SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
75%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500TE

4,083 Benchmark Score
Top 25% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12500TE is a 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor built on Intel's 10nm process node, featuring a 163 mm² die. It packs 6 physical cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1.90 GHz that boosts up to 4.30 GHz. The chip's 35W TDP is notably modest for a desktop part, and it relies on a dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 modules. Cache allocation includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 pool.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1,863 points in single-core and 13,203 in multi-core. The single-core result is strong for a low-power part, reflecting Alder Lake's architectural efficiency. The multi-core score of 13,203 suggests sustained throughput is respectable given the 35W envelope, though it trails higher-TDP mainstream parts. Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 782 single-core and 5,545 multi-core. The R15 numbers—187 single-core and 1,330 multi-core—are consistent with the newer tests.

The Geekbench results show 1,976 single-core and 7,781 multi-core. These scores position the CPU at the 57th percentile among all processors, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of the database. The average benchmark score across all tests is 4,083. The nearest rivals bracket this performance tightly: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X averages 4,073 (0.2% slower), the Intel Xeon E-2278G averages 4,052 (0.8% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X averages 4,114 (0.8% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS averages 4,121 (0.9% faster). This clustering indicates the i5-12500TE sits in a well-populated performance tier where small percentage differences separate competitors.

For real workloads, the single-core performance is the standout. A score of 1,863 in Cinebench R23 single-core implies snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like office suites, web browsing, and general system interaction. The multi-core score of 13,203, while not class-leading, can handle moderate parallel workloads such as compilation, batch photo editing, or multi-tab productivity with dozens of background processes. The 35W TDP suggests sustained all-core loads will be thermally manageable in compact chassis, but the 4.30 GHz boost clock is the ceiling for short bursts.

The architecture is Alder Lake, which introduced hybrid x86 designs, though this specific model appears to use a uniform core configuration based on the 6-core/12-thread layout. The 18 MB shared L3 cache is generous for a 6-core part, aiding in workloads that benefit from larger cache residency. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, but it is not intended for demanding 3D work—that role falls to the discrete GPU in this build.

# Benchmark Performance

The GPU in this pairing is the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, a workstation-class card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5nm TSMC process. Its chip, AD102, contains 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286 and its Vulkan score is 194,041. The average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs—a top-2% result.

The GPU's nearest rivals show it is competitive with data-center and high-end workstation parts. The NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB averages 183,725 (0.5% slower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB averages 187,147 (1.3% faster), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell averages 182,109 (1.4% slower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D averages 178,050 (3.7% slower). This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation within striking distance of the A100 series, which is notable given the A100's data-center pedigree.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, meaning the system outperforms 78% of all tracked builds. The CPU at the 57th percentile is the weaker link; the GPU at the 98th percentile is the dominant component. This imbalance is critical for understanding the system's behavior: in GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will deliver exceptional results, but CPU-bound scenarios will cap overall performance at the i5-12500TE's level.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 is higher than the OpenCL score of 175,286, suggesting the GPU's compute capabilities are well-optimized for Vulkan's threading model. These raw compute figures translate to strong performance in rendering, simulation, and AI inference tasks, where the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput (and matching FP16 at 1:1 ratio) can be fully utilized. The combined picture is a system that excels at GPU-accelerated workloads but remains moderate in CPU-intensive single-threaded tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-12500TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 modules or higher-bandwidth DDR5 kits, though the memory bus width is fixed at dual-channel. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, enabling fast connectivity for modern SSDs and expansion cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, though this build includes the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This is not a bottleneck in practice, as the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth does not saturate PCIe 4.0 x16 in most workloads. The GPU's TDP is 250W, and the suggested PSU is 600W. The CPU's 35W TDP is negligible in comparison, meaning a 600W power supply provides substantial headroom for the entire system plus peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count 12th-gen or 13th-gen Socket 1700 CPU, provided the motherboard BIOS supports it. The 35W TDP of the current chip suggests the cooling solution is modest; a higher-TDP CPU would require a capable air cooler or liquid cooler, but the motherboard's VRM design would need to handle increased power draw. Alternatively, upgrading memory from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already using it) could improve memory bandwidth, though the CPU's dual-channel controller limits gains to the memory frequency and latency improvements.

The GPU's upgrade path is less clear, as it already sits at the 98th percentile. Moving to a higher-tier workstation GPU would yield diminishing returns unless specific workloads require more VRAM than the 32 GB GDDR6 provided here. The 600W PSU suggestion leaves room for a future GPU with a similar or slightly higher TDP, but the 1x 16-pin power connector limits compatibility with older power supplies lacking that connector.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th-percentile GPU score indicates it can drive very high frame rates at resolutions like 1440p and 4K, but the CPU's 57th-percentile score may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The i5-12500TE's single-core score of 1,863 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for most games, but at 1080p with a high-end GPU, the CPU could become the limiting factor.

Streaming: The GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-based enhancements, making it well-suited for real-time streaming with minimal CPU overhead. The CPU's 12 threads handle the streaming software and game logic simultaneously, though the 35W TDP means sustained all-core loads may throttle.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can hold large video timelines and effect layers in memory, accelerating preview renders and exports. The CPU's multi-core score of 13,203 in Cinebench R23 provides adequate processing for timeline scrubbing and basic effects, though complex multi-layer compositions will lean heavily on the GPU.

3D rendering: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is exceptional for GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift, making this system a strong choice for production rendering. The CPU's role is secondary, handling scene setup and geometry processing, where its 12 threads and 18 MB L3 cache are sufficient.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1,976 and multi-core score of 7,781 support fast compilation and code indexing, while the GPU accelerates tasks like machine learning model training or shader compilation. The 32 GB VRAM allows loading large datasets for local testing.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's 35W TDP and integrated graphics allow it to run efficiently in a dorm room or small office. The GPU's power draw is substantial but only under load; idle power is modest, making it feasible for daily use.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-12500TE sits at the 57th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4,083.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation averages 184,664, which is 0.5% faster than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's average of 183,725.

