but do not require strong discrete-class graphics. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in esports or older titles will find the Radeon 740M workable, though its 53rd percentile ranking means high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming is out of reach. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit most from the i5-12600HX’s 12 cores and 16 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20714 and PassMark multi-thread of 24681 indicating strong export and render times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark data compression score of 292256 and integer math score of 79339, which speed up build tools and test suites. Students and office workers will find the system more than sufficient for document creation, spreadsheets, and web-based tasks, with the CPU’s single-thread performance keeping applications snappy. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-bound applications like accounting software, database management, or engineering simulations will see strong performance, while the GPU handles basic visualization tasks. The system is not suited for GPU-accelerated machine learning, video encoding via GPU, or AAA gaming at high settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600HX is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 55W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor was released on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of $284.

Benchmark data shows the CPU’s strength is in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2087, R20 multi-core of 8699, and R23 multi-core of 20714 all indicate strong scaling across its 12 cores. PassMark results reinforce this: multithread score of 24681, floating-point math of 58378, integer math of 79339, and data encryption of 17506. The single-core performance is respectable but not class-leading, with R15 single-core of 294, R20 single-core of 1228, and R23 single-core of 2924. The 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper tier of mobile processors, competitive with the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (0.4% ahead) and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (0.5% behind). The PassMark find prime numbers score of 83 is notably low, indicating some workloads that rely on specific instruction patterns may not scale as well. The extended instructions score of 17328 shows solid SIMD capability for media processing.

For real workloads, this CPU handles video rendering, code compilation, and data analysis with ease. The 18 MB L3 cache helps with datasets that fit within that working set, while the dual-channel memory interface ensures adequate bandwidth for the 12 cores. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported platforms, though the 55W TDP limits headroom in thin laptops. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, but the discrete Radeon 740M handles graphics duties in this build.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. It uses the Phoenix2 chip and operates at a base clock of 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with 4 RT cores for ray tracing. Its FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. Memory is system shared, meaning size, type, and bandwidth depend on the host system’s RAM configuration. The GPU has a TDP of 45W, interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It was released on 2024-01-30, succeeding the Navi II IGP and preceding the Navi III IGP.

Benchmark scores show the 740M achieving 10172 in Geekbench OpenCL and 15568 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 12870. This places it at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, a middle-of-the-pack result. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830), and AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928). The 740M edges past older discrete GPUs like the GTX 590 by 0.3% but trails the RX 580 by 0.4%. This indicates the 740M performs near entry-level discrete graphics from past generations.

For rendering, the 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 limits compute-heavy workloads. The 8 ROPs constrain pixel fill rate to 22.40 GPixel/s, which is sufficient for 1080p at moderate settings but not for high-resolution, high-detail gaming. The shared memory architecture means performance scales with system RAM speed and capacity; with fast dual-channel DDR5, bandwidth improves, but with slower DDR4, it suffers. The 4 nm process allows the 45W TDP to deliver this performance efficiently, making it suitable for thin laptops where discrete GPUs cannot fit. The lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI workloads rely on the shader units, which is not optimal.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12600HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users are typically limited to what the manufacturer configures. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, so users can upgrade RAM capacity and speed provided the laptop’s BIOS and motherboard allow it. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for future NVMe storage, though the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is fixed.

The Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU, so there is no discrete GPU upgrade path within the same chassis. Users seeking better graphics performance would need to consider an external GPU enclosure via the PCIe connection, though this is not standard for most laptops. The GPU’s TDP is 45W, and the CPU’s TDP is 55W, totaling 100W for the combined core components; the suggested PSU field is null, indicating the laptop’s power adapter is determined by the manufacturer. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system RAM to improve both CPU memory bandwidth and GPU shared memory performance, as the GPU’s bandwidth is system dependent. Alternatively, upgrading storage to a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would reduce load times and improve data-heavy workloads like the PassMark data compression score of 292256 suggests.

The platform’s release date of 2022-05-09 for the CPU and 2024-01-30 for the GPU indicates the GPU is newer, but both are active production parts. Users on this platform should focus on software optimizations and RAM capacity rather than component swaps. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows for overclocking if the laptop’s cooling solution permits, but the 55W TDP limits practical gains. The Intel BGA 1964 socket means the motherboard is the limiting factor for any future upgrades.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-12600HX with the AMD Radeon 740M in a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: laptop). The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake-HX mobile processor with 12 cores and 16 threads, released in May 2022 with a launch MSRP of $284. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated part from AMD, built on a 4 nm process and released in January 2024. The combination achieves a 68th combined percentile among all recorded CPU+GPU pairings, indicating it outperforms 68% of systems in the database.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU’s 53rd percentile is more modest. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, but falls short in graphics-intensive scenarios. The average benchmark scores tell the story: the CPU’s 33375 average vs. the GPU’s 12870 average shows a 2.6x gap in raw benchmark performance. The CPU is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (0.4% ahead) and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (0.5% behind), while the GPU is competitive with the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% ahead) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% ahead).

This is not a gaming-focused build; it is a productivity-focused laptop pairing that happens to include a capable integrated GPU. The 10 nm CPU process and 4 nm GPU process reflect different design priorities: the CPU emphasizes multi-core throughput, while the GPU prioritizes power efficiency. For users who need a mobile workstation with strong CPU performance and light graphics capability, this pairing is sensible. For gamers or GPU-accelerated workloads, the 740M will be the limiting factor, and a discrete GPU would be necessary.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The i5-12600HX’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the Radeon 740M’s 53rd percentile creates a 30-percentage-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (20714), the system performs at a high level, comparable to newer mobile chips like the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H. In GPU-bound workloads, the 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 and 12870 average benchmark score limit performance to entry-level levels.

The bottleneck depends on the workload. For gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck; its 53rd percentile ranking and shared memory architecture mean frame rates will be constrained by the 740M’s 256 shading units and 8 ROPs. The CPU’s single-core score of 2924 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, so the GPU will be the limiting factor even at low settings. For 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU’s role is minor; the CPU’s 12 cores and 20714 multi-core score will drive performance. For software development or data compression, the CPU again leads, with the PassMark data compression score of 292256 showing strong throughput.

The estimated FPS scaling follows this pattern: in games that are GPU-bound at high settings, the 740M will cap performance at low-to-medium settings; in games that are CPU-bound, the i5-12600HX will provide stable frame rates but the GPU may still hold back maximum FPS. The combined 68th percentile reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that is better than average overall but not well-rounded. The CPU’s 0.4% lead over the Ryzen 5 8645HS and 0.5% deficit to the Core Ultra 7 255H show it is at parity with current mid-range mobile chips, while the GPU’s 0.4% deficit to the RX 580 shows it is roughly on par with a 2017-era discrete GPU. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and can tolerate integrated graphics limitations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds