SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12500TE + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
75%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12500TE

4,083 Benchmark Score
Top 25% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12500TE paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop workstation build defined by contrast: a modest, efficiency-focused six-core processor sitting in the 57th percentile of all CPUs, matched with a single-slot professional GPU in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. No measured frame rates exist in the database for this exact pairing — all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not captured gameplay data. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a machine whose ceiling is set almost entirely by the graphics card, making it an unusual but defensible configuration for GPU-bound professional work.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a 95th-percentile GPU with 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 20 GB of GDDR6, and it will comfortably drive high-refresh play at 1080p and 1440p in most titles — estimated, since no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing. The constraint is the i5-12500TE: with six cores, twelve threads, and a single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1863, it delivers competent but not elite frame pacing in CPU-limited competitive shooters, where a stronger processor would extract more from this card.

Streaming. Encoding while gaming splits the load across both components. The 192 tensor cores on the Ada card can shoulder video work, but the CPU's 13203-point Cinebench R23 multi-core result indicates limited headroom for software encoding alongside a game. Single-PC streaming is feasible at moderate settings; the CPU is the component most likely to saturate first.

Video editing. This is where the pairing starts to make sense. The 20 GB of VRAM and 360 GB/s of memory bandwidth handle high-resolution timelines and GPU-accelerated effects well, while the CPU's 782-point Cinebench R20 single-core score keeps the interface responsive during preview scrubbing. Final exports that lean on the CPU's twelve threads will be mid-tier — the R23 multi-core score sits at the 57th percentile overall — but GPU-accelerated render paths are where this build moves fast.

3D rendering. Viewport performance is a GPU story, and the RTX 4000 Ada's 48 ray-tracing cores, 6144 shading units, and 95th-percentile benchmark standing make it excellent for professional DCC applications. Final-frame rendering that uses GPU engines will be strong; CPU-only renders will be ordinary, sitting roughly level with an AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS or Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X per the rival data.

Software development. Code compilation scales with multi-core throughput, and the 5545-point Cinebench R20 multi-core score places this CPU in respectable mid-range territory. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps working-set-heavy builds. Paired with the GPU's 20 GB of VRAM, this build can run local machine-learning inference workloads comfortably — a genuine strength given the 192 tensor cores.

Student and office work. The 35 W TDP of the CPU and the single-slot, 130 W GPU make for a compact, quiet desktop suited to dorm rooms and offices alike. Everyday productivity is limited by nothing here; the single-core scores — 1976 in Geekbench — are more than adequate for browsing, documents, and office suites. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also provides a fallback display path if the discrete card is ever removed for service.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build is GPU-heavy to an uncommon degree. The RTX 4000 Ada sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs; the i5-12500TE sits in the 57th percentile of all CPUs. That gap defines every workload the machine touches.

In GPU-bound rendering, compute, and video effects work, the imbalance is invisible or even advantageous — the card runs at full utilization while the modest CPU stays out of the way. In gaming, the picture reverses. Estimated frame-rate scaling from the benchmark scores indicates that at lower resolutions and high refresh targets, the six-core CPU becomes the limiter well before the graphics card reaches its potential. The CPU's nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, Intel Xeon E-2278G, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, all within roughly a point of its average score — are processors that would themselves be considered mid-range partners for a card of this class.

The practical translation: at higher resolutions and quality presets, the build is balanced. Push toward maximum frame rates and the processor gates first. The 4.30 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded game logic from being a severe problem, but twelve threads is the ceiling for modern titles that scale past that.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark record is consistent across suites. Cinebench R15 returns 1330 multi-core and 187 single-core; R20 returns 5545 and 782; R23 returns 13203 and 1863. Geekbench posts 7781 multi-core and 1976 single-core. The average benchmark score of 4083 places the processor at the 57th percentile versus all CPUs in the database — solidly mid-pack, with a single-core-to-multi-core ratio typical of a six-core, twelve-thread Alder Lake design.

Its nearest rivals by average score confirm that positioning: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X at 4073 (0.2% behind), the Intel Xeon E-2278G at 4052 (0.8% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X at 4114 (0.8% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS at 4121 (0.9% ahead). In short, this CPU trades blows with previous-generation higher-core-count desktop chips and a modern mobile flagship — a reasonable place for a low-TDP hexacore to land.

The GPU tells a different story. Geekbench OpenCL scores 146593 and Vulkan scores 123842, averaging 135218 — the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its rivals are telling: the NVIDIA A10M at 135230 (dead even), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (0.1% ahead), the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 (0.4% ahead), and the Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 (0.9% ahead). This is professional-tier silicon competing directly with datacenter-adjacent cards.

The combined percentile of 76 is the arithmetic of that imbalance: a top-tier GPU dragging a mid-tier CPU upward. For GPU-first workloads the combined number understates the machine; for CPU-first workloads it overstates it.

Who Should Build It

GPU-focused content creators and 3D artists. Anyone whose day revolves around viewport work, GPU rendering engines, or compute-accelerated effects gets the most from this configuration. The 20 GB of VRAM accommodates large scenes that consumer cards in adjacent tiers cannot hold.

Developers working with local AI inference. The 192 tensor cores and 20 GB VRAM make this a credible local inference workstation for model experimentation, while the CPU handles compilation at mid-tier speed.