Q: What memory types does the i5-12500TE support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600W, with the GPU's TDP rated at 250W and a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5nm TSMC process, with a die size of 609 mm² and 76,300 million transistors.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need workstation-grade GPU compute without a top-tier CPU. The 98th-percentile GPU performance makes it ideal for 3D artists, video editors, and AI researchers who rely on GPU acceleration for rendering, simulation, and inference. The 32 GB VRAM is particularly suited for large models and high-resolution textures, common in architectural visualization and film VFX. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's raw power, though they should expect CPU limitations at lower resolutions. Software developers working on machine learning or graphics-intensive applications will find the tensor cores and RT cores valuable for local testing and prototyping.

Content creators producing long-form video or complex motion graphics will appreciate the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute throughput, which accelerates export times and real-time previews. The CPU's 35W TDP makes this system viable for small form-factor workstations where heat and power are constraints, provided the GPU's 250W TDP and dual-slot footprint are accommodated. Students in computer science or digital arts programs can leverage this system for coursework involving deep learning or 3D modeling, though the cost of the GPU may be prohibitive for casual use. Small business workstations handling CAD, medical imaging, or financial simulations will see significant acceleration in GPU-bound tasks, with the CPU providing adequate general-purpose performance.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The system's combined percentile of 78 masks a significant imbalance: the GPU at the 98th percentile vastly outperforms the CPU at the 57th percentile. In GPU-bound workloads—rendering, compute, AI inference—the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will operate near its full potential, and the CPU's slower performance will only matter during scene setup or data transfer. However, in CPU-bound scenarios like gaming at 1080p or lightly-threaded productivity tasks, the i5-12500TE becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's single-core score of 1,863 in Cinebench R23 is adequate but not exceptional, so frame rates in esports titles or simulation games will be constrained by the processor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, points to the GPU being the star in most workloads. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's average benchmark score of 184,664 is more than 45 times the CPU's average of 4,083, and the GPU's 98th-percentile ranking versus the CPU's 57th confirms this gap. In practice, this means the system is best deployed where GPU compute is the primary bottleneck—such as 3D rendering or video encoding—and the CPU's role is secondary. Conversely, tasks that rely on single-threaded CPU performance, like legacy software or certain database queries, will not fully utilize the GPU's capabilities, leaving performance on the table.

Memory bandwidth is another consideration. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s is far higher than the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 throughput, so data transfers between CPU and GPU are the bottleneck for workloads that require frequent host-device synchronization. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface mitigates this somewhat, but the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are not fully leveraged by the GPU's Gen 4 interface.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-12500TE with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Alder Lake part with a 35W TDP and a 4.30 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 32 GB GDDR6 memory and a 250W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 places this system above 78% of tracked builds, but the composition is heavily skewed toward GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 57th percentile, while the GPU is at the 98th percentile, creating a pairing where the GPU dominates most performance metrics.

The system's overall tier is high-end workstation, driven almost entirely by the GPU. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's average benchmark score of 184,664 places it among the top 2% of GPUs, rivaling data-center parts like the A100 SXM4. The CPU, by contrast, is a mid-range part that performs similarly to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Intel Xeon E-2278G. This is not a balanced build; it is a GPU-centric workstation where the CPU provides just enough support for the GPU to shine.

For users evaluating this system, the key takeaway is that the GPU is the primary investment and the CPU is a supporting actor. The 35W TDP of the CPU enables a compact, efficient platform, but the GPU's 250W TDP and dual-slot size require a larger chassis and a 600W PSU. The result is a system that excels at GPU-accelerated workloads but may feel underpowered in CPU-heavy tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th-percentile GPU score suggests it can achieve very high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most modern titles, with the 32 GB VRAM preventing texture-related stutters in demanding games. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong rasterization performance, while the 100 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 1,863 in Cinebench R23 becomes the likely bottleneck, as frame rates in CPU-bound games will be capped by the i5-12500TE's processing speed. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, shifting the bottleneck toward the GPU and allowing the CPU to keep up more easily. The GPU's 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-resolution rendering without pixel-rate limits, and the 176 ROPs ensure efficient pixel processing.

Estimated frame rates for esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant would be very high at 1080p, but the CPU may limit maximum FPS in such scenarios. AAA titles at 4K with ultra settings would likely see 60+ FPS in most cases, given the GPU's raw compute, but ray tracing at 4K could stress the RT cores, potentially reducing frame rates. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for high-texture workloads, and the 32 GB VRAM eliminates any concerns about memory capacity in current games.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5nm process. The AD102 chip contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². The GPU has 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units, along with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,155 MHz with a boost clock of 2,550 MHz, and memory runs at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory is 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is substantial for workstation tasks, allowing large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing to reside in VRAM. The GPU's compute performance is 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), which is exceptional for scientific computing and AI inference. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for rendering workloads.

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041, with an average of 184,664. This places the GPU at the 98th percentile, outperforming the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%. The GPU's TDP is 250W with a suggested PSU of 600W, and it uses a single 16-pin power connector. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced scenes, while the 400 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based denoising. The 32 GB VRAM is a standout feature, exceeding the memory capacity of most consumer GPUs and enabling larger scenes without out-of-core swapping. The GPU's FP16 performance at 1:1 with FP32 is notable, as many workstation tasks benefit from reduced-precision compute without a performance penalty. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, while lower than some high-end parts, is balanced by the large memory pool and efficient architecture.