Small business workstations. The 35 W CPU and single-slot card fit compact professional chassis, and the card's four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups without adapters. Certified professional drivers — implied by the card's workstation lineage — suit CAD and DCC deployments where stability matters.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K. Players targeting higher resolutions rather than maximum refresh rates will find the GPU doing the heavy lifting with the CPU adequate to the task. Competitive players chasing maximum frame rates at 1080p should look toward a stronger processor.

Students in technical fields. The combination of modest power draw, quiet operation, and genuine workstation GPU capability suits dorm-room rendering, simulation, and development work alike.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. Everything in this section is estimated from the benchmark scores, not captured gameplay.

The RTX 4000 Ada's 95th-percentile standing, 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 360 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate strong performance at 1440p and 4K in modern AAA titles at ultra settings. Estimates from these scores suggest high-refresh 1440p play is realistic in most titles, with 4K ultra play comfortable where ray tracing is moderate.

The limiting factor is the processor. With a 57th-percentile CPU and twelve threads, CPU-bound scenarios — dense multiplayer lobbies, open-world traversal, simulation-heavy titles — will produce estimated frame rates meaningfully below what this GPU could deliver with a stronger host processor. The 4.30 GHz boost and 1863-point R23 single-core score prevent disaster, but they do not make this a flagship gaming pairing.

Ray tracing is well supported on paper: 48 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature support mean ray-traced effects are available and performant. Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 round out modern API coverage.

FAQ

Q: Is this a balanced gaming build?

A: No. The GPU sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs while the CPU sits in the 57th. Gaming frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios will be gated by the six-core processor, though higher-resolution play shifts the burden onto the graphics card.

Q: Does the database have measured frame rates for this pairing?

A: No. There are no measured FPS entries for this combination; all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Can this build handle 3D rendering professionally?

A: Yes, with a caveat. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation — with 6144 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 20 GB of VRAM — is a 95th-percentile GPU that competes with the NVIDIA A10M and AMD Radeon PRO W6800. CPU-only rendering is mid-tier, so GPU render engines are the recommended path.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and why does it matter?

A: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 360 GB/s of bandwidth. The capacity matters for large 3D scenes, high-resolution video timelines, and local machine-learning workloads that exceed the VRAM of smaller consumer cards.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked on the i5-12500TE, and its 35 W TDP reflects a power-constrained design philosophy rather than an enthusiast one.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W. With a 35 W CPU and a 130 W GPU, total system draw leaves comfortable headroom within that recommendation.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. This is worth noting for workstation buyers who require memory error correction.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-12500TE is an Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 163 mm² die. It carries six cores and twelve threads, a 1.9 GHz base clock, and a 4.30 GHz boost — a wide operating range that reflects its 35 W TDP design point. This is a processor built for efficiency and compact systems, not maximum throughput.

The cache hierarchy is straightforward: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 18 MB of shared L3. The L3 pool is generous for a hexacore and helps game and application working sets stay close to the cores. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, giving system integrators flexibility on platform cost. PCIe is modern: Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, enough to feed the RTX 4000 Ada's PCIe 4.0 x16 link with room to spare.

What the benchmark scores mean in practice: the single-core results — 187 in R15, 782 in R20, 1863 in R23, and 1976 in Geekbench — describe a processor with responsive per-thread performance suitable for everyday applications and most games. The multi-core results — 1330, 5545, and 13203 across the Cinebench generations, plus 7781 in Geekbench — describe a chip that completes threaded workloads competently but without the headroom of higher-core-count parts. The multiplier is locked, so the performance on paper is the performance in the chassis. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output when the discrete card is absent — useful for troubleshooting, not for serious work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing a mid-tier efficiency processor with a professional-tier workstation graphics card. The buildClass is desktop, and the overall tier — a combined percentile of 76 — places it in the upper quarter of tracked pairings, with that figure driven overwhelmingly by the GPU.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation, released in 2023, is an Ada Lovelace professional card built on TSMC's 5 nm process: 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, at a density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimeter. It is a single-slot card, 245 mm long and 112 mm tall, drawing 130 W through a single 16-pin connector. That single-slot footprint is rare at this performance level and is the physical signature of a card designed for compact professional systems — which makes it an unusually coherent partner for a 35 W processor.

The pairing, then, is coherent in intent even if unbalanced on paper: a compact, power-efficient workstation whose compute capability lives almost entirely on the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is solid. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which hosts a wide range of 12th and 13th generation Intel processors — meaning the CPU is the obvious and easy upgrade target in this build, since the GPU is already the stronger component by a wide margin.

Memory offers two directions: DDR4 or DDR5, dual-channel in either case. A DDR5 platform build preserves more forward compatibility, while DDR4 keeps existing inventory usable — a choice for the integrator, with both officially supported.

The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 20 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The platform is therefore not bottlenecked by the slot, and future GPU upgrades retain full bandwidth.

Power headroom is comfortable. The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W; its TDP is 130 W, and the CPU adds just 35 W. Even after upgrading the processor to a substantially more demanding Socket 1700 part, the 300 W recommendation and the card's single 16-pin connector leave room to grow — though a CPU upgrade pushing system draw upward would warrant revisiting the PSU sizing at that point.

A sensible next upgrade is therefore clear: replace the i5-12500TE with a higher-tier locked or unlocked processor on the same socket, which would raise the CPU percentile closer to the GPU's 95th, flatten the imbalance, and unlock frame rates and threaded throughput the graphics card is already capable of feeding. The card itself — 95th percentile, 20 GB of VRAM, active in production with a successor in the Blackwell PRO W line — has years of headroom in it and is the component to keep.